By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I'd think original 49-51 Mercury coupes are about as common as original 32-34 Fords these days
I like how it looks stock, myself...but then again, I think most 32-34 Fords look best stock as well.
I just don't want it to BE stock. At least not as far as handling and braking are concerned.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
It's in beautiful shape, and real purty to look at, but I guess it's just not something that would catch my eye, lure me in, and make me want to OWN one!
Style-wise, I think it's ahead of something like a '51 DeSoto or Chrysler, which were kind of upright and clunky. But I think something like a '51 Olds or Buick is more attractive. But I guess there aren't too many people who are really nostalgic for something of this era. I could see somebody wanting an old '49-51 Merc to customize, but this one's way too pretty to do that to.
Here in SOCAL I've seen a Bimmer 5 series "Touring", which is basically a wagon. Not sure of the year, but it looked newer (2-3 years old).
I winter time we put 25 kilos of animal feed over each front wheel - no problems with traction!
One of my professors had a really nice two-tone green 1952 Buick Super Riviera two-door hardtop.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
Silver with medium tint on the windows.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
I did find a couple of '95 530i with between 65k-70k miles for $5k-$6k.
I forget the consensus here. Should those 3 liter V8s be avoided?
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
Not sure, but I think they had the same Nikasil problem as the early 4l V8s, so I'd avoid them - they also don't have much power to offer over the 3l 6-cyl, and nowhere near the parts.
Every time I hear of or see a BMW 3.0 liter model, I think of a woman I worked with in Germany. She had a 1976 BMW CS 3.0 liter. I got to drive it once and was it NICE. On the twisty back roads I got the feeling that the vehicle simply would NOT leave the road. Quite amazing.
On the other hand, I had my VW 411 in for some muffler work, and the mechanic was working on a 3.0 CS. Evidently they had to remove the engine or some such nonsense in order to replace the dual exhaust system.
Seems like BMWs like to act up right around 80K...I think it's a good time to either ditch 'em or put a few thou into them to get you through the long haul. I'd certainly overhaul the front end control arm bushings and swap out the radiator and water pump just as a matter of course. Otherwise, probably happy sailing even if you have to pull up your power windows by hand once in a while or break into your own car when it locks you out.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
The parts came off of a wrecked, same year, 540i 6-speed sedan. It's a direct swap, I had to have myfriend at the dealer do some programming with the GT1 to get the CEL off and such, but it works perfectly.
It's a very expensive swap, you only do something like that if you HAVE to have a 6-speed 540 Wagon, it is just not ever going to be an expense that can ever be recouped.
I do all kinda funny swaps.. at the moment I have a 93 740i that really needs a trans. I am debating the following options...
1) Slap a 6-speed in it.
2) Fix the trans in it (I'm too busy/lazy but the parts are $400ish to do the whole job)
3) Get a used one that I know of for $400 (Which makes the most sense).
4) Buy a reman (Yeh, right.. a proper reman approaches the value of the car)
Correct on the Mk1s... they were the "2.4 Litre Saloon" and the "3.4 Liter Saloon", I remembered that after I posted but knew you'd correct it
I have had a few (Remember back when I was into Jags?) old Jag Sedans.. the Mk2 3.8Ls with overdrive and wires have always been the money cars as you know, and yeah they look nice but I never understood why they seem to be exponentially more money than a 3.8S.. the S-Types are so much nicer to drive.
I do think the S is a less harmonious design but given that people pay big bucks for a '59 Cadillac, one can't use harmony of design as an argument for value, now can one?
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
Reading this craigslist ad almost made me cry. I would like to share it with you, and wonder if anyone could tell me whether I should buy it.
http://lansing.craigslist.org/car/406077455.html
If nothing else, it should be an investment!
-Mathias
Well at least the seller is literate, gotta say that. Too bad he didn't mention in that barrage of non-sequitors which model S it was.
I'd like to see him write an essay on "massive depreciation", as in how to lose $75,000 in 9 years.
On the positive side, the price is actually okay, market correct (if you dare).
Not a bad ride for the price of a used Hyundai!
Price looks correct, if it is in really nice condition. These things have a few known issues (AC evaporators come to mind), so one has to be a little leery. They also can rust if neglected, as well. But, they are a lot less troublesome than the S class that replaced them. The W140 is the last of the old school S class.
It's either an S420 or an S500...S420s are pretty uncommon, so I would wager on the latter.
Looks like a lot of car for c.4-5k:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1988-BMW-735i-Rare-5-Speed-Best-Looking-735i-On-E- bay_W0QQitemZ280146330727QQihZ018QQcategoryZ6009QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZVie- wItem
Oh, salvage title you say? No problem!
