Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Synthetic motor oil

1150151153155156175

Comments

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Can we PLEASE keep this discussion far more civil and far less personal?
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    I have no beef with AMS its very good product, in fact Ams dealers make the best Eneos dealers. Ams dose an excellent job of educating consumers/dealers. I find that AMS customers are very open minded, vs M1 customers. Most Ams customers have seen significant increases in fuel economy and OCI's when the switched from M1 or RP to AMS, The same goes for when we switch and AMS customer to ENEOS. For example, our last fleet account we converted from AMS to ENEOS, 25 dump trucks i belive they were 6500 series internationals 16qt sumps. They assumed there were using the best oil for the money, AMS 5w-40 diesel full synthetic. They moved to AMS after using Rotella for years, and were happy and were very intrested to see what eneos would do! 3 trucks were used for the test, Fuel Mileage results were tabulated after 1 week on the 3 trucks with fuel mileage increases of aprox .8 - 1.1 miles per gallon over Ams. We switched from AMS 5-40 to ENEOS 0-50 which should of lost economy due to the thicker weight oil, but did not :) Needless to say all of there vechicals run 0w-50 now, Oil testing was handled by their Diesel service center, which by there own comments, was the best oil they have every used, in a diesel, from every aspect, even price. Yes it cost a little more than the AMS product, but the price increase was compensated in 1 1/2 tanks of fuel. There testing revealed that they could run the same OCI or longer with ENEOS 0w-50 but have decided to keep the intervals the same as when using Ams. Yes the Retail price of 11.49 for 0w-50 sounds steep, but when you buy pallets of 200l drums the price is the same or cheaper, because unlike Ams, Nippon oil has virtually an unlimited supply, they can fill orders of 100KL no sweat, all day long. Toyata buys so much 0w-20 in railcars that nippon had to open up and entire blending facility just to supply there texas TMX plant with lubricants and greases. All toyota tundra 2007+ are factory fill with ENEOS 0w-20 with the orrganic moly FM. If you fill a tundra with M1 0w-20 the tundra will lose about 11ft lbs of torque and 9hp. Thus the main reason why toyota dealers are stocking eneos, and besides the fact that M1 cant even produce it consistantly.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    ..."25 dump trucks i belive they were 6500 series internationals 16qt sumps"...

    So we go from F1 engines to 25 dump trucks.....

    Where did I CLEARLY say I had one or both?

    ..." I find that AMS customers are very open minded, vs M1 customers."...

    Another good strategy, dis M1 customers.

    ..."Yes the Retail price of 11.49 for 0w-50 sounds steep, but when you buy pallets of 200l drums the price is the same or cheaper,"...

    Of course, most folks need 200L drums! Oh by the way make that a pallet!?

    Lets see @.85 qt or 3.22 liter per OCI, @ 20,000 mile OCI... this drum will last 1,242,236 miles. How many drums to a pallet?

    You might have better luck with your approach if you sell to the tuner set. Most seem ok spending 17.69 x more, when 1 will do
  • blufz1blufz1 Member Posts: 2,045
    Thank God I got the M1 Ep last time at Wm! Lol.
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    I have respect for the knowledge and standard respect in general for several members.

    Once the moderators and AMS guys saw how much hoopala there was over ENEOS, excitement of the new cool interesting products, that no one else has.

    They re-nigged our contract with a 10x increase for sponsorship, Thats the BS in talking about.
    And the mud you think im slinging is well known in the industry, and is an industry wide practice. Most oil blenders offer PPB - even Nippon oil, BUT THEY WILL NEVER DETUNE A PRODUCT and sell it under the same brand name, or allow an assumtion that it is the same quality.

    These are actuall quotes from XOM

    In markets where the law requires it, ExxonMobil appears to be listing products as "synthetic", "semi-synthetic", or otherwise consistent with the pertinent laws. There is, therefore, no confusion as to what is or is not "synthetic".

    ExxonMobil manufactures and sells motor oils in various countries worldwide using a variety of formulae. Among the base and blend stocks it uses are hydroisomerized petroleum, polyalphaolefin, diester, polyolester, alkylated napthlenes, and some even more esoteric chemicals such as esterized waxes and vegetable oils.

    Depending on what country the products are sold in, they are termed "semi-synthetic", "synthetic", or something else consistent with that country's laws. For one example, a hydroisomerized petroleum is "synthetic" in North America but is not sold as "synthetic" in the European Union.

