Toyota Fearing Hyundai?

1141517192041

Comments

  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    Hyundai finally did somethin' right.

    Now they're gonna hit BMW, Lexus, Land Rover, after one good year?

    People here are trying to turn Toyota into some also-ran, and I have proven them wrong.

    Quality is Toyota's game. Hyundai is still learning how to play. This is chess, it ain't checkers. They don't plan to fail, but are failing to plan.

    I don't hate Hyundai. I just pity the fool. :P

    They seem desperate, and need to stop worrying about what BMW and Lexus are doing. They have to get their own ship in order, and start selling some cars. Their new lineup isn't exactly hittin' the spot (so say the buyers).

    DrFill
  • goodegggoodegg Member Posts: 905
    Kind of a silly post - "I kept my Sienna 9 years, it was a good vehicle, but because I wanted $2K more for it a trade in, it now sucks".

    Doesn't sound like a problem with the vehicle as much as the owner. For $2000?

    Actually I'd be suspect of a 9 YO vehicle with only 83,000 miles on it. Sounds like the buyer was too.
  • goodegggoodegg Member Posts: 905
    Now they're gonna hit BMW, Lexus, Land Rover, after one good year?

    I gotta agree with you there. Sure Hyundai is building good vehicles now, but one or two good years doesn't elevate a company into knighthood in my book.

    Lets revisit this in 3-4 years and reavaluate. Shoot by then, Dodge might have had 2 good years and then folks will want to turn them into the Toyota slayer.
  • bpizzutibpizzuti Member Posts: 2,743
    Ok, enough with the bad movie quotes. Toyota has ALWAYS been an also-ran, as much as GM was. They're just a large one, again, like GM. Except for the "hybrid identity" (which is significant, granted) they're as bad as GM at creating a brand identity (Is "Moving Forward" really any better than "An American Revolution?"). Mostly because Toyota is too big, and supersizing isn't always better. Toyota is in fact suffering from the same corporate mentalities that ended up de-throning GM: they tried to be so inoffensive to the most people that they failed to appeal to anyone. This, unfortunately, will likely happen to any corporation that tries to be all things to everyone; it likely will happen to Hyundai at some point down the road as well.

    One thing: if "quality is Toyota's game" then why are they unwilling to stand behind their cars for 5 years, and their powertrains for 10? Such a statement as you have made begs the question, after all.
  • harrycheztharrychezt Member Posts: 405
    3 year long term JD Powers... 2002 models, this is from 2005... top 3 mid-sized sedans? Entry Level:Malibu, Alero, Sonata.
    http://www.jdpa.com/studies_jdpower/pressrelease.asp?StudyID=996

    Have a good one.
    Like I always say, buy what ya like, not what someone tells ya to! ;)
    I may buy just buy a Versa SL CVT 5 door next purchase!
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Actually I'd be suspect of a 9 YO vehicle with only 83,000 miles on it

