Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

The Future Of The Manual Transmission

18283858788205

Comments

  • razorasdfrazorasdf Member Posts: 61
    They don't sell many manuals but didn't the CTS-V have a manual in 2004 or earlier? It was something someone mentioned earlier when they dropped the manual on one of the Lincolns that used to have one.

    I believe the last generation CTS-V was manual-only, while the new CTS-V will have the manual standard and an automatic optional.
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    The CTS has been available in a manual since inception.
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    Ummm, well at least it was listed that way on the CTS web site, however, there have been at least two periods during the Gen 1 CTS run where the manual gearbox was not available, and even when it was, finding one to test drive was problematic to say the least. :P

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • andys120andys120 Member Posts: 23,669
    BMW's version of the twin-clutch/DSG transmission (they call it "M-DCT") will be introduced with the new M3 convertible.

    More here.

    2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93

  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    BMW's version of the twin-clutch/DSG transmission (they call it "M-DCT") will be introduced with the new M3 convertible.

    I didn't see where it said that would be the only transmission or that it wasn't replacing the automatic. Also, this press release is in South Africa.

    The US market rejected a similar transmission in the M5, although even Bimmer magazine said the automatic is the shape of things to come from BMW (in reference to them dropping the X5 manual transmission).
  • andys120andys120 Member Posts: 23,669
    You are correct, it won't be the only transmission but it's significant IMO that it will be offered first in an M (i.e. high performance) car, then spread throughout the BMW line.

    2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93

  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    You are correct, it won't be the only transmission but it's significant IMO that it will be offered first in an M (i.e. high performance) car, then spread throughout the BMW line.

    The E36 M3 with a manual transmission seems to be in the 10-12k range. The automatic is in the 8-10k range.
  • razorasdfrazorasdf Member Posts: 61
    The E36 M3 with a manual transmission seems to be in the 10-12k range. The automatic is in the 8-10k range.

    Damn, only $10-12K? I was expecting them to be closer to $16-20K. I've really been considering getting a second track car, like a tuned Miata/MX-5, but this would be a good alternative, I think.

    Lightweight, RWD, and a 6 speed manual? I'm in love...
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    Damn, only $10-12K? I was expecting them to be closer to $16-20K.

    I have been looking at E36 M3/4 with 5 speed manual transmissions. It seems some of the modified ones from a certain dealer around Cincy are a bit higher (like 16-20), but the craigslist/autotrader private sellers seem to be under that. Of course, these are 10 year old cars with a fair bit of miles on them.

    I've really been considering getting a second track car, like a tuned Miata/MX-5, but this would be a good alternative, I think.

    It depends on how much of a relationship you want with your car and how fast you want to go. A Miata is not fast. It corners well but you have to get up to speed and then carry that speed with you around the track. This is kind of cool because it involves driver skill. It is also a great car to learn on because it won't take off on you and is very forgiving (this is along the same lines as why you shouldnt have a 600cc sport bike for your first M/C.) The other thing is the Miata has proven itself to be dead nuts reliable.

    Lightweight, RWD, and a 6 speed manual? I'm in love...

    The E36 was always a 5 speed, the E30 was also always a 5 speed, but the E46 might be a 6 speed. The Miata you have to get into the 2001 or so or newer to go from a 5 to 6 speed.

    If you want something with the roundel, you might find the 325/328 even cheaper in either the E36 or E46 guise. BMW did away with scheduled maintenance on the later models to save money, so i don't know how much I would want a BMW newer than 2003/4 or so.

    I used to drive a 1980 BMW 528i 5 speed a fair amount, and while that vehicle was maintenance intensive, it was a great ride in the late 80s/early 90s.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Agreed about the Miata, that's why I still have a '93.

    One caveat - it will spin if you lift in a hard turn. So learn quick! :surprise:

    :D
  • andys120andys120 Member Posts: 23,669
    One caveat - it will spin if you lift in a hard turn. So learn quick!

    That's odd, a small front-engined roadster should not do that,
    assuming the pavement is dry and not covered with sand. I'd check my tires if I were you.

    2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93

  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,427
    That dealer in Cincinnati...

    The cars are very cool.. and highly modified.. but, those prices are insane...

    Those are toys for those with much more disposable income than I have...

    I think you can get a pretty nice E36 M3 for around $12K..

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    It was wet, but when you lift off the throttle, weight shifts forward and the rear axle lightens up.

    Newer Miatas were "tamed", i.e. tuned for more understeer.
  • andys120andys120 Member Posts: 23,669
    It was wet, but when you lift off the throttle, weight shifts forward and the rear axle lightens up.