    Fully synthetic M1 in Europe is actally REAL SYNTHETIC 100% not the crap we get here... i guess thats what in trying to convey, even XOM admits it.

    There is a BIG difference in the REAL imported M1 you get for your 600s at the mercedes dealer than what you buy at walmart.. Get it ;)
    There is also a BIG differnce in price 5.99 compared to 18.00

    This no joke, no mud, just reality in the capitolist society we live in to day.
    I just liked it alot better when they actually told you on the back bottle that their product was not synthetic. That is honesty :D
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Folks are ok with you addressing the VOA portion. But when you are asked to address the UOA portion and literally ignore it,..... well it is your credibility.

    But hey I need an oil change soon. Send me 3.4 quarts (more if you wish to do UOA's at 3, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20k- another 24 oz I figure) and I will run it and YOU report the UOA's. You want to control the UOA's? No problem, send someone to take the samples and sent them to a lab of your choice. I can do it for you, but you probably wouldn't trust an M1 user. It will be interesting to see in print what you might happen to find. So what is 4/5 quarts (plus however many UOA's you want to run) going to cost you? (certainly less than the 11.50 per quart and at 4 quarts FAR less than $46.) If it tops M1 from an M1 user of over 850,000 miles, wouldn't that be priceless? (besides you can write it off as advertising)

    I wonder if YOU are as open as those AMS and M1 (dealers) customers you rail against?
  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,331
    You still haven't told us your net profit per quart.

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    You've consisently slammed Mobil 1 oil, ExxonMobil and their customers, and now you appear to be inventing "proofs" that support the stuff you've been laying on us.

    Regarding your claims that the Mobil 1 0W-40 sold in Europe and the Mobil 1 0W-40 sold here in the States, I find those allegations exceedingly dubious. I also find it interesting that VW, a company that has arguably the most stringent oil standards for gasoline engines in the world has publically stated that Mobil 1 0W-40 meets their 503.01. They didn't say "only European Mobil 1 0W-40", or "only Japanese Mobil 1 0W-40", they said Mobil 1 0W-40 in all markets meets 503.01. Similarly, VW doesn't say "Mobil 1 0W-40 from a Mobil gasoline station and NOT from Walmart".

    Until you provide some verifiable substance to the dubious things you've been saying, you will continue to be utterly devoid of credibility around here. That you have a vested interest in discrediting Mobil 1 and advancing the opinion of Eneos doesn't help your cause either.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Over 200,000 dollars and less than 46 dollars aint happening either. :lemon: :sick:
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    ..."Thank God I got the M1 Ep last time at Wm! Lol. "...

    Not to get off topic ;) , but how is that working out for you? :shades:
  • altair4altair4 Member Posts: 1,469
    Im stuck working a booth the Fast lube convention in vegas today...
    Im going to mosie on down to mobils booth...


    They're down at booth 505, looks like 3 aisles over 4 rows down from your booth 134. Be sure to post up that PPB info, mmmkay?
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    Im not trying to beat up M1 users as it is a good product/especially for the money.

    I'm not going to say anything else about M1, as i have it in my garage as well, im not trying to talk bad about M1 just that not all M1 is the same, and the quality of product in the bottle varies depending on where you live, and where you buy it from.

    Honestly, i have not said anything bad about there product. :mad:
    M1 product is great for 90% of the public, but there are plenty of people willing to spend more money for better product.

    Obviously you guys understand the differences im trying to make, but most "NASCAR sheeple" do not. They don't make the connection that just because the bottle says "Fully synthetic" it might not be....

    Nor dose it click that the products they buy at walmart are not the same that they use in the actual racecars. The same crowd of people think 750hp out of V-8 that guzzles leaded gas by the gallon is high tech high performance.

    If your were looking for eneos you can go to there web site and find a dealer near you, note: Only dealers that stock a min of $2500 are listed as authorized dealers. There are a lot of dealers out there about 1000 in the west half of the USA. You will never see ENEOS in any big chains, as they will not make a product at that pricepoint, but 4-5 years from now you will see Nippon Oil Products in big chain stores near you.
  • altair4altair4 Member Posts: 1,469
    You will never see ENEOS in any big chains, as they will not make a product at that pricepoint, but 4-5 years from now you will see Nippon Oil Products in big chain stores near you.

