Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
I don't recall a single BIscayne in those years. But from '70 on, Biscaynes weren't even shown in the brochure. They were in fleet literature though.
2021 VW Arteon SEL 4-motion, 2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech
FWIW, base prices that year were as follows...
Biscayne 4-door 6-cyl: $3,096
Bel Air 4-door 6-cyl: $3,233
Impala 4-door 6-cyl: $3,391.
Adjusting for inflation, that $295 spread between the Biscayne and Impala would be around $2,236, so perhaps that was some incentive.
It's also not surprising, that 6-cyl engines were ultimately dropped from these behemoths. In '71, sales were:
Biscayne 6-cyl/V8: 5,846/18,463
Bel Air 6/V8: 3,452/38,534
Impala 4-door 6/V8: 1,606/135,304
Impala hardtop coupe 6/V8: 939/52,952 (plus another 139,437 V8-only Customs)
And, of course, there was the Impala Sport Sedan (4-door hardtop) that was V8 only and good for another 140,300.
I remember about halfways through the '71 model run, Chevy advertising, "Turbo-Hydramatic and Power Steering Now Standard on Full-Size V8's!". I then remember seeing window stickers where all of a sudden, the base price of the car was about $300 more than before. Wow, how charitable!
That Biscayne has carpeting. I think that started happening earlier than '71 on Biscaynes. I'd expect rubber flooring. I know from personal experience that in '73, both the base Nova and Chevelle Deluxe had rubber flooring inside.
I forget what the last year was, that all three low-priced cars still offered a 6-cyl. But, in a masochistic sort of way, I'd be curious to see a comparison test between (among?) a full-sized 6-cyl Chevy, Ford, and Plymouth.
My guess is the Chevy would have been the easiest to live with. Ford's 6-cyl engines just seemed to choke down extra bad with emissions controls. And I'd think the 225 slant six would just be too small, and the extra cubes of the Chevy 250 would give it a slight advantage. Although, the slant six had a long stroke, and I think that tends to help out with low end torque, so that might have offset the displacement shortcoming a bit?
Another one I'd be curious about, is the '76 LeSabres that had the 231 V6 in them. I'd imagine that must have been good for some laughs in the acceleration department. And probably some white knuckles, if you had to merge on the highway.
my first car was a well worn (had the lightweight racing bodywork package!) '67 Camaro with a straight 6. You could literally stand in the engine bay next to it if you wanted to. I think yanking it out would take about 15 minutes using nothing but a screwdriver and crescent wrench.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
I wonder if a lot of rental cars back then were also the basic engine option (but likely with automatic and probably air).
Fintail posted there, a sobering fact....the '62 Studebaker, Ford, and Plymouth are as old now as the curved-dash Olds in the ad was then!
Not sure what year that engine became even-firing, but my sister and husband's '75 Century Special, bought new, was IMHO absolutely miserable with that engine. I'm not talking speed necessarily, but the rough idle was almost embarrassing in a car that was otherwise as nice as that.
But that car and engine gave great cruise mileage.
Later that 231 became the 3.8 and then 3800 Series I and II and III. That read a great engine.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
From what I've heard, the turnaround year was 1985. That year, they used the turbo block as the basis for all applications, and also redesigned it for better oil flow. The '84 and earlier versions had a lot of narrow passages and right angles that were easily clogged, and I've heard jokes that the only way you could properly lubricate a 231 was to drive the car down a bad enough road and hope all the bouncing splashed the oil into all the right places! Although, I dunno if that's what they mean by "Splash Lubrication."
Supposedly it was common for them to fail between 70-90,000 miles, although I suspect it's one of those instances where if you were meticulous with maintenance, and didn't abuse it, even the older, weaker designs would last. At least, whenever I've brought up all the issues with the old 231 in other forums, almost inevitably someone would come out of the woodwork to tell me about some old 1970-whatever that lasted to 200K miles or whatever.
I suppose it can happen, though. After all, the 2.7 in my 2000 Intrepid was running just fine when it got totaled at around 150,000 miles. The engine hadn't been out long enough to develop a bad reputation when I bought my car, but a few years later, I started hearing horror stories about what a turd that engine was supposed to be.
FWIW, the 231 in my '82 Cutlass Supreme started to crap out around 73,000 miles, but was still running when I sold the car. However, it was also about 11 years old, and had 61,000 miles when I bought it, for $800, so at that point I could probably blame the previous owner, moreso than GM, for that car's quality.
The supercharged 231 in my 2000 Park Ave never gave me any trouble, although the rest of the car did. And the regular 200 hp 231 in my Dad's '03 Regal never gave any issues, other than a slow leak in the plastic intake manifold, that never got bad enough to replace. With those two newer cars, it was basically everything else falling apart around the engine, but not the engine itself!
