By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Thanks for taking my poke at (MidWest) gov't workers in jest. I too was a gov't worker once (NASA for 7 years). Good thing there was no internet then, I'd never have gotten anything done!
Nuff said.
George
Like the other posters who expressed extreme skepticism about true instances of "SUA" I too find all this difficult to believe, except I also have a LOT of trust in my wife! I am 99% certain that I would have been quick to turn off the key, but I am far more mechanically inclined than she is. She was so busy trying to control the vehicle and standing on the brake that she didn't have a hand free to reach for the key, or a brain pathway available to think of trying.
Our Ford dealer, who fixed the car after this episode, tested everything they could think of regarding the fuel injection system, the accelerator linkage, the cruise control, and could not find anything abnormal. We have driven that car another 20-25 thousand miles ith no recurrence of anything even remotely like this problem.
I too, expected that the brakes could override the engine, but during my investigation of this situation I learned something interesting. The power brakes get their power from the engine vacuum. When the throttle is only slightly open, there is a continuous vacuum. BUT!!!! WHEN THE THROTTLE IS WIDE OPEN, THE VACUUM IS GREATLY REDUCED! The vacuum is created by the engine pumping air through the throttle body across the high restriction of the butterfly valve. When that is wide open, there is very little vacuum generated.
Theory:
1. For UNKNOWN reason the throttle sticks wide open.
2. Wife struggles with car as it turns corner, bouncing off curbs and standing on brakes.
3. Brake vacuum becomes depleted, eliminating the power assist.
4. With all her strength breaking with little or no power assist, it takes her a full block to finally overcome the 200 HP engine blasting along in 1st gear.
5. She finally regains enough control and composure to shut off engine.
6. The throttle never sticks again.
We researched the WEB for any similar instances being reported for Ford Taurus automobiles. We encountered one report that because the cruise control is designed so that there is always voltage applied to the servo circuit, even when the cruise control is switched off, a short circuit in the wrong place can actually activate the cruise control servo. Our dealer could not find any short in our cruise control.
That is our story, and we never found proof of exactly what happened. However, before any of you bet all your beanie babies that your car's brakes can override the engine, try this experiment (waay far away on a totally isolated road):
1. Come to a stop
2. FLOOR the accelerator
3. Leaving the accelerator floored, pump the brake repeatedly.
4. See what happens.
Prediction:
Brakes initially try to slow car, but as vacuum is lost, the power assist fades to a fraction of its normal value. You'll have a He** of a time stopping the car unless you let the throttle close.
The '01 console still isn't in
As good as the fake wood looks, I like it, for ease of care if no other reason. If I could change one thing about the interior in my car it would be to cover the hard plastic with some fake leather. I traded a '95 Subaru Legacy LSi for my LS. There is of course no comparison between the two cars in terms of comfort, but the Subaru had soft vinyl on the sides of the console & dashboard surfaces, same color as the leather seats. It just looked a little more nicely "finished" than the LS. (Ducking here.)
Welcome back, Jim.
Scott
As far as the wood topic goes, if real wood looks the same why bother. There is a different feeling when viewing real wood though. I would pay a little more for it, I guess it should be an option, let the customer decide if it's worth the price.
Jim W
I am not a happy camper! To top everything off today when I picked up my car the Service Manager told me that he would appreciate it if I gave them a glowing write-up on their evaluation that I get from Lincoln! Can you believe this! If I wasn't leasing this car I would try and get rid of it right away! Everytime I start it and hear that noise I think about all the choice things I can say about that service dept.
I love the car, it's great on the road but these issues cloud an otherwise pleasant experience. That's my story and I'm sticking to it!
Seriously though, no, a high-pitched whirling sound from the alternator, or anywhere else, is NOT normal. Maybe there is nothing they can do about it, but there is something you can do about it-find another dealer. Tell Brian to add them to the hall of shame. If that's not feasible, I'm sure Jim Rogers could help you.
I fear that it's dealers like these that are going to undo a great thing.
Air blowing over the exhaust system. I'll be laughing all day tomorrow. Can't wait to tell my car-savvy friends.
Here are the initial impressions, totally personal, seat-of-the pants.
Good news:
1. At idle the car sounds like a C-5 Corvette. Under acceleration it sounds very muscular. You cannot mistake it for an import. Sounds very retro 60s muscle car. Very authoritative.
