Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Acura TSX

1535456585999

Comments

  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    The only problem I face with the NAV is my over-reliance on it. I am hesitant to take the other car to different places and always opt for the car with the NAV, if I am visiting somewhere for the first time.

    Later...AH
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    In other words, it spoils you. It may be something that people start using after they get it.
  • deanvitdeanvit Member Posts: 23
    It appears from what I read that Acura is well on its way of hitting its sales goal for the TSX. Has anybody heard any rumors whether or not Acura intends to increase production next year or the MSRP for the next generation TL. I'm hoping that within the next two years to see dealers more willing to negotiate closer to invoice as they did when I purchased my 99 CL 3.0.
  • myaclmyacl Member Posts: 2
    I plan on upgrading from my 98 Accord to an Acura in the very near future. I like the TSX, but will wait to see the upcoming TL. Does anyone know if the new TL will have the same as the current TL? And what are the advantages, if any, of the TL over the TSX? Also, can anyone recommend an Acura dealer in Massachusetts?
  • myaclmyacl Member Posts: 2
    the same "price" is what I meant to say.
  • s852s852 Member Posts: 1,051
    People are making guesses at the price, but it is not known.
    When the price is known, someone will post it without having to be asked.
  • s852s852 Member Posts: 1,051
    I know the RX-8 is more of a sports car with less luxury, less rear seat room and a smaller trunk, but there is overlap in prices especially if you go with the standard model and even if you go with the high perfromance model and skimp on options.
    Since the rear seat of an RX-8 is "usable" for 2 adults, if you can live with the very small trunk and never need to carry 3 in back, I think an RX-8 is somewhat comparable if you have $27-$30K to spend on a car.
    Is anyone considering both?
  • cardiackid1924cardiackid1924 Member Posts: 11
    I considered both briefly because I love the looks of the RX-8. But decided I really needed FWD and figured the RX-8 would be going for more than MSRP for quite a while.
  • midnightcowboymidnightcowboy Member Posts: 1,978
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,330
    I actually have both (along with the G35 6-speed) on my short list right now. I did have a chance to drive the RX-8, and it is sweet. However, it would require some compromises (rationalization?) for daily driver use with 2 kids (that is, regular use of the back seat and trunk). The TSX would certainly be much more practical, while still being fun and at least somewhat "sporty", if not a sports car like the Mazda.

    Plus, it is cheaper, better mileage, lower insurance, a spare tire, yada yada yada. I try to avoid listening to my practical side if I can help it.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • xplorx4xplorx4 Member Posts: 621
    Huh? The RX8 doesn't include a spare tire?

    I guess Mazda assumes that if you get a flat, well, hey, you've got roadside assistance anyway, right?
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    According to the Mazda RX-8 mini site, a spare tire is an accessory. As for roadside assistance, if there isn't a spare what's the tech going to do other than tow the car? Personally, I'm not willing to wait for a tow truck, get towed, dismount the tire, repair or replace, and remount when I can change a flat in 15 minutes.

    If I were considering a RX-8 I spring for the spare tire.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,441
    Lots of cars with run flat tires don't have spares.

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    The mini site didn't mention run flats - I would presume Mazda would tout that feature.

    But according to an article I recently read (C&D??), the problem with run flats is that all manufacturers recommend replacing them anytime you run them flat.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,441
    I wouldn't want runflats.. Mostly because of ride and handling issues. But, if they are readily available at tire dealers, it wouldn't bother me to not have the spare.

    kyfdx

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • himilerhimiler Member Posts: 1,209
    The RX-8 doesn't have run-flat tires (too much unsprung weight for Mazda's engineering tastes), but the car comes standard with a tire pressure monitoring system, and a spare tire "kit" -- fixaflat, or something similar.
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    As an FYI, all vehicles starting in November must come equipped with a pressure monitoring system:

    http://www.edmunds.com/news/regularnews/articles/63929/article.ht- ml
  • himilerhimiler Member Posts: 1,209
    Thanks for the heads-up.

    The question remains, however -- what good is a tire pressure monitoring system if a driver can't be bothered to actually put air in their tires.