    So, if I'm reading between the lines correctly here, Nippon Oil will PPB something for the masses?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    ..."They have no undertanding on how a oil with a TNB of say 4.8 can out last an AMS oil product with TBN of 12. TBN is everything to them. TBN has nothing to to with the oils ability to be broken down and oxidised by NO and NOx's. "...

    Given the ULSD (15 ppm) this certainly does impart much LESS importance on the 5W40 diesel engine/specification products. However I still want a 12 TBN as most of the UOA's show very low consumption (generate low wear and waste products) Given that LSD WAS up to 500 ppm that was significantly greater soot forming potential.

    However since RUG/PUG is still 30 ppm (min of 2x greater than ULSD) and the specifications for most engines still have oil change intervals recommended from 3,000 to (MAX) 7,500 miles, for the majority of applications it (TBN) STAYS important.

    The ratio is 50 to one!!!!!! (less than 2% of passenger vehicle fleet are diesels)

    There are more esoteric issues with 5w40 but this is glazed eyeballs/brain on sleep mode subject matter.
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    Correct, basicly your standard GRP II/III product something to compete with all the other major brands q-state/havoline/castrol gtx/mobil/ect.. As well prob a CVT and ATF.

    One of the main reasons you haven't seen eneos in North America, is contractual agreements with the OEM's. Untill 2006 if you wanted CVT fluid for your honda/ford/nissan vehicals you would have to go to the respective dealer parts counter, and buy one of those expensive shiny bottles for $24.00 avg. Now you can simply call your parts dealer ie: Baxters or a Myers auto parts and get a replacement fluid for $10. Eneos is also super popular with independant import repair shops that used to have to order there cvt/ATF/0w-20/0w-50 from the dealer and mark it up even more to the customer. Now they buy ENEOS better quality and charge the same price but they get to make the money not the dealer parts counter.
    Oem import fluids have been a monopoly in the usa for a while but now there is different branch in the supply line to bypass the OEMS.
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    I agree

    Sorry guys if i come off the wrong way, im not really an [non-permissible content removed]. I just had 2 much coffee and diet pepsi, man that caffine gets me really snippy.


    Just because i love there product and happen to know alot about there company, and defend em when people say the products crap and is a small no-name snake-oil company.

    How are you guys so sure im at the ENEOS booth. :)
    Just mabey im at the Torco Oils booth... Hmmm
  • blufz1blufz1 Member Posts: 2,045
    Actually, I can't really tell a significant difference. Ep is 8% more dense than M1 and the engine does seem very smooth but within the realm of subjectivity. I would think it not legal to "blend different M1's to different price points" without disclosing the fact,but who knows these days?
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    You would think it would be wrong to PPB, but this is the catch.
    1 Mobil reserves the right to change formulation any time they feel like it.
    2. Mobil 1 is a brand name not a specific formulation.
    3. Due to continual product research and development, the information contained herein is subject to change without notification. (from M1 spec sheet)
    4.Typical Properties may vary slightly. This product data sheet is based on global product data sheets for use with products purchased in the U.S.
    (from M1 spec sheet)

    Damit in supposed to talk about M1 Grrr....
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    What do you guys know about Torco oil's
    SR-1 and SR-5 series lubricants?

    How do you feel about the MPZ FM additive?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    ..."ENEOS 0W-20
    100% synthetic motor oil".....

    ..." Advanced Fully Synthetic Motor Oils..."...

    ..."Features & Benefits:"...

    ..."Group III/IV 100% Fully Synthetic "...

    link title

    What is clear:

    group III ("hydrorefined" to use other Eneos references, however hydro refined might be the more "correct" usage (aka hydro cracked) ) and group IV blended ARE being advertised/marketed by Eneos AS 100% synthetic.

    What is NOT clear: what are the percentages?!

    What is ambiguous: why the no group III/IV references on the Eneos.com web site, BUT on the above link.?!

    (sorry for the "cut,cut,cut and paste" job, I did not want to include the other 99% unrelated to the point, so folks can click on the link to see the WHOLE drill) Further one can click on the various other viscosity products (Eneos).
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    I know the grpIII used is some sort of new GTL based sythoil.

    And the eneos web site is new as of about 2 weeks ago, it seems to have a lot of generic information, and hasen't been fully updated with the current product specs. The old website before the update, had current specs.

