By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Another example is the change from LSD (up to 500 ppm) to ULSD (15 ppm on down) The TBN, (12 in the case of Delvac One 5w40 aka Mobil One Truck & SUV 5w40), not 6 mo ago was a VERY important measure: while still important, another important metric was, still is the SOOT LOADING 1.5-3% upper level); to the TBN. So if you got soot loading (for any number of reasons) it was important to have a good (reserve) TBN to neutralize acid production due to soot loading. Since soot loading is/was caused primary by higher sulfur PPM, what does one think happens to the soot loading metric when soot is now structurally 97% LESS?? !!! Again a reason why TBN (using ULSD) lasts/stays higher so much longer!
So for example a high quality oil (Delvac One 5w40, aka Mobil One Truck and SUV 5w40) was almost total overkill for a 10,000 mile OCI, was a lock for a 20,000 mile OCI with LSD. Now with 97% less sulfur ppm, a 25,000 mile OCI is a belt and suspenders kind of interval!! This is without bypass oil filtration!! If one adds bypass oil filtration:? CLEAN CLEAN CLEAN, longer longer longer.
Can I go to 500,000 to 1,000,000 miles? Those are my goals, and time will tell. Can it go to 500,000 miles to 1,000,000 miles with bypass oil filters? That would also be the goal and time will tell, also. What I do know for sure: if I keep the OCI's the same (25,000 miles), the oil with the bypass oil filtration will indeed be cleaner. Do I think it makes a difference? Absolutely!! Do I think it is statistically significant? Probably. Has it been positively correlated?.... NO! Does either scenario make longer term economic sense? I hope so. I know logically, but truly, I do not really know practially. All we can reasonably expect to do is given the goal, stack the odds in ones' favor!?
Best Regards,
Shipo
How will you use a Pella if the trend to omit the dipstick really
takes hold? Are you still moving to Hong Kong?
Ummm, I won't.
"Are you still moving to Hong Kong?"
Nope, it looks like the move is off as my Mrs. Shipo's company is being sold.
Fast forward to late August when we were exploring the island as well as Kowloon, I repeatedly caught him walking into things with a wide eyed look on his face while gazing at the local young ladies. Finally he admitted, "Dad, uhhh, I think some of these asian girls are pretty hot." :shades:
Best Regards,
Shipo
No takers on this question?
So these 2 oils are pretty much seen as equals? Nobody thinks one is even a little better than the other? lol And anyone had any luck finding Mobil 1 0W30?
The real keys are there statistical correlations!!?? Practically speaking, are the premiums worth the performance?
So for example, if @ PAR, I would convert all 5w30 applications to 0w30 in a heartbeat. Given premium, does the (so called ) performance advantage pencil out?
45,000 miles ago, I decided to go from the oem filled 5w20 conventional oil to 0w20 Mobil One. So I bought a supply of 1 qt bottles at discount. I have been getting between 38-42 mpg. Now I did notice (beginning with the first tankful) an IMMEDIATE jump in the RANGE of mpg (1-3 mpg) Now because of the decision to switch, I have not done an A/B test (but have noticed a distinct difference) let alone an A/B and BACK to A test.
I just recently bought some 5 qt containers of 5w20 Mobil One @ 23 bux and change. My perception is no premium or @ par to the 0w20. So it will be a no brainer to do the next oil change interval (20,000 miles) to see if there is a performance difference due to the viscosity difference of 0w20 vs 5w20. I swag little to no difference.But if there will be, I would anticipate 1-2 mpg difference.
So it is up to YOU (me, in my case) to decide whether the viscosity is worth either the premium or the discount.
Actually I was just interested if anyone had a preferance between the 2 oils.
Interesting article
..."LongLife Service regimes
The LongLife Service regime is so called because there are no set service intervals and, depending on how you drive your vehicle, and the conditions of use, a service will be required anywhere between 9,000 miles or 12 months (whichever occurs first), up to a maximum of 20,000* miles or 24 months (whichever occurs first)."...
http://www.vw.co.uk/assets/Longlife_servicing.pdf
With a little more information I can provide you with oil and oil filter recommendations for your Honda. AMSOIL continually outperforms not only petroleum based products but all major synthetic competitors as well. Overall AMSOIL is the best lubrication not only for automotive purposes but in industrial, farm, compressors, and much much more!