    Maybe this is a regulation that's intended to let the tire and auto manufacturers do the CYA thing. As long as drivers are AWARE that they're driving on under-inflated tires, the manufacturers are absolved of liability. In that respect it makes good sense, but I still don't like the government making cars more expensive for those of us who know how to use a tire gauge.
  • xplorx4xplorx4 Member Posts: 621
    but I suspect we'd better get back on topic! :)
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    This regulation is a direct response to the Explorer/Firestone fiasco IMHO as low tire pressure is a real issue.

    Yes, it will protect tire and automakers from liability. But at least a warning light might force some people to take car of their vehicles and perhaps realize it's up to them and not the James Sokolov's of the world to fix their problems.

    The systems being implemented are actually pretty cheap. It uses the ABS sensors to measure tire revolutions. When a certain threshold of differential is reached on a tire, it sets off the warning light.

    On topic - does the TSX currently have a pressue monitoring system?
  • himilerhimiler Member Posts: 1,209
    TSX w/TPMS? Not that I can tell from the Edmunds or Acura sites. I didn't notice a warning light for it on my test drives, either.
  • xplorx4xplorx4 Member Posts: 621
    robr2- not all TPMS use the ABS sensors. Some, like those installed on the Nissan Murano, use pressure sensors inside the the wheel, which give you an actual real-time pressure reading.

    See the NHTSA site for more info.

    I believe you can get an aftermarket TPMS installed on your car for about $100 from many tire dealers, if you're the type who is ignorant or forgetful enough to not check your tire pressure periodically.
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    You are correct wrt the actual use of pressure sensors inside the wheel. But those are fairly expensive and you won't find them on low to mid end vehicles. IMHO, the ABS type will be more prevelant.

    "I believe you can get an aftermarket TPMS installed on your car for about $100 from many tire dealers, if you're the type who is ignorant or forgetful enough to not check your tire pressure periodically." I presume you are using the generalization of "you" here??
  • xplorx4xplorx4 Member Posts: 621
    I presume you are using the generalization of "you" here??

    Yes, "You" as in "I believe one can get an aftermarket TPMS installed on one's car for about $100 from many tire dealers, if one is the type who is ignorant or forgetful enough to not check one's tire pressure periodically." Sorry if the wording might have sounded offensive... ;)

    [begin rant mode]
    As an aside, I can't believe how many cars I see on the highway with low tire pressure! It makes me want to write a big note that says "YOU HAVE A FLAT TIRE!" and stick it on my window when I pass those fools!
    [end rant mode]

    TPMS are a good idea. I bet if you can wait for the 2005 TSX, it will have the TPMS somehow integrated into the NAV or a dashboard warning light indicating such.
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    No foul - sometimes I take things too personally.

    I'm hoping I can wait a new vehicle. The body shop calls me almost every day "we think we found some more damage..."
  • blaneblane Member Posts: 2,017
    According to Motor Trend:

    Honda Factory Performance is expanding its lineup with the addition of an all-new, dealer-installed performance package for the 2003 Honda Accord V-6 Coupe to dealerships nationwide. The package features a high-performance, sport-tuned suspension with recalibrated shocks and springs, new wheels and tires, and an aerodynamic rear spoiler and lower body kit.

    Accord Coupe FP:

    High-performance pre-assembled springs that reduce the ride height by one-inch and lower the Accord's roll center

    High-performance shock absorbers tuned for enhanced road handling characteristics

    17-inch 215/50VR-17 Yokohama tires (AT models only; standard on MT models)

    Full aerodynamic under-body kit (front, sides and rear)

    Rear wing spoiler

    Factory Performance interior and exterior badging.

    The Accord FP package can be installed on any new 2003 Accord V-6 Coupe (manual or automatic transmissions) and must be installed by a Honda dealership. Suggested retail pricing for the Accord Factory Performance package, not including installation costs, starts at $4,204 for AT versions and $3,492 for MT versions.

    The Honda FP package carries the same 3-year/36,000 mile warranty as all Honda Accessory equipment and does not affect the factory warranty. An additional benefit is the ability to include the cost of the FP package in new vehicle financing arrangements.
  • himilerhimiler Member Posts: 1,209
    So, let's see...

