Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Entry Level Luxury Performance Sedans

1412413415417418435

Comments

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    dino001 said:

    qbrozen said:

    Current 3-series sedan is 182". 5-series is 194. Kia is 190. So definitely closer to the 5 than the 3.

    These are full lengths. More important would be wheel base and cabin space/legroom. Does anybody have those handy?
    Having a bit of trouble with passenger volumes of the BMWs, but here is what I was able to dig up. Interestingly, the 3'er has more front leg room than the 5'er. Stinger trumps both. Rear leg room is within a tenth of an inch between the 5'er and Stinger.

    Stinger:
    Length 190.2
    Width 73.6
    Height 55.1
    Wheelbase 114.4
    Passenger capacity 93.8 cu ft
    Leg room front/rear 42.6/36.4

    5’er:
    Length 194.6
    Width 73.5
    Height 58.2
    Wheelbase 117.1
    Passenger capacity ?
    Leg room front/rear 41.4/36.5

    3’er:
    Length 182.5
    Width 71.3
    Height 56.3
    Wheelbase 110.6
    Passenger capacity ?
    Leg room front/rear 42.0/35.1

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,325
    They are all a bit too big and heavy for my tastes, although I did enjoy a 440i GC M Sport we had in our loaner fleet. RWD and the M Performance Power and Sound kit made it a lot of fun despite being a bit porky...

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,928

    dino001 said:

    circlew said:

    I looked at a white StingerGT2 2 weeks ago. I sat it in and it had far more room than my Q50S. I mentioned that it looked like a 5'er interior to the sales person. The exterior is far more upscale that is more up to date than a 3'er, IMHO.

    So the Stinger looks like a legitimate effort from Kia. Let’s hope people will buy it, so it stays in the market. If it is 5-series size, then $50k+ sticker for fully loaded fast supercharged V6 may be ok, considering Kia always throws in decent cash incentives. Low end 2 liter starts 35k, so that’s much more pallatable and separated in price from lux and comparable to four cyl turbos from other brands, too. One knock against is the mpg on GT, when you compare it with, say BMW’s 3.0 six turbo. It souns a bit like the previous gen without much fuel asavinlg tech. It may be a positive for some.
    Sounds like the 2 liter might be the better bang for the buck.
    I've heard too many happy BMW owners over too many years and too many car models praise the in-line 6 engines, that to get a BMW without one would be sacrilegious to me.

    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • dino001dino001 Member Posts: 6,191
    andres3 said:

    dino001 said:

    circlew said:

    I looked at a white StingerGT2 2 weeks ago. I sat it in and it had far more room than my Q50S. I mentioned that it looked like a 5'er interior to the sales person. The exterior is far more upscale that is more up to date than a 3'er, IMHO.

    So the Stinger looks like a legitimate effort from Kia. Let’s hope people will buy it, so it stays in the market. If it is 5-series size, then $50k+ sticker for fully loaded fast supercharged V6 may be ok, considering Kia always throws in decent cash incentives. Low end 2 liter starts 35k, so that’s much more pallatable and separated in price from lux and comparable to four cyl turbos from other brands, too. One knock against is the mpg on GT, when you compare it with, say BMW’s 3.0 six turbo. It souns a bit like the previous gen without much fuel asavinlg tech. It may be a positive for some.
    Sounds like the 2 liter might be the better bang for the buck.
    I've heard too many happy BMW owners over too many years and too many car models praise the in-line 6 engines, that to get a BMW without one would be sacrilegious to me.

    I was one, yet I have a four-cylinder now and think it's quite alright.

    2018 430i Gran Coupe

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    The BMW is a car, not a church (although some might contest that) :p There is certainly a trend to turbo-4s all across the board in the auto biz right now.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,568
    dino001 said:

    andres3 said:

    dino001 said:

    circlew said:

    I looked at a white StingerGT2 2 weeks ago. I sat it in and it had far more room than my Q50S. I mentioned that it looked like a 5'er interior to the sales person. The exterior is far more upscale that is more up to date than a 3'er, IMHO.

    So the Stinger looks like a legitimate effort from Kia. Let’s hope people will buy it, so it stays in the market. If it is 5-series size, then $50k+ sticker for fully loaded fast supercharged V6 may be ok, considering Kia always throws in decent cash incentives. Low end 2 liter starts 35k, so that’s much more pallatable and separated in price from lux and comparable to four cyl turbos from other brands, too. One knock against is the mpg on GT, when you compare it with, say BMW’s 3.0 six turbo. It souns a bit like the previous gen without much fuel asavinlg tech. It may be a positive for some.
    Sounds like the 2 liter might be the better bang for the buck.
    I've heard too many happy BMW owners over too many years and too many car models praise the in-line 6 engines, that to get a BMW without one would be sacrilegious to me.

