Toyota Fearing Hyundai?

1262729313241

Comments

  • goodegggoodegg Member Posts: 905
    I'll take a chance here and predict you like the Hyundai or Kia van, and hate everything else.

    Am I close?
  • msindallasmsindallas Member Posts: 190
    I have a feeling that crash test ratings of 4 vs. 5 stars for the driver doesnt mean much, everything else being 5. I am not a die hard fan of any brand, will buy the best value I see, in performance, amenities, luxury, comfort, warranty and price. I think Sienna tops at performance, amenities and luxury, Entourage tops at warranty and price.

    The question is how much a customer is (I am) willing to pay for that extra power, amenities and luxury (comfort, quality of interior material, craftsmanship, electronic toys, etc.). I would like to stay away from Toyota for their sales/marketing tactics. Heck, I am not too thrilled about the minivan either, in the 1st place. If it provides 6+ seating, ample storage behind 3rd row (for stroller/baby stuff) at a reasonable price, I might buy an Enclave, too. It has the warranty midway between the 2, and I am willing to let go of the power sliding doors for a higher driving position. Just that right now no one has the combo I am looking for in an Enclave (CXL, articulating headlights and no sunroof).
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    It's obvious they haven't sampled the 269HP '07 Sienna. They will get around to it.

    DrFill
  • bpizzutibpizzuti Member Posts: 2,743
    Is that the one with the 20 inch chrome wheels, side sills, hood scoop, and rear spoiler?

    270 HP on a MINIVAN...jeez....
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Now was that 269 HP rating using Premium or regular unleaded? I know in the past Toyota would test using premium to get a higher HP rating then sell the vehicle as regular gas burner.
  • msindallasmsindallas Member Posts: 190
    270 HP on a MINIVAN...jeez....

    So now the only difference between a minivan and a crossover SUV with 3rd row is the sliding rear door? I was thinking so myself, but just asking the experts...
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    That and the lower cargo floor in the van.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    And fewer AWD models available - Sienna is the only one that has that option afaik.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I wonder what percentage of the Sienna's are AWD? They could be a big part of sales if they are the only Mini Van offered with AWD.

    Why does Toyota charge twice as much or more for XM than other car makers?
  • joe97joe97 Member Posts: 2,248
    I'll take a chance here and predict you like the Hyundai or Kia van, and hate everything else.

    Am I close?


    So I stated one of my perference when shopping for cars (e.g. safety) and facts from IIHS and NHTSA, you assumed I like Hyundai/Kia vans, and HATE everything else.

    I will say this: most of the vans on the market today are very competitive. Just safety is at the top of my list.

    Still, vans are just not for me period. Probably years down the road I might consider (once I have larger family). I was simply making an observation, which is why I said, "If I was in the market for one".

    FYI - my current and past vehicles (in alpha order): Audi, Acura, BMW, Chevy, Ford
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    It's obvious they haven't sampled the 269HP '07 Sienna.

    Obvious because they chose 3 other vans, including a Hyundai and twin Kia, ahead of the Sienna? ROFL. Odyssey isn't exactly a wimp in the power department, nor are the Hyundai/Kia vans.
  • coneheadssuckconeheadssuck Member Posts: 10
    uh..........why are we going on almost 2 year old data.....and if hyundai is doing so well....then why did Toyota just become #1 in sales in the world?....over GM I might add......
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Oh I see it now, the base Sedona is the SWB model. But looking at the equipment, it's a no-op for me. The rear seat doesn't fold into the floor (something I really like in my MPV), and the 2nd row doesn't recline or slide. I guess I'll keep my MPV.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Recall there was a post re Hyundai being 15-20 years behind Toyota, then a response that it's more like 5 years. I was pointing out some comparos to demonstrate that Hyundai is less than five years behind Toyota when it comes to the cars themselves, and in many cases there's professional opinion that Hyundai models surpass comparable Toyota models. Some of these reviews were a year+ ago, but deal with current Toyota and/or Hyundai models.
  • bobadbobad Member Posts: 1,587
    Why does Toyota charge twice as much or more for XM than other car makers?