    Why would that be? My wife bought her LS400 new in 1989 and it today is just under 90K miles. It was not cheap keeping it in top shape. Still better than most of the new stuff from Lexus. We shall see how many 2007 Lexi are still in like new condition in 2025. They do not build them like they used to.
  • driver56driver56 Member Posts: 408
    It wasn't a good vehicle overall. I put enough money into it to keep it in good running order. I needed it for my work, but I wanted a replacement. The book value for the shape it was in, for that model, with options, mileage included (83,000 - about average up this way) was $7000 CDN. I had no desire whatsoever to trade it in for a wholesale $ figure. I was only curious. I sold it privately to a local for 5 grand.
    That was more than the Toyota dealers wholesale price but 2 grand less than the book value.
    My original point was that vehicles don't always fetch what they perhaps should. In my case the so-called good Toyota resale value was not there.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    That is good of you to finally acknowledge that Hyundai is doing some things right. Also that Toyota is beginning to slip. For example, Hyundai not only overtook Toyota in the JD Power 2006 IQS score, but Hyundai improved over 2005 while Toyota actually backtracked. Why is that a big deal? As you pointed out, "Quality is Toyota's game." Quality is what has built Toyota's brand loyalty over the past fifty years in the U.S. What happens when that quality slips, as appears to be happening, and other automakers--such as Hyundai--offer cars with comparable quality and longer warranties for a lot less money? Toyota's brand loyalty will carry it for awhile, but car buyers are getting savvier every day. Instead of listening to a car salesperson saying, "Don't buy that brand, it's junk--they're still learning how to play the quality game" etc., they do their research and make up their own minds.
  • oldguy70oldguy70 Member Posts: 97
    Speculation hasn't helped clarify the issue one way or the other.
    You, like many, maintain a solution convenient to your objective, but leaping to solutions without defining the problem often leads to the wrong solution.
    Perhaps if the issue was explored further, the right answers might be forthcoming?
    More questions should be asked perhaps?
    (1) Why was trade-in value lower than expected?
    Was it because the current glut of used cars has depressed prices (fact)?
    Was it because the owner shopped at only one dealer (fact)? Was it because private sale is often better than trading in? (fact)?
    Are we getting the whole story? (debateable)?
    What would the trade-in value of a 9 year old competitive vehicle be--ie, a Ford Windstar, A Chrysler Town and Country, etc.?(fact).
    (2) Why were costs of maintaining the 9 year old vehicle alledgedly higher?
    Was it because parts and labor costs of most vehicles are far higher these days than in past generations (fact)?
    What was the outcome of maintaining the vehicle well--it apparently was quite serviceable after 9 or 10 years? (fact)
    Are we getting the full story (debateable)?

    As you can see, arbitrarily pointing fingers can often be the wrong way to resolve differences.

    Another example of how discussions like this one go south relates to your repeated claim that Toyota quality has dropped because of lower ratings in some reviews.
    Should the question be put another way--"Has Toyota dropped, or have others gone up?" Truth be told, you will probably find the answer is that others have finally got the message that quality counts.
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    Hyundai is competeing with Toyota, not the other way around, so the warranty is not an issue for Toyota. Hyundai NEEDS to sell on warranty and price. Period.

    Toyotas quality, as I have shown, is outstanding, and Hyundai is still learning how to get it done. Give me five years of consistent ability, then give me a call.

    Comparing Toyota to Hyundai is like comparing Reyes to Jeter. There is no comparison, at this point. :confuse:

    DrFill
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Comparing Toyota to Hyundai is like comparing Reyes to Jeter. There is no comparison, at this point.

    Your analogy for the second time is still poor. There is a clear difference between the two ball players. The quality difference between the two car makers is not so well defined. In fact it has to be taken one car at a time. I think that Hyundai is winning that race one car at a time.

    You base your arguments on the number of vehicles sold. By that criteria GM in the US is far superior to Toyota. GM is still Number ONE in the USA by far. GM sells 7 full sized PU trucks to every Tundra sold. Following your line of argument that makes the GM PU trucks 7 times better than the Toyota Tundra. Of course I would agree with that.

    Even when it was shown that Hyundai passed Toyota in the IQS that you posted, you refer back to numbers sold. You some how equate units sold with quality. I look at Edmund's reviews by owners of any vehicle I think about buying. I would give those reviews more weight than JDP or CR with their no-name statistics.

    Lastly,
    If Toyota is doing so well? Why are they laying off workers in plants like Princeton Indiana? Is their a chink in the almighty Toyota armor?

    PS
    Happy Memorial Day to all you stay at home folks.
  • bobadbobad Member Posts: 1,587
    I always thought it was foolish to put blind faith in such things as automobiles. Though not likely, a car manufacturer can take a bad turn and go from great quality to poor quality in 1 or 2 years. Or,,, the inverse can happen. That should be recognized, not ignored.

    My car is only 1 year old, and I won't be buying another for 9 years. So the quality of Hyundai, Toyota, and the rest are irrelevant to me at this time. I will re-evaluate in 8 years, and make my choice. I have no idea what the choices will look like in 8 years, and don't really care at this time.

    Meanwhile, I just don't care which car is "best". If you're researching to buy a new car, I suggest you don't listen to brand loyalists. Drive the cars, listen to unbiased owners, and ignore the glowing reviews. Consider the VALUE above all else, no matter whether you spend $15K or $60K.

