By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
http://www.cheatsheet.com/automobiles/why-hydrogen-fuel-cell-vehicles-need-to-clean-up-their-act.html/
Look at the mpg imp ( .8326 conversion) on these UK TDI's. It makes our economy cars look like gas guzzlers! 69 mpg imp = 57.45 mpg US gal , 128 oz
http://www.carbuyer.co.uk/reviews/recommended/best-diesel-cars
Geez, 73.5 mpg/ 2.45 gal= 3.333 cents per mile driven. (Golf TDI, 88.3 imp) for 15,000 miles per yr commute @ 2.45 gal, that's $ 42 a mo! (vs $76.56 mo now @ 40 mpg)
On the electrical power front, is this a surprise?
http://www.wsj.com/articles/power-auction-may-foreshadow-rise-in-utility-bills-energy-stocks-1440208508
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/energy-prices-crashing-then-refiners-100000197.html
In 1950 it cost .09 a mile to own and operate a car. Gas was .27 a gallon. This year the AAA says it's running .58 cents a mile to own and operate an average sedan.
Doesn't really mean much until you realize that your hunk of sheet metal in your garage is costing you $8,000 a year and every ten minute run to the 7/11 to buy a $4 gallon of mile costs you another $2 in transport costs.
So the real moral is to move to town and walk.
You're right, cars are brutally expensive!
So the key is if you HAVE to own a car,/s have the business/es cut you a check for the actual per mile rate you use for business, or have them pick up the tab for the actual expenses, whichever benefits one better is what to do.
The IRS website will tell you that commute miles are NOT deductible. I would hate to be accused of practicing tax law, or CPA advice. So upon advice of either, IF qualifying is met, one can also use IRS section 179 for qualifying business related vehicles.
IF none of that Is deductible, I would think seriously about getting rid of the (non-deductible) car altogether .
Just be glad you don't have to look for an apartment in the city of San Francisco ! it is easy to see why services like Uber are SO popular . I am told the avg price for an unfurnished 1B (reality translation dinky) apt is $3,500 per mo.
Here is a tiny cookie cutter one @ $2,900 per mo. North Beach, ( if you know the area)
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2133-Stockton-St-San-Francisco-CA-94133/2113117800_zpid/
Wow, all things considered, that would make a $12. family sized piazza app $50, when the $15 per hou min wages kick in. Oh but it's walkable.
So iIF you could get the IRS business mileage rate at 57.5 cents per mile, it's easy to see that you would make some $$'s.( $ 6,075)
Using PUG adds about $1,071 a year ( @ $ 2.99 25 miles a gallon, PUG, $2.41 ULSD) So easily that is 7 cents more pmd:f or 41 % MORE. ( 11.96 vs 4,82 cents)
So even when anybody can see that this is way cheaper, I realize that non diesel types are almost totally tone deaf to the differences. One gasser owner on this board has not even dared to run a pmd:t to compare. Why ? Trying to infer doubt ? Afraid of the truth.?
The only Cadillac that has used a Delta-based architecture is the ELR which shares a Delta II chassis with the Volt. The next-generation Cruze will shift to the D2xx platform which is yet again an evolution of the original Delta architecture and designed to replace other compact vehicle platforms used across GM and support small car and SUV/CUVs variants.
Further on down, it goes on to say:
The Cruze diesel was the first GM passenger car in the US equipped with a diesel engine in 28 years, however sales were weaker than expected with 2% of US models.[111]
..."The Cruze diesel was the first GM passenger car in the US equipped with a diesel engine in 28 years, however sales were weaker than expected with 2% of US models.[111]"...
It is funny how you find these percentages in technical gobity goop articles, BURIED very deep somewhere in the Internet .
Given 2013 sales of 248,224, ( Good Car Bad Car), that puts DIESEL Cruze sales at about 4965. The very next year, ( 2014 ) another article said that 1.2% of diesel Cruzes ) or sold of the 2013 number, posting 3029 units. Even that % figure is misleading . The 2014 sales were 273,060 units.. That would put 2014 diesel sales at 1.1%
Another article, puts GM's diesel Cruze target at 10% of overall sales( per year.) Perhaps it is understandable why the real figures are buried ...somewhere . But then, GM also did that with the ignition issue .
Like I continue to say, I can't even make this stuff up.
Slow news diesel day ! Otherwise wholesale heating oil @ app $ 1.39., RBob gasoline is app $1.46. On the wholesale price of diesel ( retail@ $2.41), governments take is approximately 46% (CA state + Fed 63.78 cents, not including 9/10% SST,) The rest of the complex food chain makes about 27.5 % Biggie oil post 9 cents of each $1.00.
