Hybrids in the News

1192022242597

Comments

  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    for reacting too slowly to Hybrid demand.

     

    Think about this: They give those HUMONGOUS rebates on their cars and trucks - why couldn't they just have a Hybrid, set the MSRP at their "average" markup, and not rebate it?

     

    Think how many they would have sold if the Malibu was a Hybrid at that cost point.
  • mirthmirth Member Posts: 1,212
    I think Lutz is dead-on in his assesment. Creating hybrid technology is a huge investment. Even with their success, it'll be years and years before Toyota recoups that. And that's assuming more and more people will continue to keep paying a $3K premium just to own a hybrid. I can easily see GM, with it's much more limited R&D budget, passing on hybrids because of these facts.

     

    They did fail to think about the PR angle, which Toyota is masterful at. However, Toyota has the cash to take a gamble like that - GM does not. In a way, Toyota has helped other companies because they've taken the risks and generated the hybrid buzz, and other companies can just ride it now.
  • yerth10yerth10 Member Posts: 431
    According to

    http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?section=communique&newsid=741- 0

     

    As of Nov-2004, Toyota has sold 306,862 vehicles

    Honda 81,867.

     

    In December, Toyota & Honda must have sold around

    10,000 with Ford another 3,000 (Between Oct-Dec).

     

    So the total exceeds 400,000. Thats great.

    For Toyota, exceeding 300,000 is another milestone.
  • yerth10yerth10 Member Posts: 431
    Right from year 2000, GM has been saying that hybrids will not sell.

    At that time SUV / Pickups were selling like hotcakes when Oil prices

    were at $ 25 / barrel.

     

    But now with oil @ $ 40, GM has to give lot of discounts to sell

    their big SUV's. Their strategy has gone wrong.

     

    Time to turn the focus to Hybrids atleast now.
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    Lutz is backtracking and Hem Hawing about how GM missed the boat.

     

    His claim that Toyota's hybrid investment was "marketing" is sour grapes at best.

     

    His company dragged butt and now are getting bitten.

     

    He sees that 100,000 Pruises number and is kicking himself for not seeing about 70,000 Hybrid Malibus in that forecast.
  • yerth10yerth10 Member Posts: 431
    There is an article about GM-Sequel FCV in www.greencarcongress.com

     

    By increasing the Hydrogen storgage from

    5,000 psi (350 bar) to 10,000 psi (700 bar), GM-Sequel's range has

    been extended from 150 - 300 miles.

     

    They also use Li-Ion battery to provide supplementary power.

    Hope GM applies this battery in Gasolene-Electric vehicle as well.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Advertising and Business Case go hand in hand. I'm surprised Lutz doesn't see it that way.
  • yerth10yerth10 Member Posts: 431
    In http://www.city-journal.org/html/15_1_nuclear_power.html

    the writer talks about the World's movement from fire to electricity.

     

    Household cooking has moved from gas-stoves to microwave & toaster ovens.

    Space heating which is done by Oil & Gas has been supplemented by

      Portable Electric heaters.

    Ore-smelting in steel plants which has used fuels like coal, oil & gas

      has been replaced by electric arc-furnaces.

     

    The last and the most important is the Automobile.

    Even here the movement has started in 2 areas.

     

    2 & 3 Wheelers : These vehicles which are traditionally powered by Gasolene

                       is moving towards Electricity. In a visit to local Toys R Us store, I saw a lot of Razor scooters and Kids Hummers.

    Hybrid Vehicles : Though motors are playing a role in hybrids by capturing

                       the re-generative energy, they still needs to have plug-in

                       facility.

     

    Once if Plug-in-Hybrid vehicles start coming in, the grid power will reduce the Oil crunch.
  • electrictroyelectrictroy Member Posts: 564
    Lutz comments are not much different from Volkswagen's. Volkswagen is experimenting with hybrids, but they think replacing gasoline with diesel is a better solution... +10% more energy efficiency... and VW plans to release a 120mpg car in 2007 to prove it.

     

    troy
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    If diesel hybrids can be affordably built as sedans in the US and be clean enough, I'm not opposed to them in configurations that will provide high MPG cars.

      

    Imaginary Diesel Hybrid Sedan for the USA:

      

    For example, if we could get a diesel hybrid 4-dr sedan with around 120 HP and MPG rates in the 60-70 MPG range, and keep that car under $25,000 and make it a PZEV, then I'm all for it.