    It's amusing to listen to those who speak in absolutes. They believe their favorite car is better than other cars in every way. Well, that's an immature way to look at things. Every car has several good points that should be acknowledged. But some people are so biased and so brand-loyal that they pretend they don't exist. They even try to spin such tangibles as large discounts and a 10 year warranty into negatives. That's pretty amusing, but some buyers are actually swayed by the arguments.

    When we make a major purchase like a car, we should always place a high premium on VALUE. The Hyundai buyer should, as should the Toyota or BMW buyer, for that matter. When you bought your Camry, you really wanted BMW 5 series, right? But looking at the quality, features, and price, you couldn't justify it. But wait! If you throw out the irrelevant badge mystique and look at the cars objectively, you must consider the NF Sonata.
  • bpizzutibpizzuti Member Posts: 2,743
    If Toyota isn't competing with Hyundai, then Toyota is run by fools. There is ALWAYS competition, and if Toyota isn't competing then they're losing business. So your argument doesn't work.

    Toyota quality, to be frank, sucks. They know it; they paid a quality cost to increase production and gain the worldwide "#1" title, which was worthwhile propaganda.

    If Toyota's quality is so outstanding, then it costs them exactly NOTHING to extend their warranty to the level of Hyundai's, and then start drawing away their buyers, further increasing Toyota's sales. They have not done so because they know it would cost significantly more than zero, as their cars would NOT hold up that long anymore.

    Toyota not competing was just a dumb thing to say Fill. If they don't compete, then their sales will just go away to other manufacturers that DO compete. Oh, what a feeling....to know that a manufacturer cares so little about it's customers that it's not willing to fight to keep them.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    GM is suffering from the same malady that Toyota will find themselves in shortly. It is called complacency. Aside from the LS460 ToyLex has little to be proud of in MY 2007. Oh, I forgot they sold the most cars. Just as China sold the MOST shoes. I guess that is how you determine who is best.
  • oldguy70oldguy70 Member Posts: 97
    "I suggest you don't listen to brand loyalists. Drive the cars, listen to unbiased owners, and ignore the glowing reviews. Consider the VALUE above all else, no matter whether you spend $15K or $60K."

    Excellent advice--as far as it goes. I would hasten to add a bit more to the "listen to unbiased owners, and ignore the glowing reviews"
    Consider adding this to your advice..."IGNORE THE ANTI AUTOMAKER HYPERBOLE".

    As to "value"--you're absolutley right, but don't forget that oftentimes, value exists in the eye of the beholder.

    Something else you said resonates...."It's amusing to listen to those who speak in absolutes".
    How true.
  • goodegggoodegg Member Posts: 905
    Toyota quality, to be frank, sucks.

    Wow. Visit these boards long enough and you'll see as many Toyota bashers as Hyundai bashers.

    Just plain silliness "Toyota quality sucks". Why does Toyota offend you so much to utter this nonsense?
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Just as China sold the MOST shoes. I guess that is how you determine who is best.

    Hey, a new twist on the McDonald's argument. Haven't heard that one before (billions served right? :shades: ).

    Sometimes a $5 pair of fake Birkies and a Big Mac just hits the spot.

    Toyota has always paid out the least percentage of its auto revenue for warranty claims. Trying to correlate the warranty claims with the quality survey results of JD Power is a bit dicey, but some have tried. (Warrantyweek.com)
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I can tell you where I am coming from. I have owned two new Toyotas. A 1964 Toyota Land cruiser and a 1994 Toyota PU truck. They were both unreliable and cost a lot to keep running. I am just trying to balance out the scales that seem off balance. I believe much of the pro Toyota anti Hyundai diatribe is put out by those that have a financial interest in Toyota crushing all competition. Once they have run the others out of business you will be stuck with what ever crap they want to sell you. Automotive history is filled with many good automakers that were run off by stronger wealthier auto makers. Toyota would love to do just that.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Sometimes a $5 pair of fake Birkies and a Big Mac just hits the spot.

    Maybe the cheapo sandals, I never let a Big Mac touch my lips. Remember the High Fructose Corn Syrup they use. I still like a nice Ribeye on occasion.

    I do like MCD stock. Pays good dividends.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Heh, had a nice rib eye for dinner last night and ran out of chocolate syrup, so made some with Hershey's cocoa and beet sugar this morning. And Filet O' Fish is the usual order.

