Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Honda Odyssey Future Models
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Is this the new Honda Odyssey?
Cheers!
i think the equation is slightly more complicated than that...however - is it suggested somewhere that Honda is becomming #3?
Amemiya, also Honda's executive vice president, conceded that the line's first-year production would likely be limited to around 65,000 units, but said it should reach the full capacity of 150,000 by the second year.
"The Alabama plant will be facing many big challenges, such as through the full model change for the Odyssey (minivan) in the autumn," he said. "But we should be producing at full capacity next year."
Here is the complete article:
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040104/autoshow_honda_usa_1.html
".... Brauer said consumers looking for a family-size vehicle can expect Honda to ship an Odyssey hybrid minivan in 2004."
Karl Brauer is the editor-in-chief of the car-review website Edmunds.com.
My comments:
I have always thought that the best way to do a hybrid in a larger vehicle was to have the rear wheels electric drive/regenerate, with a 'standard' gas motor with front wheel drive under the hood. That way you get AWD with no performance or mileage penalty, and no driveshaft rasing the floor of the vehicle up higher.
With the Toyota AWD Sienna, you lose your spare tire when they put the driveshaft in. Honda can get around this with a hybrid.
Ref:
http://www.wired.com/news/autotech/0,2554,61645,00.html?tw=wn_tec- - hhead_1
The low capacity is on the new second line - not the current line. IMHO, I think the SUT will be built on this second line.
I guess I concentrated more on the part of your message that regarding the full capacity issue. Based on what you quoted (see above) it seemed like you left out that the "full production" issue applies to the new production line. What you quoted seems to say the entire plant won't be producing at full capacity.
That's the problem with the internet - we don't listen to each other.
All Ody's to be built in Alabama and second line for Pilots. Alliston to build MDX, Pilot, and SUT.
And if hybrid comes to either the Odyssey or Pilot, will it be one of the versions of a vehicle available, as is the case with the Civic?
Anyway, don't you think Honda would differentiate itself and be viewed as more innovative (in comparison to Toyota) if the hybrid technology were applied to the the mini-van, as opposed to the SUV?
Slightly off topic but I thought this was an interesting feature on NPR on the 5th; a discussion with a reporter from the NewYorker on the supposid safety of SUVs and the misplaced trust in the relative safety of these vechicles versus others:
http://www.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=1584409
Apparently, the numbers from the Edmunds Hybrid poll suggests it would be most desireable applied to the SUV, with the Mini-van a second.
I wonder why? Is it because SUVs are recognized as fuel-efficiency challenged, or because they are so popular? Or both?
http://thehollywoodextra.com/honda/honda.html
The current Odyssey is much more attractive than the 2004 Sienna, 2004 Quest, and the photos that are suspected to be the 2005 Odyssey.
Since Chrysler has not made much change for the new 2005 Grand Caravan and 2005 Town and Country, their minivans will be the most attractive if the Odyssey changes very much.
Don't mess up the current Odyssey styling!!
It is just as hard for SUVs to look good as it is for minivans.
I think most of us (including me) prefer that "squarish" look, which was the fashion for the 80s and 90s in the Mercedes, BMW, Lexus, etc.
I guess for the younger generation in 2004+, the new fashion is more roundish, which is apparent in the Mercedes, BMW, Lexus, etc.
Even with that roundish figure, I believe the new completed Odyssey will look great, especially with the cross-bars on top and that awesome grill and 18" wheels.
The Quest is no doubt extremely ugly, just like most of the Nissan line. Nissan is going down hill.
But the Odyssey will look great.
The Sienna could have looked great if Toyota weren't being so CHEAP and STUPID and tried to make it look ugly on purpose just because of that "Toyota" badge.
If I were Toyota, I would give it a nice chrome grill, rear spoiler, and make that ugly dash look like one of their sedans with Navigation.
Since they don't have a Lexus minivan, they should make the Sienna look like a Lexus.
Since they don't have an Acura minivan, they are making the Odyssey look like an Acura.
The Yukon may be big and 8 seats, but I bet it drinks gas like water. So how much are you paying for gas each week? $50 or more ?
With a minivan, it's more like $25.
The minivan will seat more people (Highlander, 4Runner)
The minivan will be more comfortable with 7 people (Explorer)
and an Odyssey won't slurp gas like water. (Yukon)
http://www.autoweb.com.au/start_/showall_/id_HON/doc_hnd0310211/c- ms/news/newsarticle.html
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. announces an all-new Odyssey for the Japanese market.
A 2.4-litre DOHC i-VTEC engine and newly developed CVT 7-speed transmission provide superior driving performance, while the new low-floor platform ensures a roofline of just 1,550mm. The intelligently designed, spacious interior comfortably accommodates seven people in three rows of seats.
The innovative third-generation Odyssey combines a low centre of gravity for improved ride and handling, an elegant form with sleek lines and unsurpassed roominess due to the low floor.
The Odyssey offers two engine options. A 118kW 2.4 litre four cylinder and a high-performance 2.4-litre DOHC i-VTEC with 147kW. Two transmission types are also offered, a 5-speed manual and a 7-speed CVT.
The new Odyssey is equipped with IHCC (Intelligent Highway Cruise Control) vehicle speed and inter-vehicle distance control system. It also features the voice-operated Honda HDD Navigation System + Progressive Commander, with rear camera, for significant improvements in functionality and operability.
The Odyssey's new design results in a roofline 80mm lower than the previous model, allowing access to standard multi-level parking facilities. It also offers 5mm more headroom than the previous model for far greater roominess than the vehicle's external appearance would suggest.