Given that there was a very slow ramp-up in production and availability in the first year on market (2014) I'd wager an educated guess that it was less consumers not wanting the diesel models but GM's supply constrictions limiting sales. The emission certification, modification of the car (new suspension, new hub/wheel assemblies, DEF tank installation, etc.) and importing of powertrains probably wasn't cheap but I could see GM being cautious and taking a feel for the market and using the experience to prepare for the next-gen Cruze (which is designed from the ground up for the North American market with a turbo diesel powertrain option).
Talk to a calibration (i.e. computer tuning) engineer or read the SAE papers and one of the hardest parts of building a diesel for the North American market is meeting drivability and emission requirements. We have a much more diverse range of operating conditions and the N.A. Cruze Turbo Diesel was GM's first application for selective catalyst reduction and exhaust after treatment on a passenger car (the overseas market Cruze and other models use different diesel powertrains without these features).
In other words while I'm sure GM public relations may have touted that they hoped to have a 10% take rake, the marketing and leadership at GM was probably using the Cruze as a test bed to see market reaction, prepare their dealer networks for passenger car service and maintenance, build experience on the sales side, and use the car as a testbed for a lot of new emission technologies that will be needed here and in Europe.
It wouldn't surprise me if there wasn't much if any profit on the diesel models but GM has gained a lot of experience. I'm hoping they've used the teething issues and learned from their early adopters and will be able to make a full offensive when the redesigned 2017 model comes out. Time will tell.
My cost to date on the 2013 Touareg TDI is $1.07 per mile. That includes the payment of $921 per month. Got to love that no interest $0 down payment. Two years down, three to go. Then my cost per mile should be in the under 20 cent per mile range. Unless diesel goes way back up. Or I get antsy for a new diesel SUV.
Any way you slice it, cars aren't a cheap hobby. But none of them are.
IF I sold my 03 Jetta TDI right now with the 187,000 miles, basically the cost of ownership would be about 6.4 cents a mile. IF I just totally write it off against the initial cost, it's 9.6 cents per mile.
Like model @ 25/50 mpg & current prices of $ 2.99 PUG/$ 2.41 ULSD, that is $22,365-9,013= $13,352 SAVED! I have read the TDI also sells for app $2,700 more.
Not @ all bad for a $236 premium @ that time.
MSRP: $30,565
Internet Price: $25,120
You Save:
$5,445
Low POSTED fuel prices ARE being used here !!!!??? That is $14,960 SAVED IF you use $4.00 for gas / ULSD prices! (29,920-14,960) So your assertion is not true!
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-08-24/gasoline-is-both-incredibly-cheap-and-absurdly-expensive
@ 39 .6 mpg, 15 Passat TDI and @42 mpg Accord hybrid, you might want to run fuel prices that you are concerned with. It would be a no brainer for us to get 42 mpg in Passat TDI. I doubt seriously you will get 50 in the hybrid.
@ $4 = $7,265. ($26,154-$18,889) Your assertion is STILL not true!
Be that as it may...
So I think you're seeing both de facto and in the real world , that both VW and Mercedes, (in my friends ML 350 used example) are in fact making the gasser /diesel prices fairly similar.
My 2014 MB GLK 350/250 is minus -$500 cheaper for BlueTec diesel. I have even said it multiple times, albeit to multiple tone deaf receptions.
Indeed, similar gas/ULSD pricing has been my experience for four diesels in over 13 years. So for example, $236 is similar in price to the gasser (2003 VW Jetta TDI ). I have always used it tongue in cheek. You've also heard the drill on the 2009 VW Jetta TDI , with the TDI's IRS tax CREDIT? The tax credit in fact made it far cheaper than 2009 VW Jetta gassers. 2012 VWTouareg TDI? SOS/dd.
I was hoping not to detail this " code" directly, but obviously, your research and the math indicates it. So given Accord hybrid " pat" pricing (aka higher than Passat TDI) , it makes no sense over both Passat TDI AND Accord gas.
You want the 15 Passat TDI cheaper? Simple, get a used one! Get one the dealership use use /s/d internally, after you made your best NEW deal. Picky? Ask your dealer to call you when they find one closer to what you want.
http://news.yahoo.com/california-pulls-plug-electric-car-subsidies-rich-175147859.html
2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460
Diesel power train options in models are more restricted, yet run the $ gambit from mild to wild. By far, more % & $$'s are spent on options in gassers rather than TDI's.
Evidently, Audi's constant improvement program efforts are paying dividends! Customer survey's seem to edge Audi quality up there, almost second to none. I am sure they are aiming to be number one (past Lexus, et al) or at least equal with Porsche .
Unrelated
TRAFIC! the good news bad news ?
..."Commuters in Washington, D.C., suffer the most, losing an average of 82 hours a year to rush-hour slowdowns, a new study finds. Los Angeles, San Francisco and New York come next on the list of urban areas with the longest delays."...(vs 42 hrs nationally)
See, I can't even make this stuff up?