      

    Who can guess WHICH part of my "imaginary diesel hybrid sedan for the USA" is NOT likely to happen?

     

    Troy, what's going to be your tune about the "hybrid premium" when the Diesel Hybrids hit the US and the "diesel Hybrid Premium" is about 40% higher than the existing premium?

     

    Because that's EXACTLY the problem with D/H cars - the diesel adds money to the base price and the hybridization adds money to the base price.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Who can guess WHICH part of my "imaginary diesel hybrid sedan for the USA" is NOT likely to happen?

     

    Let me guess the hybrid part.
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    They will not be able to make those sedans affordable. If you think the "hybrid premium" is TOO HIGH NOW (and I know many of you do) then wait until you see the "diesel hybrid" premium...
  • rfruthrfruth Member Posts: 630
    They (Toyota) don't name the other carmakers so who knows whats up. - snip - Jan. 14 -- Toyota Motor Corp., the world's biggest supplier of gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles, said it may license its system to other carmakers, as demand for vehicles with better fuel economy grows.

     

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000080&sid=akAOU4Peu- dj4&refer=asia
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I don't think Honda is convinced that hybrids are here to stay. I agree, I would be more likely to buy one of there VCM vehicles or their diesel.

     

    By using variable cylinder management, we can easily match the fuel efficiency of hybrids,'' Fukui said. ``Ultimately, fuel cell vehicles will probably become the solution.''
  • rfruthrfruth Member Posts: 630
    Honda sure has a funny way of showing hybrids aren't here to stay, yea one day fuel cell vehicles probably will be the solution but what year might that be ?
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I am going by what the Honda fellow is saying. It sounds to me like Honda feels they can match the hybrids with Just VCM. They are not throwing a whole lot into the hybrid arena. That is compared to their biggest rival Toyota.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    They are not throwing a whole lot into the hybrid arena

     

    Two of their bestselling models have hybrid option now. More will come.

     

    And while fuel cell may be the future, who is to say they won't be hybrids? Ford Focus FCV-Hybrid is one!
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    who is to say they won't be hybrids

     

    Honda President Takeo Fukui says By using variable cylinder management, we can easily match the fuel efficiency of hybrids

     

    You better talk to this guy he has a different opinion of hybrids than you do. Hybrids have peaked and will be old news in a couple years.
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    in development now for 2006/2007/2008 models will just DROP what they are doing and say "OK, nevermind."

     

    Hybrids are here to stay until Fuel Cells take over. Dirty or Clean Diesel is not the answer - reducing or eliminating fossil fuel usage is the long term goal, and nothing on the road does that better than Hybrids RIGHT NOW.

     

    Right now, TODAY, and in the foreseeable future, Hybrids are the best option. No argument possible for that. Look at the top Greenest cars - they are all Hybrids.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    You should provide a link to the article you're quoting Fukui's statement from. I've read something different, and it doesn't scrap off hybrid from Honda's plan, just in Honda's SUVs in the near future. But, that by itself isn't clear either! Here is a link and statement that relates to the subject:

     

    "Honda can devise cheaper alternatives to save fuel in vehicles. For example, the Odyssey and the hybrid Accord use cylinder deactivation."

     

    VCM and hybrid technology aren't mutually exclusive. And you should know that.

     

    Chances are, we will see VCM applied to light trucks before we see hybrid option being added to them. Hybrid option will help enhance the effectiveness of VCM, like it does in HAH.
  • electrictroyelectrictroy Member Posts: 564
    "Troy, what's going to be your tune about the "hybrid premium" when the Diesel Hybrids hit the US and the "diesel Hybrid Premium" is about 40% higher than the existing premium?"

     

    .

     

    When gas costs $10 a gallon next decade, people will be willing to pay that premium.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    You should provide a link to the article you're quoting Fukui's statement from.

     

    I will refer you back to post 1109:

     

    rfruth, "Hybrids in the News" #1109, 14 Jan 2005 7:16 pm
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Note that Fukui-san is NOT saying Honda does not believe in hybrids. The fact that Honda developed the Honda Accord Hybrid with both a hybrid powertrain and VCM demonstrates that they see value in hybrid technology. The article points out the difference between Honda's and Toyota's philosophy on hybrids: Toyota has developed and is actively producing and selling a model that comes only as a hybrid (Prius), while Honda's hybrid-only model (Insight) is being made in very small numbers while Honda concentrates on hybrid technology with their mainstream cars, Civic and Accord.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Honda concentrates on hybrid technology with their mainstream cars, Civic and Accord.