Oh, new paint you say but the clear coat is peeling? No problem!
Oh, new AC compressor but it needs to be charged? No problem!
Oh, you put in "new" seats but the driver's power motor is out? No problem!
Oh, "only" 168,000 miles. No problem!
Now why do you suppose he has 0 bids on 4 days and 2 kicked auctions already?
I'd buy it for $1,000 bucks. And probably lose money on it.
No, I wouldn't buy it for anything actually.
That one that said "imagine the fun that will be!" made me laugh.
I used to want one of those BMWs (not seriously, just in a fantasy world), but shifty just cured me of that fantasy. I'll stick with my 1988 Olds 98 for now. And when it's dead I might get a new 08 Accord exl with the 4 cylinder 5-speed manual. Almost as big as that 7 series, I think...
I think that bugeye is very good looking in an ugly duckling way.
I've never seen one of these before.
168k - still a lot, regardless
a/c - doesn't work, he could get it charged easily
seat - tilts to the left? what's up with that?
salvage title - I'd rather not have to believe a story...
edit - Didn't see Shifty's comments, obviously
Anyway, not my favorite looking one, later 7 much better.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ROLLS-ROYCES-RAREST-ONE-OFF-ALL-FUNDS-TO-NON-PROF- IT_W0QQitemZ140148644716QQihZ004QQcategoryZ6384QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZView- Item
I guess that's enough torture for tonight!
Other "watch-outs!" are the transmission, which often needs synchros and bearings (not easy to find) and the front end king pins, which require very special machining to get right. Not a DIY job.
Fun per dollar ratio is HIGH, but this might not be the car to start with. Very responsive car and so little power that you'd have to try hard to hurt yourself. No modern car can put this kind of smile on your face IMO.
50 Rolls --- the price is preposterous. There's not a Rolls Royce on god's good earth worth anywhere near that kind of money. What's he think he has there, Lawrence of Arabia's pre-war Phantom?
Get real man!
More torture...so many hidden treasures out there.
That bugeye does look like a lot of fun.
If this one was in good shape it might be too, but it's a bit of a mess.
Kind of rough shape, but still fun to drive? Didn't James Bond drive one of these (underwater?) in The Spy Who Loved Me, or is my memory all wet?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1967-Oldsmobile-425-V8-Ninety-Eight-Four-Door-Har- dtop_W0QQitemZ150153004898QQihZ005QQcategoryZ6407QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZVi- ewItem
The digital dash and the gleaming chrome engine and underside are something to be seen...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1941-Willys-Blown-468-Finest-restoration-anywhere- _W0QQitemZ160151545736QQihZ006QQcategoryZ6470QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewIt- em
I'll stop now, I promise.
Ferrari 308 GT4 -- the hardest Ferrari in the world to sell to anybody. Maybe $15,000 tops?? and it's like throwing your money into a blazing woodstove. No upside whatsoever. Miles are kinda high for a Ferrari. One good thing about the car is that it is California smog exempt, because it would never have passed here. Just look what happened to the last guy. Don't go there. Ugly car IMO.
Jaguar largely told me to go pound sand. Jaguar can rot as far as I am concerned.
Now, i still love the X300s, they were the best cars, reliability-wise, that Jaguar EVER made, problem is, they are now 10 years old at least.. so they are getting up there in age.
Oh, don't get an E34 530i Wagon.. get a 525iT. The 525 has a MUCH more reliable drivetrain that requires a LOT less expense to keep running and to beat the band it's not much slower and they get great mileage.
Funny you are the third person now to tell me that very thing. The first person I wrote off as a fruit cause he is one of those, "new cars suck only cars built in the 90s and earlier are any good," kind of people. The second guy is a little less nutty but you aren't nutty at all so I guess it is true.
I probably wouldn't have noticed it unless you mentioned it! I guess it's easy to do with those types of steering wheels where the bottom half is symmetric with the top! Or I guess it's possible that the center hub with the logo is just on upside-down? Or can it only be put on one way?
Also kinda interesting how pristine that interior looks, except for the wheel, which is all cracked to hell. I guess that's common with those old steering wheels though. My '67 Catalina's wheel is cracked in two places at the column, and two places on the rim.
As you may remember, I have a thing for jags. I have no idea why. I've never owned one. I've driven quite a few, though. I just love them. Always feel great and look great. SO, you're saying to get a '94-97. hmmmm... maybe. All of the negative comments you hear and read really affect one's perspective, ya know? I'd be worried about having one as a daily driver. But once my current lease is up, I'd really like to find a cheap luxo car to drive around in. I'm getting a bit tired of all these new car payments.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S