2. With it in stealth mode right now(no tips showing just the downturn like stock) people look around and stare to see what car sounds like that.
3. The current setup produces an additional, on average, 10 hp. This was based on an average taken on baseline and after modification on a chassis dyno.
4. The replacement system will have most of the little bends of the stock system taken out. This will make for an easy owner installation if desired, since the majority of pipe is a straight piece.
5. At highway speeds the car is very quiet, with just a hint of exhaust rumble. Accelerating under medium pressure produces a very satisfying snarl. Definite performance tone. The younger crowd will love it.
Bad news:
1. In its current state of development, there needs to be additional sound dampening done for the 1500-2000 RPM range under light engine loading, such as ascending a gradual slope. The resonance at this RPM and loading is rather loud and boomy inside and outside the car. This is a major annoyance, especially since the car gets into this RPM range often in rural driving. They will tweak the system to reduce or eliminate it. It is interesting that the tone is very deep. Reminded me of my 68 Pontiac Firebird Ram Air 400.
So at this point the system isn't ready for prime time. By next week I should be able to test out their changes. I'm going to bring it back in on Thursday.
Brian
Thanks
George
Jim also indicated his willingness to have a LS Owners meeting while he is there in NY on either April 9,10 or 11. Jim is also checking to see what other Ford/Lincoln executives might be willing to participate.
If any members are interested in volunteering for the show, please email me at: brian.gowing@llsoc put NY AUTO SHOW VOLUNTEER in the subject line, and let me know what days and times you can handle.
Brian
Do you have the standard system or the audiophile? I have the standard system and also find that with the Fade control set in the middle, there is little sound from the rears.
Would you really consider getting rid of a car with these issues?
The reason why I leased my AS was to continually upgrade to a ewer AS such as a supercharger LSV8 6 speed manual. If BOW, nexus, Audio, etc. came out with a similar vehicle, I will have to do my new car shopping all over again. It's interesting that the six speed transmission is listed as one of the preferred options wanted by AS owners on the llsoc website.
Still hoping,
Wes
Have a good day,
Wes
Take care,
Wamsley1
Good luck,
wamsley1
The Scirocco's butterfly valve in the throttle body froze open immediately after a carwash in below freezing weather and full acceleration. VW had a service bulletin and promptly repaired under warranty. It was caused by ice forming on the butterfly valve and freezing it in the open position. Very scary since it was so unexpected. The brakes did stop the car, but required all my effort.
The Ford Expedition did the same thing when I got on it with full acceleration. It took almost a block to stop in heavy traffic from about 50 mph. It too required all my effort to stop and get to the shoulder safely. The concern was that if I shifter to neutral to coast to the side of the road, I would blow the engine. I tried it again in a safer place and duplicated the problem. Drove straight to the Dealer, talked to Service Manager who knew of a new service bulletin containing a fix. It required a new accelerator cable, due to a bind in the stock cable which caused the throttle to stick wide open. They ordered the cable, was replaced in a few days and never had a problem again.
I am very disappointed since factory phone is very hard to dial when driving because it sets so far back on the console.
I asked him about 2002 LS phone and he said they have been told that a new phone is on it's way, probably digital and will not retrofit 2001's. Oh POOP! I hope Lincoln will change their minds and offer retrofit, since a better phone is deserved by current LS owners.
jrogers-Can you brief LS owners on this or llsoc forum when new model or running changes/options are released? At least at the same time infor is released to Dealers. I hated reading the Premium Package infor by stumbling across it on Edmunds. I, for one, visited the Edmonds LS site for 8 months before purchasing my LS V8. If I was a potential buyer, I would expect the most up-to-date information regarding LS options. Thanks.
FYI: 2002 Thunderbird infor is now available on Edmunds site.
FAXed the Reflash TSB info. from the LLSOC site. (Thanks again, Brian!)
Talked with the service manager again. He states that my (Nov. 1999 build) is not on his list of the "select few" (his words) that this applies to. He FAXed me the info (from www.fordtechservice.com) that he was looking at. He claims that my current calibration (reflashed once - in early 2000 - is not on his list. His info. on my car lists Calibration as: 9WHABAFA
The list he FAXed me does not show this calibration.
He also informed me that the problems this Reflash is designed to address were "normal characteristics" of the trans.