     

    They are not indicating that they will pursue hybrids any further than they have. Not when the President says they feel they can match hybrid performance with VCM. He has already said they will not put hybrid in any of the truck/SUV type vehicles. That does not leave much that is not already hybrid. It also looks as thought they will limit the hybrids to about 20k per year. Not what I call a big push to sell them. Would you want to sell something you were losing money on?
  • cablackcablack Member Posts: 45
    Quote: "Would you want to sell something you were losing money on?"

     

    Would you want to *advertise* something you were losing money on?

     

    For those how missed it, Honda had a significant commercial during the NFC playoffs yesterday touting their three hybrids (Insight, Civic, and Accord).

     

    The argument could go on and on about exactly *why* Honda chose to do the commercial, but clearly they are hoping to derive some value from their hybrids, directly or indirectly.
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    quote Gagrice="He has already said they will not put hybrid in any of the truck/SUV type vehicles."-end quote.

     

    No, NO, NO he did not say that at all. He said it is "not in the current 3 year plan." They get re-evaluated over time.

     

    And Honda has previously stated that they can "put the IMA system in any car they want" and they will do that as they wish.
  • electrictroyelectrictroy Member Posts: 564
    I suspect Honda, like Volkswagen, is leaning towards diesel as the "car of the 2010s". They just developed a new diesel Civic that outperforms the hybrid in MPG, power, and torque... and without the expense/uncertainty of a giant battery.

     

    I suspect Honda is now leaning towards diesel for future growth.

     

    troy
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    "High-end hybrids. This could be the year gas-electric hybrid vehicles move away from being a "tree-hugging phenomenon" and into the mainstream, Jackson says. Hybrids have finally reached the level where buyers don't have to trade performance for fuel efficiency — a key combination for attracting a broader group of drivers."

     

    http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2005-01-16-autonation_x.htm
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Do you think the following excerpt from the (Bloomberg) link suggests a move away from hybrids? If so, how? Your comment "They are not indicating that they will pursue hybrids any further than they have." does not make sense to me if you read the text in bold.

     


    ”Honda President Takeo Fukui said he plans to mainly install hybrid system in mass-produced vehicles instead of hybrid-only models to keep costs lower and make hybrids more available.”

     

    Thats is OPPOSITE of what you've been suggesting.

     

    And again, VCM and Hybrid technology are NOT mutually exclusive. If VCM by itself match current hybrids (someday, I don’t see it today), I would bet that adding hybrid option to it (like it IS in Accord Hybrid) will be better. What do you think?

     

     
    It also looks as thought they will limit the hybrids to about 20k per year.

     

    Thats about right, and more than Acura TSX that AHM projects to sell each year. And TSX is no hybrid. Why is that?
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Actually it would be over 40k per year just counting '05 production for the Civic, Accord, and Insight hybrids.

     

    I wonder if VCM is practical in a small-displacement 4 cylinder car, like the Civic for example?
  • electrictroyelectrictroy Member Posts: 564
    Probably not. A small-displacement 4-cylinder car is already at the minimum power (~25hp at highway speeds), and if you shut off cylinders you'd no longer have enough power to keep the car moving.

     

    In contrast a 6-cylinder car like the Accord Hybrid generates ~50hp at highway speeds, so you can turn off 3 cylinders and still have the minimum ~25hp needed to keep moving down the highway.

     

    troy
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Civic Hybrid’s 1.3 employs a variation of VCM but it is activated only during deceleration to enhance the efficiency of regenerative braking (lower pumping losses). In this case, three of four cylinders are shut down. But, I doubt it can be extended to be like VCM for cruising purposes (at least two cylinders may have to be on, if they can provide sufficient power).

     

    As for Insight, it has been rendered a "model car" rather than a car that Honda wants to sell. I suspect Honda will replace it with something from the future Jazz/Fit line.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Thats is OPPOSITE of what you've been suggesting.

     

    I am only posting what the Boss at Honda said. He thinks they can match hybrid mileage with VCM. Why would you think he would say that if he was not trying to get away from hybrids? They are a big drain on an otherwise well run company. Others here are assuming that Honda will put IMA in other vehicles because they can. They have not said they would only some posters have said they would. Can and will are a long ways apart.

