Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

General Motors discussions

1431432434436437558

Comments

  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    I don't really know. I believe that was the whole reason Toyota grabbed stake in them. To co-develop motors for smaller applications. Isuzu does have a good reputation for building some of the best on the market and the Duramax does score well in the rankings.

    So that challenge doesn't seem impossible.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    You should drive a new Escalade, X5 or ML500. They out-handle any car built by Honda or Toyota except the S2000. I just do not like low cars. Too difficult getting in and out of. I cannot see myself buying any new sedan on the market. I tried the xB Scion and it was not bad. except the ground clearance was poor. I do a lot of back dirt roads and steep angles. I have to hit my driveway sideways with my wife's LS400 as it is so low. PU trucks and SUVs are the only vehicles I am considering except for a runabout for short trips to the store. Even that will have to be easy getting into and out of. Maybe the HHR. A friend that is 6'6" fits in his pretty well.
  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    While on the surface that sounds like a good idea, that would really only leave Pontiac with one or two models to sell.

    There are some holes to fill in on both sides. Holden would get a RHD Solstice, while Pontiac would get a midsize RWD to replace the G6, and a version of the Statesman as a Bonneville or G10 or something. The smaller Holdens are rebadged Opels and Daewoos, so Saturn and Chevy would get those. Four cars is plenty for Pontiac, and would encourage the holdout dealers to go along with the Pontiac-Buick-GMC partnering.
  • chuckhoychuckhoy Member Posts: 420
    That's another reason I am concerned with Saturn. They are all freestanding dealerships.

    I am not all that concerned because the dealership network is not all that prolific anyway. There are skads of Chevy, Pontiac and Buick dealerships all over the place. Probably the reason why you can get them close to invoice. Nothing is more conter-productive than competing against yourself.

    I never understood why GMC exists as a brand name. They are exactly like Chevys.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    GMC at one time was much heavier built than the Chevy PU truck. In the 1960s we only bought GMC at Pacific Telephone. Not sure when they became clones.
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    The HHR has been largely successful. The Miata is being outsold by the GM twins. I dont see your point.

    Surely you realize that the original post mentioned GM's lateness. I didn't comment on whether they were successful, but GM was certainly late, which was the point you didn't understand.

    You are also ignoring that GM was one of the first to cash in on SUV popularity in the late 90s and early 2000s.

    "was one of the first" == "not the first". Seems to me Ford was the one who launched the SUV craze with the Explorer.
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    So what vahicles do you think fall into the "rebadged" category then?

    Those that are rebadged!! None of those in production.

    But there are some others that have minor revisions (badges, fascias) that make it what folks refer to as re badged:

    colorado/canyon
    torrent/equinox
    Yukon/Tahoe
    Cobalt/G5 (only 2 door version)

    Of the above I feel only the large SUVs were a huge mistake. With all the volume they sell they could have made them look different. They have multiple tools for the sheet metal and it would have only taken some design/engineering time.

    Colorado/Canyon is such a small volume and nobody cared about small trucks when they were introduced. The Torrent was put in to make up for a hole at the GMC/Pontiac dealerships. The next ones will be different (actually I doubt here will be a Pontiac version). The G5 was another hole at GM-no sportier samll 2 door coupe. Again a last minute filler.
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    Judging from my experience with the Saturn Auras, I think my comparison is about right. New Malibu = Fusion = last gen camry = current gen accord.

    I know anybody can have an opinion and there is variation in desires (otherwize we would all drove the same car and they would all be the same) of the above the Aura is rated higher than the current generation Camry by the leading auto media in this country. In their educated opinion the current gen Aura is better than the current gen Camry. And from the ones who have driven the new Malibu it is better than the Aura. But again there will be lots of opinions.

    Again, the last one getting to the market being the Malibu.

    Funny, next year the new Accord will be out and it will be the last one to market. boy Honda is behind.
  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    In the 1960s we only bought GMC at Pacific Telephone. Not sure when they became clones.