    Because Toyota sells more cars? ;)
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    The company's maturation is. Market significance, brand equity, marketing, sales, resale, etc.

    It's a matter of being consistent, and being patient.

    As Edmunds has said, their cars are good, but they seem to have benchmarked vehicles that have since been redesigned. Hence a five-year lag.

    DrFill
  • bpizzutibpizzuti Member Posts: 2,743
    Why does Toyota charge twice as much or more for XM than other car makers?

    Naah, it's probably because the Toyota brand XM is higher quality, with more power, more standard features, and higher resale value. :shades:
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    It's called "leapfrogging."

    If Hyundai has benchmarked cars that have since been redesigned, how does that explain that the new-for-2001 Elantra bested the new-for-2003 Corolla, or that the 2006 Accent bested the 2006 Yaris, or the 2006 Azera bested the 2006 (2007?) Avalon, or that the 2007 Santa Fe is considered very close to the 2006 RAV4? Doesn't seem like a five-year lag to me. Except for Toyota's part, as it is now finally trying to top the Elantra with its 2009 Corolla. Maybe it will top the Accent and Azera with the next Yaris and Avalon also. As you said, it's a matter of being patient.

    Oh, I forgot... as far as Toyota is concerned, comparisons don't matter. ;)
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    I noticed in that little fit you just posted you didn't counter anything I said, you just attacked the messenger. Now since you are saying that I am disparaging Toyota would you like to show me where I was wrong in what I wrote?

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    Ah but the Hyundai bashers here are stating that Hyundai cannot be anywhere near Toyota because their sales have dropped. But then we have you saying that its ok for Toyota to have a sales slump if everyone else is having one.

    I am just pointing out that there seems to be a double standard here.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    Then the power-to-weight ratio, gas mileage, resale value, extra towing capabilities and ease ,and extra cargo and passenger room should bring you to the right minivan.

    A few things, the extra power to weight ratio isn't that much and the majority of the drivers of mini vans would not notice a thing between the two.

    The gas mileage difference is 1 MPG which for all intents and purposes is the same between the two vans.

    As for towing, have you ever seen a mini van tow anything?

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    I know a couple that tested drove both, they went with the Hyundai. They said it was giving them more for the money. somehow I believe them.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • goodegggoodegg Member Posts: 905
    Which mag just put the "new and amazing" Elantra last in a comparo against the Civic and Sentra? And their editors said something about "using the last gen Civic as their benchmark"? I'm sure the Hyundai club will disregard that one, and others that occur.

    I think its Motor Trend. On newstands now for your enjoyment!
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    A lower power-to-weight should lead to less aggressive throttle inputs, easier merging, and further improving long-term fuel economy.

    This "couple" didn't meet me on that fateful day. A pity. I am only one man. :(

    One damn handsome man. :)

    DrFill
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    Not to disturb your delusions of grandeur, but if Toyota benchmarks a car, not feelin' the Elantra will fit the bill. Only one other economy car can sit at the adult's table.

    Nice try, doh. ;)

    DrFill
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    You are wasting your talent with Toyota. You should be selling Porsche or Ferrari. Something with a little more class :shades:
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    Toyota Corolla May 2007: 45,005

    Hyundai Motor Co. USA (8 Vehicles): 43,885

    Or

    Toyota Corolla May 2007: 45,005

    Hyundai Elantra Jan-May 2007: 40,315 (Down 3,000)

    DrFill
  • bobadbobad Member Posts: 1,587
    There you go with those numbers again. Remember, quality and value can affect sales, but sales can not affect quality and value. Sales is a lagging indicator. I'm not really interested in what Toyota quality and value was 5 years ago.
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    A lower power-to-weight should lead to less aggressive throttle inputs, easier merging, and further improving long-term fuel economy.

    I would agree if you are comparing a 170 HP van against a 250 HP van but not when comparing these two cars. Each additional 1HP increase gives you less benefit that the preceding increase of 1HP, this is called the law of diminishing return.

    Once you get above a certain amount of HP the upper limits are rarely if ever get used, especially in a mini van. My daily drive has a lot less power to weight than either of the mini vans being discussed yet 99% of the time I can keep up with accelerating traffic without breaking a sweat and the only times I am not doing the flow of traffic at the end of the on ramp is when someone ahead of me not going fast enough.

