Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
Oddly enough there is an "old" formula 5-20, but not an EP formula 5-20....
My doubts have to do with 5-30 Extended vs. 5-30 non-Extended formulas. It's clear that the Extended formula will last longer. What's not clear is which is "tougher" during 5,000 mile runs. Maybe for all practical purposes they are the same, for such a shorter oil change interval!
Something weird is going on, not necessarily with the oil, but with the additive packs, because non-Extended Mobil 1 5-30 is GF4, while Extended 5-30 is not GF4.
So in a way Extended might be better, because it has the old style, tougher additive pack, but on the other hand, is there less actual lubricant in the Extended version (because there is 36% or so more additives than in the non-Extended)?
To make things more confusing, did they reduce the volume of additives in their regular formula, or increase it in the Extended formula? Right now Mobil 1's website leaves me confused. I don't think it's necessarily a marketing ploy, but something more complicated in response to the SM/GF3 standards change....
Mobil 1 5W-30 is recommended for all types of modern vehicles, including high-performance turbo-charged, supercharged gasoline and multi-valve fuel injected engines found in passenger cars, SUVs, light vans and trucks
That text appears on the "regular" formula page.
Here is what the "Extended" formula page says:
Mobil 1 Extended Performance motor oil is designed for today's longer service intervals. Mobil 1 Extended Performance products contain 50 percent more SuperSyn, 37 percent more cleaning agents, and 36 percent more anti-wear additives than Mobil 1. Mobil 1 Extended Performance with the Advanced SuperSyn System helps keep engines running like new and helps extend engine life by reducing wear and oil breakdown. Please follow the recommendations in your owner's manual while your car is under warranty.
Not the absence of any reference to the "heavy duty" applications like supercharged and turbocharged.
Not a scientific analysis, but the advertising seems intended to appeal to hard drivers for the regular oil, and extended OCI drivers for the Extended oil.
Best Regards,
Shipo
I added some Slick 50 to my last 2 vehicles and was very happy with the results.
I would like to use a semi synthetic oil as well, the synthetic oil seems pricey for regular changes.
Yeesh! And yet you waste your money on snake oil called "Slick 50"? Makes no sense.
Best Regards,
Shipo
Hmmm, given that this is a discussion on "Synthetic Oil", my version of your statement would be "...change your oil with synthetic oil per the manufacturers recommendations religiously, which will help engine last much more than any chemical additive ever could..."
Best Regards,
Shipo
To expand upon some of your thoughts; my last two BMWs have had 2.8 and 3.0 liter six cylinder engines, and they both have had a roughly seven quart oil capacity, which is nearly twice the size of many engines of a similar size. Combine that with the fact that the cars came from the factory with synthetic oil, and that fully synthetic is the only oil specified, and you have an engine that should at least do 10K miles between oil changes. But wait! There's more. The 2.8 engine was certified ULEV and the 3.0 was certified ULEV-II, and as such, the amount of contaminants produced by those engines during normal operations is a mere fraction of what engines produced just ten years ago (not to mention what they produced thirty years ago), and there is a direct corelation between clean combustion and clean oil.
So, if the take a very clean burning engine with twice the normal compliment of oil in its sump, and synthetic oil at that, what do you get? Simple, an engine that has a target 15,000 OCI from the factory. I say "Target" because there is an on board computer that is tasked with determining when the oil should be changed, and that of course is based upon the kind of driving that has been done since the last oil change. On my last car, I picked it up in Germany and once broken in, I drove the willies out of it on the AutoBahn. Not surprisingly the computer called for the oil to be changed at just over 13K miles. Right about the time of that oil change, I moved to New Hampshire and started doing a lot of long distance commuting between here and Long Island. I usually time my trips to avoid as much traffic as possible, and this last time around, the computer called for an oil change at 31K miles, a whopping 18K miles since the first change.
Best Regards,
Shipo
So also if my 3.4 qt system were to be now 7 quarts, then in theory I can now run 106% MORE miles on an OCI. ( or 20,600 mile OCI's).
In general I agree with that, however, there a few other things to consider:
1) Will your oil-filter last for 20K miles?
2) Time and oxidization also play a roll in oil life. If your hypothetical 20K miles is driven in less than a year, then "non-issue", otherwise I'd change at the 1 year point regardless of how many miles had been driven.