    It was an incremental process 1964-74, approximately.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    This is what Edmunds considers to be Twinned Vehicles for '06-'07 models.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    Yeah, I'd agree with that list too, and I'd add the Lambdas... :blush:
  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    From the list:
    Nissan 350Z, Infiniti G35 coupe

    Um, the G35 has a back seat and the Z doesn't.

    They also left off a lot of the nondomestic twins: Camry and ES, Accord and TL, Sonata and Optima, Accent and Rio, Elantra and Spectra, xA and Yaris, etc.
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    They also left off a lot of the nondomestic twins: Camry and ES, Accord and TL, Sonata and Optima, Accent and Rio, Elantra and Spectra, xA and Yaris, etc.

    Okay, Bumpy. These cars look alike. :confuse:

    DrFill
  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    If the Mazda6 and Fusion count as twins, then so do those.
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    The Accord sedan is this year for release date and the coupe is next year. At least I think so. New Malibu will steal the light, and the Aura will back off the stage. Which may be OK as the paid audience is low anyway.
    Loren
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    But I am. :blush:

    DrFill
  • chuckhoychuckhoy Member Posts: 420
    A legend in your own mind. ;)
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    I don;t think the Accord and TL qualify. Honda has done a good job differentiating the Accord from both the larger TL and the smaller TSX. Over in the UK, sure, the Accord is a TSX. Here, it has a different engine, completely different styling, a 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder that have less power than the comparable TL or TSX. The 4 cylinder models only have 5 speeds as opposed to the S2k's 6 speed gearbox in the TSX. I guess the TL to the Accord is like the ES to the Avalon to me. Now Civic/RSX? Sure those were close...
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    If the Mazda6 and Fusion count as twins, then so do those.

    I really wouldn't consider the Mazda6 to be a twin to those other cars, but more like a cousin. The Fusion/Milan/Zephyr (or whatever they call it these days, I lost track) are pretty much badge engineering jobs of each other, and while they're derived from the Mazda6, it's not all that obvious.

    It's about as much of a "twin" as Lemko's '89 Brougham and my '76 Grand LeMans, which are derived from the same platform, but look different as night and day.

    I'd say "twinning" is just another euphemism for "badge engineering". Something like a Camry/Avalon/ES350 is what I'd call "platform sharing". Likewise I'd call the LaCrosse/Impala/Monte Carlo/Grand Prix to be "platform sharing".

    I always considered badge engineering to be just changing the easy stuff, like grille inserts, or nowadays plastic front fascias, taillights, interior vinyl/leather/fabric/carpet textures, etc. But once you start making substantial changes to the sheetmetal, dashboards, etc, that becomes platform sharing.

    And I think in some instances, a platform can be both badge-engineered and platform-shared. For instance, looking back to GM's downsized '77+ big cars. For the most part, they all had unique sheetmetal, interiors, dashboards, etc. If you got the fender on your Impala smashed, you couldn't just go to the junkyard and get one off of a Catalina, Delta, or LeSabre, because there was just enough difference that it wouldn't interchange. Now maybe the doors did interchange, I dunno.

    Pontiac ditched its big cars after 1981, but then once demand for them returned, it issued the Parisienne. Now this thing was basically just a badge-engineered Impala. The dashboard was out of the Impala/Caprice, just with the four gauge cutouts being round instead of square. It used an Impala rear-end, with the Impala's tightly-spaced 3-taillights replaced with a generic one-piece job with horizontal stripes. And up front, the Impala's horizontal 3-bar grille with a lattice background was replaced with a Pontiac split grille.
  • chetjchetj Member Posts: 324
    that is pretty ballsy...the aura must be a pretty decent car for them to do that
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    When they say they share interior componentry to be "twinned" then the Es and Camry do not qualify. Same with the Accord/TL. To many interior differences. Lamdas do though. No idea on hte rest since I would not be in any of them.

    I sure would not put the corvette and XLR in that category. Differetn interiors. In fact in looking at the list I would say it is pretty inconsistent.
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    For the 2008 model year, Toyota has cut the price of its Camry Hybrid by $1,000, or 3.8 percent, to $25,860, including destination charges.
    To hit the new price, Toyota cut back on some standard features. The 2007 model featured alloy wheels, JBL audio system, leather steering wheel and shift knob, and electrochromic mirror with compass and Homelink. For 2008, content has been dialed back to steel wheels, single-disc CD player, urethane shift knob and steering wheel, and manual day/night mirror.


