Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Dealers Too Busy For OnLine Shoppers
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
I hoped others would catch the extreme irony in that. They really do care about the little buy in between election campaigns. Our governor was caught on part of his (not reporting "free" golf outings and coin investment scandals) and his party's shenanigans. Now they're angering many by passing laws to impact the incoming opposition party in governorship and both houses--eliminating many of the political payoffs they themselves practices through 10 years of politics.
Everytime I see the carpetbagger on a campaign interview for 2008, I think of all the tricks they got by with from AK to DC to NY. The problem is they ain't much worse than the rest up there. I
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Do you give that "invoice or less" price by e-mail... or only via phone call?
I wonder how those ratios compare with the industry as a whole. They strike me as pretty damned good.
When I send out for internet quotes, I am ready to buy (and I'm not interested in talking by phone until the deal is set). If I email 10 stores seeking a vehicle (precisely specified), I may get 5 or 6 replies on a hot seller, 7 to 9 on a slow mover. I seek price from the get go and those that don't supply one in their initial reply are immediately crossed off my list. As a result, at least two-thirds of those I contacted are history after the first round of email.
MSRP: X
Invoice: Y
Rebates (if any) : Z
Make us an offer you feel is fair for both of us, and let us know when you would like to test drive.
I don't actually sell on the floor, so I'm not a real salesperson, and my bonus is based on volume not gross. It doesn't matter to me if we make $3,000 or lose $300. That's my manager's job, any exact number is given by him. We have the highest internet closing ratio in our district, our response time is under 10 mins, and we do okay. We can work totally by email, as long as the person will respond to email. Thanks to all the internet car buyers out there, you guys keep us in business and should be appreciated.
FYI: If they are informed, they had a guy like Isellhondas agree to their bid, first. That may explain why you observe better closing ratios...
As customers realize they can get a much better deal internet shopping, that's all they'll do. How do the salespeople at your dealership feel about this?
Does the manufacturer have large holdbacks for the make you sell? What is the incentive for your dealership to be focused on volume and not profit?
I'd guess you sell non-luxury cars that are in relative high supply to demand.
That's not the reason. The reason to avoid being the first one to name a number is because it sets a floor for the buyer, and a ceiling for the seller.
As a buyer, you have locked in a price that will never go down once you've named the first number. (Of course, there are exceptions to this, but is difficult to do this without appearing unethical or creating bad will.) The same thing is true for the seller (although in practice, they often try with the last minute "we made a mistake, we need to raise the price" ploy.)
Part of the negotiation process is the element of price discovery -- the buyer can guess what the seller will accept, but doesn't really know. While a buyer can go in knowing the invoice, holdback, and most of the incentives, s/he won't know about the other factors that might motivate the dealer to offer even deeper discounts than those might suggest. If you, as the buyer, name the first number, you have shut off the flow of information and will never have a chance to find out.
Personally, I have tried contacting the same dealers as a walkup and as an online customer. The difference is pretty dramatic.
Daveyd088: I have found that many Internet "managers" typically give a reasonable price but then say: "I do not know how low the price may go once you are here". Buyers armed with that less than optimal quote give you a number that is maybe $500-1000 lower. You smartly jump on it because it is within acceptable range and you "earn their business".
I got the impression that because my email showed that I did my homework, the dealers were willing to show their cards too, so to speak, because they could see I was someone who didn't want to play around and who was ready to write a check. I was detailed in my figures and provided a contact number. I am going to buy our next car in the same way; this time around, we also visited a local dealer for the test drive and later gave them a chance to match the $250 below invoice offer...they initially said they would, then backed out when we showed up, so I doubt I'll bother with them next time around.
"
However, one very nasty experience at an "internet dealer", where the finance department proceeded to ruin the internet pricing with a series of unexpected fees and other garbage, has suggested this way of buying a car may not be that much different from the persian baazar method so many dealers still use. I will never buy from that dealer again.
One way Internet car buying could be improved is for the discussion to include __EVERY FEE__ that the customer will be expected to pay. That way, there will be no deal-breaker surprises or last minute hassle.
I hope you didn't reward the dealer for their bad methods by purchasing the car from them...!
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
If you received a below invoice cost on your 07 G35 it must be because you live in a low demand area. Chicago dealers didn't care what I knew about the cost of the car, they would not come down more than $1000 off sticker on a G35x with prem/tech/navi. It had nothing to do with negotiation skill. Simple supply and demand.