3) The more oil your sump contains, the longer it takes said oil to reach a temperature high enough to "Boil out" the water that has collected inside of your engine since its last shutdown. If your car is driven on lots of short trips, you might find that the increase in oil capacity is enough to prevent it from reaching a high enough temperature to keep itself clean and contaminate free.
Best Regards,
Shipo
Given your above post, this solution is easily within the realm of that on board computer.
Alright, I understand to a degree the warnings about using synthetic in a car with this many miles. I seem to get the impression that doing so is not a big deal while others say don't do it. If the issue is that the leak appears due to build up, then I don't believe there would be much of a problem due to the regular OCI's. If it is due to seals not being able to handle the new oil, then I may have a problem.
Questions:
1. What are my chances of contracting a leak?
2. If so, will it be severe?
3. Will it be correctable?
4. About how long do you think I have before one would appear or basically when is my safe point to assume it will not leak?
I have used Mobil1 in other cars but never one this old.
thanks.
I am coming from two places
1. 694,000 miles with 15,000 mile OCI's with Mobil One 5w30 synthetic.
2. 10,000 mile break in OCI on oem fill (Honda 5w20, CONVENTIONAL oil) with a 2004 Honda Civic VP.
So in truth, I would have no qualms whatsoever with 10,000 mile OCI's (per Honda Civic's owners manual and shop technical data and warranty periods) with any one of half a doz or more superior conventional oils; I.E., I would use EM Superflo 5w20,
So with #2, I switched to Mobil One 0w20 (synthetic) I will go another 10,000 mile OCI for two reasons:
1 final break in
2 After the meager warranty of 3 yr or 36,000 miles, I have no problems going to 20,000 mile OCI's.
So if you continue to do 3k oci's, in effect you would waste far less money if you stayed with conventional oil.
You are doing mostly highway miles so you don't have to change oil so offen.
I think oil brand like Chevron, Havoline or other major brands can easy go to 6K mi on highway.
Syn: 20 changes at $42 per change = $840.00
Dino: 33 changes at $24 per change = $792.00
The difference is barely a $50 bills over 100K miles (assuming constant prices, of course)...heck, if I just stretch a few of the syn changes to 6K miles instead of 5K, the price would even out if I just changed the syn oil 19 times in 100K miles...so, I do feel comfortable going 5K miles on syn oil...
Since the oil cleans, lubricates, cools the engine, especially cleans and lubes, there can NEVER be any harm in changing oil before it is sufficiently filthy for the sensors to pick up...kinda like showering twice in one day...usually not mandatory, but can anyone ever be hurt by showering again before they stink to high holy heaven???...
Even I feel better when I start the engine, and all that fresh oil is pumped in all the internal parts, knowing the oil is fresh and clean at 5K...just my habit, I guess...
I think if all you will do is 100,000 miles, why bother? The TDI I plan to run 500,000 to 1,000,000 miles. It is a bit oxymoronic to see those most concern with using synthetic for short OCI's, usually the ones to sell or get rid of the car at a lower mileage interval. I also have app 250,000 miles on a 14 year old Toyota 1987 Landcruiser which went to the shop for 15,000 mile valve adjust intervals. It was an every day business and client vehicle. The mechanics always marveled at the tolerances and lack of sludge in the motor up until it was sold. The oil was 5w30 Mobil One and heaven help me FRAM PH8A oil filters.
On one car the synthetic helped with cold starts for certain, and for maintining somewhat cooler temperatures while running through the desert in summer, (air cooled engine with cylinder head and oil temp gauges) but otherwise there were no appreciable mileage benefits on any of the cars, which is what I was hoping for.
I wouldn't have a problem with extended oil changes on new engines but I wasn't keen on stretching them beyond 5,000 miles on old engines.
http://www.gmtechlink.com/images/issues/ref_gds/synthgd.pdf
Sometimes it takes awhile for the GM page to download
I've written on this topic many times over the last seven years, and each time I do, I put a little more thought into the subject. In the end, after all of the arguments are distilled away it seems that I keep coming up with two distinct classes of folks regarding the OCI:
1) Scientific oil changers, and
2) Religious oil changers.