    A little off the subject BUT Camry hybrid price dropped by $1000!!!! Wow what a price drop. BUT they also dropped aluminum wheels, premium sound system, leather stuff, homelink and electrochromic mirrors. Hate to tell you but all that adds up to a more than $1000 MSRP. So in actuality they put a price increase in and allowed some folks to afford a hybrid. Sounds to me like they just cut content and allowed a baser model to be available with the hybrid.
  • advequityguyadvequityguy Member Posts: 138
    GM sells thousands of diesel trucks in CA. Any car maker can sell diesels if they meet the emissions standards.

    Technically, the Isuzu diesel that is used in the 3/4 and 1 ton Chevy diesel trucks doesn't meet the current Federal standards for emissions. They get around this problem by using engines manufactured before 1-1-07 in their current production trucks, as the new Federal rules apply only to engines made after 1-1-07, not the actual truck.

    ....last to the market again? you see a theme here?
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I guess it would be better to be last than to have a mess like Ford has with their diesel HD trucks. And where is the Toyota diesel everyone was talking about two years ago for the Tundra? Are you saying that all the GM diesel trucks on the ground are using pre 2007 built engines?

    Have you ever heard the term "They saved the Best for Last"?

    I have no interest in a fire breathing diesel guzzling truck. I am waiting for the more practical diesel PU trucks to arrive. They are available all over the World except for one third World Country. The good ole USA.

    Yes WE have fallen behind. Not just GM but all the automakers that sell vehicles in this country except Jeep, VW & MB.

    So we shall see who is last to the market as no one is here yet with what many of us want. Who will be last with a 1/2 ton diesel PU truck to all 50 states? My bet is Nissan just after Toyota. The Big 3 will beat the foreign devils to the market.
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    Cadillac said its redesigned 2008 CTS, which hits showrooms in
    late August, will start at $32,990, including a $745 destination charge.

    In comparison, the 2007 Lexus IS 350 starts at $36,420, including a $715
    destination charge. Cadillac noted that the 2007 CTS with a 3.6-liter V6
    started at $33,530.

    The 2008 CTS gets several upgrades for the new model year, including a
    263-horsepower 3.6-liter V6, a redone cabin with "hand-crafted accents,"
    standard 17-inch wheels and tires, and a Bose eight-speaker sound system.
    Other new standard items for '08 include Stabilitrak and a tire-pressure
    monitoring system.

    Lexus has not yet announced pricing on its 2008 IS 350.

    What this means to you: Cadillac keeps the momentum going with a palatable
    price tag on the new CTS.
  • advequityguyadvequityguy Member Posts: 138
    Sir,

    Can we be reasonable? This coming from the same automotive press that touted the Olds Intrigue? The same one that made the Dodge CIrrus car of the year? The same that made the trailblazer the SUV of the year?.....

    The Saturn Aura is a fine, high quality mid-size car that is worthy of consideration, and I'm sure the Malibu will be a fine car as well, but world beaters they are not.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    The number one selling car in the USA is hardly a world beater. It is just a beater for going to work and back. Down to the mall to get your doors all dinged up by some low life in another CamCord. They are not on the market to appeal to the same demographic that buys an LS460L or an S500. You get what you pay for.
  • advequityguyadvequityguy Member Posts: 138
    Wow. I must have struck a nerve with the whole "using old engines" thing.

    Ford is having problems with their fire breathing diesel guzzling truck? I dunno, seems to me like they're working just fine. Strong as all get out to boot. And in compliance with current emissions laws. Go figure: upgrade to a much stronger engine and meet new emissions requirements at the same time. I dont know if you've seen any speculation on the subject, but according to my sources, the GM Isuzu diesel is having power output issues while being made to comply with the new regulations. I dont think they're saving the best for last, brother. They're just simply being last to the market, again.