     

    Maybe they are advertising hybrids at the NFC play-offs because it is the Green thing to do right now. It feeds people that think they are environmentally astute.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Another way to look at it:

     

    Suppose the incremental improvement in fuel economy from hybrid technology is X. And suppose the incremental improvement from VCM is Y. Assume X = Y. Would you rather have X, Y, or X + Y? I'd rather have X + Y myself.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I'd rather have X + Y myself.

     

    Why? It just adds complexity to the equation with little or no gain. I think the VCM is a great idea. I would like to try out the Odyssey EX-L for a few days to see if it is comfortable on a long trip. If you can get a vehicle that size that gets 30 mpg on the highway it would be a worthwhile.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    VCM does little to help in stop-and-go city driving. Hybrids do help there. That is why I like the combination of the two of them, where practical. I haven't yet seen anyone say that VCM is practical on a 4 cylinder car. So for that kind of car at least (e.g. Civic, Insight, Prius) hybrid technology seems more practical than VCM to improve fuel economy.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    I am only posting what the Boss at Honda said.

     

    No. You're posting your own conclusions drawn from his statement. If you really want to see what Fukui is saying, read the text I highlighted from his statements above. He's talking about "installing hybrid systems". How do you arrive at this being moving away from hybrid?

     

    It just adds complexity to the equation with little or no gain

     

    Again, thats your opinion. Don't represent it as a fact. I see VCM as complimentary to IMA system, simply because one provides greater impact in city (hybrid) and the other on freeways.
  • electrictroyelectrictroy Member Posts: 564
    VCM does make more sense, financially. If you can build a 4-cylinder Civic that can switch back & forth between 160hp & 80hp, and still get 50mpg highway...

     

    ...why bother with the expense of a battery/motor?

     

    troy
  • fuel manfuel man Member Posts: 3
    I agree. Honda is not saying they are scrapping hybrids for more fuel efficient ICE's, they are saying that VCM is just another technology that can be applied to hybrid and/or non-hybrids to help them realize efficiencies.

     

    Honda is touting that they are the only vehicle manufacturer that is offering three hybrids today. They are also very vocal in their goals to develop a fuel cell vehicle.

     

    Regarding new models, is anyone hearing anything regarding Honda's plans to offer more hybrid in the next five to ten years? While it is fine and good that they are working on fuels cells, they are still atleast ten years away from offering a reliable fuel cell vehicle that is affordable. In the meantime, they can not ignore the attention and the sales that Toyota is enjoying.

     

    I think they would want to react by offering a hybrid version of their Pilot, Odyssey and maybe even a MDX to compete with Toyota. Fukui is making vague statements in true Japanese form. Is anyone hearing what is really going on?
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Honda's short term plan may be to offer VCM first in its light truck lineup. Only two trims of Odyssey have it right now, the others could get it eventually, and next to follow is Pilot beginning MY2006. That still leaves MDX (must be due for redesign next year) and Ridgeline. That is plenty of vehicles before having to move to offering hybrid trims.

     

    Power train for Acura RDX at the moment remains a mystery. It could be offered as a hybrid, or with a conventional (V6) engine. We shall know shortly.

     

    As far as Honda/Acura cars are concerned, 2006 Civic Hybrid is being tauted as being significantly better, Accord Hybrid has been in the market for about a month now, and there is potential for TSX and/or TL to get hybrid option when the sales stabilize to a point of not showing an increase.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    VCM isn't going to be free either. ANC will have to be coupled to it, besides the additional controls. And then, whether or not VCM will be effective (and designed) to go with four cylinder engine remains to be seen.

     

    In current (non-hybrid) applications of VCM, Honda Inspire (Japanese market, with 247 HP 3.0/V6) and Odyssey (North American market, with 255 HP 3.5/V6), the improvement from VCM is said to be about 10-12% on highway. So, if Civic gets you 38 mpg on highway, you're looking at a 4 mpg bump. And if it gets 32 mpg in city where VCM effectiveness is minimal, may be an mpg or two.

     

    With hybrid option, however, I would expect next Civic to deliver 50 mpg, with or without VCM (if Honda sets it up with I-4 engines).
  • electrictroyelectrictroy Member Posts: 564
    "VCM isn't going to be free either. ANC will have to be coupled to it, besides the additional controls."

     

    .

    What's ANC? My understanding of VCM is that it's not much different than a normal car. The valves simply disconnect & dangle, leaving 1/2 the cylinders turned off. The expense of that design is essentially the same.

     

    Bottom-line: You could provide the fuel economy of a 3-cylinder car at cruising speeds, but still preserve 6-cylinder power (or 2-cylinder economy with 4-cylinder power) with virtually no additional expense.