    I was one, yet I have a four-cylinder now and think it's quite alright.
    Ditto.. Of course, the last n/a 6 cylinder helped push me that way. It was uninspiring.

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • dino001dino001 Member Posts: 6,191
    edited January 2018
    kyfdx said:

    dino001 said:

    andres3 said:

    dino001 said:

    circlew said:

    I looked at a white StingerGT2 2 weeks ago. I sat it in and it had far more room than my Q50S. I mentioned that it looked like a 5'er interior to the sales person. The exterior is far more upscale that is more up to date than a 3'er, IMHO.

    So the Stinger looks like a legitimate effort from Kia. Let’s hope people will buy it, so it stays in the market. If it is 5-series size, then $50k+ sticker for fully loaded fast supercharged V6 may be ok, considering Kia always throws in decent cash incentives. Low end 2 liter starts 35k, so that’s much more pallatable and separated in price from lux and comparable to four cyl turbos from other brands, too. One knock against is the mpg on GT, when you compare it with, say BMW’s 3.0 six turbo. It souns a bit like the previous gen without much fuel asavinlg tech. It may be a positive for some.
    Sounds like the 2 liter might be the better bang for the buck.
    I've heard too many happy BMW owners over too many years and too many car models praise the in-line 6 engines, that to get a BMW without one would be sacrilegious to me.

    I was one, yet I have a four-cylinder now and think it's quite alright.
    Ditto.. Of course, the last n/a 6 cylinder helped push me that way. It was uninspiring.
    The N/A straight six had a great sound. Beautiful, I loved it. But in terms of performance and fuel economy, it was a slightly improved product of 1990s. My only concern with my current four turbo is its long term durability. Its first iteration was introduced in 2012 models, so the jury is still out on true long-term numbers. Mid-term seems OK, as there are no massive failures at 100k+ threshold being reported so far. We had a very long track record with the N/A straight six. Those four cylinders are still building the record. One positive, it seems the owners, dealers and garages got the memo regarding proper oil grades this time, unlike in 80s, when turbos were used first time the stakeholders had no idea how to properly maintain those engines. Cheap mineral oil was the king back then, it would sometimes kill the scroller bearings in 60k miles from coking, even if changed at 3k miles, as the oil particles were just too large for fast scrollers.

    2018 430i Gran Coupe

  • flightnurseflightnurse Member Posts: 2,217
    Dino the N20/26 engine had a timing chain issue that BMW has FINALLY recognized and have increased the factory warranty, other than that the N series engine seems to be pretty built proof. The new B series engines are too new but would think they are just as built proof. The mileage for the F3X series cars have exceeded the EPA #, on a trip to Santa Fe, I averaged 37, Rick got 36 going to Austin in his GT.
  • flightnurseflightnurse Member Posts: 2,217
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Ha! I was just going to post that. Kia takes on the big boys. The Stinger isn't perfect but look at the price differential!

    One wonders how it will all pan out, though, when we look at the 3 year resale for each of these?
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,342
    I read that article in the magazine. Seems like BMW took the hit there. Audi romped.

    would be interesting to see the same test, using the big motor models instead.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,928
    stickguy said:

    I read that article in the magazine. Seems like BMW took the hit there. Audi romped.

    would be interesting to see the same test, using the big motor models instead.

    They really did like the A5 Sportback. What amazes me, is the A4 is significantly lighter than the A5 Sportback, and is essentially the same car. The sportback might be tuned a bit more aggressively suspension-wise though than the "family" sedan.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • flightnurseflightnurse Member Posts: 2,217
    I posted this over on Bimmerfest and of course, many people are bitching that the 430i xDrive didn't have the "right" suspension. Of course, not too sure what they mean by that since you can't get xDrive with the 704 suspensions. But the price is a whopping 14K difference, is Audi worth it?
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,928

    I posted this over on Bimmerfest and of course, many people are bitching that the 430i xDrive didn't have the "right" suspension. Of course, not too sure what they mean by that since you can't get xDrive with the 704 suspensions. But the price is a whopping 14K difference, is Audi worth it?

    Based on Car & Driver's review and my bias, I'd say so.

    Also, you don't get a free loaner car at a Kia dealership :smile:
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,928

    I posted this over on Bimmerfest and of course, many people are bitching that the 430i xDrive didn't have the "right" suspension. Of course, not too sure what they mean by that since you can't get xDrive with the 704 suspensions. But the price is a whopping 14K difference, is Audi worth it?