    I believe that all US automakers are behind the curve on small diesel engines when compared to the VW diesels, no doubt about that. I dont really get the whole MB diesel thing though. I mean, wouldn't it make more sense to buy something other than a MB if you were interested in economy than buying a fuel efficient diesel MB? I'm thinking that if I want and can afford a MB, I could give a damn if gas prices go up a nickel.

    As for a small diesel for 1/2 ton trucks, I believe you are correct there as well. I believe Ford and GM will hit the market with that in the 2009 model year, and that should be a huge success. Then again, a huge success by a US automaker in a market they already dominate isnt really gaining any ground. If GM and Ford took a third of the truck business from Toyota and Nissan, I dont think it would make a whole lot of difference, but at least GM would be the first (or nearly first) to the market with something.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    "The number one selling car in the USA is hardly a world beater. It is just a beater for going to work"

    I like that! Cool saying that pretty much sums it all up!
  • drfilldrfill Member Posts: 2,484
    Getting a Camry might be like getting a good beater.

    Buying a domestic makes you feel like you just got beat. :P

    DrFill
  • louisweilouiswei Member Posts: 3,715
    The non-DI base CTS (the $32,990 one) is comparable to the IS250 but NOT the IS350. IS350 is the top of the line IS and is comparable to the DI 300HP version of the 2008 CTS.

    The 2007 Lexus IS250 starts at $32,190, including the Delivery, Processing & Handling Fee of $765.

    Just trying to keep the record straight...
  • brightness04brightness04 Member Posts: 3,148
    Yup, hybrids are going mainstream. I just read a recent number that shows the monthly Camry sales includes 11% hybrids! Yah, it's time to mainstream-price these beasties. The uptake is going fast. GM better bring out their hybrid answers soon.
  • louisweilouiswei Member Posts: 3,715
    So Toyota is making its hybrids attractive to the masses instead of just niche products...

    Way to go, yota!
  • brightness04brightness04 Member Posts: 3,148
    Ouch, that tagline is brutal :-) Is GM feeling like, hmm, fleet sales are better than no sales at all again?? At this rate, resale value ain't gonna matter much 'cuz everyone and their dogs are bringing in new and improved cars at lower prices in the coming years.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Ouch, that tagline is brutal

    lol, I didn't even make the fleet connection.

    Apologies if I already linked this in here:

    Reality Check: Consumer Enthusiasm for Hybrids Cools
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I have not really followed the large truck business for a couple years. Our 2005 Ford one ton diesels were horrible. We had two Excursions with the same 6.0L engine and at least one of our trucks was in the shop at any given time. Mostly sensors and check engine lights. It was mostly in very cold weather in the Arctic. I have not read much negative about the Duramax or Cummins diesel engines. I really had no idea any of them were having issues with emissions. Most of the people around here pull all that crap off and put straight exhaust. Chip up the power. No smog checks for diesels in CA so why worry about it. Even with the big diesel premium they sell quite well. I could not get the deal on a diesel when I ended up with this GMC hybrid. I should have not been so cheap and paid the difference.

    The reason I want a MB diesel SUV is range. The gassers are horrible. I like driving diesel engines better. More low end torque which is much better for cruising down the highway. I have owned a MB and VW diesel in the last two years and they were both good to drive and got great mileage. If GM comes out with a diesel SUV or PU I like I may buy. If not I will switch. No more gassers for me.
  • brightness04brightness04 Member Posts: 3,148
    IMHO, it's all part and parcel of the adoption process for a new technology. Consumers are gradually weaning from their fantasy projections when it was still vaporware, and start to face the reality. Remember how the arrival of PC's were supposed to cook dinner for us within a few years? I'm not holding my breath waiting, even after two decades. At this stage, hybrids price/value should not be appealing to even 50% of consumers . . . charging less than making it unappealing to all but the 10-15% that the current production capacity can satisfy is leaving money on the table, and short-changing the R&D funds for the next generation. It's like the $5000 PC in 1982. Only those really good at running Lotus 1-2-3 for book keeping, and well-heeled hobbists needed apply. Over time however, the technology price will come down and value will increase. 11% market penentration (among all Camry's sold) is quite impressive this early in the game.
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    They'll have a couple good cars on the lot for resale value ;) Do note that they do not buy the V6 models, though after driving the i4 Accord I found it to be as enjoyable a performer as the 3.5V6 Aura, so in that respect they compare. I imagine the Camry i4 to be a bit sluggish. And I am sure no one considers discounting in the game or proper choices of models, but then again, it is in their park, so it becomes their game. I am pretty sure I know what went wrong with the Aura launch and continuing sales, but no one would believe me here, so I am sealing up the lips.
    Loren
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Ah, I see, name calling those which buy other products will help your cause. Great debate so far. :confuse:
    Loren
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Now I am really confused, are we talking about the Impala or the Grand Prix?