I am a scientific oil changer, you are a religious one. The fact remains that extended oil changes (ie. >= 15,000 miles as recommended by the vehicle manufacturer) have been around for at least a decade (if I recall correctly, Porsche got the ball rolling back in the early to mid 1990s). Since the inception of the 15,000 mile OCI, I have yet to see a single scientific study that suggests that engine life would be measurably enhanced by reducing the number of miles drive between changes. The flip side of course is that I've seen plenty of evidence, both scientific and anecdotal, that suggests that if anything, running a modern engine 15,000 miles with premium synthetic oil, fed with modern clean burning fuel, is a conservative number. When I was working for MB-USA back in the mid 1990s I kept a close watch on their synthetic oil tests. The result? None of their test cars, which routinely had the oil analyzed, ever needed an oil change before 20,000 miles.
A few questions:
- Is modern gasoline formulated to combust far cleaner than any gasoline ever made?
- Are modern LEV, ULEV, ULEV-II, and Tier2 certified cars capable of burning modern fuel so cleanly that particulate matter is far less than 1% of what similar engines produced just twenty years ago?
- Is modern fully synthetic oil capable of holding in suspension far more post combustion particulate matter than any conventional oil ever made?
- Is modern fully synthetic oil capable of holding acid causing water in suspension far longer without allowing said acids to form?
- Is modern fully synthetic oil many times more capable at maintaining its chemical structure without breaking down with both time and usage?
- Would doubling the oil capacity of a modern engine (such as BMW does) versus other engines of similar size not also double the oil life?
Science says that the answer to each and every one of those questions is an unqualified, "Yes". When I think about it, maybe I'm still wasting my money by sticking to the 15K oil change. Maybe I should extend it to 22,500 miles, or even (gasp!) 30,000 miles. In the end, I'm inclined to adhere to the recommendations of the scientists and engineers that built my car. Then again, I'm an atheist too. ;-)
Best Regards,
Shipo
I am capable of checking and topping off the liquids, and changing various filters.
It's almost a daily driver, but sits most of the time in the garage. Is it worth it to switch, I heard that it's better for the engine, and it last longer, but I don't know if I'm ready to go more then 5k between oil changes.
Contrary to some rumours, Supertech oil isn't private label Pennzoil. It is from an independent refinery, used to be out of Shrevesport.
Also keep in mind that the Starburst, GF-4, and SM oil certifications are all "self-certified" - there are no independent tests to confirm compliance. The Pennzoil label is worth the extra peace of mind.
I have no such qualms about Supertech filters which are private label Champion Labs brand. Many of us believe they are far superior to Fram filters (and I recollect that Pennzoil and Quaker State filters are re-branded label Fram filters). Champion also makes STP and Bosch filters found at Autozone. In fact when I used to get Walmart oil changes, I would ask them to use Supertech oil filters instead of Fram.
The hierarchy of prices at Walmart is as follows, from cheap to more expensive, base on my recollection:
1. Supertech Oil Change with no inspection.
2. Pennzoil oil change with no inspection.
3. Pennzoil oil change with inspection.
4. Bottled oil, conventional, with no inspection.
5. Bottled oil, conventional, with inspection.
6. Bottled oil, synthetic, with no inspection.
7. Bottled oil, synthetic, with inspection.
Not all these variations are obvious from their posted menu of prices, but ask.
I have one vehicle that is working on a 25,000 mile OCI (again with a Mobil One T&S 5w40, aka Delvac One 5w40)
I also like changing app once per year instead of the usual 5 times a year.
I think with OLDER cars especially, it's a good idea to have it up on a lift and someone looking the car over every 3,000-5,000 miles. I think that 15K between regular visual inspections, on older cars, is too long.
I am from the old school that 3K on dino oil was normal, could push to 4K miles if necessary...I have converted both of my new cars to syn oil, and I feel comfortable now at 5K changes...
Could I go 10K or 15K with no damage???...maybe, but I am comfortable at 5K, so I will do that...the poster with 694K miles and changes at 15K, keep going, I am glad you feel OK with that...I like 5K, which may be more old habit, than based on science...
One thing: since the oil is the way to clean and lube the engine, I do believe that you cannot change oil too often, within reason (i.e. every 500 miles is not taking care of your engine, it is as ridiculous as taking a shower every hour to feel clean)...that's enough from me... :shades: :shades:
This is app 47 oil changes vs a 3k OCI's = 232 oil changes.
368 qts/4=94 gals vs 1,848qts/4= 464 gals,.
not to mention 47 oil filters vs 464 oil filters.
The huge savings, if one has to pay to get the oil changed is the labor. Normal change is 18 dollars so 47 changes would cost $846. vs 232 changes =$4,176
I would also agree that it is convenient to look under the car at oil changes. I guess I really give it the once over when I wash the vehicles.