    Clearly those are old non us product specs, as they are specking the ECO-STAGE product that is sold over-sea's. Note: the color of the oil is listed as L3 or and orange color.
    ENEOS 0w-20 Is a light golden amber. I have seen the Eco-Stage 0w-20 it's bright orange in the sun.

    I belive the ebay link is correct, as it looks like he cut and pasted from the old website, with correct spec.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    .."Clearly those are old non us product specs"...

    Clearly that perception is CLEARLY wrong, as the Eneos 0w20 product would ship from Henderson NV, which as you know is REAL close to LAS VEGAS (Conventions Center), where you currently are manning a BOOTH @ the SEMA Show!? Just LQQK at the link!? Since Eneos controls WHOM the dealers are .... does the left hand know what the right hand......?
  • blufz1blufz1 Member Posts: 2,045
    Check out the Mobil 1 site. The first answer to the first question states the the product is the same regardless of quart or jug packaging. Not exactly on point,but interesting re the current discussion.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Many folks do not realize that M1 (ExxonMobil) lost the arbitration case to Castrol in its bid for the words "100% synthetic" to actually MEAN PAO IV/V. (Castrol wanted group III hydrocracked to MEAN 100% fully synthetic.

    Now the OTHER side of this means that whatever ExxonMobil hydrocracks (being as how they are one of the worlds most HUGE oil companies', they can now call EVERYTHING group III and hydrocracked = 100% synthetic!!!!????

    They do not !! But...

    Perhaps Eneos feels good about calling their products 100% synthetic because it contains an unknown % of group IV PAO while Castro only uses 100% hydrocrack group III and still calls it 100% synthetic !!?? :shades:
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    ..."Continue normal PM and sample interval."...

    "For those interested, here is my latest UOA with specifics listed below.
    Lab used was Predictive Maintenance Services

    Car: 2004 Jetta GL (PD)
    Miles on car at time of sample: 110,490
    Oil used: Mobil Delvac 1 5w40
    The oil was in the engine from September 28th, 2006 until April 7th, 2007
    Fuel used was almost exclusively BP #2 ULSD (plus 2 tankfuls of Sunoco B20)
    4 ounces of Stanadyne Performance Formula were added at each fill up
    Driving style: easy, with shifts between 2000 and 2500 rpms, and with fewer highway miles than previously driven.

    Iron 57
    Chromium 2
    Lead 6
    Copper 7
    Tin 0
    Aluminum 10
    Nickel 1
    Silver 0
    Boron 21
    Sodium 6
    Potassium 6
    Magnesium 322
    Calcium 2617
    Phosphorus 1143
    Zinc 1260
    Molybdenum 1
    Fuel A
    Water <0.1
    Glycol N
    Visc @100c 14.5
    TBN 7.52
    Soot 0.4
    Oxidation 15.00
    Nitration 10.00

    Comments from Predictive Maintenance Services:
    ...
    Attached is the UOA for your vehicle. If this sample represents a 20K OIC,
    then all is doing extremely well. TBN is surprisingly strong for this
    mileage.
    Wear levels and contamination appear normal. No corrective action indicated by tests performed. Continue normal PM and sample interval.
    Thanks for continuing to choose AV Lubes and Predictive Maintenance for your
    oil testing needs."
    xxx xxxxxxxxxx
    Chief Analyst"...

    www.bobistheoilguy.com

    Do a search for

    Mobil Delvac 1 2004 VW Jetta PD 20,250 miles.

    Interesting reasons why I like Delvac One 5w40?
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    Wow, great UOA. :D

    Question: How many "make-up" quarts did you put in over those 20,250 miles (if any)?

    Comment: Geez, after more than 20,000 miles, your Delvac One had a higher TBN than the ENEOS 0W-50 stuff that's been hawked around here recently has when it's fresh out of the bottle (7.52 versus 6.4). Not too shabby. ;)

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    Im saying the eneos website is wrong as the product specs there are non US product.

    Typical Properties of ENEOS Motor Oil Eco Stage

    Quality grade API SM
    SAE viscosity grade 0W-20
    Appearance Orange
    Density (15°C), g/cm3 0.854
    Flash point (COC), °C 230
    Kinematic viscosity
    (40°C), mm2/s 41.5
    (100°C), mm2/s 8.5
    Viscosity index 199
    Pour point, °C &#150;45.0
    TAN, mgKOH/g 2.4
    TBN (HCl), mgKOH/g 5.1
    Color (ASTM) L3.5

    Note: The typical properties may be changed without notice. (December 2004)

    Those specs are not the same as the product that is being distributed here,in the USA.