    But you got my drift. :shades:
  • oldguy70oldguy70 Member Posts: 97
    Your frequently stated objective to "balance out the scales" appears to be a little thin, primarily because "balance" in any discussion usually demands looking at every facet of the topic at hand in a purely objective and unbiased manner.
    Your comments herein seem characterised by what appears to be a decidedly anti Toyota bias, and I have yet to see any objectivity in what you advocate.
    Is this what you consider "balancing out the scales?"
    If so, I would respectfully ask where is any "balance" needed in these discussions?
    From what I perceive herein, it seems the pros and cons of both sides of the discussion are about equal--as it should be.
    So if it ain't broke, why try to fix it?
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Ok then, Put me on the anti-Toyota pro any other car maker side of the scale. Though us old guys should stick together.
    Have a great Memorial Day!!!
  • bpizzutibpizzuti Member Posts: 2,743
    Unfortunately, it's not nonsense. Everyone I know that has owned a Toyota in the past 20 years had to pay a ton to keep it running due to all of the mechanical problems with the vehicle, and swore it would be their last Toyota. And it was too.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    My 1982 Tercel ran good - only stranded me one time. I sold it in 1999 because we moved 3,000 miles away and I didn't want to deal with it. If we had gotten a Previa in '89 we might still be driving in, but the '89 Voyager was ten thousand dollars cheaper and we got ten years out of it.

    I didn't buy a Sienna in '99 when we got our Nissan because we thought it was a bit too plush for our needs and it was a bit pricey. We tried to buy a base Odyssey but the dealer was exceptional (exceptional jerks ;) ).

    We've been real happy with the Quest but that doesn't mean I'm not going to cross shop all of them next time.
  • bobadbobad Member Posts: 1,587
    Gagrice,

    I don't think Toyota's quality is terrible. It could be better, but it's no worse than the other makers at present. Just because we like a certain car does not mean that the rest are unworthy. I own a Sonata, but it's not like I chose it over a Camry by a wide margin. There are things to like about every car in this segment.

    Back on topic, I know that Toyota fears Hyundai. I read remarks from a Toyota executive that said so.
  • driver56driver56 Member Posts: 408
    After purchasing new, driving it daily, then selling my Toyota, I cannot scorn it, nor praise it. If it had been impeccable (or at all close to it) I would have, for once, become, perhaps, brand loyal. Did not happen. Fine with me.
    I maintained it like all others before it, by the book. Oil/filter changed by a Toyota dealer at the recommended intervals, etc. etc...... Just another a - b, fairly reliable, relatively safe, comfortable mode of transport.
    That's all I can say. I didn't expect any more nor less of it. It did what it was intended to do, did it well enough. That was my experience.
    When people ask me what I think of a particular auto, I now say "look around, don't get caught up with brand names, do some research, don't just take your neigbours advice, test drive til it hurts, take all opinions with a grain of salt, buy what suits you, have some fun".
    Should Toyota fear Hyundai? I hope so. Hyundai/Kia build well engineered quality vehicles and they'll take their market share. That's positive for all of us.

    Back to work!
  • iluvmysephia1iluvmysephia1 Member Posts: 7,709
    have said that they think that Toyota isn't "fearing" or worrying about HyunKia. I think that most of you have heard about the hard-working quality of the Japanese. The pride. The fear of "losing face" that the Japanese people have. My point is that I think Toyota does fear Hyundai and I also think that they are working hard to stay on top of GM.

    But the flurry of so much competition, even from my current fave Mitsubishi and their resergence is going to make things tough on Toyota and their goal to stay number one.

    But their quality has taken a hit of late and if you disagree then you're not doing your reading and research. It's a well-known fact now without even having to mention Toyota engine sludge.

    A person needs to do their homework and study up for a long time IMO and test drive liberally, but, the news of late regarding Toyota is not glowing and altogether positive.

    I'm happy to have gone to a Mitsu and if not a Mitsu I would've bought from favorite Kia or Hyundai. Both of those Korean automakers and Mitsubishi are working hard to not only stay in the game but move upwards. If you're not moving upwards where are you going?

