By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
The SUV/CUV station wagon perspective is actually very practical .Where on the sedan, I don't like the station wagon styling, and it seems extra hard to get in/out.
I may have mis-spoken a bit on the styling of the station wagon cars. I actually like the styling. It is not enough (given SUV/CUV's) to convince me to switch to a car.
My family has had station wagons, one was a Toyota Corolla and the other was a Toyota Cressida. The Toyota Cressida had a detuned supra engine , I6, for a WOW as I remember! It was great in the SOS/DD trek with way less mpg and torque.
I could have sworn that California required their own front plates on vehicles registered there. Guess your old Passat was a Slope rig.
Diesel isn’t dead yet, but it soon could be."
The death of diesel: From superfuel to fossil fuel (thememo.com)
So for example. an MB GLK 350 22 mpg, per mile driven cost $.364.
Contrast this with $ .0814 per mile driven(35 mpg@ $2.85). 447% MORE ! ??
So IF EV is SO good and DRAMATICALLY cheaper, do you even wonder why London taxi's are not EV's and hybrid gassers? So de facto, what they're saying is when you burn two times more gas you are polluting less than diesel. Again, that is patently absurd or another modern miracle.
http://www.flyingpenguin.com/?p=18088
Or another way of asking, on an avg 70,000 miles per year -NYC taxi, would you rather get 54 mpg versus 25 mpg ? ($4 per gal vs $8 per gal in UK.)
My Ford C-Max Energi, on the other hand, has copious amounts of headroom and enters / exits like an SUV.
Yes, it is SO much cheaper living in the city with no car! Depending on how far the store is away @ $2.00 per mile and tip.....that $4 gal of milk is now $8.80. I am sure you'll really impressed the cab driver with a $.80 tip.
Hm, how are you going to get that $400. COSTCO load home on the NYC subway?t
Or get a friend with a MINI. "What can Blue do for you?"
Actually I bought it in Oregon and registered it to my residence in AK. Remember back then diesels were verboten in the People's Socialist Republic of CA. I registered all my vehicles in AK until 2009 when my DL was going to expire. I would have to fly up to renew and made the big mistake of becoming a CA resident. On front license plates. I did not want to drill holes in my Touareg for the front plate. So far two years later no one has said anything. What is funny I had my Suburban that I bought in ID with AK plates that said 4BAJA. Used to see the same cop by my condo and he never stopped me to find out why I did not have CA plates. My Ex drove all over San Diego in our 1979 Honda Accord with expired MN plates, for 4 years. Never stopped. Crazy eh?
I do walk for eggs but the heat has zapped my neighbor's chicken production. I'm down to my last two and it may be a couple of days before I can replenish my supply. She's completely out of eggs today.
Diesel is more popular in California than I thought.
Indeed, I am getting penalized for producing infinitesimally small amounts of garbage and also penalize for NOT producing massive amounts of recycling. The half dozen/ of another6 o one principle.
http://news.yahoo.com/great-lakes-gas-prices-jump-partial-refinery-shutdown-194502046--finance.html
BP in Detroit MI : ULSD $2.49,
RUG $2.69, MG $2.69, PUG $3.09.
Let's see, more cars in the PVF (passenger vehicle fleet) 269.3 M ? More VMT (vehicle miles travelled ) in B's @ 2,988 B miles?
http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD
Another california bonus is that rich people who drive new/mint cars never have to register them. Seriously. People just drive on the dealer tag forever, then turn it back into dealer a year or two later at lease-end with the same dealer tags on it.
Also the lower diesel-fuel prices in California are nice, for stickshift VW TDI drivers, and I suppose the slushbox VW TDI people too.
I voted with my wallet again, buying another gas-powered stickshift car (Chevy SS Sedan). Also I discovered how much stickshift is worth to me, because I could have bought previous-model year with automatic transmission for about $7000 less! I would have been so disappointed had i bought the automatic transmission.
I too have been spoiled by Chevrolet's use of the Tremec MT product line. Does yours have the 6066 model?
Edmunds.com lists the 15 Chevrolet SS btw 46 to 48 large MSRP. Even the 2001 Z06 Corvette does better than its' EPA 14/21 mpg? PUG. In that era, the Z06 had 10% more aggressive or lower gears.
I do have to say the Tremec 6070 MT 7 sp has caught my eye. Would a Tremec 6070 motivate me to buy that particular transmission, since it comes only in the Corvette ? I don't know, probably not at this stage of my life.
Needless to say, any of these products are in extremely small niches markets.
So if you are OK with paying approximately 16.4 cents to 24.6 (low/high side) per mile driven, as opposed to diesel (35 mpg) being at a 8. 2 cents pmd: f, I'm sure all of us are just fine with that. (Vote with my wallet issue)
Right now the commute is handled by the 2009 VW Jetta TDI. It is boring (boring is GOOD) posting 40 mpg @ 15,000 miles @ 7.18 cents pmd, and currently costs $1,077.00 per year .
Hopefully, the second set of tires will see it past the 10 year mark (150,000 miles) to 180,000 miles (90,000 miles per set).
So far, so good.
Maybe that is due to the fact the Homeless ate all the garbage and only WASTE was left.
Smoking vehicle complaints rise in Salt Lake City. (standard.net)
The diesel market share is already @ 5%. So I think the diesel car portion currently @ 2.5% should only grow toward 3% and beyond.