    The ECO-STAGE, ULTRA-HYPER formulations are for japan and Europe repectively and are not the same formulations as we have in the usa. Im sure Eneos is in the process of updating the website to the current US specs.
    And the russian specs are different yet. I want to get my hands on the ENEOS flush and the 2-stroke oil that they run in the moto GP
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Seems like Eneos is doing all those things (and MORE is your inference) which you infer is bad that you accuse Mobil One of doing. Now for sure the industry has policies, practices and procedures that might appear incongruous to other than folks familiar with the industry. So if I may quote something I heard just recently "Two things you would would not want to see being made sausage and politicians bringing home the bacon" (aka pork) .

    However if the cited oils do meet the standards mentioned, I.E., ..."Quality grade API SM "... etc, then I am really not sure what the effects of your distinctions REALLY mean.

    So should I be glad I didn't order Eneos products based on the errors you describe? Did I avoid Eneos ROT GUT products? :lemon:
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Here are some links to other Delvac One 5w40 tests

    link title

    ..."Also Compatible with Diesel Engines
    ENEOS Motor Oil 5W40 meets the API CF standard, so it can also be used in passenger cars and small trucks that have diesel engines."...

    link title

    ..."Note: The typical properties are subject to change without notice. (December 2004)"...

    As GSR1 has so noted, Eneos 5w40 has NOT kept up with even the (old) Delvac 1 5w40, diesel side:

    off a container of Delvac 1 bought in Jan 2003 ..."api service CI-4, CH-4, CG-4 CF-4,CF, SL/SJ warranty requirements"...

    Here are the current specifications (Delvac One 5w40)

    API CI-4 PLUS/CI-4/CH-4/CG-4/CF-4/CF/SL/SJ

    link title
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    There are 2 great articals in this months edition of Lubes n Greases on Diesel oils and the future of additives as well as a great comparison of SAE vs JASO vs AECA oil specs.

    You guys think what im saying is some mud slinging then you gotta check out the artical on pg 38 titled "A Cause for Concern" It outlines the some of the horrible practices the US oil blenders are doing.. There is ONE major and very respectable blender( You and i probably have there product on the shelf in the garage) that is turning out absolute crap.... They also make a very poular expensive synthetic? :) The blended product actually contains 10% used oil !!!!!!. They are blending used to new base oil at a ratio of roughly 1:10 with a VOA tbn of 0.59 and a silicon PPM of 179 !!!!!

    It's amazing what a manufacture will do with there own blend once they have a name brand established. Once people start assuming that they are getting a good product becase they are buying a brand name, then the product quality just takes a crap, because we are sheeple.
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    For those not in the industry. The website is http://www.lngpublishing.com/
    I belive you can download the magazine in PDF format
    Lubes 'n' Greases
    March 2008 Volume 14 Issue 3

    Also note that the crap product is PPB for major retailers, with the same product at different automotive based retailers is of good quality. :lemon:
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    ..."You guys think what im saying is some mud slinging then you gotta check out the artical on pg 38 titled "A Cause for Concern" It outlines the some of the horrible practices the US oil blenders are doing.. There is ONE major and very respectable blender( You and i probably have there product on the shelf in the garage) that is turning out absolute crap.... They also make a very poular expensive synthetic? The blended product actually contains 10% used oil !!!!!!. They are blending used to new base oil at a ratio of roughly 1:10 with a VOA tbn of 0.59 and a silicon PPM of 179 !!!!! "...

    1. The web site you link does not seem to allow a look at the issue you mentioned

    2. While I am no copyright lawyer, it seems you can post the relevant text and give the proper references, with no violation.

    2. How do the practices you mentioned show up in VOA and UOA tests by independent labs doing these types of tests?

    3. Is that why there is a distinct lack of Eneos VOA's and UOA's?

    Now your last sentence is interesting in that on a Mobil Delvac One 5w40 UOA (if that is one of the blenders you are implying) had SI (silicon) of 5 after app 10k OCI. (which i linked) .!!! WOW! So if what you are saying is true, this Mobil One/Delvac One 5w40 stuff is far far far better AFTER UOA's than even I suspected!!!! :lemon: :shades: NOT!! The testing really is the proof.
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    I would love to post the articals, but im using the print version, i really don't feel like retyping the magazine :) I just recived my copy today in the mail, so im sure the electronic version should be availible shortly ( you would think its availible first).

