Options

I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)

16906916936956961306

Comments

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,429
    Nope, it is pretty discreet - it is located just below the rear view mirror, and is pretty small. Normal people might think it is a transponder or something. I also live in a relatively low crime area, and usually park in a garage.
    boomchek said:

    @fintail - that's cool. Do you ever worry about leaving your dash cam in the car when parked? I don't have one but wouldn't want to leave it because it might be a reason for someone to break in and steal it.

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,429
    I went to the auto auction today - lots of oddball stuff - old Volvos and Saabs, MGB, Lincoln Mk V, fintail, Cimarron, etc. I parked in front of this immaculate early 80s Regal sedan, which presented to me kind of an evolution of car design:

    image
  • boomchekboomchek Member Posts: 5,516
    Wow, it's crazy how much bigger your Benz is. The Regal was based on the G-Body platform iirc, and that was a midsize back then. I bet a modern Corolla would be somewhere close in size to that Regal.

    2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX

  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,339
    Everything is getting bigger and more unwieldy...

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,292
    That Regal actually looks good. Reminds me a bit of a first-gen Seville.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    Just going by memory, that Regal, an '82-84, is on a 108.1" wheelbase, about 197" long. Maybe 72" wide and about 55" tall. Interior volume, around 101 cubic feet for passenger space, maybe 16 cubic feet of trunk?

    Most of its measurements are still probably typical of the modern intermediate, with the exception of height. I think a lot of cars these days are more like 57-58" tall?

    An '81-83 Malibu sedan, which is the same platform, has 102 cubic feet of passenger space (door panels and seats aren't as thickly padded, which increases some measurements slightly) and 17 cubic feet of trunk space (rump isn't as sloped). The EPA's cutoff for a "full sized" car is 120 cubic feet combined, so in theory the old GM A/G platform, in 4-door guise at least, missed it by just one cubic foot!

    Another thing that might be deceptive about those older cars is that they had bumpers that jutted out, and while that added to the official length, it didn't contribute to making the cars look bigger. With Fintail's new car, the grille is pretty much out at the front of the car, and the rear doesn't have a jutting bumper, either.

    Sometimes, those bumpers can add a good 8-10" to the length of a car. For instance, a 1967-69 Dart is around 196" long. By 1975-76, I think they were up to around 206", but to me they looked a bit shorter, because of the sloped off rear. But, the 5 mph crash bumpers that stuck out added to the length.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,920

    This just showed up in my driveway.
    Got to drive it.

    Love those wheels. What year is that?

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,429
    Per the maker (2010+ cars are essentially the same), the E is on a 113.2" wheelbase, 192.1" long, 73" wide, 57.1" tall.

    The angle of the pic might make the newer car look bigger, too.
    andre1969 said:

    Just going by memory, that Regal, an '82-84, is on a 108.1" wheelbase, about 197" long. Maybe 72" wide and about 55" tall. Interior volume, around 101 cubic feet for passenger space, maybe 16 cubic feet of trunk?

    Most of its measurements are still probably typical of the modern intermediate, with the exception of height. I think a lot of cars these days are more like 57-58" tall?

    An '81-83 Malibu sedan, which is the same platform, has 102 cubic feet of passenger space (door panels and seats aren't as thickly padded, which increases some measurements slightly) and 17 cubic feet of trunk space (rump isn't as sloped). The EPA's cutoff for a "full sized" car is 120 cubic feet combined, so in theory the old GM A/G platform, in 4-door guise at least, missed it by just one cubic foot!

    Another thing that might be deceptive about those older cars is that they had bumpers that jutted out, and while that added to the official length, it didn't contribute to making the cars look bigger. With Fintail's new car, the grille is pretty much out at the front of the car, and the rear doesn't have a jutting bumper, either.

    Sometimes, those bumpers can add a good 8-10" to the length of a car. For instance, a 1967-69 Dart is around 196" long. By 1975-76, I think they were up to around 206", but to me they looked a bit shorter, because of the sloped off rear. But, the 5 mph crash bumpers that stuck out added to the length.

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    This morning in the parking lot at work I spotted what appeared to be a 1966 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 convertible. My guess is that it's a clone, as only four were built, according to Wikipedia at least.

  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    Nice!
  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,339
    Yeah, almost certainly a clone; The Shelby convertibles were first offered in the 1968 model year. 1967 also saw the creation of "Little Red" a notchback GT500 prototype with a 428 engine and a Paxton supercharger.

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,384
    Now that I like.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • texasestexases Member Posts: 11,108
    Shelby 350 Mustangs are pretty easily cloned, not that much body work to change, an under hood body brace, some engine mods on top of the 'hi-po' version of the 289, and I think that's about it. Oh, and relocate the upper suspension A-arm down an couple of inches.
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,726
    @kyfdx,
    Last year air cooled, 1997 I think. Super low miles and lowered euro suspension height.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,920

    @kyfdx,
    Last year air cooled, 1997 I think. Super low miles and lowered euro suspension height.