    That would be true on any car but there was no way to produce lift-off oversteer on those old TRs and Fiats I drove, to get the rear to come out you had to stand on it.
    Neither had IRS so that might be a factor.

    2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Miata is the opposite - it's really hard to get it to oversteer with power to the rear wheels. Of course mine is stock and only made 99 ft-lbs of torque when new.
  • boaz47boaz47 Member Posts: 2,747
    Must have been something the japanese missed on the lotus they copied to make the Miata. The old Lotus Elan was pretty balanced. It was as easy to drift sideways as my old 124 Spyder. Mustangs from the mid 80s had to be driven with the tail out and your foot on the gas but I had never read about the rear end sliding out on the Miata. I never raced one mind you. But I am surprised. Not that you can't learn to live with it. The old MR-2 would turn lose without warning and send you into the hay bales. They did a lot to fix that before they discontinued them.
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    Agreed about the Miata, that's why I still have a '93.

    One caveat - it will spin if you lift in a hard turn. So learn quick!


    Yeah, its still way more forgiving than the S2000. Those and the original MR2s got nicknamed frisbees at the track.
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    Yeah they seemed to have some pretty pristine examples; they are just outliers price-wise. Even the stock machines they have seem impeccably maintained, serviced and detailed.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I have the stock sway bars. I could tune it to be more neutral, even to tend to oversteer, but this is a commuter primarily.

    Funny thing is I was playing around with a PlayStation 3 in a store, and ended up racing a Crystal White NA Miata, just like mine, in the game.

    It was hilarious! It really "felt" like my car. Tendency to understeer a little, great grip in the corners, relatively slow acceleration (a little better because the one in the game was turboed and tuned).

    I was just amazed at how well they simulated how the car drives. Impressive. Even the sounds from the engine.
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    Funny thing is I was playing around with a PlayStation 3 in a store, and ended up racing a Crystal White NA Miata, just like mine, in the game.

    It was hilarious! It really "felt" like my car. Tendency to understeer a little, great grip in the corners, relatively slow acceleration (a little better because the one in the game was turboed and tuned).

    I was just amazed at how well they simulated how the car drives. Impressive. Even the sounds from the engine.


    I am kind of "in the business" in that respect, and the vehicle dynamics models they have for $50 video games are better than the ones they had for multi-million dollar research based driving simulators only a few years ago.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Cool.

    Well, I should say good work, then.
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    I can't claim credit for the dynamics models, I am a user not a creator. I guess I can say that I complained about the existing ones enough that they developed better ones. See I knew all my whining would pay off some day. :D

    Research base driving simulators can be pretty sweet:
    Ford Virttex

    NADS (thats really what its called)

    And Daimler has one in Berlin but I can't find a good picture of it.

    These guys have a full motion base and a can simulate acceleration, braking, and cornering. Most of the little guys just have a fixed base simulator with a wide front field of view. For most driver research, this is arguably all you need.
  • razorasdfrazorasdf Member Posts: 61
    Well this I did not expect so soon. Mercedes is offering their new "MCT" dual-clutch transmission beginning with the AMG SL63. I hadn't even heard they were planning to introduce one within the next year or so. Too bad it still can't take the incredible torque of the 6.5L V12... But then again, they don't pair a manual to that beast of an engine either.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I can't wait until the home video games come with a simulator like that! ;)
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    that Tesla's little runabout has a manual transmission? :-)

    Was reading R&T this month and they had a little blurb about the '02-'06 WRX/STi - a whopping 97% of the 389 owners surveyed had bought manual-shift cars! :-) :-)

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • andys120andys120 Member Posts: 23,669
    ....Tesla's little runabout has a manual transmission?

    That makes no sense with a purely electric car, there's no gears. Perhaps they simulate a manual shifter as the do on some CVTs. :confuse:

    2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93

  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    Actually, according to the two articles I read, it has an honest-to-God cute little manual two-speed transmission. Apparently it will run around all day in second gear, but for fastest launches (it is supposed to be a sports car, after all) there is an extra lower gear...

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • razorasdfrazorasdf Member Posts: 61
    Actually, according to the two articles I read, it has an honest-to-God cute little manual two-speed transmission. Apparently it will run around all day in second gear, but for fastest launches (it is supposed to be a sports car, after all) there is an extra lower gear...

    Well, originally it was supposed to have two gears total - one forward, one reverse. Transmissions keep breaking (still do) with peak torque at 0 rpm, however. This two-speed unit was put in in the interim, but I don't think Tesla has let any journalist use first gear. The teeth of the gears are chipping away with each drive, too, or so I've heard.