    That's roughly $23,000 for the car, another $4,000 for the Factory "Performance" kit, plus ~8 hours @$75 per for labor (another $600). To sum it up, roughly $28K gets you a lowered Accord with a bodykit, with no additional stop or go power.

    Oh, boy! Such a deal.

    If Honda hadn't been so concerned with acceptance in the mainstream over the last 10 years, maybe they would've built a couple of cars that don't require gussying-up. (To wit, the RX-8 would've been a spectacular Honda.)
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    the honda s2000, element and civic hybrid are so mainstream.
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    If Honda hadn't been so concerned with the mainstream, they'd be back to selling motorcycles. They gotta pay for these sport cars somehow.
  • himilerhimiler Member Posts: 1,209
    venus, you may not have noticed, but roadsters are everywhere these days, and the Elephant isn't half as "niche" as it wants to be (so far, it's very popular with folks in their 40's).

    The Civic hybrid is a neat idea, but most other car builders have hybrids in the works, so it's hardly unique. Besides, even if a Civic hybrid buyer is truly convinced that they're doing something (anything?) positive for the environment, there's no good financial case for buying the hybrid over a plain ol' petrol burner.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Civic Hybrid is still unique (oh well, two other cars like it are in production).
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    "maybe they would've built a couple of cars that don't require gussying-up"

    The S2000 comes to mind. What makes the RX-8 any better than the S2000? The rear seats? Neither the Supra or 2+2 300ZX were hot-sellers. With only 159 lb-ft of torque you might as well buy a TSX or G35 and have a real 4 door car. The automatic RX-8 only has 210HP vs. the TSX's 200HP. Neither are going to win many stop-light wars.

    As for the Element, regardless of who Honda is selling them to, they are selling them ... quick. And in most cases they are selling close to MSRP.

    The Civic Hybrid was the first "real" car in the US to offer hybrid technology. Sure there are some new models coming out with the technology (kind of like Saturn having the 4-door coupe first) but the Insight, Prius, and Civic Hybrid were pioneers. Just as much of a case can be made for those cars as one can for a 1.3L engine which uses as much gas as a V6 and has less torque than my 4 cylinder Accord. At least a Hybrid gets 50 MPG or more.
  • sailoverfuelsailoverfuel Member Posts: 82
    Elements at almoust MSRP...maybe to people who do not read Edmunds. Yes the TMV is close to MSRP (and the salesman printed it out and brought it to me as if to say wow...we sell close to MSRP) but we Edmundians know better than that. I just got a fully loaded Elephant EX, galapagos Green with nice stuff for 1,100 under MSRP visited ONE dealership got a good deal and 5 hours later (yes slow) I was at home with the E parked outside).

    iTS KINDA' LIKE SUSHI... hard to swallow at at first but it GROWS on you. Its my wifes her idea...me not too crazy about it...now I love it. The interior is cool and its starting to look like a Mini H3 (yeah right!)
  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    They are still selling the EX's at MSRP or very close to it. And the dealerships are having a very hard time keeping them in stock. Especially the 5 speeds. I have yet to even see a 5 speed 4wd.
  • xplorx4xplorx4 Member Posts: 621
    I've been having a hard time getting accurate insurance quotes for the TSX. It appears that many insurance companies don't have it in their databases yet... I assume because it's so new.

    My current insurance company substituted a 2003 2.3TL to determine the rate, which was their "closest match" to the TSX.

    Has anyone had other difficulties in obtaining accurate insurance quotes specific to the TSX?
  • cateusebiocateusebio Member Posts: 3
    Hi All,

    I maybe purchasing a TSX soon. What are people in the San Francisco Bay Area paying for the TSX w/ nav and manual? I got a quote from Steven's Creek for $500 below MSRP. Is this a good deal? Thanks.
  • gkearns56gkearns56 Member Posts: 49
    I was watching ESPN Auto Show Coverage and they just showed a Acura TSX S-Type version. This car will have a 6 cylinder - with additional boost and be available next year. It appears that many people suggested they could buy a Honda Accord V6 loaded up for the same price of the base Acura TSX.

