Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Comments
The handling will be closer to the Benz and BMW the original poster was used to in his current cars, but the interior is definitely not at Euro-luxury levels. Still, it's a really nice package that is pretty big inside and quite small outside - only about 3 inches longer than the BMW 3-series but two inches narrower - and has a lot more space and a third row. And still great handling.
Doesn't the government now require kids to be in car seats until they are like 8?
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
I'm looking for something that can carry 5 people and gets good gas mileage since my daily commute is 65 miles R/T. Also I am 6'4" tall and not in the mood to be shoe horned into a sub-compact. I'm most likely looking at a mid-size sedan but am open to other suggestions. Looking to spend less than $14,000. Unfortunately, my car does not qualify for the "Clunker" bill.
I tend to keep my cars a long time (high mileage) so a car with a history of reliability is important. Any suggestions???
What do you consider good gas mileage? If you want 30+ mpg, that limits us considerably more than 22mpg.
How about a V6 Charger? The 3.5liter 5-speed auto should hold up pretty well, I think. I'm sure mileage will be low 20s, though.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
Basically i am looking for a 4 cylinder. Like the power of a V6 but gas will probably be back to $4 in summer 2010. Quite honestly, the 4 cylinder is probably enough for me. So 27-29 mpg on my daily commute. I managed 24-26 with the Intrigue.
Not a fan of Chrysler cars.
Although ... if you tried real hard, you could achieve high 20s in a 525i.
Of course, a $14k 525i won't last you as long as a $14k Accord.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
With a family of five, I think the Taurus or Impala would be a good choice, but I have no idea what sort of mileage they get.. Isn't the smallest engine choice a 6-cylinder?
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Sonata has as much room as Accord, just as reliable, and has better gas mileage.
Any thoughts on the Camry?
Both Taurus and Impala are 6 cylinders. Plus I am not sure I can get a newer Taurus for under $14k without a ton of miles.
Used car shopping is harder than new car shopping.
Anyway, I've found quite a few '06-'07 Accord SE's in your price range. I looked at an '07 with 40k miles that the dealer basically came down to $14,000 pretty easily. Also, lots of private seller ones out there on craigslist/autotrader etc. in that price range. I also got a price on an '05 EX in pristine condition for $10,800 but it had 70k miles. Still a pretty good deal IMHO. The nice thing about the Accords is that (at least today) they're still worth stupid money with 150k+.
I assumed I couldn't get an 2007 Accord for that price. the sticker prices for these vehicles are pretty high on dealer's lots. 40k miles on a vehicles like this doesn't bother me since I will likely keep it over 150k miles.
Appreciate the help. I'll try to test drive a Ford 500 and Impala this weekend to see if I should keep them on the list.
I think in some places a new 2009 Fusion/Milan has been going for $5000-6000 off MSRP, which I believe would put some versions in that range also. I don't know what kind of availability there is any more, though.
'24 Chevy Blazer EV 2LT
- Good engine. Nearly identical to the V6 in the Camry(which is a copy of the GM design in many ways, actually)
- Similar to the Camry but without the resale value(read - LOADS cheaper used)
- Back seat that is big enough. You can fit 5 adults pretty easily in it.
- Really nice on long trips.
- Gets about 27-28mpg combined.
- Basically a better, smoother Intrigue.
*A 2007 LaCrosse CXS is the modern version, IMO. 3.6VVT engine, Cadillac CTS suspension - a real sleeper that everyone overlooked. Avoid the other trim lines though - ick. Just not the same.
Also can be had with a *bench* seat, which gives you a 6th seat(yay!) and loads more roomy feel.
You won't even spend $12K on one. Try that with an Accord or Camry.
EDIT - No, really - the engine and suspension is way way WAY different and there's no throttle lag. It handles nicely, too. Like a CTS with front wheel drive. And 2007 because that's when they started their 100K drive train warranty.
Yes, it's not a 4 cylinder, but it will fit 5-6 people comfortably and get nearly 4 cylinder mileage. The only other option would be the new Jetta Deisel. But that's half as reliable as the GM, to be honest. And the GM costs a lot less to repair as well.(VWs are as a rule pricey to fix and break more often)
I would also second the motion for an '06 or '07 Accord; I'd also suggest looking into an '07 or '08 Altima, but you might have some difficulty finding an '08 Altima for under $14K. I average about 30 MPG w/ my '08 Altima (4-cylinder) so you should be fine if you choose that route.
The LaCrosse is an interesting perspective; might be a bit hard to find the CXS model that plekto recommends; the majority that I see on the market are CX and CXLs, basically rental fleet specials.
So I have been looking around but I do not see anything that really turns me on. I looked at '08-'09 Cadillac STS v6. Would possibly work as it is pretty quiet and drives well, I am worried about the cost of ownership over a couple years. It does run on regular, gets 26 (epa), and the v6 felt peppy enough. The seats just were not to my liking. Too firm, too cheap feeling, too wide. I slid on the seats through the corners. The "new" cadillac has definitely been cheapened.
I am going to drive a Buick Enclave. I sat in one and the seats felt great. I was not impressed with the plastic wood though. Will have to see if it has enough pep for me.
I am also going to drive the new Toyota Venza. Only looked at those online. Both of these vehicles are Front wheel drive which I do not really care for. I hate the torque steer.
So to summarize, Clean, somewhat luxurious, extremely QUIET interior is a must. Got to have pretty decent power, room enough for my samples, and I am a bicycle enthusiast so I have to be able to fit a hitch to it for a rack. Of course fuel mileage is important as it is one of my largest expenses.
Suggestions????