Lesson learned.
3 years later, their new salespeople bragged to me that they "live for the haggle". Their idea of "fun" won't be at my expense. :lemon:
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
I have never seen any other make do this.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
If you want to make deals contingent on the dealer's invoice, then you get what you ask for..
regards,
kyfdx
(not the host here)
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
I don't understand how "Dealer Holdback Expense" can be categorized as an expense when it generates income. The dealership is suppose to collect holdback from the manufacturer... not the customer. I'd find another dealership if I were you.
Well I would run away very fast from this dealer. The only thing that is not included, in the invoice Edmunds gives you, is the Advertising fee. This is either a very new car salesman or he is simply lying threw his teeth. Either way they would never get my business.
I'm afraid they'd have been told I signed at the price before they wanted to add on more fees and they have my address if they want to try to force me to purchase without a final agreement on the price. I'd tell them it would sound great on the local TV station's consumer problems segment about their adding on fees and trying to use a final agreement to further up the price. I'd tell them the name of my attorney in case they further wish to contact anyone.
It's just never too low for some dealers/salespeople, is it?
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Each of our mfg's invoice differently.. Ford for example puts a charge for gas, ad fees and holdback on the dealers side of the invoice. Mazda only puts the ad fee, holdback.. Toyota(in some regions) puts a laundry list of things. Saab used to put the cost of the owners manuals on the invoice. Oddly enough mazda pays to fill up the car but it never covers the cost so the dealer has to eat most of it...
If the customer wants to start haggling at "dead cost" instead of invoice or MSRP then things like holdback, ad fees and other legit invoice items are fair game.
O.k, but it seems to me that after a dealerships gets the invoice price from a mfg. they will sometimes add their own costs to the invoice statement. Which is the summary cost printout, or whatever it's called, that I have been shown before.
Also, not to open a can of worms, but your definition of holdback makes is sound like a true expense. You pay this when you purchase a vehicle from mfg, then they give it back to you when the vehicle is sold. Why would a dealership ever want to give up their holdback to a buyer? Which seems to happen a lot.This practice of going after holdback is encouraged by many buyers/negotiators.
Like you, I don't want to open up a holdback debate but again each mfg handles holdback differently. One of our mfg pays holdback to the dealership on the parts statement quarterly which is used to pay off parts expenses. So it never makes it back to the sales department. So the folks working in sales don't want to know anything about holdback...also if the car is a dealer swap the dealer who had the car originally keeps the holdback...so everything isnt exactly black and white...Not off limits its just a touchy subject unless the consumer is aware of all the internal workings of the mfg - dealers relationships.
Why would a dealership ever want to give up their holdback to a buyer? Which seems to happen a lot.This practice of going after holdback is encouraged by many buyers/negotiators.
sometimes mfg have dealers in stairstep or volume bonus programs. This forces dealers to push units to hit target numbers. If I'm close to hitting a big bonus I will take almost any deal, even losers to make the incentive. A few months ago I loss about $15000 selling cars on the last day of the month to hit a substantially larger bonus. These are the types of mfg programs that forces dealers to be extremely aggressive and almost vicious towards the competition.... without these incentives many dealers are not profitable.
The "invoice" to which you are referring is really a borrowing statement of sorts. When the dealership purchases the car, it doesn't actually come out of pocket to buy the car -- it borrows the entire purchase price and finances it until the car is sold. This allows the dealer to control a lot of inventory while minimizing its cash outlays, and effectively increases its returns.
This practice of borrowing has been expanding to include these extra "fees." Some of these "costs", such as the holdback, aren't really costs at all, but are just used to increase the amount of money that the dealer can borrow, which helps those margins and cash management. I'm not sure how they structure it, but here's a possibility: by including the holdback on the invoice, this could be used in effect to pay the holdback to the dealer before the car has even been sold. (It could be disbursed when the car is taken into inventory as part of the "loan", with that holdback loan repaid out of the "real" holdback payment once the car has been sold.) If that structure was used, it improves the dealer's cash flows and creates an inducement to acquire more inventory, which is good for the manufacturer (unless the dealership can't eventually sell it...)
From what I can tell, some manufacturers such as GM reimburse the advertising fee post-sale. In part, the manufacturer puts it onto the invoice as part of a forced contribution plan, and it should motivate the dealer to move product because it effectively adds an additional incentive to the dealer -- not only does the dealer collect the holdback, but also gets the ad fee reimbursement upon sale.