    Face it the added HP is all but useless and just a marketing tool.

    This "couple" didn't meet me on that fateful day.

    Even if they did they would have bought the Hyundai anyways. These are smart people and would have seen your crap long time ago.

    Also FWIW more power tends to cause a lower fuel efficiency.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Just think then how far behind the Lancer, Sentra, and Civic the Corolla is! They have all of those cars plus the Elantra to leapfrog! (Recall the subject here is "Toyota vs. Hyundai", not Toyota vs. Honda. If it were, it would be a sad, sad place for Toyota fans to be.)

    I read the MT review. This is the same magazine that, a short time ago, scored the same Elantra higher than the Sentra in their COTY comparo, and said of the Elantra, "Hyundai has taken a credible shot at the class-leading Honda [note: they didn't say Corolla] with a piece that offers much of its goodness for less money." Kind of confusing.
  • goodegggoodegg Member Posts: 905
    Recall the subject here is "Toyota vs. Hyundai", not Toyota vs. Honda.

    Oops. My bad. Good ole Honda pokin' its head into the wrong room. Was inevitable tho.
  • driver56driver56 Member Posts: 408
    Question. Is the Sienna all-wheel drive system a reactive or proactive one?
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    Better to see crap than to drive it. ;)

    How smart could they be? Who you tryin' to kid? Did they get the Limited?

    Limited passenger room, Limited cargo room, limited options (can't even get Nav, much less AWD or Power 3rd row seats), limited power, lower fuel economy, and it may set a record for lowest resale value (worth less after 3 years than a 5-year-old Sienna).

    Look, I'm not sayin' Hyundai builds crappy cars. It may not be crap now, but.......oh damn....they drove it off the lot?!?

    Oh well, they better bust out the Air Wick, 'cus they'll be in there for a long time. :P

    They didn't buy anything. They got sold. Cross them off the Mensa Prospects list.

    DrFill
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    That's true about being in there for a long time; they probably will want to take full advantage of the 10-year warranty on the Entourage. And with its class-leading safety, they will feel secure toodling around in it with the family for all those years.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Is the Sienna all-wheel drive system a reactive or proactive one

    Would you settle for "Virtual" AWD?

    wwest, "Toyota 4WD systems explained" #1087, 25 Apr 2003 2:12 pm

    In other words, beats me!
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    How smart could they be?

    Apparently very smart as they got the van they needed and saved a bunch of money. Would paying more for the same be smart? I think not.

    Limited cargo room,

    By only about 6-8 cubic feet, not a whole lot.

    limited options

    Limited in what options? Anything that really matters?

    can't even get Nav

    Sure spend thousands for something that is practically useless. How many times does the average person actually need a nav system. I would guess that once in my life I actually needed a nav system but a stop top ask directions saved me the thousands that a nav system would have cost.

    For those who actually need a nav system I suggest forgoing the factory installed ones and going to wally world and spending one fifth the cost for a Garin (or like product) that you can transfer from one vehicle to another.

    much less AWD

    You know I have spent my entire life living either in the upper midwest or Alaska and I have only driven FWD or RWD and had no issues.

    lower fuel economy

    Again the fuel economies are basically the same.

    and it may set a record for lowest resale value

    Again you may get more for the Toyota but you pay more for it to begin with so where is the savings? Sorry but I don't want to spend 5 grand more top have a car worth 4 grand more 5 years from now, it doesn't make sense.

    Look, I'm not sayin' Hyundai builds crappy cars.

    Yes you are, you cannot admit that Hyundai makes as good a car as anyone else (including Toyota) and they cost less. As soon as people start realizing the reality of the situation you will need a new job.

    Oh well, they better bust out the Air Wick, 'cus they'll be in there for a long time.

    Yep since Hyundai makes good reliable cars they can keep it a long time. Hey my Hyundai is 8 years old with more that 140K miles on it and is still going strong. No need to get rid of a car thats running with no trouble.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    If the Sienna sells itself, why the $1500 cash rebates on it and several Toyota stable mates? Looks to me like they are trying to compete with Hyundai. Or are they tired of looking at the rear end of the 3 Mini vans way out in front of them? Honda is not offering rebates on the Ody. Is it that much better than the Sienna?