Thanks!!!
6 adults fit nicely into ours with the front bench seat.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Yes they do
The center front seat back holds forward for a storage unit - and the entire thing really has as much usable room as the floor console. I know, I checked
It's *way* roomier than a Sonata or Accord. You can actually fit three car seats in the rear, though it's a tight fit, I'll grant you.
http://l.yimg.com/dv/izp/buick_lacrosse_cxs_2008_dashboard_dashboard.jpg
This is the normal layout
http://images.autotrader.com/images/2009/5/30/257/578/11770622773.257578641.IM1.- 08.565x421_A.562x421.jpg
This is the bench. Awesome cup holder as well.
http://images.autotrader.com/images/2009/5/30/257/578/11770622771.257578641.IM1.- 06.565x421_A.562x421.jpg
That center section on the floor/up front is actually the front half of the seat bottom that flips forward. Flipped back and the center down it's completely open across the floor.
I don't know, though, if you could get the CXS trim with a bench seat other than an actual custom order option. I did hear of a few people who had that ordered, but They're probably either urban legend/sales BS, or unobtanium.
Just stay away from the over-powered FWD V6's and that should not be a problem. (I don't know if the specific vehicles you mentioned are available wit a 4 cylinder.)
Edmunds does not think very highly of the LaCrosse. BTW, the backseat in the Jetta is too small.
I'm test driving over the next week to eliminate some cars.
I'm 6'5" and had no problem with my '06 Accord. I didn't even have to put it back all the way. However, that's with a power seat. I find that I need the power seat in most cars, no matter how large, so I can fit comfortably.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
I would also suggest a Lexus ES350 if you're considering a Caddy STS. Also think about a regular old Ford Taurus (aka the Ford Five Hundred)
And if you are willing to buy new, a well equipped Honda Accord EX might fit the bill; plenty of room, and you can choose the 4-cylinder model for better fuel economy or the V6 for more power. (with still decent gas mileage)
In fact, you might be better off going with a new one. They seem to be selling for well below invoice and in the $17-$18K range, if my memory serves me right from the prices paid board.
Of course, the 2.5SL and 3.5 models get much pricier, and in my opinion, the 2.5S is the best buy. If you want a power driver's seat, toss in an additional $800-$1000 for the convenience package (also includes steering wheel audio controls and a few other smaller things).
Wife doesn't care too much about what car I get but she gave a definitive "No" to the Buick LeSabre.
Thanks again.
This is my first post here. I'm new to car ownership (despite being 30 years old! - I'm from NYC), so I'm trying to learn all I can since I've relocated to the Midwest where car ownership is a requirement.
I'm in IL, where the winters are bitter and brutal. I survived this winter, but I've seen highways and driveways littered with car casualties who couldn't get by in the snow. As I understand, AWD and 4WD cars are great for snowy environments like where I live, but most of the ones I've seen in my research are SUVs, or rather slow cars. I prefer performance cars, but most of them are not only not AWD, but they're often not even front wheel drive. It seems the few AWD cars with good performance are well outside my budget.
So what I would like to know is your opinions or recommendations on car models that meet the following criteria:
1. AWD/4WD
2. acceleration - 0-6 in less than 7 seconds
3. kbb value of $15,000 or less based on less than 70,000 miles of use
4. Generally good performance in winter conditions
5. Comparatively low maintenance - either good reliability reputation, or fairly inexpensive to repair.
6. Average insurance cost
Ideally, I'm hoping for a model no older than 03, though I'm certainly flexible. I'm also flexible on all of the criteria except the first three.
What do you think? Is it hopeless?
thanks so much in advance!
I just started researching what SUV I should go for..I want to decided based on following
1. 5 seater or 7 seater (Planning kids next year..)
2. new or used one
3. What features I should be looking for?
My price range is from 20K to 30K.
Helpful links and suggestions greatly appreciated.
Or you *might* consider a Tacoma 4x4. It's "fun" in another way as it's a real off-road vehicle as opposed to a yuppie SUV. Manual transmission of course. It may go 0-60 in about 8 seconds, but with manual, it *flies* in and out of traffic because you can keep it wound up and in gear. A typical automatic takes almost a full second to figure out what you want, shift down, and rev up and start moving.
This is often referred to as "wide-open-throttle lag"
So in actual driving, just getting *anything* with a manual transmission instantly turns it into a car that feel sporty and quick in real life driving. This is even true with a 4x4 truck.
As for the Subaru WRX, make mine a wagon with a stick! :shades:
And I'd still recommend snow tires even if you go with AWD. An AWD with all-seasons is only marginally better than a FWD with snow tires....and that's only when starting. The snow tires will stop and turn better regardless of AWD or FWD.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
For me, it's not so much wanting a fast car for the cool factor, but I just really, really hate trying to change lanes in traffic and always being beaten to the punch by faster cars. So it's specifically about zipping through traffic easily - with the limitation that it would have to be with an automatic.
In the absence of AWD options, if there are cars with strong acceleration that in your experience handle well in snowy conditions, even if they're not specifically AWD, I'd appreciate those recommendations as well.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S
But I agree, a 2003-2004 G35x with 70k miles or less would be my dream car.
Now, I just saw a 2001 CL 600 V12 with 80k miles for $13999. That sounds like a dream come true, but it's 80,000 miles, and I wonder what the maintenance costs would be on a car like that and what the insurance cost would be (if it's hugely different than, say, a G35).
I wouldn't touch that with a ten foot pole if you have any concern about repair cost. There's a reason they're so cheap! The people that can afford to fix them can afford to buy new ones.