So - help, please? Now what do I do? Any suggestions? Mark?
When I had this done by the dealer I purchased the car from (in another state) it was handled perfectly.
TIA!
- Ray
Who is now so discouraged with this process.......
Sorry for the rant. This really isn't the place for this. All I started out to say was that the difference in your experience is that a cause and fix were immediately available, as opposed to the "phantom" incidents.
BTW-that phone situation really sucks.
I'm working on it. Your calibration should be updated. I asked about your calibration and below is the answer I received. I'm now working with Service Engineering to get to the bottom of it. You are the first one I have heard about that the dealer couldn't find in the TSB.
*******
Mark,
9WHA-BAFA is the 9WHA-BAF calibration (the last A just means w/air conditioning). This is the Job #1 level for the U.S. Sport package and was replaced by the BAG, BAH running change calibrations.
9WHA-BAFA should be serviced with the 1LQ18S0506 calibration and 1U7A-FA module (I assume 1U7Z-FA is the service number).
Mark, Regarding the Tranny, The dealer says I have the latest calibration. My car has never been reflashed and I have a build date of 2/8/2000. I don't
know how this is possible. My dealer said he talked to ford tech support who told him this fact. My question is how can I have the latest code that just
came out in Mid January when my car had not been touched since the day before LS-MANIA and since I have never had a reflash. By the way one
quick code that the service rep didn't know exactly what it was had an Identifier Automatic: 9WHABAHA Could you please enlighten me.
Please let me know what they need so that my dealer will do the TSB.
Regards,
Victor
After a car wash, rain or snow, windows get wet as many a three days later when I operate the windows. My fear is moisture is being traped in the door compartments which can't be a good thing.
I brought it in, the tech said he would check the drain holes. Got the car back, no cahnge.
Has anyone else noticed this? Is it just the window seals rewetting the windows, or am I picking up moisture trapped in th doors?
Also, I unfortuneatley have the standar stereo package and I am not happy with it at all. Does anyone know where I can get the specs on what is there? Speaker impeadence, watts, dB/watt etc. I would like to keep the front end unaltered, I can't bear to change the dash, but would like to up the rest of the system.
Thanks for the input,
Scott
and they keep harping on the lack of storage space.... who cares!!
I must have missed that post. Sorry!
I'll check on your calibration. I am certain that you do not have the latest calibration, but like the previous post it seems that some calibration codes may be missing from the TSB. I'll find out and let you know.
Mark
Bottom line, I need the reflash to correct the dangerous condition I have when I have to WAIT for the car to go from R to D5. It goes into D5 when it gets darn good and ready.
I am really frustrated. Wasted another hour plus at yet another dealer with no success. Can anyone from Lincoln (Mark??)HELP on this issue.
I am wondering if our states Lemon Law will help me out on this one? Anyone tried that? I am at the point where I am willing to try most anything to get this resolved. Has this issue been reported to the NTSB yet? Anyone know? I think it is dangerous and may merit a mandatory recall. Of course, this would mean the dealers would actually have to be able to apply the TSB. I do not understand why it is so complicated.
Consumer Reports reliability scores are based on reader input, so one then must assume that this board does not attract CR readers.
It is much easier for an evangelist to ignore items that may in fact may irk others who are not as into the LS as most are here. The average car buyer is not chasing down things like 9WHA-BAF calibration data or sport exhausts.
When you shoot high as the LS has, expect some arrows.
Again, I do sincerely appreciate all your efforts!
BTW: The dealer is Baranco - about 3 miles form where I live, in Dulut, GA - north of Atlanta...
- Ray
Still holding out hope!
For what its worth: When I studied up on the new C-class before buying, their phone option is a Motorola Timeport (digital) with or without hands-free, and integrated into the stereo and or navigation system. My wife has a phone that she rarely uses and the C240 was also a demo (as-is, I guess we're both impatient ;-D) deal without the phone, so she really didn't care. The Tele-Aid (similar to RESCU) is standard and requires no separate cellular activation. After the 1st year it will cost just under $20/month to keep it activated. It also can be used to track the car in case of theft and can remotely unlock it. I picked up the brochures for the CLK and E class and they have the same options. A much better deal - the options price out about the same without the navigation rig - and at least it's current technology.
It is interesting to note that from their data the 2000 LSV6 is a used car to avoid, yet according to their frequency of repair charts the V6 falls down only in the electrical area yet the car is consigned to a worse than average reliability for the 2000MY. The V8 prevails with a slightly better rating of average reliability for the 2000MY...
Also - SCCA Solo II (autocross) will be at Turner field Sat. 3/17 (practice) and Sun 3/18 (points). The Atlanta Region SCCA has more on their website. Hope I'm not the only LS again...
http://www.bonforums.com/dealerview1.htm
Raymond
I find their report on the LS very contradictory also. They say "Reliability of V8 models has been average; the V6 has been subpar." They give it a big black circle for much worse than average reliability. Satisfaction is rated at above average.
HOWEVER, they give the V8 an almost perfect score on "frequency of repair" which is unusual for an American marque. The V6 gets slightly worse marks but still very good.
Go figure...
Joe
For the Lincoln LS, they say, "Reliability of V8 models has been average; the V6 has been subpar." What the Hell does *that* mean?
Certainly, we haven't seen any pattern of reports among the posters on this board that indicates a generic problem with the V6 engine. I'm afraid unclear CU reporting on this data can do a lot of harm to an auto manufacturer without providing any substantive data to document that the problems reported were serious or nit-picks.
"we will no longer be selling new Lincoln or Mercury vehicles nor will we be doing any warranty work on these vehicles. This is due to Lincoln and Mercury downsizing of dealers."
Now they have become exclusively Toyota. Fortunately I didn't buy my '00 LS8 Sport from them. Just had a couple oil changes, etc.
The report is mostly positive, but say ambiguous things like "The Lincoln's sport-suspension tuning was judged inferior to that offered by BMW. It relishes a good flog down a twisty stretch, but it sacrifices too much ride comfort on the altars of grip and body-motion control. On the other hand, the road holding grip (0.81 to 0.82 g) remained within 0.01 of our BMW 328i long-termer and braking performance ended up in BMW territory at 175 feet from 70 mph."
I don't understand what "ride comfort" disadvantage to the little 328i they could be writing about. I think the LS sport ride comfort is incredible with almost no sacrifice in comfort to achieve its acknowledged great handling.
Regarding "dealer dings", I'll bet that Sanderson Lincoln-Mercury (Phoenix) will rue the day they screwed up the 35,000 mile service on Car & Driver's Lincoln LS! They now have national recognition! Ouch!
It should be painfully clear to LM that BMW has established the benchmark, and the LS is going to have to overcome a lot of pre-established opinion with overwhelming superiority just to get a fair call.
I have concern that whereas LM mounted a fantastic assault on this market with the LS in its introductory year, I'm not seeing information that convinces me they are keeping the pressure on that will earn them parity in the psychological side of this market.
I think that for the psychological impact alone, they should offer a manual transmission option for BOTH the V6 and the V8. I know the bean counters say the manual has too small a market, but the trouble with bean counters is that they seem to have zero understanding of the emotional side of marketing. (Do bean counters have souls?) I think the very fact that LM would offer a manual V8 would increase sales of ALL Lincoln LS's, including SSTs and automatics. Having an option for manual transmissions in both models is a strong cue that THE LS IS A SERIOUS SPORT SEDAN. I think the other cue is that with at least one model, (such as a manual V8 Sport) the LS can *easily* break the 7-second 0-60 benchmark.
The other night, the Phoenix Suns came out and devastated the LA Kings in the first half with a 28-point lead. Then, in the 2nd half they fell apart and ended up LOSING the game 89-100!
I'd like to encourage LM to realize they are entering the 2nd half of the Luxury Sport Sedan game. A lot of the car magazines and Consumer Reports are now sounding distinctly lack-luster about the Lincoln LS. What a contrast with the first half of this game. Come on, LM, KEEP ON MAKING YOUR SHOTS!
Another option is to use the manual gear box already attached to the duratec and make the package a V-8 beater. LM already has the goods with the Jag configuration. While I understand the Jag must be have marginally greater performance for marketing reasons, that doesn't preclude L/M from bolting some goodies on the duratec used in the LS. Would be cheaper, I assume, that designing a new gearbox; it could be done in a relatively short period of time; and I would buy it in a heartbeat!
btw: please excuse any typo's you may find. I'm boycotting the Edmund's spellchecker