    Very cool.. I wish I'd bought one 10 years ago.. Now, they are out of my range.

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,429
    Saw all types today - first a nice 62 Coupe DeVille on correct looking medium width whitewalls, a Fisker Karma, a clean 80-83 Toyota 4x4, and a Dodge Omni. Forgot to mention I saw a clean Celebrity wagon yesterday.
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,292
    edited October 2015
    For @fintail - a look back at the original brochure:

    http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2015/10/06/fabulous-fintails-at-50-1965-mercedes-benz-230200-sedans-brochure/


    BTW: if you right-click on each thumbnail page and open in a new tab, you get a large, hi-res scan of each.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,429
    Cool stuff - those are what I call "second generation" fintails, as the 190 and 220 series cars (like mine, a 220SE) were discontinued in the summer of 1965. These cars were mostly identical to earlier fintails, but had different engines as is mentioned, and slightly different interior trim. I've never seen that brochure before - that was around the time when MB finally moved on from wide whites, too. I like how the floor shift is touted, a mild pretense of sport, perhaps, maybe coming off the rally and racing success of the FI models.

    Some inaccuracy in the article, I just can't resist pointing out - the W111 220 series cars debuted in 1959, the slightly smaller W110 190 cars, and the fancier W112 300 series cars were introduced in 1961. All are actually on the same wheelbase, save for the rare LWB variant of the W112 300SE. Definitely a different era compared to MB of today.

    ab348 said:

    For @fintail - a look back at the original brochure:

    http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2015/10/06/fabulous-fintails-at-50-1965-mercedes-benz-230200-sedans-brochure/


    BTW: if you right-click on each thumbnail page and open in a new tab, you get a large, hi-res scan of each.

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,429
    Today's sightings - Mk1 and Mk2 MR2s (the latter the same car I saw last week) and an Acura Vigor.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023


    I know it ain't no Mopar, but Holy Chrysler!

  • MichaellMichaell Moderator Posts: 262,475
     mustang GT500 KR  convertible – red with white trim.  excellent condition 

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and let us know! Post a pic of your new purchase or lease!


    MODERATOR

    2015 Subaru Outback 3.6R / 2024 Kia Sportage Hybrid SX Prestige

  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 16,974
    75 Monte Carlo, looked mint. Black over Red.

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    I always liked the initial Monte Carlo's (somewhere around 1971 or 72 maybe?), but I also liked all of them through the late 70's. IIRC there wasn't all that huge of a price bump up from a similarly equipped Malibu?
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,920
    berri said:

    I always liked the initial Monte Carlo's (somewhere around 1971 or 72 maybe?), but I also liked all of them through the late 70's. IIRC there wasn't all that huge of a price bump up from a similarly equipped Malibu?

    '70-'72 for the first model.

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • toomanyfumestoomanyfumes Member Posts: 1,019
    '91-'94 Mercury Capri convertible (the angular aussie import.) Looking a bit rough, but moving along the freeway at a good clip. I can't remember the last time I saw one, not a very attractive car.
    2012 Mustang Premium, 2013 Lincoln MKX Elite, 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander.
  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    Pretty impressive that it wasn't rusted away in WI. Were those built in Australia, or just based on an Aussie platform?
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,429
    Those Capris were Oz-built, VIN will start with a "6" I believe.

    I am in eastern OR right now, a lot of old weatherbeaten material sitting around. Most unusual, a decent looking 41 Caddy coupe just sitting outside, and a 53-54 Dodge or Plymouth 2 door.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    berri said:

    I always liked the initial Monte Carlo's (somewhere around 1971 or 72 maybe?), but I also liked all of them through the late 70's. IIRC there wasn't all that huge of a price bump up from a similarly equipped Malibu?

    I always thought the 1970-72 Monte Carlo had an upscale mystique to it, something that it lost a bit of with the 1973 redesign and especially the 1978 downsizing. It actually looked expensive, rather than simply ostentatious like the later models.

    As for the price, my old car books shows a V-8 Malibu hardtop coupe starting at $2809 in 1970, while the Monte started at $3123. So, about a 10% price premium. That doesn't seem like that huge of a premium to me, considering the nicer interior, more upscale styling, longer wheelbase (but no more interior room), and the fact that the V-8 was a 350 rather than a 307.
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,292
    andre1969 said:


    I always thought the 1970-72 Monte Carlo had an upscale mystique to it, something that it lost a bit of with the 1973 redesign and especially the 1978 downsizing. It actually looked expensive, rather than simply ostentatious like the later models.

    I agree. The 1970-'72 models were extremely elegant looking. Around here they were not at all common either. But neither were the Pontiac Grand Prix nor the Thunderbird. The '73 looked a bit overdone to me. But as the years went on they became much more common than the 1st generation ever was. The '78-'80 is best forgotten, though the later ones in the '80s were cleaned up a lot. I remember test-driving an '84 or so GP when it was new, and it just didn't feel solid to me. I passed.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • texasestexases Member Posts: 11,108
    edited October 2015
    I always was impressed with the length of the fan shroud when I checked the oil on a 70-72 Monte:

  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,875
    edited October 2015
    I absolutely remember those base prices, from when I was a twelve-year-old kid about living at our Chevy dealer, andre!

