Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
Do you think its the same supplier in Canada ?
Thanks
My Subaru mechanic recommends a heavier oil and last year I ran 5W-50 on the same trip and got 27 Miles Per gallon on a pure synthetic. This year I ran the 10W-40 concoction that is now mostly conventional and found that I got 30 MPG on the average. So it's clear to me that the weight of the oil definitely makes a difference on gas mileage. It's also just as clear that the engines are better protected with higher weight oils since they run much quieter since I started using the heavier weights.
I moved to the Valvoline Blend since the 40 weight blend and synthetic oil pass the tough European tests in durability.
I'm currently very happy with the 10W-40 combination for my Subaru. It just runs smoother with the heavier weight. Since it's a small engine it works very hard. It was a good recommendation from my Subaru specialist mechanic.
However, my Mazda runs very well with it's recommended 5W-30 that my Mazda specialist mechanic also recommends in that one due to valve lifter issues.
Apparently the balance is different for different vehicles.
I think dry sump offers some advantages under certain conditions regarding both ground clearance and high speed maneuver, but the average car doesn't really need it, nor would it benefit from it, that I can see.
Yeah, caesar, just tell them that it's a good idea for those long-slung exotics pulling close to 1g on turns (or more in race cars); also on road cars eliminating the oil pan allows perhaps a lower profile for the engine compartment. So it might even have a subtle effect on styling.
Someone on Bobistheoilguy did testing on the SuperTech group 3 syn. and it appeared to hold up quite well. I think moly. showed up in the test. Interesting if accurate and not something left over.
It's interesting that they still call it Tech 2000 in Canada, the name changed in the U.S. about three years ago.
thanks
oil...
The first way is called cracking, while the second way is called synthesis. The name implies the means to the end.
Group I
" II
" II+
" III
" IV
" V
Check out the links to Bobistheoilguy's board for deep digging explanation.
Roughly 48 quarts of Mobil 1 and Shell Rotella T Synthetic and the rest was Valvoline Maxlife.
TB
Notice: This is humor!
Seems like the 2002 version of the oil would be fine for my old 94 Camry.
or are there quality control issues due to the low cost?
Anyone used it for a long time?
Consumer reports said all (API graded) oils were the same and should be purchased on price.
who makes the st oil?
My big worry would be the quality control - batch to batch, not the basic specs
It's made by a Pennzoil/QS subsidiary called Specialty Petroleum in Shreveport. I think the base oil is Exxon-- definitely not Pennzoil since they don't have any excess capacity. To my untrained eye the specs look about as good as Quaker State, better than Wolf's Head, but not as good as Pennzoil. I use it because $11.94 is a good price for oil changes and it's bottled, hence better control and less risk of contamination than bulk oils. I always insist that a ST filter be substituted for the crap Fram.
Here's ST SJ compared with the other PZ/QS 10W30 SL oils. I'd expect the SL specs to be slightly better:
10W30 SuperTech Pennzoil Quaker St. Wolf's Head
Visc. 40c 73.2 67.0 69.1 65.3
Visc 100c 11.0 10.5 10.5 10.5
Visc. Indx 140 160 139 138
Flash-F 410 430 410 430
Pour-F -29 -33 -22 -17
Low Pumping-C -25 -30 -22 -30