    @flightnurse On Chronic Car Buyers I posted Car & Driver's sportback/coupe S5 comparison review which is also interesting, since these 4-door coupes are really just sleeker sedans.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • dino001dino001 Member Posts: 6,191
    Not sure if 430ix standard suspension is same as my one in my RWD 430i (I have a std., not M-sport, not adaptive M-sport). Anyway, I don't care what C&D says about 430 ix GC steering and suspension. It's good enough for me. Perhaps I'm getting older. On my next round of vehicles I may be out of ELLPS altogether and into stupid SUVs. Ugh. Or maybe one more - if so, both A5 SB and Stinger will be on the list.

    2018 430i Gran Coupe

  • flightnurseflightnurse Member Posts: 2,217
    dino001 said:

    Not sure if 430ix standard suspension is same as my one in my RWD 430i (I have a std., not M-sport, not adaptive M-sport). Anyway, I don't care what C&D says about 430 ix GC steering and suspension. It's good enough for me. Perhaps I'm getting older. On my next round of vehicles I may be out of ELLPS altogether and into stupid SUVs. Ugh. Or maybe one more - if so, both A5 SB and Stinger will be on the list.

    I'm with you, my 330 suspension is base, but it has the right amount of firmness without being harsh. I like Stinger, I don't care if it doesn't have the best suspension I have no plans on tracking my cars again. But a 14K difference is a huge difference.
  • flightnurseflightnurse Member Posts: 2,217
    andres3 said:



    @flightnurse On Chronic Car Buyers I posted Car & Driver's sportback/coupe S5 comparison review which is also interesting, since these 4-door coupes are really just sleeker sedans.

    MB been doing that now for 15 yrs with the CLS, it's an E class with a sleek body and they charge more for it.
  • coldinohiocoldinohio Member Posts: 170
    kia stinger gt AWD-- this it top of line v6
    just test drove today; nice engine note; very responsive in "normal" driver setting i.e not sport
    nice steering wheel-- flat bottomed
    tech is good; not sure HUD is needed as very washed out on a sunny day but apparently that is adjustabale
    really nice seats with nice side bolsters
    very audi-like/light
    dealer had +$3500 market adjustment---lol
    kia does not have any 'concierge' services-- so as mentioned above, not sure how they will do in the >$45-$50k market
  • dino001dino001 Member Posts: 6,191
    edited February 2018

    dino001 said:

    Not sure if 430ix standard suspension is same as my one in my RWD 430i (I have a std., not M-sport, not adaptive M-sport). Anyway, I don't care what C&D says about 430 ix GC steering and suspension. It's good enough for me. Perhaps I'm getting older. On my next round of vehicles I may be out of ELLPS altogether and into stupid SUVs. Ugh. Or maybe one more - if so, both A5 SB and Stinger will be on the list.

    I'm with you, my 330 suspension is base, but it has the right amount of firmness without being harsh. I like Stinger, I don't care if it doesn't have the best suspension I have no plans on tracking my cars again. But a 14K difference is a huge difference.
    Now it's about the dealer - if I have to put up with some sleazball salesman who is used to selling stuff to people with 550 FICO and won't change his tune, I may be deterred by him. Unfortunately my recent experiences at establishments selling "mainstream" cars have not been overly positive. To be blunt, every time I went to a place like that, I felt like needing a long hot shower. Hopefully I'll get lucky next time.

    2018 430i Gran Coupe

  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,325
    dino001 said:


    Now it's about the dealer - if I have to put up with some sleazball salesman who is used to selling stuff to people with 550 FICO and won't change his tune, I may be deterred by him. Unfortunately my recent experiences at establishments selling "mainstream" cars have not been overly positive. To be blunt, every time I went to a place like that, I felt like needing a long hot shower. Hopefully I'll get lucky next time.

    That's my worry as well, not to mention potential warranty hassles if I took a Stinger to an HPDE. At least you can get it in RWD. Having said all that, my usual strategy of buying a 2-3 year old CPO works great for me, the only downside being the ability to tailor a car to my exact specs- for example if I had ordered my F22 it would have had a red interior, PDC, and no hole in the roof- but the $15,000 savings compensates for the "imperfections."

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • flightnurseflightnurse Member Posts: 2,217
    dino001 said:



    Now it's about the dealer - if I have to put up with some sleazball salesman who is used to selling stuff to people with 550 FICO and won't change his tune, I may be deterred by him. Unfortunately my recent experiences at establishments selling "mainstream" cars have not been overly positive. To be blunt, every time I went to a place like that, I felt like needing a long hot shower. Hopefully I'll get lucky next time.