    Also there are a lot of graphs and cool comparisons, that would just be so much easier to look at the actuall artical.

    All the test were VOA's and were ment as a "State of the Industry test" they regularly test the big 8 oil companys standard product's to see when and how the new additives are being used. And the reason to bring this to readers attention was the inconsistancy's of Blending practices to the Large Retailers, and bulk oil that is distributed to lube shops, that carrys the Big Brand names, like Q state, Pennsoil,mobil,castrol.
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    I do not have the references (for this was PRE internet) but Consumer Reports literally LONG ago did a piece on the fact that oils were NOT consistent. I remember the other issue at the time was "buy on price" as there really was no material differences. Again if I remember correctly, they referred to it as "regional differences". I remember @ the time I was concerned about Castrol GTX for a 1985 Toyota Camry. So doing the math, that was 23 years ago. So does that mean they have been consistently inconsistent, or is the rule- inconsistency? :lemon:
  • krzysskrzyss Member Posts: 849
    A few suggestions:
    If you use proper language you come out as more reliable source. I have hard time believing you because of persistent misspelling:
    (articals, companys, carrys, caffine, mabey, basicly) and grammatical errors ("about there product", "Nor dose it click", "peddle there product there").
    If you cannot write, can you read all the info about oil and then share it with us?
    I doubt it.

    Best regards

    Krzys

    PS There is "Spell Check" button next to "Post My Message"
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    Sorry about the spelling, as i didn't know i was being graded. :shades:
  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,331
    Sorry about the spelling, as i(sic) didn't know i(sic) was being graded.

    Like it or not, your credibility is severely diminished by poor spelling and bad grammar.

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    I write backwards from the way i speak. Usually when i write i write the last half of the word first and and the first two or three letters last. I don't know? (only when handwriting) I never did too well in english., but i still managed to get a degree. GA Tech - M.E. with emphasis in A.E. (automotive engineering). Im also ASE Master tech, ASE Master Machinist ( Block & Cylinder Head), and active member of the SAE.
    SO i'm sorry if i sound uneducated, usually when im on here or any forum im in a hurry when typing, and my laptop keyboard dosen't help.
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    This is the latest import product in to the US.
    Ester Yamalube

    This new product is hot!!!! Its a very similar in formulation to the ENEOS 0w-50 non SM Pro-Race, but without the Friction Modifier. and less VI improvers. It contains aprox 40% complex ester base. Which is about twice as much as the ENEOS 0w-50 SM formulation!!!
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    How do you guys feel about the new synthetic blends hitting the market in 2009-2010 GF-5 spec. They are supposed to be 10-30% PAG's blended with GRPIII mineral bases. They are designed to replace the PAO/Ester blends of the major companys. Since PAO/and Esters are so volatile(price wise) in todays market, and to combat the ever changing formulations based on supply availability. These new blends are what the GF-5 specs are based on.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    You might want to address why the Japanese vendors( car oil) are going the other way 0-15W 50 while the hot US products are 0w20, 0w30. Even the European vendors are going from 0w40 to 0-5w30. (VW 507.00 5w30 being an example)
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    You might also wish to address the oil for motorcycles have entirely different parameters than for passenger vehicles; to the point where neither is recommended for the other.

    I hope you are NOT saying you'd put Yamaha motorcyle oil in your Ferrari F1 racer. ;)

    Given appropriate standards, its all in the UOA's,lessening of wear-higher mileage intervals, better mpg, etc. and real world longevity.

    Really the new 3,000 miles OCI's has become 10,000 miles OCI's !!!!

    In the case of VW 507.00 it is variable up to 30,000 miles OCI's.
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    No i would never stick that formulation in my vehical as its not a FM product. i was just highlighting a new product.

    I belive the motivation behind the 0w-50,0w-60,0w-70 formulations are because they can, In most high performance applications, there has always been a trade off. High-temp protection vs startup/warm up protection. ie: with 20w-50 product you give up startup protection.(unless oil heaters are used) Until recently, technologies didn't exist to allow a blender to blend a UHV range oil that actually is something you would want to put in to your engine.