    Toyota is at the top but IMO they're not moving correctly to stay up there at this time. Why might I say that? From recent research that tells me that they're leaning on their past and their stock price and a particular American car maker did the same type of thing, only about 25 years ago-look what has happened to them.

    Only now I think the downward movement can happen faster with all of the comptetion-even from newly merged carmaker entities.

    2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick

  • driver56driver56 Member Posts: 408
    I had signs of engine sludge with my 98 Sienna shortly before I sold it - really didn't expect that at all. That completely caught me off-guard considering I had regular oil/filter changes done at the proper intervals. That was pointed out by the buyer's mechanic. He actually seemed O.K. with it, said he would get an engine flush done. That's history for me now.
    I drive a Nissan truck currently. Hyundai doesn't market the type of vehicle I wanted/needed (at least not for North America), otherwise I may have been interested in the Santa Fe. The Veracruz(sp?) looks promising.
    I now have serious doubts regarding Toyota's quality. With all their recent recalls and such, perhaps they've become too big for their britches.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    There is a lot of evidence to the contrary. I don't mean experiences of a single car owner, but statistics gathered from large samples, e.g. JD Power and CR surveys. Toyota is still one of the most reliable brands overall. That's not the issue. The issue is that many people today are willing to pay a premium for that reputation of reliability. So if Toyota lets its reliability slip (e.g. the slight downturn from 2005 to 2006 in the JD Power IQS, and CR's analysis that Toyota's reliability is levelling off), while Hyundai surpasses or even stays close to Toyota in reliability, will those same people still be willing to pay the "Toyota premium" now, or a year or two down the road?

    I've already decided I am not willing to pay that premium. I've owned 3 Toyotas--2 Corollas and a Celica--and they were all pretty reliable except the first Corolla, which had four significant problems in its first 3 years. But I've also owned two Hyundais and they were just as reliable as the Toyotas, if not more so. And they cost $4-5000 less than a comparable Toyota. So Toyota would need to make a pretty great or unique car--the Prius is one--for me to consider buying it instead of a better-value alternative like a Hyundai or Kia.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I don't think Toyota's quality is terrible.

    I don't think Toyota quality is terrible either. I don't like Toyota corporate or their dealers as a whole. In 1964 when I bought my first Toyota I would not have considered a GM product. I disliked the way they did business. For me they changed and were much easier to deal with by the late 1980s and through the 1990s. In 1988 when I bought my first new GM product I was fed up with Toyota, Honda, Nissan and Subaru. I considered all the new Japanese vehicles I owned as sub standard. The only exception was a 1970 Datsun PU, a dandy little truck. I look at Toyota today the way I saw GM in the 1950s & 60s. A ruthless corporation with no redeeming values.
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    I base my comparison of the two companies based on the same criteria that the two ball players would be copmpared.

    Consistency, awards, titles, market image, sales, the whole package.

    I am a Mets fan, so i know EXACTLY how great Reyes is, and I KNOW he has a long way to go to be Derek Jeter, as much as I dislike this fact. :(

    Anyone, without bias, looking at the two companies, will not see very much worth comparing.

    Hyundai can have a nice year or two (Not that it's having a good sales year, or last year), but only Toyota can be Toyota, grow their business, almost exponentially, while covering quality, award after award. :shades:

    This is clearly over Hyundai's head.

    DrFill
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    If Toyota isn't competing with Hyundai, then Toyota is run by fools. There is ALWAYS competition, and if Toyota isn't competing then they're losing business. So your argument doesn't work.

    I beg to differ. :surprise:

    Toyota certainly isn't losing any business to Hyundai, if you've seen the sales numbers.

    Toyota runs with the big dogs, Mercedes in luxury, and GM worldwide. It would kinda be like racing for pink slips vs. playing pick-up sticks for spare change. Toyota has real business to attend to.

    Hyundai needs to sit at the kiddie table with Mazda and Subaru, and if they're really good, give Nissan some headaches.

    They only headaches I see are their days supply for all of these super, just-redesigned vehicles they don't sell
    (sales are down this year).

    How about getting over 500k for the year, before we put you on Legends Field. :confuse:

    DrFill
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    Apparently a lot of posters here either don't know, or don't want to know it, that Toyota is changing the market, class by class. Toyota is many things. Complacent isn't one of them.