     

    troy
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    ANC = "active noise control" = required to silence VCM

     

    "While "drive by wire" is now common with many manufacturers, Active Noise Control is unique to this vehicle. Active Noise Control (ANC) uses sound waves generated from the audio speakers to cancel out any booming noise from the powertrain. The ANC controller uses a microphone to detect any noise and then generates a signal 180 degrees out of phase to cancel out the original noise."

     

    "The cancelling sound waves are emitted from the front and rear speakers during 3 cylinder operation, idling and at-start running. During 6 cylinder operation, the system is off. ANC sounds a bit like science fiction but it has been used by the military for stealth technology and now it has found another purpose in creating a smooth quiet ride."
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    VCM is quite simple actually, just an extension of VTEC. Seals off half of the cylinders when activated. BUT, it isn’t just VCM controls that poses some challenge, it is the after-effect itself. In VCM applications (Accord Hybrid and Odyssey), engine mounts have been revised to address the NVH issues, and ANC has been added for a quieter cabin. A 2-cylinder motor is going to sound and feel very different without it.

     

    So, going back to the Civic implementation, would you take it for something like 33/42 mpg rating instead of 32/38 mpg? It may actually be possible to get those kind of mileage with a 6-speed automatic (like AAD that Honda has been testing) without resorting to VCM. VCM, as in Odyssey, seems to have also required slightly shorter top gear BTW (but not in Accord Hybrid potentially since electric power comes to assist and keep VCM activated longer), so it is not a direct 1/2 conversion.
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    The last paragraph of this little clip is the MOST interesting....

     

    "The morning began with the Motor Press Guild Keynote address given this year by Bernd Pischetsrieder, Chairman of Volkswagen. Mr. Pischetsrieder’s started out by saying that in his opinion the hydrogen economy was not a realistic solution to air pollution concerns. He also stated that having multiple alternative fuels is not good because it is not feasible for drivers to have to hunt around for different fuel sources such as CNG, Ethanol or Bio-diesel.

     

    He put forward the idea that we must look to existing infrastructure to provide the solution which he suggests will be the use of synthetic fuels made from Bio sources like soy beans, or by using the gas normally burned off from oil wells in a gas to liquid fuel process.

     

    He proposed diesel engines running on these synthetic fuels as the solution to CO2 reduction. Currently VW diesel engines don’t meet the strict California emissions standards but VW is committed to meeting the strict new standards taking effect in 2007.

     

    Mr. Pischetsrieder also said that VW are working on a Diesel Hybrid but didn’t give any timeframe for when this might be available to the public. He also said that they were working on an engine that behaved like a diesel at low revs and like a gas engine at higher revs, combining the best qualities of the diesel and the gas engine."

     

    The whole story is here:

     

    http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?section=article&storyid=796
  • yerth10yerth10 Member Posts: 431
    According to www.greencarcongress.com, Toyota plans to sell 20,000

    units of Toyota Prius in Europe. Thats great.
  • yerth10yerth10 Member Posts: 431
    There are few technologies to reduce the fuel consumption.

     

    5 / 6 Speed Transmission : MY-2005 Accord, CR-V, Odyssey, Pilot

    all feature a 5 speed transmission which will give better mileage

    than 4 speed. Even GM & Ford are working to move to 6-speed

    transmission.

     

    VCM : By shutting half the # of cylinders during cruise, they

    expect mileage to increase.

     

    Hybrid : Capturing and storing re-generative energy in batteries

    and using it later is another important tech.

     

    Honda expects to use all the above and their hybrid target is

    50,000 vehicles.

     

    However Ford expects to sell 30,000 hybrids vehicles this year and

    this compares closely with Honda. Also Toyota & Ford are concentrating

    on Full hybrid which is expecting to give even better mileage.

     

    Anyway Honda being a small company does a very good job and they had

    the guts to sell a small car like Insight whereas a bigger company

    like Daimler is still struggling to bring their Smart car to US.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Hybrid cars showed up about 100 years before Toyota & Honda started building theirs.

     

    http://www.techcentralstation.com/011905E.html
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    Think of the millions if not billions of gallons of fuel we could have saved had Hybrids been put into play decades ago.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Think of the millions if not billions of gallons of fuel we could have saved had Hybrids been put into play decades ago.

     

    I think the cost to build them has always played a big part. Take the Chrysler diesel/hybrid. It never got out of the test lab because the cost difference.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.