The 2nd row seats are equipped with a double folding mechanism that allows them to be stored flat, while the 3rd row seats feature a power under-floor storage mechanism allowing them to be easily stowed away at the press of a switch. A variety of seating arrangements creates a luggage area of up to 1,052 litres.
The power tailgate can be opened and closed using the keyless entry remote control, a switch on the dashboard, or the switch on the inside of the tailgate (closing only).
AFS (Adaptive Front Lighting System) works in coordination with steering wheel angle to change the direction of the headlight unit and illuminate the vehicle's path when negotiating curves or turning.
Four-wheel VSA (ABS + TCS + side-slip control) combines with DBW (Drive By Wire) for engine torque control to ensure precise control over vehicle stability.
Brake assist is standard on all types, with the Absolute featuring an electronic brake assist system. A learning function automatically adjusts the assist operation point to conform to the driver's braking habits.
CMS (Collision Mitigation Brake System) uses millimetre-wave radar to gauge distance to the vehicle ahead, providing the driver with audio and tactile warning of a possible collision, while also applying light braking pressure. If the system determines that a collision is imminent, it applies strong braking pressure to enhance the effect of the driver's own braking, thus mitigating damage in the event of a collision.
E-pretensioners (driver and front passenger seat) work in concert with CMS, pulling lightly on the seatbelt if there is a danger of a collision and more forcefully if it is determined that a collision is imminent, for increased restraining effect.
Honda's original G-CON (G-force Control) technology is incorporated to create a body with a crash safety design that is among the best in the world. It can withstand a 55km/h full-frontal collision; a 64km/h front offset collision, a 55km/h side collision, and a 50km/h rear collision. Furthermore, in addition to a high level of self-protection, the vehicle's crash compatibility body reduces damage of other vehicles.
Equipped with a side curtain airbag system for the 1st~3rd row seats that helps reduce head injuries in the event of a side collision.
Front-row seats are fitted with 3-point, load limiter-equipped, pretensioner ELR seatbelts. The driver's side belt is equipped with a lap pretensioner on the outer end of the lap belt, in addition to the shoulder belt pretensioner, for improved occupant retention in both the pelvic and thoracic regions.
Now of course, this is the Japanese version, but the USA version can't be that much different, besides being larger with dual sliding doors.
But can you imagine 7 speed automatic transmission and all those new high-tech?
That being said and with a nod to andrewtran71's view of the Yukon XL's looks, I've found a bit of truth in a recent study that showed the more time you spend looking at someone, the more attractive you are likely to consider them to be. I think that the same happens to us with almost anything, including automotive designs. This helps explain how some "radical" new designs become the rage and also why I simply loved the looks of my '95 Civic when I bought it used in 1998, but hated them when that design change first came out.
It also helps explain Subaru, Saab, and Volvo owner loyalty as well as the masochistic Hummer owners devotion to their rides. The latter remind me of the women who have wrecked their backs and now pursue surgical remedies for their mangled feet because "It is much better to look good than it is to feel good!" (Billy Crystal's character Fernando, I think -- obviously a take off on Ricardo Montleban, SNL 19??).
So the best thing to do is to change it very gradually, instead of the drastic radical change, like the Nissan Quest, which is sooooooooooooo ugly, I can't even make myself look at it for more than 2 seconds because I'm afraid I might turn into stone----like the Madam Medussa effect.
A good example is the Lexus LS. It started out with the "classic" squarish Mercedes look. Then over the years it got slightly rounder on the edges. This gives people a chance to get used to the very slight changes first before taking on more changes.
Now the old Sienna was ugly to begin with, so making a drastic change was good for the new Sienna, which looks 100% better than the old one.
The Odyssey has been a great example of smart slight changes. I hope they will continue this smart move with the new Ody. I expect there will be some roundness on the edges and more aerodynamics, but the overall classic shape will remain the same. This will please the "old" crowd like myself as well as the newer generation crowd.
That's why I think the Japanese version
http://us1.webpublications.com.au/static/images/news/aw/hnd031021- 1amg.jpg
will be the new Ody except it will be bigger and it will have dual sliding doors. It looks very similar to the old Ody, but with slightly more aerodynamic rounding of the edges and body lines.
The ASM concept Ody
http://automobilemag.com/auto_shows/03tms_honasm_1.jpg
looks very drastic, which would be a mistake for the US Ody.
Say it ain't so.
No. No. No. I can't be. I refuse to believe it.
Call it denial. Call it wishful thinking.
Man, I hope the new Ody will not look like that ASM concept.
If the next Ody is the ASM concept, I'm buying a Sienna XLE Limited.
That ASM concept is UGLY. Plain ugly.
"I just read The Temple of V-TEC and i saw that the Honda ASM Concept is shorter than the US Honda Odyssey. Here are the dimensions:
ASM Concept / US Odyssey
Overall Length: 4840mm / 5110mm
Width: 1830mm / 1920mm
Height: 1790mm / 1770mm
Wheelbase: 2900mm / 3000mm
As you guys can see the ASM is about 4 inches narrower than US ODY, 4 inches shorter wheelbase than US ODY, and more than 10.5 inches shorter than the US Odyssey."
Based on this info, there's no way the US Odyssey will be the ASM concept!
10.5" shorter and 4" narrower than the curren Ody?
That sounds more like a Japanese version.
http://www.vtec.net/modelmatrix/
"The Temple of VTEC is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Co., Inc. or any other division of Honda Motor Co.
Some of the information presented here is speculative, and is not provided nor endorsed by Honda Motor Co., Inc."