    From Lexus LS, to Camry, to Rav4, to Lexus RX, to Prius, to Tundra, Toyota can, and does, make some of the best vehicles over the past 20 years.

    Innovative, powerful, well-thought out. And the market react to them.

    After they create the market.

    Hyundai can't even see the targets Toyota has already hit dead bullseye! :blush:

    Hyundai has the resume of a AAA call-up. Toyota is the NY Yankees. And they're playing like the Red Sox. ;)

    DrFill
  • bpizzutibpizzuti Member Posts: 2,743
    Sorry, but your argument still doesn't work: competition is competition, and Toyota needs to compete, no matter what the size of the competition.

    Think of it this way: Hyundai steals...say, 25k sales. As you said, kiddie numbers. Except Mazda steals 35k...then Subaru steals another 25k...then Nissan manages to come up with 75k of sales that would have otherwise went to Toyota (Probably trucks; theirs are better anyway). Honda grins and takes another 50k. Small numbers individually, but added together, it's over 200k in sales. That's real money. That's also real business...if real business is ignoring a bunch of competitors simply because individually they don't amount to much, then you took VERY different business classes from the ones I took.

    As for Toyota not losing business to Hyundai, obviously they are. Right here on this board is an account of a customer Toyota lost to Hyundai. Toyota lost many of my friends and associates to other manufacturers, Hyundai included. If your attitude is typical of Toyota management, then Toyota is headed for as bad a wakeup call as GM had. Of course, that may not be a bad thing.

    One more thing: I won't be buying a RAV4; I'll take a Sportage instead. Longer warranty, more features for the same price or less...and the company is hungry and looking to grow and EARN my money rather than expecting it because they're #1. ;)
  • iluvmysephia1iluvmysephia1 Member Posts: 7,709
    that's the attitude you need! Look at it this way, too.

    The Sportage you'll be buying has intelligent body design going for it, too. The Honda CRV and the Toyota RAV4 are lacking in that category and it ain't even close.

    Kia or Hyundai or Mitsubishi are better choices in SUV's and cars and Warranty's. Remember, Mitsubishi also offers the 10 year, 100,000 mile Warranty because Finbarr O'Neill went from Hyundai to Mitsubishi to be CEO and took the great Warranty with him.

    Who knows where Finbarr O'Neill is now BTW?

    2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick

  • bpizzutibpizzuti Member Posts: 2,743
    Actually, my biggest gripe with the RAV4 is that it's too big. Toyota doesn't even MAKE anything that competes with the Sportage/Tuscon.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Toyota is watching Hyundia. Hyundia is where Toyota was about 15 years ago. Not saying Hyundia is 15 years behind Toyota by any means. For those not taking Hyundia/Kia seriously, they are going to be sorry in the future. Hyundia/Kia offer great value for thier vehicles. Something Toyota did 15-20 years ago. Toyota has a past reputation for quality. The bar has been raised and many manufacturers are meeting or beating this bar. The fact is the 800lb gorilla (Toyota) is just stealing the spot light for now. Consumer are figuring out slowly but surely you don't have to buy a Toyota to get a great quality and realiable vehicle.. ;)
  • goodegggoodegg Member Posts: 905
    Toyota doesn't even MAKE anything that competes with the Sportage/Tuscon.

    Funny you say that considering the Tucson is one of the poorest selling Hyundais out there. Nobody's buying 'em bro. Even the much ballyhooed Sonata has been selling only 10,000 units a month. Ouch.

    Like the "critically acclaimed" TV series that gets yanked after one season.

    Probably has to do with the aweful 'styling' of Hyundai vehicles. Good mechanicals but somewhat of an eyesore lineup.
  • bpizzutibpizzuti Member Posts: 2,743
    Yeah, actually, that's one of the reasons I prefer the Kia...the styling is better than the Tuscon's. ;)

    I see quite a few of the things around here. More Kia than Hyundai, but the Kia dealer is more convenient around here anyway.