    I had wondered the same thing when Nissan started selling the GT-R here. Here is a dealership whose average sales price is about $25K, now sell a 90K car. If you don't want a KIA, then get a Genesis G70 with a manual. But I don't have a problem walking into Kia dealership to get my car serviced, and if it does have to get service I'm not too worried. I highly doubt they will screw things up, yeah, I won't get the free loaner have a nice lounge to sit in, but I saved 14K...
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    In a world of $60k pick-em-up trucks, I don't see how folks can be so snobbish about a $50k car, frankly.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Maybe Kia could cash in on the "reverse status" thing----"EVERYONE has a BMW and Audi, but I have no need for such ostentatious displays". Tricky to pull that off, but it has been done.
  • flightnurseflightnurse Member Posts: 2,217
    qbrozen said:

    In a world of $60k pick-em-up trucks, I don't see how folks can be so snobbish about a $50k car, frankly.

    was that how much you spent on your truck? :):):):):):)
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    Mine had a sticker dangerously close to $50k and I don't even have leather!

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • flightnurseflightnurse Member Posts: 2,217
    qbrozen said:

    Mine had a sticker dangerously close to $50k and I don't even have leather!

    LOL, and people complain that a base 320i doesn't have power seats. B)
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,928

    dino001 said:



    Now it's about the dealer - if I have to put up with some sleazball salesman who is used to selling stuff to people with 550 FICO and won't change his tune, I may be deterred by him. Unfortunately my recent experiences at establishments selling "mainstream" cars have not been overly positive. To be blunt, every time I went to a place like that, I felt like needing a long hot shower. Hopefully I'll get lucky next time.

    I had wondered the same thing when Nissan started selling the GT-R here. Here is a dealership whose average sales price is about $25K, now sell a 90K car. If you don't want a KIA, then get a Genesis G70 with a manual. But I don't have a problem walking into Kia dealership to get my car serviced, and if it does have to get service I'm not too worried. I highly doubt they will screw things up, yeah, I won't get the free loaner have a nice lounge to sit in, but I saved 14K...
    Yes, but in order to really save 14K you'd have to have a car with similar specs and performance, now, you could argue your getting somewhere around 9/10th's for 8/10th's cost. As with everything, there is a law of diminishing returns.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,928
    qbrozen said:

    In a world of $60k pick-em-up trucks, I don't see how folks can be so snobbish about a $50k car, frankly.

    After buying the S4, I didn't feel so bad about spending so much money once I saw how much people were spending on average trucks and SUV's.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • flightnurseflightnurse Member Posts: 2,217
    andres3 said:



    Yes, but in order to really save 14K you'd have to have a car with similar specs and performance, now, you could argue your getting somewhere around 9/10th's for 8/10th's cost. As with everything, there is a law of diminishing returns.

    So I went and built a Stinger 2.0 RWD and a BMW 330i, I believe they are as close as you can get, and there is a 7K difference. Now if you pick 4 series then it's close to 9K difference. When Genesis brings the G70 you will be able to get it with a 6 spd manual and the difference wont be that great but I'm sure the BMW will be more.
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,342
    should be the GT version though to get the hatch. Or was that what you meant?

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I just priced out a Ford F-150 Platinum, heavy on options, and I'm already up to $72,900. Sure does have everything, though. :p
  • flightnurseflightnurse Member Posts: 2,217
    stickguy said:

    should be the GT version though to get the hatch. Or was that what you meant?

    Nope I built a 330i sedan. I looked at what the article compared, I think that is the only fair way to go about it, some people on Bimmerfest think the Stinger should be compared to the 5 series because it's close in wheelbase. But if Kia talks about the 3 series then compare it to the 3 series.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    I also, as I have stated before, think the Stinger is closer to the 5-series. No idea why Kia says anything about the 3'er, unless it is only because that is the standard all the mags use.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • flightnurseflightnurse Member Posts: 2,217
    qbrozen said:

    I also, as I have stated before, think the Stinger is closer to the 5-series. No idea why Kia says anything about the 3'er, unless it is only because that is the standard all the mags use.

    Why do you think it needs to go against a 5 series? Size? I think Kia wants the 3 series because of the price.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    Not sure where we made the comparison before, but yes, because of its size. Comparing on price does not make sense to me. You can get an Escalade and 911 for the same price, so does that mean they are comparable?

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,342
    the comparison tests have all been versus the 3, A5, etc. even if the WB is a little longer, it doesn't really compete against the cars in the E/5 series class. Seems like it has always been that way though.

    I was thinking it should compare to the 3GT. I assume they still make that one? The car mags (C&D) used the hatches (4 series and A5 sportback)

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • flightnurseflightnurse Member Posts: 2,217
    They still make the 3GT, the issue really is, the 3GT only comes in xDrive while the Stinger can be had in RWD and AWD. Which I don't think is a proper comparison.
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,342
    well, in the north east, the 3 series effectively only comes as Xdrive. You will never find a RWD on the lot. I am guessing that Kia will likely be the same.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    edited February 2018
    Here is what I posted on the previous page. In terms of interior room, especially rear seat space, the 5 and the Stinger are a virtual tie. In all measurements, it is clear that it is closer to the 5 than the 3.

    Having a bit of trouble with passenger volumes of the BMWs, but here is what I was able to dig up. Interestingly, the 3'er has more front leg room than the 5'er. Stinger trumps both. Rear leg room is within a tenth of an inch between the 5'er and Stinger.

    Stinger:
    Length 190.2
    Width 73.6
    Height 55.1
    Wheelbase 114.4
    Passenger capacity 93.8 cu ft
    Leg room front/rear 42.6/36.4

    5’er:
    Length 194.6
    Width 73.5
    Height 58.2
    Wheelbase 117.1
    Passenger capacity ?
    Leg room front/rear 41.4/36.5

    3’er:
    Length 182.5
    Width 71.3
    Height 56.3
    Wheelbase 110.6
    Passenger capacity ?
    Leg room front/rear 42.0/35.1

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • flightnurseflightnurse Member Posts: 2,217
    stickguy said:

    well, in the north east, the 3 series effectively only comes as Xdrive. You will never find a RWD on the lot. I am guessing that Kia will likely be the same.

    This because the dealer won't order them, but you can get RWD cars you just have to order them.
  • dino001dino001 Member Posts: 6,191
    edited February 2018
    The idea of going against 3 rather than 5 is to advertise „it’s bigger, has more power, more stuff and it’s cheaper”. Going against bigger 5 series that has many more available features (even if optional) would make it rather unsubstantiated in eyes of people who are silling to spend north if 60 grand, even uf couple metrics match. Just like the CTS might have been 5er size, it was crossed shopped by 3-series buyers, no matter what Cadillac’s marketng department tried to sell.

    2018 430i Gran Coupe

  • dino001dino001 Member Posts: 6,191
    stickguy said:

    well, in the north east, the 3 series effectively only comes as Xdrive. You will never find a RWD on the lot. I am guessing that Kia will likely be the same.

    That may be true where you live, not so much here. So all you need is to get on a plane, or order.

    2018 430i Gran Coupe

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    dino001 said:
    The idea of going against 3 rather than 5 is to advertise „it’s bigger, has more power, more stuff and it’s cheaper”. Going against bigger 5 series that has many more available features (even if optional) would make it rather unsubstantiated in eyes of people who are silling to spend north if 60 grand, even uf couple metrics match. Just like the CTS might have been 5er size, it was crossed shopped by 3-series buyers, no matter what Cadillac’s marketng department tried to sell.
    On the other hand, it could be judged heavier and less dynamic than the 3'er yet hold its own or be better than the 5'er in those areas. Also, of course, WAY cheaper than a comparable 5.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • dino001dino001 Member Posts: 6,191
    I think less than 5 percent of buyers look at curb weight and less tham fifth of those would make it a decision issue.

    2018 430i Gran Coupe

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    Yes, but I think many sports sedan buyers "feel" the weight.
    Granted, some manufacturers do wonders. My 3950lb CTS felt lighter than my 3700lb Mustang and 3750lb G35x. 

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • dino001dino001 Member Posts: 6,191
    With current engines, weight is much less an issue than it was 20 or even 10 years ago.

    2018 430i Gran Coupe

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,342
    BMW certainly keeps porking up. only so much you can do to overcome physics.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,928
    dino001 said:

    I think less than 5 percent of buyers look at curb weight and less tham fifth of those would make it a decision issue.

    so doing the math, your saying about 1% make it a decision issue?

    While probably accurate, I'd argue the percentage where it does matter is higher. Weight (less of it) assists in better handling, ride, acceleration, fuel economy, and braking. Lighter cars simply feel more toss-able. Those seeking sporty handling will notice it, even if they don't look at spec sheets.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,928
    stickguy said:

    BMW certainly keeps porking up. only so much you can do to overcome physics.

    Tires and brake pads will complain about weight by making you run out of them sooner and faster. The tires on my lighter TTS are holding up well, though I am planning to get new PS4's soon.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
Sign In or Register to comment.