One thing I have wondered...Buick still had that smaller 3.0/181 V6 in 1985. I wonder if that got the beefed up/improved lubrication treatment like the 3.8 did, or if it was left alone? There had also been the 4.1/252 V6, but it was dropped after 1984.
That wear meant less efficiency of the oil pump and lower pressure. Replace the cover
and the gears, and I believe there was an "improved" version, and you were home free.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Left rear repair is noticeable to me.
I thought this was interesting and is from there....'73 Bel Air sedan followed by a Catalina Safari on the line.
Lunch tables next to the assembly line. Don’t think you’d see that today.
If any of those guys are still around, they are likely all over 100 years old now.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
Has "SS" labeling, but I don't know enough about these to know if that's for real or not. Lots of bright trim for an "SS" it sorta seems. Has a huge, ridiculous hood scoop with "COWL INDUCTION" labelling, which I KNOW is incorrect for the car, LOL.
I've seen those wheels elsewhere, but not a fan.
I think the basic styling is pleasing, and I always thought it was funny that in '78, the wheelbase actually went up an inch.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
2021 VW Arteon SEL 4-motion, 2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech
Passed 15 mins ago in town, in wet weather and salt on the roads, a clean black ‘91 Caprice Classic sedan I’ve never seen before. Clean whitewalls even.
I can hardly believe that 1991 was 33 years ago.
Ab, I agree about the tall instrument panels in all three of those cars too. I moan about that in late '70's big FoMoCo products as well.
I suspect these are cars from GM and related suppliers workers who bought with their discounts.
They have been in their garage for decades, often as a second car. Now the owners have passed or
moved to the great state of Florida, and those cars have moved to new owners.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Agreed; but that burled wood trim sure looks nice against the otherwise-all-black interior!
https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1987-pontiac-tojan-2/
and it got me down the rabbit hole to this beauty. Price as expected is eye watering. But the really interesting thing to me is that even in 1970, on a fairly heavy car with that monster of a motor (the Hemi), you still go drum brakes all around standard. And someone actually order this car with them. That must be spooky in the wet.
https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1970-dodge-challenger-r-t-18/
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
It looked identical to this! Truly a beautiful car.
Adjusting for inflation though, that Eldorado's lease comes out to around $799/mo in today's dollars, which honestly doesn't sound THAT bad. For comparison, the payment on my Charger was $777/mo, although I know it's not a direct comparison, doing a short term lease to a 6-year car payment.
Still, drive a Caddy, for the price of a Dodge! Although, working backwards, the ~$54K my Dodge ended up costing would be around $12,750 or so back in 1979...which was about the entry point for a stripped-down Caddy. I couldn't see any Dodges being that much in '79, although maybe if you went hog wild, you could get a Magnum XE or St. Regis up to around $10K if you went hog wild?
1977: $109/mo
1982: $159/mo
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
I just saw this video this morning, from Mrs. Potamkin. "Over $6,000 for a Dodge Monaco or Ford LTD?", LOL.
1977 is the commercial date.
Mrs. P., first new '77 Caprice Classic coupe our hometown dealer got in, and it was fully loaded, had a sticker of $7,700.
But Potamkin owned other GM dealerships, so Mrs. P's consternation left out GM product, LOL.
Notice no bustleback, as they were much more expensive.
On FB this morning, after looking at some Potamkin ads, I saw that someone wrote that their Dad bought a late '70's (I think) new Caddy from them, at a good price. He said though that you sometimes had to book a service appointment weeks out.
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Ironically, the Chevy dealer in Clarion was also a Caddy dealer. I remember going there with a friend and sitting in a '79 or '80 Eldo in the showroom, trying out the door handle from the back seat, LOL.
I've mentioned this before, but I do think it's funny, yet arrogant, that I recall a newspaper ad my hometown dealer ran that said:
DART
Chevrolet
THERE'S REALLY NOTHING IN-BETWEEN!
Cadillac
I know there was an actual styled wheel option on Eldo and Seville, a pretty decent looking one too. That would be a must on my ideal spec bustleback (80-81 Elegante, loaded in the right colors etc).
Now, the yellow plaid cloth interior?
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
On the one in the video that SDA posted, I don't think they look too bad, but in person, I just didn't like them at all. I think it was just something about the size/shape of that center cap, and it seemed like the whole assembly jutted out a bit too far.
I seem to recall a wire hubcap on some of the RWD Cadillacs back then, that actually seemed flat, almost recessed, and even though you could tell it was fake, I thought it looked nice. This might be what I'm thinking of, but looking at it now, I don't find it quite as attractive as I remember...
Here are the "wheels" on a Seville I was thinking of (this is a lovely car but dearly needs whitewalls):
And a different wheel, I assume a wheel and not a cap:
This episode aired September 26, 1980 - the twilight of disco, as shown by the Saturday Night Fever showcase theme.