So for example, it is always a fair observation that if someone doesn't want to buy a Volkswagen to get a diesel, might mean that the TDI option ( VW's 23% +) is not a real big factor in somebody's priorities of vehicle or engine choice. The same can be said of other brands like : Audi, BMW, Porsche, Mercedes, etc,.
I have been wanting actually a Toyota Land Cruiser diesel since easily 1986, 29 years. Since the TLC was one of the best made Toyota's in those times, I sucked up having to buy gassers because of the brand. Of course, it didn't hurt being able to use the IRS section 179 tax code in the process. I fully suspect that the 1987/ 1994Toyota Land Cruiser TDI 's would still be passing the smog only inspections.
Beyond cars, people flash on Cummins and Powerstroke. Big honking trucks, not SUVs or crossovers in other words.
I think either of the next two observations are probably spot on. If anything would cure you of wanting a diesel, it would be a 1985/86 (my case) a Mercedes-Benz 300 diesel sans turbo. Lose momentum or speed upgrade ( my case SOS/DD up to 7,300 ft) and 50 mph was what you WISHED you were going. But the same was true actually for most gassers at the time . Contrast that with today's diesel and it's literally a night and day difference AND much better mpg.
Not that long ago, fully 75% of diesels on the road were "light" trucks.
If your car is no longer capable of driving, then you might as well decide not to put it on the junkyard but transform it to a wood cutter insted much like what these guys did with their 1992 Honda Civic. These guys modified their old car and made it more handy by putting a Stickler in one of the wheels.
http://woodsplitter.legendaryspeed.com/these-guys-transformed-their-car-into-a-wood-splitter/
He's probably the one that fills the whole valley below my house with woodsmoke from his outdoor boiler running full-on to heat his poorly insulated house.
The ironic thing is we get it back in spades when there's forest fires! Go figure ?
On your three other issues,it's easy for you to run calculations and do the comparisons. Let us know what you conclude.
2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460
I personally feel its a lot less headache then a diesel car and which gives 50mpg in full traffic city driving.
Diesel Passat may be good for long distance interstate driving but Accord Hybrid is awesome for city stop and start driving.
Base model Accord Hybrid costs only 31,000. which is less then a Passat TDI S
Hybrids are an even smaller % of the PVF than diesels. That is despite a decade or more backing by the government with unseen and seen special tax credits, write offs and other advantages too numerous to mention and know. By contrast, diesels have been largely vilified during that whole time.
Economics is more important me. If I wanted driving dynamics, I would be driving a Porche
Passat TDI have currently great deals in my area , nearly 5000 off the MRSP. So I might go for the Passat TDI
Just now received an email from the Honda dealer that the base Honda Accord Hybrid is discounted to 24,800.
So tough decision to make. Honda hybrid city driving is 50mpg versus Passat TDI 30mg. My most of the driving is city, about 80 percent so I might lean towards Honda
sutliffvolkswagen.com/new-Harrisburg-2015-Volkswagen-Passat-2.0L+TDI+SE-1VWBV7A32FC077677
(According to Fuelly.com) You are over stating the 2015 Honda hybrid 50 mpg (42.) and understating the Passat TDI 30 mpg (39.6) . Given the difference in slightly higher mpg of the hybrid and higher acquisition prices ( than the TDI) , it will take you much more than 100,000 miles to break even ( more like 250,000 plus miles).
For economic purposes, it seems that you prefer a more expensive base model Honda Accord hybrid as opposed to more loaded and CHEAPER Passat TDI.
Purely as a comparison, ( I spent the day with ) a person who owns a 2009 Camry hybrid with 92,000 miles. He gets around roughly 32 mpg. (2015 TCH @ 36,5, 2009 TCH @ 34.4) In my 2009 VW Jetta TDI with 95,000 miles, we have never gotten under 38 miles a gallon and that's in punishing, punishing stop and go traffic, i.e. city .
2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460
Great advise. Now is really a good time to snap the bargains. Gas prices being very low, the diesels and the hybrids are being steeply discounted. Once the Gas hits 4 bucks then those puppies will be shooting a premium . I am off to the VW and Honda dealer tomorrow to test drive both.
No one has any issues with someone NOT wanting/liking/needing a TDI, least of all someone like me.
So for example, the friend with the Toyota Camry hybrid getting 32mpg, didn't want to hear, or wasn't interested that we get 40 mpg in a competitive TDI. So, ...I didn't bring it up. The ironic part is that the CUV MB 250 blue tech gets better mpg than a hybrid CAR. It's more than 600 #'s heavier and 4 Matic vs FWD.
I'm just not a fan of the outdoor boilers due to their poor efficiency and, as a result, high pollution level. The guys that use them will deny it without question, but when they install one and then the next winter there is a constant blanket of foul smoke for the whole winter where there was not before, the evidence is, well, self-evident.
I grew up with a wood stove as our sole heat source (well, half of my childhood, anyway). I do like it, but my lungs do not. While it is a minor issue in my own home, it is a much more poignant problem for me outdoors. I dislike it when my neighbors burn wood for that reason, so I'm surely not going to add to it.
Purely (or mostly) city driving is really the type of environment intended for hybrid/electric vehicles, there's no question about it. If you like what you're getting from the hybrid most of the time, then that "20%" of the time when you are out on the highway basically getting "gasser" mileage, that's not that big of a deal.
It really does surprise me, though, that people still maintain the idea that diesel fuel is more difficult to come by, or that the engines emit a noisy "clatter." Maybe my perception is skewed due to my Subaru ownership, but I would say that neither is true in the modern world.
As was mentioned, get the one that you like best!