    On resale: Just take your 2 year old Sienna into any Toyota dealer and get the shock of your life on a trade-in. You will not get crap for it. The only place you see high resale prices are on the used car lots. Anyone that buys a car based on resale is not familiar with the way the system works.
  • hause7hause7 Member Posts: 153
    i traded in my 04 sienna with 50,000 miles and got 21,000 on trade in(i paid 31,000 for it, lost 10K $). Not bad. A Sedona EX equally equipment with the same miles is worth 13,800(Brand new they are 28-31K(you loose 18K $).
  • hause7hause7 Member Posts: 153
    They make 266Hp 245 lbs of torque with regular which it uses. If you use Premium it makes 272HP and 252 lbs of torque. I see a lot more sienna's than Kia/Hyundai vans. On the sienna club people have reportedly got up to 27mph on long road trips with the A/C blasting with 4 or more passengers. I got 525 miles on a tank of gas and the gas guage was still between empty and a quarter tank.
  • harrycheztharrychezt Member Posts: 405
    are you talking minvians?(I am lazy...not going back to look).
    Last Summer, August, to be exact.... went to Hyundai to get a Window gasket replaced under warranty. I was hovering around the showroom(it was an hour job/wait).
    A couple was looking at the minivan(btw, it is Kia's... they did have it out first, and Hyundai just tweaked it for their uses)anyhow, long story short; I told them down the road, Kia had their Sedona for 2,000 less, on sale now.
    They left and went to Kia(I left 20 minutes later).
    Either 1 of the sales staff, or maybe the sales mgr, overheard this conversation...
    because as soon as I walekd out the door to the service center, to pick up my car, this service mgr came out, introduced himself, and got into my face(basically, although he was biting his lip, "being nice" to me).
    He asked me if I had a problem(hated my car, saiud he would give me a newer one and a good deal, because I was there 2 times in 2 months or window issues)....
    I said not really(our Scion tC had issues to, with wiper blade arms not working, at the time)....
    Then he said why did I tell those people ot go to Kia!
    I said we were talking, and I told them of the SALE(he had Edmunds print outs, but this was the dealership's own deal, using money given to them by Kia,to use however, to move minivans, it appeared..Big ,2000-2,500 off Sedona's sign out front when I drove by).
    He said something else( and I kind of gave him a polite brush-off, said I must be going)... went back a few times for tune up, once, oil change, etc...
    and I just avoid the showroom.
    I felt like telling the guy" Hyundai makes $$$$ off of Kia sales, too!",(just not his dealership).

    The people had a 92 Honda minivan, and were trading it in.
    They did not care for the nearly 30K MSRP on the minivan(I was nearby, hearing the salesman say"we can't really discount, due to low number of minivans, but can finance you,give you a break"...etc...while Kia was selling same thing for 2K less, to 3K less).
    Another guy told me(he sold us our 04 Sonata) "they never came back"(probably got the Sedona).
    I was a bit ticked about going back there for minor issues like gasket around the window needing replaced 2 times in a few months( it's over 50 miles one way!)...
    so, I might have been a bit of a pain that day, lol.

    Should go back and tell the guy to pay off my 04, and give me the 07 Azera for 20K, and 2.9% for 60 months, lol!(the sales mgr who asked if I did not like my car anymore, and wanted a newer car, blah,blah,blah).

    Anyhow, I'll keep my car at least 2-3 years more. It's not bad.
    Unless gas hits 4 per gallon next year...then I may trade in for something smaller, fast!

    sorry to go on and on...
    take care/not offense.
  • wolverinejoe80wolverinejoe80 Member Posts: 337
    why why why? when you can just buy a civic, mazda3, sentra, or even new elantra?

    i just don't get it. corolla is the most boring and ugly option out there. this clearly shows you that people don't really care about looks and performance.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    Very good. And now you have discovered the secret to volume sales in the auto business! ;-)

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • harrycheztharrychezt Member Posts: 405
    Seems the couple with the 1992 Honda minivan( back in 2006, I mentioned a few posts above), were looking for value, over a brand name? They looked @ Hyundai Entourage, and then went to Kia, for Sedona, where the sale was, that I had told them about, and the guy who sold us our 04 Sonata(next visit a few months later, for oil change) had told me(when I asked) "The couple never came back"(they may have got the Kia, on sale, for 26,000 and change!).
  • snakeweaselsnakeweasel Member Posts: 19,592
    Interesting according to Kelly Blue Book a '04 Sienna XLE Limited well equipped with 50K miles is worth only around 19K in excellent condition. In good condition its worth less than 18K. Add to the fact that all the sales pros here state that KBB is high I have to wonder how you got several thousands more than KBB. I wonder what the rest of the deal went.

    Plus when you compare the drop in value I take it you are looking at the MSRP and not the selling price. You can get the Sedona for more off of sticker than you can the sienna. If you look at the actual purchase price it becomes more inline.

    2011 Hyundai Sonata, 2014 BMW 428i convertible, 2015 Honda CTX700D

  • bobadbobad Member Posts: 1,587
    why why why? when you can just buy a civic, mazda3, sentra, or even new elantra?

    I looked at the Corolla when I bought my Sonata. It was small, cramped, noisy, rode rough, was not very peppy, and was weak on safety features. For the same money, I got a much bigger, more comfortable car with a much better warranty. I don't think ANYONE really wants a car as small as the Corolla. I think they buy them for the mileage, and suffer with the cramped interior, rough ride, and noise to save on gas. Even at $3 a gallon, a $1000 savings can make up for the slightly lesser gas mileage for many years.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Welcome to the Forum,
    The low wholesale book here at Edmund's has the 04 Sienna LE with 50k miles at $14,400. What did you trade for? Edmund's is a bit high on their trade-in values so you would be lucky to get the $14k for that Sienna at most Toyota dealers. For me if I was going to lose 10 grand after only 3 years I would keep the vehicle. If you buy right you should not lose 33% in 3 years.
    According to Edmund's the new cost of the 2004 Sienna XLE AWD loaded was about $25,800 including tax and license. So you paid $5000 more than the average at $31k.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    "I don't think ANYONE really wants a car as small as the Corolla. I think they buy them for the mileage"

    I for one want a car smaller than Corolla, but with the same amenities as compact-class cars. I have almost no choices that meet those criteria, so I bought a smaller car (the Echo) with aftermarket cruise and stereo upgrades instead.

    I think there are "big car people" and "small car people". Each very much appreciates the attributes of their chosen size, and can't understand the other group's perspective that well. Me, I can't figure out how anyone would put up with the poor handling, low gas mileage, and remote driving experience of most of the midsize sedans, PARTICULARLY the Sonata and Camry. Camry hybrid is the only car of that size that gets onto my radar for acceptable fuel economy, and still the other negatives I mentioned apply.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • bpizzutibpizzuti Member Posts: 2,743
    Ok Mr Toyota salesman, if AWD is such an important feature on a minivan, please tell me why EVERY other manufacturer dropped it as an option, and what percentage of Sienna sales are AWD models?
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    Not everybody lives in the "Dirty South", and people who go through months of snowfall, like NYC, Philly, Washington, Chicago, might like a more capable vehicle.

    Lexus is adding AWD to their sedans for similar demands: In the North, they will sell nicely.

    Sales and demand varies by region.

    The tail doesn't wag the dog. If Toyota does it, the others might want to re-think their position.

    But then again, Toyota can, and has, had a history of investing more in their product/customer needs than other makers. :blush:

    We wouldn't leave a New Yorker out in the cold. New Yorkers are paid! ;)

    DrFill
  • bpizzutibpizzuti Member Posts: 2,743
    Toyota's BEEN doing it, and so have others (Mazda, Dodge). Mazda and Dodge aren't doing it anymore. Again, what percentage of Sienna sales are AWD models?

    Incidentally, if you won't leave a New Yorker out in the cold, why aren't you making a vehicle to compete with the Sportage? I want something THAT size, and Toyota has left me out in the cold. ;)
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.