    Didn't we just go through that in the 70's or something and the companies that made smaller cars ended up doing well? Yeah, I think there was some company called Toyota that did that...and now they're supersizing their "compact" SUV. ;)

    Anyway, people are going to go back to "smaller is better" again with the gas prices and all...that's why we now have cars like the SX4, Versa, and Fit. Toyota's only entry is the Yaris, which CONSUMER REPORTS didn't even like (and they like ANYTHING with a Toyota badge on it). The Scions all up-sized for the most part too. So I think Sportage sales will pick up, along with Chevy's upcoming small SUV (to slot in below the Equinox).
  • joe97joe97 Member Posts: 2,248
    You really need to do some research before posting. You have no respect for Hyundai, just admit it.

    Toyota certainly isn't losing any business to Hyundai, if you've seen the sales numbers.

    Yeah everything to you is sales numbers. Is Toyota losing business to Hyundai? Cover your ears, YES!!

    Hyundai needs to sit at the kiddie table with Mazda and Subaru, and if they're really good, give Nissan some headaches.

    Since you are such a numbers guy, check the Mazda and Subaru numbers vs. Hyundai. Try again please.

    They only headaches I see are their days supply for all of these super, just-redesigned vehicles they don't sell
    (sales are down this year).


    May 1, 2007 Inventory:

    1. BMW- 26 days
    2. Toyota- 44 days
    3. Honda- 51 days
    4. Hyundai- 55 days

    Average Inventory: 63 days

    Doesn't look to me Hyundai couldn't sell. What's happening with Hyundai's decline is mostly supply issues. Yeah, you might have heard the strikes and scandal which greatly affected production. Demands for small Hyundai cars, especially, are hot, but units are far from meeting them. Also, the Sonata year-over-year (YOY) comparisons are skewed because Hyundai introduced its purposeful fleet program last year, which ran through November of last year. Unfortunately, on a YOY comparison basis, sales would be down all year. Of course, there are many good high points in Hyundai's lineup (i.e. Santa Fe, Azera). It has been a tough 2007 for most automakers in the US, even Toyota has lost grounds in sales last month.

    By the way, have you driven a Hyundai vehicle, EVER?
  • joe97joe97 Member Posts: 2,248
    Funny you say that considering the Tucson is one of the poorest selling Hyundais out there. Nobody's buying 'em bro. Even the much ballyhooed Sonata has been selling only 10,000 units a month. Ouch.

    The Tucson has been selling okay but definitely needs a refresh. I think some of the potential sales very well could have gone to the success of the Santa Fe.

    As for the Sonata - 10k/month is actually a good chunk of increase over the past generation (keep in mind the past generation Sonata averaged less than that).

    The biggest obstacle Hyundai faces is its image. The problem is still, a good amount of consumers wouldn't even consider a Hyundai. What they don't realize Hyundai products are just as good the rest of the competitions out there, no matter what some here and others trying to pull, or tell you otherwise. As long as Hyundai CONTINUES to make quality and reliable vehicles, as they do now, they will be fine!!
  • driver56driver56 Member Posts: 408
    I guess you guys are already aware of this. Hyundai/Kia have certainly come a long way since the Pony days. I'm impressed.
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    You have no respect for Hyundai, just admit it.

    What part of this don't you get? My respect for Hyundai would come from......it's advertising......it's sales.....it's image.....

    Hyundai has an all-new lineup! Outside of the Tuscon, Entourage, Accent, Elantra, Sonata, Santa Fe, Veracruz, all new, and sales are down.

    Already know image is down, and the ads speak for themselves..... :lemon:

    Buick actually has a MUCH better history of quality awards, and consistency.

    I consider Buick a better threat. Gm is on the comeback. I am impressed by what they are doing, for the most part.

    And for those of you keeping score at home:

    Jeep 2006YTD: 144k
    Jeep 2007YTD: 159K (+11%)

    Mazda 2006YTD: 89K
    Mazda 2007TYD: 100k (+10%)

    Hyundai 2006YTD: 147k
    Hyundai 2007YTD: 143k (-4%)

    When should I start handing out merit badges and stuff. This looks like a company that needs more support than I can give it. :blush:

    DrFill
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    A ruthless corporation with no redeeming values.

    Remember when Toyota had a spate of recalls last year? "The problems got so bad that, in July, Toyota ceo Katsuaki Watanabe felt obliged to bow deeply in apology." (Business Week)

    I can't seem to find any links where Bill Ford or Bob Lutz apologized for quality issues - taking responsibility would seem to be a redeeming value, even for a corporate face.