Shipo and Ruking maybe y'all can help me here.
The Sandman
Oh geez, here we go again, another Amsoil zealot who's had too much Kool-Aid to drink.
Dude, the only entity that says that Amsoil outperforms all of its competition is Amsoil and those who hawk their products. Please, before you start with the usual Amsoil rhetoric, bilge we've heard here on this board time and time again, go over to the BITOG web site and get yourself schooled by browsing through the UOA databases. In there you will see a huge body of evidence that shows that in the real world, Amsoil performs no better than any of the full Synthetic (i.e. Group IV, PAO based) oils currently on the market, and in many cases worse.
FWIW, even though Amsoil seems to be a fairly decent product (although very much overprices compared to the competition), due to the deceptive marketing tactics and blatant falsehoods that they use to sway the uninformed, I will not use their products and I will not recommend them to anybody else. The simple truth is that many of us abhor the noise that comes out of the Amsoil camp, and more than anything else, I believe that is what holds them back from becoming a truly successful company.
Best Regards,
Shipo
I have been hearing some real good things about their EA bypass oil filter product, but bypass oil filter products usually appeal to a very very very limited market/audience. Also this product is VERY pricey (if there is such a word)
WalMart's (current) $23 for a Mobil One 5w20 (can be used in your Civic if I remember correctly) 5qt jug/4.60 per qt is a metric I would consider if you are even remotely considering a like Amsoil product. I bought my last two containers in tax free OR. 2 containers should easily last me 20,000 miles x 2 for 40,000 miles. :shades: Might need a timing belt and water pump change at that point.
Bill
As a fast answer, I would use Mobil One 0w40 and oem, Mann or Mahle oil filters.
https://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/MotorOil/Oils/Mobil_1_0W-40.aspx
You might also review the technical data updates for the latest recommendations for oil specifications. Rest assured however the Mobil One0w40 meets and exceeds the ..."VW 502.00/505.00/503.01"...specifications in force at the time. The latest specifications are the VW 507.... which (selectively) are backwards compatible.
As for the Amsoil zelots the true gains in using the product is the longer OCI the oil is built to support, if you stay with under 5,000 or even 7,500 mile OCI's then the extra cost does not justify its use. If you can run the 25,000 miles for the ASL or even the 35,000 miles of the SSO oils then yes I would say Amsoil "outperforms" the other oils
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=1035939#- Post1035939
It is pushing 60,000 miles at the so called elevated mpg. It was my intention to run the full OEM recommended OCI interval (10,000 miles) as per Honda recommendation, AND to switch and STAY with Mobil One 0w20 to 5w20 (group IV). So in that sense, it was NOT/never an A/B experiment. However, there is NO doubt in my mind that I would LOSE (avg over another 10,000 miles OCI) mpg, upon switch back to a conventional 5w20. Additionally passed the meager warranty period I run 20,000 miles OCI's. Again for the additional 10,000 miles, same/same (watching paint dry here comes to mind) mpg. i.e., no change.
Best Regards,
Shipo
Baring the doubling is understanding the modifying variables.
So almost a sub variable but might be considered a main variable:
1. a percentage increase due to the greater "sump" with the addition of a bypass oil SYSTEM
2. use of a bypass oil filter.
3. Refreshment is NORMAL but "refreshment" for any condition indeed alters dilution rates, etc. Again, not a BAD thing.
So indeed at BEST the documentation is sloppy. With no response to inquires, I would concur with your assessment.
So? I use a Pela 650 dipstick oil extractor. Who cares? The fact is that to do six UOAs, six oil samples HAD to be removed from the engine and sent off for destructive analysis. I use oil analysis too and trust me; they don't send your oil back to you when they're done with it. So, either he's lying about having the UOAs done in the first place, or he ran his engine low (doesn't sound probable given the rest of his post), or (most likely) he added oil throughout the 30,000+ miles of the test and then lied about how much he added.