    I do remember the optional price of a 350 2-barrel over a 307 in the Nova and Chevelle lines was only $26!

    Mid-year they came out with a strippo, base-model Chevelle. It did not have a single piece of trim or emblem or nameplate down the side. Ugh.

    The first-gen Monte Carlo is about the only car I think looks like it was designed with fender skirts. They were optional but really fit into the side styling of the car IMHO.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,429
    Saw one of these today - can't recall the last time I saw one, which is saying something as I think all survivors are in the PNW:

    image
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,384
    I loved those Corollas back in my youth. When they were new. and I was not old.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,384
    an early vintage Audi 4000. Rare enough, but this one was driving (keeping up with traffic and everything) on the NJ Turnpike! Gray, looked a little threadbare but I did not notice any rust, though I was in a different set of lanes.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,429
    Today spotted an immaculate ~72 Cadillac hearse - apparently still in service as it was at a funeral home.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    low miles, no doubt. :)
  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 16,974
    ..people just dying to take a ride in it.  (Ducking and running)

    Pretty strange it would be still in service.  I'd bet it just an eccentric person using it as a driver (like the character from Six Feet Under, Claire?)

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • js06gvjs06gv Member Posts: 460
    (like the character from Six Feet Under, Claire?)

    Haha, exactly what I was thinking. Hers was either a '71 or 72 as well. Awful green color.

    2024 Ram 1500 Longhorn, 2019 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon, 2019 Ford Mustang GT Premium, 2016 Kia Optima SX, 2000 Pontiac Trans Am WS6

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I'm just weird enough, I guess, that I'd LOVE a '61-62 Cadillac hearse to drive around in. Maybe not an everyday driver, but sort of a "fun" car in a twisted sort of way.

    I caught an episode of the old tv show "Thriller" the other day, where an eccentric horror writer played by Natalie Shafer (Mrs. Howell) had a 1959 Cadillac hearse. It only appeared in one or two quick shots. I've only seen bits and pieces of "Six Feet Under", and definitely remember that loud green Caddy hearse.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,429
    It was a smallish town place, it might have been in the fleet. I'd rather have a last ride in that than an XTS hearse or new Lincoln or whatever is common now. I wonder if there could be a market for vintage hearses, they are a lot cooler than modern ones.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    edited October 2015
    I always wondered, if a vintage hearse happened to be in my fleet when I passed away, if I could request that it be used in the funeral procession? I wonder if a funeral home would honor that? Probably, if the price was right.

    When my Grandmother passed away back in May, the hearse they used for the funeral was based on a final-generation Lincoln Town Car. It was still pretty classy, I thought.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,429
    A funeral home in a town I lived in as a kid has several old funeral service vehicles, Which can be seen here . I know the Packard at top is still in use upon request, and I suspect the others can be too, if they are up and running.

    Seems like a cool idea, vintage hearses in use, classy last ride. Even a late run TC seems classier than new cars, somehow.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Henry Ford was carried to his grave in a Packard.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Over his dead body?
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,384
    I just read that entire web site. Surprisingly fascinating stuff.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    fintail said:

    A funeral home in a town I lived in as a kid has several old funeral service vehicles, Which can be seen here . I know the Packard at top is still in use upon request, and I suspect the others can be too, if they are up and running.

    Seems like a cool idea, vintage hearses in use, classy last ride. Even a late run TC seems classier than new cars, somehow.

    What a unique way to write off a car collecting hobby as a business expense!
  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 16,974
    My wife knows my last ride should be in a Lincoln hearse.   I don't have anything against Caddy, but I prefer Lincoln.   Naturally, I'm sure  that will be the last thing on her mind at the time.   
    I also wouldnt be surprised if hearses based on the last of the Town cars bring good money.  There really isn't anything to based them off of, although they say FWD vehicles are easier to stretch and convert.  

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,429
    And the best thing is, these could actually be used in the business, unlike so many other write offs that are purely for personal pleasure.
    robr2 said:


    What a unique way to write off a car collecting hobby as a business expense!

  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,875
    edited October 2015
    Here's a good quiz on old-car instrument panels (all domestics):

    http://www.americantorque.com/game/dash-id-54-64/

    I got 41 out of 44. I thought I'd do better....LOL--when I was a kid I wasn't into sports at all but just absorbed cars and brochure info! I did poorly at early-mid '50's--sometimes I'd know it was a Mopar but I'd miss which division--same with '50's Buick and Oldsmobile.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,429
    edited October 2015
    I was born in the malaise disco era, and I got 37 out of 44, 84%. I am pleased. I am an obsessive I guess.
This discussion has been closed.