    And the trend toward 0w-20 oils is based on Fuel eff. and cafe #'s. 0w-20 has been the norm in japan for years since 2000.
  • gsr1gsr1 Member Posts: 26
    Quaker States SAE 5w-30 for high mileage engines, that was being sold at walmart's has been BUSTED!!!

    Quaker state was putting the API donut on the bottle, when the PPB product didn't even come close to meeting the specs.

    All the product was pulled from the shelves, and re packaged.

    Now Quakerstate has been banned from using the API donut on the 5w-30 product that is sold at walmarts.

    These PPB practices are finally catching up. See for your self at your local walmart. There is no more API donut on q-state 5-30 high mileage. Untill recently most of the oil tested was obtained from the manufature. Its about time the consumer protection people started sampling and comparing what is being distributed to the masses.

    I know you guys are going to ride me for this one. See for your self at your local walmart, q-state has lost it's api certifcations for 5w-30 (only the walmart blend)
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    ..." know you guys are going to ride me for this one. See for your self at your local walmart, q-state has lost it's api certifications for 5w-30 (only the walmart blend) "...

    "LOST" might indeed be relative. They might have simply decided NOT to pay the costs of the freight to TEST and wear whatever applicable certifications.

    They might have simply decided to do what folks like (I have read across several sources) Amsoil does. They say they conduct their own R&D and tests: They also add their own internal tests conform to XYZ applicable certifications. They are NOT the only ones to do so. I have read in passing that Redline does the same. Both state openly bang for the buck economics are prominent drivers. They also say they will write letters to your OEM/oem authorized dealers in case you use their oil that does not REALLY carry the specified specifications under the anti trust provisions, which Auto man/auto dealers can prove was caused by their oil product.

    As I have said before, the proof is in the UOA's. The VOA's are of course (ONLY) the baseline. In Quaker State's case, the savings are potentially HUGE HUGE HUGE. I mean what % of Quaker State customers run a UOA on WalMart's QS products????????!!!! So really it is a slam dunk bet. If that is not insult to injury, it is even better than that for them. They can just give you a free oil change for your now sludged engine or give you the WC Fields line: go away boy, you're bothering me. ;)

    ..."It contains aprox 40% complex ester base. Which is about twice as much as the ENEOS 0w-50 SM formulation!!! "...

    It is a bit like the words "100% synthetic." Mobil One defined it as PAO group IV/V. Castrol called 100% synthetic hydro refined/cracked Group III. Since Mobil One lost the arbitration case to Castrol, no one is going to get sued (successfully anyway) to claim a hydro cracked group III is NOT 100% synthetic. I would hope Mobil One still keeps to calling 100% synthetic Group IV/V. Legally, as you can see, even they are not bound.

    I remember not too long ago posters saying Eneos was 100% synthetic (group IV PAO).. Funny the ENEOS web site said and STILL SAYS hydro refined and listed III and IV are defined as 100% synthetic. Interesting now we have come off the 100% group IV/V PAO ENEOS assertion.

    So yes there is flux and change, as a result UOA's will continue to influence me, as these are definitive documentation of changes from the changes (VOA) :shades:
  • obyoneobyone Member Posts: 7,841
    Lubriplate

    specifically

    Super GPO

    Super GPO is nonsynthetic however, I had OCI of 10K verified by Blackstone Labs who suggested that I run it a bit longer. They didn't have a base sample so I had to send one along with my used one.

    I know that some of their greases are spec'd by GM for use in their vehicles. Just wondering if anyone else out there has tried them?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    A small little tube of Lubriplate grease ( plastic gearing lube).comes with most garage door openers. Seems to really work. Lubriplate literally makes a plethora of lubricants for an almost vast range of applications. They lubricate almost ANY application you can think of.

    The motor oils no. Anymore without comparing the oils specifications with the oem owners manual, would require more time and research, testing and ultimately risk, than I would be willing to do.

    The company's local distributor seems to cater to the high tech and industrial trade. While they do sell 1qt containers, they seem to favor 5 gal pails to 55 gal drums.
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    I don't see the point of the Super GPO oil. Why? Because for roughly a dollar more per quart, I can buy synthetic Mobil 1 0W-40.

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    The local WalMart now carries 0w30 M1 in 5 qt containers and is actually a tad cheaper than the standard M1 5w30/10w30 !!
Sign In or Register to comment.