    Alas, it'll be at least a year until they get this whole transmission thing taken care of. But an electric car with a manual? Whodathunk...
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    Well, I'm only quoting to you what I just finished reading, but both articles say the same things: it was never intended to have a reverse gear, as it is all-electric and they don't need one, they just turn the motor backwards. And both editors I was reading had used first gear.

    But apparently final decisions about the transmissions are still in the works, yes. They expect to start cranking them out to customers in the next six months though, so those decisions may be already made as I write this....

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • razorasdfrazorasdf Member Posts: 61
    Was it the Car and Driver test? Hmm, I've read a few and they all were forced to say in second gear. I guess my information is outdated, or my memory sucks (probably both).

    However, I do clearly remember Tesla promising that they'd give customers temporary transmissions and swap them out for free once they develop a solution to the problems they're facing within a year after delivery.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    I reread the R&T article more carefully, and what you said could be true: while the guy talks about the 2 forward speeds and makes it sound like he used both, it appears later on that he probably did all his driving in second gear. Sorry about casting aspersions on what you said! :blush:

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    I read Senior Content Editor Erin Riches' review of the 2008 Porsche Cayenne CTS and am puzzled by the closing statement "You'll need to be even a little more nuts to buy one with a manual transmission".

    Okay I get that it's a 5000 lb SUV but.... one that has 405hp, corners like it's on rails, goes 0-60 in 6 secs and stops on a dime. So since it drives like a sports car, what's so wrong with it having a manual? :confuse:

    -Frank
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,733
    yes, I think you are correct with your final assessment. Seems to me some of the writers talked about it as if they used it, but it was just smoke and mirrors. :)

    In any case, is it really a true manual? I don't remember them discussing a clutch. I kind of imagined it almost like a 2-speed powerglide. And, really, a clutch would be downright odd in such a car since full torque is at 0 rpms.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    Well, I reread the C&D article, and they definitely used first gear because they mention it specifically. They did say that there were two cars for them to drive, and one was a second-gear-only car, and that was the one they did the majority of the driving in. They only tested the car where they used both gears to get best acceleration times for the numbers section (and the number are pretty amazing).

    Now you bring up a good point with the clutch question. They mention easing up on the gas for the shift from 1 to 2 in order to get the smoothest gear change, so that sounds like a 3-pedal car. That, and if you look at the picture of the shifter, it is not in a straight line or zig-zag as automatics are, it is a dogleg with 1 and 2 both forward of the neutral position. But I can't be sure one way or the other.

    On a separate note, I was interested to note that in the reports this month about the new Evo, they are predicting (no comparison test yet) that it will be faster with the manual than with its whiz-bang, latest-gizmo-SST-whatever automatic (by a few tenths).

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,733
    hmmm... I thought it was a straight line, but I don't have the articles in front of me (they are next to the special white reading seat at home). But, like you said, 1 and 2 are straight up from neutral. So that still seems automatic-like to me. Almost like the Jag j-gate shifter. Maybe that's what made me think it was auto.

    I actually think a manual may help their tranny issue if they can force a slowdown on the clutch uptake (either electronically or hydraulically). It would eat up the clutch pretty quickly, though.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • razorasdfrazorasdf Member Posts: 61
    The temporary transmission is a sequential manual with no clutch pedal. Gotta love Wikipedia. ;)

    More info here.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    A couple of things to note:

    * all STI models are manual
    * C&D's readership is not exactly a representative sample of the public

    In other words, they're mostly car guys like us.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Erin probably expects that to be a family car, else the buyer would just get a 911.

    I'm not saying I agree, but that's probably her rationale.
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Hey if it was your standard glorified minivan... oops I mean SUV, then I'd agree. But if I'm gonna plunk down $90k on a vehicle that handles like a sports coupe then what's wrong with wanting a stick?

    -Frank
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Nothing, but Erin's angle is that you're a little crazy to expect your family vehicle to do that in the first place. ;)
  • razorasdfrazorasdf Member Posts: 61
    On a separate note, I was interested to note that in the reports this month about the new Evo, they are predicting (no comparison test yet) that it will be faster with the manual than with its whiz-bang, latest-gizmo-SST-whatever automatic (by a few tenths).

    Actually, the manual version of the Evo X will only be faster in a straight line. The SST will dump the clutch at a predetermined rpm (I believe 5250) while you can rev the manual to redline and just dump the clutch. It pulverizes the drivetrain, but it gets the job done. On the track, the SST proves to be faster, but that may be partially because the manual version is a slightly lower-end model with only 5 forward speeds.

    I thought the latest round of magazines had a few comparisons on their own tracks. I know there was a Japanese test with old STI vs new STI vs Evo IX vs Evo X 5MT vs Evo X SST, but I forget the outcome. Though I think the results from that test were different from the latest magazine tests, particularly concerning the Evo X...
  • boaz47boaz47 Member Posts: 2,747
    I was reading a comment from the President of Toyota on the Prius and he said they plan on making every Toyota a hybrid within the next ten years. Looks like Toyota might beat MB at doing away with manuals if that proves to be the case.
  • ny540i6ny540i6 Member Posts: 518
    I was reading a comment from the President of Toyota on the Prius and he said they plan on making every Toyota a hybrid within the next ten years. Looks like Toyota might beat MB at doing away with manuals if that proves to be the case.

    So are they saying that Toyota will sell nothing but hybrids, or that every Toyota will be available in a hybrid configuration?
  • boaz47boaz47 Member Posts: 2,747
    I could look up the site and article again but it sounded like if the quote was right that he wants all Toyota's to be hybrids. They want to produce a Yaris sized hybrid and the next two sizes till they get to a Camry sized hybrid. I am not sure what they have planed for a truck. With the system Toyota uses there will be no manuals with their hybrids.
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    They want to produce a Yaris sized hybrid and the next two sizes till they get to a Camry sized hybrid. I am not sure what they have planed for a truck. With the system Toyota uses there will be no manuals with their hybrids.

    Okay, except I think just about all the enviro-people that wanted a hybrid bought one. I don't know how there is going to be a business case for a Yaris-sized hybrid. 12,000 car that gets 40 mpg gets a 2000 mark up to get...45 mpg woot woot.
  • boaz47boaz47 Member Posts: 2,747
    I tried to find the specific article and it was taking longer than I thought. However the Green car people had a quote I will post. I can't say how truthful it might be only that it is supposed to be a quote.

    "At the Frankfurt IAA, Toyota Executive Vice President Kazuo Okamoto said all of the company’s vehicles will eventually be based on hybrid powertrains.

    In the future, the cars you see from Toyota will be 100 percent hybrid. We believe that in 10 years the world will be filled with hybrids.

    Okamoto declined to provide a timeline. Toyota has stated that it plans to sell 1 million hybrids a year by 2010.

    Earlier, President Katsuaki Watanabe said he aims to halve the premium in price of hybrids over conventional vehicles as soon as possible."


    I believe the US President for Toyota Echoed , not a pun, the same idea.

    I also read something about all future Toyota hybrid cars might get the Prius name.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    No, it's just a great shame. The worst part is, there's no way to demonstrate to them what they are missing, because they are actually entirely ignorant of how to use it! :-(

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    Ummmm...let's get a few things straight here.

    1. Toyota wants every model line to offer a hybrid variant, not for every vehicle they sell to be a hybrid. Also, in some cases (trucks) they expect to substitute diesel for hybrid as the fuel-sipper powertrain option.

    2. In future, they might make the hybrids carry the Prius label to mean it is a hybrid, ie Camry Prius for the hybrid Camrys, but that is just one idea. They are also still jazzed about their original idea, which was to make the Prius name signify the model with the latest, newest technology regardless of type (as in , hybrid was the latest tech of the last decade, in the future it will have new different technology in it)

    3. They want to sell 1 million hybrids globally in 2010, still less than 1% of the total market I would imagine, and certainly only around 10% of all Toyotas sold, so not a huge percentage.

    4. I agree that hybrids = no stick shift in Toyotaspeak, and that's too bad. I am waiting to see if Honda offers a stick on its new hybrid sport coupe scheduled to arrive in 2010. I am treating that as the belwether of future manual offerings among hybrids, as Honda has one of the strongest commitments among the Big 6 to both stick shifts and hybrid powertrains.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • boaz47boaz47 Member Posts: 2,747
    I only wanted to point out the direction and say Toyota seems to be leading in the race to do away with manuals. But it does pint out that to of the Major manufacturers we both agree are on the road to a manual free future. As we discussed some time ago the Toyota hybrid system doesn't seem to have any need for a manual. Not as big of a change for two pedel people.
  • xhe518xhe518 Member Posts: 107
    Other than a small sub-set of "car nuts" most people prefer an automatic...(at least here in the US)...It's not some big conspiracy.
Sign In or Register to comment.