Now that more consumers know about the "invoice", I would expect this practice should expand. Since the average consumer confuses "invoice" with "cost", it makes the invoice an easy target. This is one reason why that while it is important to know the invoice, it is also important to understand the other money that flies around in a transaction. It's not always very straightforward, obviously...
Ok, this is not really true because by making your target your dealership certainly made more than $15k, did not it? Dealers are not really upfront about their real costs and incentives and many claim they are giving the holdback when in fact they are justing "hiding" their other profit sources. What is particularly annoying is the crying we hear: I cannot sell this below invoice because..
And yes, the dealerships screw their own sales force on more than just holdback arrangements because many sales people typically get very little of the back end profit (trade-in and financing). Those issues are certainly not part of the consumer side....
yeah we hit the number...but what if we didn't? It was a hail mary pass with thousands of dollars at stake.
There are times we do everything to hit numbers and miss...meanwhile we took lower than avg. profits earlier in the month chasing the number....when you don't hit it the front end losses can be staggering.
The mfg's make the target numbers difficult to hit and they bank on big percentage of dealers failing to hit the bonus. You imply its a sure thing and nothing could be farther from the truth.
Lets say you invest $10 million for a single point new car franchise, you employ 150 people and your monthly expenses are around $500,000 just to keep the doors open. Is it too much to expect to earn a profit?...
I just realized this isnt the right venue for this discussion..sorry hosts.
Point well taken! There is risk envolved to everything we all do. I am not questioning anyone's right to make a fair buck for their services.
I just hope that dealerships would say "this is my best price, because that is what it takes for me to stay in business". Personally, I think that is very honorable. However, crying, lying about profits, margins & incentives, as well as other games are really nasty. In the information age, this is just laughable!
Why should their goal just be to stay in business?
Don't they want to make a fair profit for their shareholders/owners/employees and hopefuly grow the business at the same time.
If I ran a business with the only goal being to stay in business I might as well run a not for profit business like Paul Newman.
Nothing against Paul Newman by the way I think he is a great guy.
I'm not a fan of dealers who whine things like "oh I'm losing money to sell the car, blah blah.." I suspect some folks will feel good thinking they beat the dealer or whatever...but it's not a good sales tactic in my opinion.
Seems the more variables the manufacturer and dealership can throw into the pot, the more difficult for the consumer to accurately gauge true "cost".
You?
What level of profit would you like to make if you have $10 million of your money on the line?
Personally, the whole discussion about profit or loss is ridiculous.
Its nobodies business but the dealer.
The only thing that should matter is the price you can pay.
If you want to work in a highly paid sales position where there is no negotiation then...oh, wait...there's no such thing.
It's nobody's fault but the dealers that consumers are so suspicious of their actions. They have earned a reputation for being shady and doing their best to take advantage of uneducated or naive buyers.
It's certainly the dealer's right to maximize their profit. It's also the buyer's right to minimize their cost.
This is a free market and car salesmen should stop crying about it.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
Review your vehicle
Volvomax: I think I was pretty clear when I said making market level of profit and I certainly do not control the market!
Everyone is technically entitled to a fair profit and process. My original objection was to lying about profit. I have had dealers cry to me about not making any profit at invoice numbers whereas there were sizable manufacturer to dealer incentives and/or other dealers were selling for $2-4k lower.
I object to lying and blatant misinformation as I am sure you do when buyers lie to you?
I don't know why I find that so funny. Don't you think it is the dealers job to determine how they will do their job? If they determine that they only want to answer questions with phone numbers then that is their right. I would imagine it would be waste of time to answer every email that says something like "my name is john and I want you absolutely best price". Do you really believe that a dealer would give you a good price if they have no idea of who you are or if you are at all serious? The rules are pretty simple my friend, if you don't like a way a dealer does business then go find another. I really doubt too many of the dealers, who post on here, would worry too much about losing your business.
Now the people that never give phone numbers, are the ones we'll probably never hear from again anyways, so why would I pull my pants down and give up confidential pricing info to someone who I haven't even spoken to or for all I know could be a competitive dealer? Besides if I do give my best number on email, they can print it out because it's in writing and use my number to go and lowball another dealer. That's not good business practice to say the least, and I don't think it's worth doing for the handful of extra skinny deals a month that the dealer might get.
2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX