Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Comments
I had forgotten how people tailgate each other at 75 MPH and I can't believe I used to be one of those people!
The only day I enjoy driving now is Sunday, especially in the morning. That is when I usually take the Commander out for a run. I drive the Chevy at 80 m.p.h. but I am just moving with the flow of traffic at that speed.
In a strange way, the 55 m.p.h. speed limit was fun because most people were driving 65 or 70 m.p.h. so I could put on a little burst of speed to show them how fast my old car could get to 80 m.p.h. Now that everyone is already going 80 m.p.h or more (while talking on the cell phone) I just stay in the slow lane and let them go by. I will still be driving my Commander when most of those cars are gone too.
I doubt it, given that you'd easily spend $700 for some improvement to that very same car without blinking.
Funny you should mention the $700 figure, because that is exactly what I paid for the Commander in 1979. I do drive the car all year because I live in the Los Angeles area. I don't drive it when it rains.
It is not just the gas expense, but everything that goes with the V-8 and all the options. Over the past ten years, I had to replace/rebuild the hydrovac power brake unit twice, the automatic transmission once, and the power steering pump once. The power windows are slow on a six-volt system, so I have to keep those cleaned and oiled or they won't work properly. Changing the plugs on the driver's side of the car takes a lot of time because the battery and power steering hoses are in the way.
I spent most of my time and money fixing things that are not even on that 1952 Champion plus that Champion keeps a lot cooler in hot weather and the motor is very quiet because there is no overhead valve noise.
Therefore, if that same car was available either as a Champion with the overdrive transmission or as a V-8 Commander with the automatic, it would be a close question for me given that I live in the City and have to stop and go on most trips.
Here is an interesting article about a guy who rebuilds Studebaker flathead sixes.
http://www.hemmings.com/hcc/stories/2005/01/01/hmn_feature24.html. Part of the article says this.
The engine-building side of the business started at an equally unintentional pace. After a friend asked him to rebuild a flathead six, he took on a couple more rebuilds, then eventually decided to advertise that service as well. Bill said he now builds about six engines a year, one at a time, and despite the wide range of engine rebuild options he gives his customers, he generally builds his engines for both power and reliability. "These things are like a tractor engine," he said. "If they're in good shape, you can't hurt them."
Each engine he builds completely to the customer's tastes, from 90hp stone stockers up to outrageous (for a Studebaker flathead six) 140hp naturally aspirated, non-stroked, multi-carbureted fire-breathers. Prices range from $2,800 for a basic rebuild to as much as $4,300 for the heavy hitters
====================================================
My first car was a 1960 Lark 6 with an automatic trans and I later owned an Army surplus Lark with a three-speed with overdrive that I bought for $300 in 1980. That was the best $300 I ever spent and the transmission made a big difference in the performance. I did not have any major maintenance or repairs during the ten years I owned and drove it, then the reverse gear below on the transmission and it went to the junk year under its own power. I swear, I would rather have a Studebaker 6 in my Chevy instead of the Quad 4 that had a major breakdown at 30,000 miles and had to be replaced before 50,000 miles.
My old Lark ended up here and was still there when I stopped by about 5 years ago. http://www.pvilleparts.com/ It claims to be the hubcap capital of the world.
I think I will send them an E-mail and find out if the Lark still exists. All the Studebakers were parked by the family house and it was still complete except for the rear brake drums. They had a 1957 Packard station wagon in restorable condition last time I was there too.
Thher used to be a guy everyone called Flathead Temple who specialized in flathead Ford V-8's but if he decided he liked you he would take on a flathead Studebaker six. He used to tell us kids that the Studebaker V-8's were junk compared to the flathead sixes.
He lived in Lomita and worked out of a shop in his backyard. You couldnt' rush him and he was a real Prima Donna but his work was cheap and pure perfection.
It is definitely a minority opinion that the Stude Sixes were better than the V-8s. Bill Cathcart seems to be the only guy into rebuilding the sixes on a regular basis, but there are numerous Stude mechanics who like the V-8s and they stay together even when you supercharge them and triple the original horsepower. They were designed for compression ratios of greater than 12 to 1, which is one of the reasons why they are heavier than later V-8s.
I came to the defense of the six-cylinder motor because it makes sense in that nice 1952 Champion hardtop shown earlier. That is such a nice looking but economical car to own and operate. A car that is getting near 60 years old should not be exceeding the speed limit (in every State except Texas) in any event.
I might have posted this before, but both the 1953 Studebaker and the 1955 Citroen DS are shown as early examples of aerodynamic cars. http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/02/a-brief-illustrated-history-of-automoti- ve-aerodynamics-part-2/ In 1955 the Citroen only had 75 horsepower while the Studebaker Champion 6 was up to 102 hp. in 1955 and you could get a Stude V-8 with 185 hp.
The main difference between the Citroen styling and the Studebaker seems to be in the glass area. The Stude does not have the curved glass and the passenger compartment is wider. I read somewhere that the front windshield created high speed drag on the Stude, but the design it is still much more efficient than the first Ford Mustang. Studebaker wanted to put a curved glass windshields on the coupes and hardtops, but (fortunately) they did not have the money to do that. The sedans and wagons did get curved glass winshields in 1955.
*genuinely* aerodynamic cars would probably have shapes we wouldn't like.
I agree with that statement. The AMC Pacer has a drag coefficient of 0.32. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_drag_coefficient The 1953 Studebaker is better than the Ford Mustang and Dodge Viper. Too bad they do not list many older cars.
Studebaker thought America wanted economical and fuel efficient cars in the 1950s, but they were wrong. Gas was too cheap to bother with that. Even Nash Rambler gave up on their economy Rambler/American in 1956 and 1957 until they decided to try it again during the recession of 1958.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rambler_American That is an amazing story.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1947-STUDEBAKER-CHAMPION-BUSINESS-COUPE-/26077295- 4445?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item3cb747814d
Market price is probably around $7500 to $8000.
Cool car! Personally I would resto-rod it but very tastefully. I wouldn't change the exterior except for radials and I'd try to use the column shifter for the automatic gearshift. Not much engine room in there, so I dunno....maybe a V-6 with a blower?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1963-Studebaker-GT-Hawk-Rare-Black-and-Red-Very-N- - ice-/110679574940?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item19c504499c
GT's have done better than Avantis for a while. Avantis were high for a Stude for a long time but never went through the roof. Conversely, Hawks increased quite a lot, and even Lark hardtops and convertibles, in nice shape, have gone up quite a bit over the years. R2 Larks are in a class by themselves, and even low-level two-door sedans bring big bucks.
There were just under 16,000 GT Hawks built in the three model years (the '64 model year ending in Dec. '63), but it seems they have a high survival rate.
I recently sold my '64 Daytona Hardtop which is a 'twenty footer' to a Stude buff from Australia. I have the cash but we've yet to firm up a pick up date. It has floor rust which wasn't disclosed by the seller to me. The car was sold new by my small hometown dealer and I remember it as the original owner had it til 1990, but it's simply more project than I can deal with now.
The $23K bid on the Hawk is pretty much what you'd expect for a nice car, at least based on photos.
As we all know, sometimes an eBay bidder is disappointed enough in the "camera tricks" that he takes on a lawsuit. It won't be the first time.
I'm sometimes asked to view a car that's shown on eBay and report back to the buyer before he bids, and occasionally I am shocked at the misrepresentation. So I'm not surprised that what seems like a "generous bid" is, in fact, not indicative of the market, but rather indicative of people's naivety or treachery.
Also it's hard to compare old used cars one to another. They are all different, so one can't be too "loose" in descriptions. If Car A has nice paint, and car B has shabby paint, then they aren't "close"---they are at least $5000 apart right there. And if you add a shabby THIS and a shabby THAT, then the car A could be worth double the car B.
Aside from what you noticed, I saw dirty carpets, some sloppy aftermarket trunk mats, and what looked like a rattle-can re=spray of the radiator shroud.
So I'm not so sure the new owner is going to be so happy with this car.
I would have guessed half that amount but what do I know?
This is the BEST thing that can happen for a seller and this may be the case here. Egos take over and reason go's out the window!
But with 65 bids, in a still-shaky economy, this is yet another recent example that folks are indeed interested in a sharp Studebaker that is advertised attractively.
It's a matter of timing. Had that car been advertised at a different time and not spotted my these agressive bidders, the results could have been much different.
Like I said, the seller got lucky!
True, but only 3 were in it after $7,800, and 2 were in it from $20,000 on up.
But once again, a few sales don't make a "market". The buyer pool for Studebakers is quite small, so this depresses the value versus say an equivalent GM car. When you have limited supply AND limited demand, then rarity doesn't boost value.
Of course, this presumes all of them are very very nice cars.
Years ago my wife and I were shopping for a Honda and she picked out a Fiji Blue Pearl Civic for a test drive. I was dreading the cute jokes and nicknames this car would inspire..."I'm taking 'Pearl' for an oil change" or "Are you Hungary? I'll Fiji blue pearl!" I remember doggedly searching for something wrong with that car and settled on a loose-fitting interior door handle. Next!
Really, I understand why you might think that. But given cars of equal quality, nice '63 Rivs should routinely outsell nice GT Hawks.
The problem might be that we see a *lot* of Riviera beaters for sale because they made so very many more Rivs than GT Hawks (easily 10 to 12 times as many).
So the beaters tend to drag down the averages. Also a lot of Rivs get modified into low riders, customs, etc. whereas you rarely see that happening to GT Hawks.
But all things being equal, in the broad market of appeal, a Riviera done up really nicely is a more popular package in the overall marketplace.
I keep looking for a nice one but every one that pops up on Ebay has either been ratty or modified. There was a stripper '63 awhile back that didn't have A/C or power anything that wasn't standard. I don't know if it met reserve.
Where I live, I often see a decent red '63 and an eye popping near perfect green '65 Gran Sport!
Guess I'll keep looking.
Funny you wouild talk aout gas mileage because "ferocious" is an understatement! If I jumped on the gas in my '65, I could watch the gas guage drop. Of course, it would lay rubber for a half block if I was so inclined. They also needed the highest octane I could find!
I had to chuckle when you mentioned the handling of those T-Birds. They would plow through corners while eating tires and front end parts.
They didn't get disc brakes until 1965 and they would go through linings and drums liek there was no tomorrow. The Rivs used huge aluminum front drums that were so much better.
Here's one...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Buick-Riviera-_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQ_trkparmsZalgoQ3- - dLVIQ26ituQ3dUCIQ26otnQ3d5Q26poQ3dLVIQ26psQ3d63Q26clkidQ3d8985187478773157081QQ_- - trksidZp5197Q2em7QQitemZ220779128442
It's well equipped as Riviera should be but Mickey Mouse has paid it a visit too. The half vinyl top is incorrect and tacky and whoever drilled the hood to install hood pins of all things is nuts!
Still, probably one of the nicest ones I've seen.
Several years back I saw a dark green '65 Riv GS at Carlisle. I liked it a lot. I get sick of white, black, and bright red on everything. I think color plays into values on old cars, and I wouldn't mind saving a few bucks on a color that doesn't knock everybody else out, if the car is super-straight. In later Studebakers, where I tend to know more of the details, I can't stand it when an otherwise really nice car has (to me) glaring authenticity issues, even minor ones, like that $25K GT had.
I heard that the Buick mechanics just hated them. The slightest bump to the front bumper would cause them to quit working. They used a complex, primitive system along with some micro switches.
This is why you'll often see a 65 Ric with the headlights permanently opened. On one of my 65's they worked and on the other they didn't and I never bothered to find out why.
The 64's had pods next to the headlights that glowed softly when the headlights were turned on. A nice look!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Buick-Riviera-1963-BUICK-RIVIERA-_W0QQcmdZViewIte- mQQhashZitem3cb7a3b003QQitemZ260778995715QQptZUSQ5fCarsQ5fTrucks
I'm not an authority on Rivs, but it looks pretty darn authentic to me. I'm not sure about the wheels/wheel covers, and the ad says it's got a '64 engine, but I'm not seeing anything chromed that shouldn't be, etc., like on that GT.
Nice car.
Wrong color paint, wheel covers were an option for sure.
No air conditioning as a car like that should have.
Somehow I think the seats out of a '65 got in that car. Again, not 100% sure.
There is an expensive restaurant with valet parking in Marina Del Rey, CA. They only have 4 spaces by the entrance, all other cars park in back. It is so funny to see them park my Commander up front with the most expensive cars while Porsche's and Mercedes end up getting parked in back. The valets doing the parking think the Commander is rare and expensive. You get a lot of fun for the dollar driving a Studebaker.
It's a Gran Sport that has taken off!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1965-Buick-Riviera-GRAN-SPORT-ORIGINAL-CONDITION-- /170635186154?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item27baa64fea
I always have to laugh when I hear people arguing about the correctness of the bolt heads on a Model A Ford. Henry Ford himself didn't much care what bolts he used---whatever was on the shelf was good enough. And really, on a car that is mass-produced in rapid industrial style, little problems of authenticity are, IMO meaningless quibbles, especially when they are easily correctible. You can grind and strip off chrome and paint it, you can fetch the right hubcaps if you so wish, and you can unbolt the fender skirts and continental kit and sell them.
What I'm saying is that I certainly wouldn't reject a nice car at a fair price if there are some wrong pieces on it. In fact, I'd probably keep them on there just to annoy the people who spend their whole day prowling the car shows in order to point out what's wrong with other people's cars. I love to say "oh, I know, and I don't care". :P
It doesn't take a genius to figure this out.
When I had repair work done on my '08 Cobalt at six weeks old, I rejected it at pickup time because the little square "GM" emblem on the front fender was too high. There is no way anybody even bothered to measure where the one on the other side is. LAZY!
It'll be interesting to see where it ends up for sure!
Years ago, I had a "restored" 1965 Mustang Convertable that was a beautiful car. It had 1966 wheels on it instead of the right ones and people just couldn't wait to point that out to me as if I didn't already know.
My response was usually the same as yours.
The two bidders that are going at it both have ZERO bid history. Not good.
The others have dropped out.