    This pumped up V6 should help Acura TSX. I too prefer a V6 engine for performance. It's about time Acura seen that if they are going to offer an upscale model, then put a 6 banger under the hood.
  • sopecreeksopecreek Member Posts: 203
    With V6 and so much more power to the front wheels, I wonder if the car will suffer from more torque steer and degraded handling.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Are you sure they weren't talking about the new TL with Performance package? Which, BTW, is supposed to have 270 HP, and available with 6-speed transmission.

    With V6, the TSX will only get heavier, right on the nose, something that may require additional tweaks to the suspension setup to balance it out. And if it does happen, I hope it comes with LSD.

    However, given the pace at which TSX is selling (almost 3000 units in July!), I doubt we will see a more powerful version any time soon. At least not before the new RL is released.
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Gkearns - Which auto show were they covering?
  • gkearns56gkearns56 Member Posts: 49
    I checked the weight difference on the 4 cylinder Honda Accord and V6. There is only 196 pound difference. I believe Acura would "beef up" the suspension as they did with the TL S-type model.

    This indeed was a TSX S-type concept model they were showing. They indicated it would most likely appear October 2004. The auto show I was watching was on ESPN2. It comes on at Friday from 3:30-4:00; then anther came on from 4:00-4:30 and finally 4:30-5:00 (eastern standard time). One was the New York, Chicago and an International one.

    I believe Acura would take the necessary steps to reinforce the front-end (larger brakes, stablizer bars, tires and etc) to make this competitive. It would have about 240 hp (similar to the V6 Accord's engine). This is not unheard of because Nissan uses their award winning VQ 3.5 & 4.5 series engines throughout their Infiniti and Nissan product lines with slight modifications (depending on the vehicle).

    By the way (as several others have already posted and actual photos are available), the Acura TL (according to ESPN2's auto show host too) will come with 280hp.

    I'm sure many of you are aware that the TSX is the European Honda Accord outside the states. I think its a very nice car in which I will take a great interest in should they sell a "S-type" version.
  • himilerhimiler Member Posts: 1,209
    It's unusual for Honda/Acura to give so much advance notice on an upgraded model (TSX-S in late '04). Should they be concerned about TSX buyers who will delay their purchase until they can get their hands on the Type-S?

    Anyone else think that '04 TSX prices will dip below invoice when the '05 arrives?
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    I doubt it will dip below invoice. Year end clearance may not be a big deal for a low volume car like TSX, and it could hang on at invoice during clearance.

    The question I have, Is Acura going to increase the volume of TSX soon? They sold 3000 units in July! Or perhaps they will watch how the new TL affects TSX sales. If higher volume keeps up, it will make the task easier to get a deal on the TSX.
  • markjennmarkjenn Member Posts: 1,142
    For me, the tradeoffs in a V6-powered car would be too much - more weight, less crisp handling, more torque steer, poorer gas mileage, higher service costs - and move the car into a class where there are already a lot of competition. FWD, 4-cyl, 3200 lbs are a nice combo. FWD, V6, 3400 lbs and 250-hp are not.

    So Honda, please do it! If this happens, all the hoopla will shift to the V6 car, and we'll be able to cut some great deals on the 4-cyl.

    Actually BMW's upcoming 1-series is starting to look better all the time. It will likely have a 2.0 valvetronic motor of around 180-hp, RWD and a weight of under 2700 lbs. If they can keep the price around $25K, I see this as a lot of competition for the TSX.

    - Mark
  • himilerhimiler Member Posts: 1,209
    The 1-Series looks great on paper, but I haven't yet been able to get past its bathtub-on-wheels design.

    A V6-powered TSX will put some hurt on a big bunch of cars -- Accord V6, Maxima, Altima V6, E/IS300, A4, 330i, G35, etc.

    As long as the handling doesn't suffer too much, I can definately get behind that!
  • sdradioguysdradioguy Member Posts: 101
    What a coincidence. I just tried a couple of days ago to get a TSX insurance quote through AAA of Southern California (I live in San Diego), and my agent said the TSX was not in his database. It did not occur to me to see if he could pull up a TL insurance quote for a rough, ballpark comparison. I'm surprised the TSX wasn't already in the database. I wonder if it has something with it being introduced as a 2004 model in early 2003. Perhaps it will magically show up on ins. co. databases once we officially enter the 2004 model year.