    :P
    Loren
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    An article on the Aura link new sales approach. They say it is working. Take a look at the numbers - you decide. They are planning to do this with the New Malibu too. Interesting. Comparison cars being New Accord (i4?), Camry(i4?), and ??? How about the Aura, and G6 too -- just kidding.
    Loren
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    An article on the Aura link new sales approach. They say it is working.

    Great idea. Perhaps they could put Fits and Yaris's next to the Aveo in the Chevy dealers, too. Chevy is on the offensive!
  • cooterbfdcooterbfd Member Posts: 2,770
    Rob,

    Ford got their lunch handed to them in '88 and '89 by the 4 dr. S-10 Blazer. Explorer came out in '90 (the rest is history). 4 dr Tahoe came out in '94 or '95, Expedition came out in '97. Suburban came out in 1936. The ONLY answer to it was the old International Travelall until the Excursion in'98.

    Excursion=bye-bye
    Suburban= sells well (relatively speaking)
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Seaside , CA has a huge auto mall for one stop shopping. Most every make within walking distance. You can try out loads of cars. They have used cars too, so you could see what a particular car is like after ten to twenty thousand on her.

    So what next, Cadillacs, BMWs, Mercedes, Lexus, Infinity and Acura cars available to test drive at your local Cadillac.

    Seems like Saab should be selling now with higher gas prices. Our local Caddy dealership sells those now. Is this the proper mating of lines? If Pontiac is soon to be the performance division, then Saab? If Saturn is collecting those previously looking abroad for cars, then Saab? Seems like there are a lot of Buick + Pontiac dealerships, but the Buick line is suppose to be near luxury (maybe FWD near luxury). So you have salespeople selling totally different cars. But then again one must go back to Chevy & Pontiac both having performance cars, like the Camaro and Corvette, the Solstice & GTO (all Holdens). Clearly defined, Pontiac would get the sports cars and Chevy the entry level cars for the masses. Seems to me Buick + Cadillac dealerships make some sense, Then Chevy, GMC trucks and Pontiac under one roof. Move Saturn into a new name of Saturn International sales as an importer, while making those Euro cars, like Opel and Saab here and selling under their branded names abroad.
    Loren
  • cooterbfdcooterbfd Member Posts: 2,770
    Loren, I'm starting to see a few "GM Auto Malls" here in the NE, where they sell most every GM make.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    A good place to rate and review the auto malls is in Edmunds' new dealer ratings module.

    and now back to the regularly scheduled programming....
  • lweisslweiss Member Posts: 342
    Actually, I believe that the SUV craze was really started by the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The idea of taking a Jeep Wagoneer or Jeep Cherokee or a Jeep anything and making it luxurious and sporty pre-dated anything Ford or GM did.
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Well I don't care to rate auto malls, but will suggest that it is the ultimate GM comparison test done right. If you can get to a mall, all the cars are in one place and you can drive them and see them, almost side by side. The advantage is that you also can get the proper information ( or what should be proper information and often is not ) on the car being tested from the supplier of that car, and not some b.s. ( once again, could be b.s. anyway, but ya know what I mean ).

    Loren
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    That's right, sort of the first status symbol SUV too, like the Escalade Tahoe. I do recall how fancy they looked compared to an army jeep or a work truck.
    Loren
This discussion has been closed.