Best Regards,
Shipo
To me, a bit off topic, as the word "synblend" connotes hydrocracked from the less than group IV anyway. I also realize that to some, this might be seen as a personal bias. However, for the record I ran (conventional-"NON synblend ") oem fill, so called "break in oil" for the first 10,000 miles OCI as per OEM Honda recommendation. Indeed if you MUST have a "synblend" you can truly make your own and know EXACTLY the ratio.
In addition, unless you dig much deeper, what is the ratio of hydrocracked, so called "syn" vs normal? It is certainly NOT PLASTERED all over the container!? How is that statistically significant over say MotorCraft 5w20 anyway? So the "NON" hydrocracked conventional oil will do the trick, ESPECIALLY if you do less than 10,000 miles OCI's anyway.
Indeed you might scan the UOA's at BITOG AND the MotorCraft web site to compare and contrast the synblend against the NORMAL MotorCraft 5w20 oil to see if the benefits are worth the premium (why spend 2 per qt when one $ /sub one $ will do? In addition, if you are not going to keep the vehicle beyond 50,000 to 100,000 miles; why are you doing less than 10,000 mile OCI's to begin with?). The normal MotorCraft is good to go to 10,000 mile OCI's for those Ford and Honda specifications (Ford specification being much more stringent than Honda)
In closing if I decided to continue to use conventional oil (5w20 that meets the Ford and Honda specifications of course), I would buy on price. (MotorCraft, ExxonMobil Superflo, etc) ALL (5w20) are robust by virtue of the specification. Are there individual differences? Absolutely!!
Thank you very much for any information!
Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
Son's: 2018 330i xDrive
If I use Mobil 1 motor oil is it necessary to use Mobil 1 filter also? My dealership use $5 oil filter, but Mobil 1 filter cost around $10. Does an oil filter really make a big difference, which like switch from conventional oil to synthetic oil?
Best Regards,
Shipo
Just as an aside, I would go with the premium filter ONLY in the very rare case of the bypass oil filter which actually is manufactured to filter out MUCH smaller sized microns. The trade off is much lower flow, but off CRITICAL line/FLOW, obviously. Another is of course the much higher premium due to higher quality filtering materials, manufacturing costs and MUCH lower production and sales volume.
I really need you guys' suggestions to make the decision in order to have a peace of mind.
I have a friend that has a Toyota Camry with 458,000 miles!! (mostly freeway in a daily long (obviously) commute.
First the good news. On late model engines NO causing of oil leakage due to switching from conventional to synthetic oil.
Caveats:
1. need to make sure there are no existing leaks that are obscured by the conventional oil. If there are, then get the source/s of the leak/s fixed. (you should anyway regardless of the conventional vs synthetic change issue) Synthetic oil is less inclined to so called "plug" minor leaks like conventional oil might.
2. while Toyota denies this, make sure there is no engine sludge formed already in the 33,000 miles of operation using conventional oil. The dealer or yourself can perform the inspection. If you have a good relationship with your dealer, they might even do the inspection free of charge.
Use the lowest viscosity recommended by your oem owners manual or technical data. So for example if it recommends 5w30 to 10w30, use the 5w30.
0w30 viscosity also will do (given it meets the other specifications) .
I would run a MINIMUIM of the oem recommended OCI like for example 7,500 miles. Most dealers in this above example would recommend 3,000 to 5,000 mile OCI's.
For example, I personally have no issues running (on a 2004 Honda Civic with a 10,000 mile oem recommendation with 5w20 conventional oil) 20,000 miles with Mobil One 0w20, 5w20 oil.
1. How do I check the leaks that are plug by the conventional oil? The only thing I do is to check the oil level. The level doesn't change at all since last time I changed the oil 3000 mi ago.
2. I check my engine just by opening the the oil cap and peeking into it. Is it enough? You mentioned to check if there is sludge inside th engine, how does this relate to switching to synthetic oil? (if there is sludge I can switch or if there is no sludge I can switch)
3. The OCI I do with conventional oil is 3000 mi, because most of my driving is cold start in the morning and drive less than 2 mi, cold start again in the afternoon and drive from campus back to my apartment. If I switch to Mobil 1 what OCI do you suggest under the same condition?