    Hyundai's Chairman is trying to redeem himself a billion ways. :shades: (Inside Line)
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/01/lienerts-predictions-for-2006/

    These lofty expectations for Hyundai/Kia are not working out so well. Turns out they were not much to worry about. Sure every competitor should be watched, but if Toyota is worried about another auto maker, it's Honda or maybe Nissan. Hyundai/Kia have a long long way to go.
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    That's a pretty ignorant statement, if it's about Toyota. I cringe at who may've spun such ignorance.

    I doubt I'll be surprised. Typical of what has been sent over the past week. :sick:

    Substantiating such a claim seems to be above and beyond current forum members.

    Too weak a claim for me to even bother to parry.

    DrFill
  • iluvmysephia1iluvmysephia1 Member Posts: 7,709
    down in apology because of recalls, there's that Japanese deep sense of pride being expressed again. It is customary and usual but what is not is Toyota's recent spate of recalls and TSB's and downright disturbing performance in building Toyota's lately.

    I don't see how that can be overlooked. Yeah, they're still selling them, but, and it is a big Butt, Americans are buying cars they don't really have passion for because some dork writing for a car magazine told them it was the "safe" car to buy.

    Or an uninspired family member tipped them off that Toyota is tops in everything everywhere. Dumb decisions made in balking form just "because".

    I choose to buy and chose to buy in March a car that I love and a car that will hold up for me. It is backed by a large Warranty but that's not the reason I bought it. I bought it because I get the same feelings looking at and driving my '08 Mitsu Lancer GTS that I got when I bought my first car at age 18. That car was a '65 Ford Mustang. I loved that car but my new car is one that I feel even closer to even though I've only owned it for two months.

    Toyota, Honda, Subaru, Nissan, et all...don't produce that feeling for me. I could've faked that feeling and bought that '06 Scion xA in 5-speed form or that 2007 Toyota Yaris in 5-speeds and bright red metallic paint. But I didn't...I waited for something with some more character and more excitement.

    Toyota reaches and tries but falls short for me. Average American consumer may find what they need in a new Toyota but are they getting what they need and what they want, too? They're buying them but I don't agree that they're getting satisfaction from them. I am pulling for GM or someone else to grab the number 1 worldwide spot. Toyota needs more...is that new Supra gonna come out for a look-see? That would be some progress from the utilitarian to the sporty "must-have" quality Toyota is sorely lacking.

    Now, with quality suffering, where's their beef? Eh?

    2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick

  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Here's an interesting article that explains the main challenge for Hyundai: getting more people to take a look at their cars. It appears most people haven't forgotten the Excel.

    When a group was shown the [Veracruz] without any identifying logos on it, 71% said they'd buy it. Once the Hyundai logo went on, however, that dropped to 52%. In the same research, a Toyota logo lifts intent-to-purchase by more than 20%.

    http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_21/b4035069.htm

    Look for the new ad campaign next month.
  • chrisclc13chrisclc13 Member Posts: 8
    let's do this people, how about you all come to my dealer (san diego), we put a honda, toyota, and hyundai of every type side by side and then decide if hyundai should be feared... I was confident enough to put a Elantra GLS next a Civc LX last week, and we blew the little bugger out of the water. You get more options, and spend $4k less!!! That is a FORTUNE in the compact market. The only things holding hyundai back at the moment are dealer network, production capacity, and their 90's image as crap on wheels.
  • dino001dino001 Member Posts: 6,191
    would not be watching Hyundai. Are they in first league yet? Probably not, if not for sales, it's the respect. But they're coming big way.

    If you bought Sonata or Elantra ten years ago, you would have to give a long explanations to practically everybody in the family, work and neighborhood. Today it is not necessary, not at all unles you live in a million-dollar neighborhood. Many might still not agree with your choice (how many people would not touch Toyota, Chevy, or Ford?), but you would not need to explain yourself. That is worth a lot.

    With progress of their quality and name recognition they are scheduled to arrive at the major brand party pretty soon. They are Toyota of 1980 or perhaps even 1985. Only a fool would think they're not a threat.

    2018 430i Gran Coupe

This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.