..."Rounding out the Top 10 worst commuting cities are San Jose, Boston, Seattle, Chicago, Houston and Riverside-San Bernardino."...
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/blame-beeping-economy-worst-us-040552266.html
The real issue is that the 4 diesels that we operate are under some of the most grueling conditions. Additionally, the SOS/DD trek ( zero to 7,300 ft) are usually only superseded by treks on roads in the Rocky Mountains .
..."Overall, Americans experienced 6.9 billion hours of traffic delays in 2014 compared to 6.6 billion in 2007 and 1.8 billion in 1982."... ($ estimates $ 160 B
I say if Congress, et al refuses to fix it with transportation monies, they already levy from fuel taxing paying Americans, give us all tax credits @ our per hour rates for delays the inaction results in. Do you think that might be a motivator to get things done?
I for one could use a $10,000 tax credit, but then again, who couldn't ?
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongress/a/congresspay.htm
DC is pretty bad; we bailed on a trip a couple of years back when we couldn't find a parking spot at one of the farthest flung metro stations.
Early in my career, as a wee lad, I spent about a year working in the DC area! It was apparent even 40 years ago, that was the place to be if one wanted to make a career in government. Lois Learner being one example.
Entrepreneurialism was not a bad path either.
Then retire somewhere in the area ( in Virginia) as part of the mink and manure set.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/09/21/dc_metro_area_is_super_rich_7_of_the_10_ten_counties_are_in_the_dc_suburbs_.html
My old house, all 1500 sq. ft. of it, shows at just under 1.2 million.
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/311-Waukeena-Way-Cottage-Grove-OR-97424/48456767_zpid/
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/32623-Glaisyer-Hill-Rd-Cottage-Grove-OR-97424/48460426_zpid/
Yes, I can see why you like it. He is coming from a Acura MDX reference. He was another anecdotal reference for 18 to 22 mpg for approximately 110,000 miles, with app 420 miles range. He is also pretty happy about the GL's 739 miles range.
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD
RBob gas app 1.355. HO 1.38.
2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460
http://news.yahoo.com/many-u-drivers-ignoring-tech-features-cars-survey-171315052--finance.html
I still want all the gizmos.
About the redundancy - when I do something on the computer, there's usually at least three ways to get to my end result (shoot, just choosing to mouse or keyboard is a choice right there).
So maybe I can parallel park just fine, but there may be times I want the car to park itself while I dig out my list or phone out of my pocket.
The trouble of course, is that lots of this stuff isn't intuitive. It took me months just to find the on/off switch for my van's 120 outlet, including searching the manual and online.
- Depending on your region, consider temperature. A hybrid will do much worse in the winter when the temperature affects the battery. Our TDI has no problem is lower temperatures, although I understand that it may take longer to start in really cold climates (unlike LA).
- There is nothing like that double clutch automatic transmission. It is like driving a manual. In my opinion it is vastly superior to the CVT in my C-Max.
- In terms of longevity, a battery pack will lose charge over the years. The diesel will not, although the DSG does require a 45K maintenance interval. But at 200K and 10 years, the hybrid will not work as well as the diesel. Most of the high mileage hybrids that are cited are from Taxis, but they have a lot of miles, not a lot of years.
- For family use, the Passat wins hands down, due to the storage in the trunk. Words can't describe how big it is. The Honda would do for some luggage, but the VW is superb. Every time we pack for a trip, I can't believe it.
- The diesel will get better mileage when driven aggressively. You have to drive carefully to achieve MPG in any hybrid. With the TDI, you just drive.
Really, I am all for freedom of choice. But the truth is I am actually feeling "forced " to have accepted some stuff that I really don't want. (Like model)
I think it ha been demonstrated time and time again (on this thread anyway), that people would rather spend way more money for the gizmos, than they would way less for the diesel option. So certain cost savings are not real or clear motivators.
It would also seem that gizmos don't really do a lot for residual value, or there does not seem to be many studies or comparos that indicate they do. The latest computer hacking of the cars steering, braking controls etc., is not a confidence builder either. Yet , by in large like model diesels seem to sell for higher residual values.
Another is say $10,000 of gizmos will cost in California another 9% on sales tax. In some other states, this also pads the yearly registration fees.
I am sure people can vouch for ithis ,n the case of options that either burnout or don't work. It can cost a lot more money for repair. IF they're not fixed, they actually subtract from resale or residual values .
I am glad you like the GLK Bluetec. I may get rid of my PU and the wife's LS400 and get one for a daily driver. I will look for a 2013 coming off lease, if they are not too pricey. It looks like they hold their value very well.
"U.K. motorists with diesel-powered cars are enjoying a rare treat. For the
first time in 14 years, the fuel costs less at the pumps than gasoline and the situation should persist at least a few more months."
Why British Diesel Drivers Can Rejoice for First Time Since 2001 (Bloomberg)