    Right now, I'm paying about $1,000 a year to insure a 1996 Civic (I keep full coverage, because it's a popular car for thieves to steal, and San Diego seems to be in the middle of an auto theft epidemic).

    I had been shopping around for a 325i, C230, G35, S60, et al, when I finally decided on the TSX, which I plan to buy by the end of August. My agent was able to give me quotes for all those other cars, which ran between $1,500 and $1,700 a year. I'm guessing maybe the TSX will be in that range too, perhaps a little less. But it's still a Honda product.. and a lot of Hondas are on the "most wanted" list for thieves, because the parts are so valuable, and Hondas are popular cars to modify among the "Fast and Furious" set.

    xplorx4 -- what part of the country are you in, and what did your agent quote you for the TL coverage? I can't recall exactly how much coverage I have right now, but it's comfortably above the minimum for California. I do remember bumping up my liability to $300,000 last year, because I had bought a condo, and wanted more coverage, so if I did cause some nasty wreck, at least I wouldn't lose my home. I'm selling my condo right now, so I might be able to bring my liability back down to $100,000 or less. That could make a huge difference.

    Anyway, those of you in SD, Orange, or Riverside Counties, please pass along info on Acura dealers who are willing to deal, and what you're paying for a decent (not minimal) level of insurance coverage.
  • fedlawmanfedlawman Member Posts: 3,118
    Hey all, I'm in the middle of a solo road trip and I thought I'd share some of my experiences.

    I drove down from Seattle to San Francisco last Thursday and the TSX was a pure joy! I made over 400 miles per tankful, and averaged a hair over 30 MPG...with A/C on and more than a little exuberant driving.

    On straight, smooth pavement, the TSX is pure GT...it's quiet, compliant, and the seats are suprememly comfortable. When the road gets twisty however, it's as though the TSX transforms it's character. The car just hunkers down and attacks curves..this car changes direction like a go-cart!

    I even got to play a little with some other cars on the road, and discovered the TSX is more than powerful enough to play with the big boys...even in the canyons.

    I played a little with a 3.5L Altima and got the jump on him the first time. He was doing about 65 on I-5 as I slowly came up from behind him. As I got closer, I could see him checking me out in his rear view mirror, so I downshifted to 3rd gear and waited...right foot poised. Sure enough, he thought he'd show me up and punched it...but I was already on the gas!

    I hung with him until we both lost our nerve to go any faster. We slowed back down for a couple of miles, then I downshifted to 3rd and tried to blow by him. Unfortunately, I didn't get the jump on him this time, and soon I was again looking at his tail pipes.

    Some time later, I played a little cat and mouse with a 325i. This game was more entertaining because we were so evenly matched. These two cars are so close in power and weight, and it shows on the street. At any speed, in any gear, on straight and curvy roads, neither one of us could get the jump on the other. If one of these cars has an advantage over the other, only a racetrack would reveal it.

    Anyways, I love my TSX...it is a true touring car on I-5, and a superior canyon carver in the San Mateo hills. I can't wait for the drive home tomorrow!
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    stop it! i may regret getting my accord ex v6 if you go on.
  • stretchsjestretchsje Member Posts: 700
    The guy probably was seeing if he could keep up with a TSX without leaving high gear. Or if he could keep up using only the cruise control buttons to accelerate. Or maybe he just didn't care because they have nothing to prove- everyone knows the 3.5l Altima is fast.

    C'mon, be realistic here.
  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    And it would have given the Altima quite a run for it's money.

    On the interstate it's not always the car that loses the "race". I infuriated a Maxima SE in my 1993 Civic EX by hanging with him up to 120mph. Not a happy camper at all to see a gumdrop green EX coupe riding his tail at that speed. He could have left my had he been willing to go all out, but in a car like that, all out is straight to jail stuff.

    I don't regret buying our EX-L 5 speed coupe not one bit. Well maybe a little now that the 6-speeds are out. But I'd have lost my driver's license by now if I had one of those.
This discussion has been closed.