Diesels in the News

14445474950171

Comments

  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I just got a price quote from T&C Jeep in Portland. The diesel added $2000 to the price. It would be nice to have that power plant in the Chrysler Aspen & Pacifica.

    The Liberty diesel was an experiment to see whether consumers would be willing to pay an extra $1,500 for a diesel vehicle.

    It worked well enough for Chrysler to release the diesel Grand Cherokee, which costs an extra $3,000 and is expected to save drivers $592 a year on fuel.

    Diesels make up less than 0.5% of the cars produced in North America. Diesel car production is expected to increase to 15% by 2015 and 18% by 2020, according to estimates from the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute.

    Offering an average of 30% better fuel efficiency than gasoline engines, diesels are a good gasoline alternative for highway driving.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    This may be why so many truck engines have failed recently. Not because of the ULSD.

    DETROIT -- Scientists hope the coming flood of diesel-powered vehicles to North American car dealerships sheds further light on a little-known problem with fuel made from the Canadian oilsands.

    Diesel fuel made from 100 per cent oilsands petroleum has been causing injector malfunctions and other problems in some diesel truck engines in Alberta, an international conference of engineers heard Monday. The problems disappear when the pure Alberta fuel is mixed with diesel from anywhere else in the world.

    The problems are believed to be linked to the molecular structure of fuels derived from the oilsands, and the process used to extract it.


    Oilsands diesel
  • bc13bc13 Member Posts: 32
    sort of a post to 2 messages. re the jeep grand cherokee, why would the premium for diesel be 3k? its the same benz diesel that is at about a 1k premium (if that) on its cars. won't get into the disappointing mileage (think it only gets 23 mpg, would have expected more).

    with the oil companies already out there saying it'll cost more to ramp up production of diesel, does anyone really think they there will be a cost savings in the use of diesel fuel? you just know that the oil companies will start pricing diesel at a 10-30% percent premium to gas. There will still be a savings in fuel usage (which is admirable), but not likely much if any in cost. the thing i don't understand about that is that I keep hearing diesel is a natural byproduct of the refining process and on occasion its also cheaper to make.

    Seems to me like they are setting up diesel to fail.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    ..."does anyone really think they there will be a cost savings in the use of diesel fuel?"...

    The short and long answers are yes.

    Not to get off topic/thread here, but I think it will follow the (for example) Toyota Prius/Chevrolet Corvette/Z06 paths, for a while. Notably Prius' are currently selling at invoice; down from MSRP PLUS.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I think you would find that it would be somewhat less than 3 grand. They bundle several options with the diesel engine. According to the new EPA ratings the diesel GC is 19 MPG combined the 4.7L standard V8 is 15 MPG combined and when you use E85 it is 10 MPG combined. You get a 22% increase on the combined mileage. And a whopping 48% increase over ethanol.

    I am not sure where you are but in So CA diesel today is about 29 cents less per gallon than Regular Unleaded. That with an additional 18 cents per gallon tax on diesel. So it is cheaper part of the year. With the added increase in mileage it is a good deal. For the average car or truck gas would have to be 25% less expensive to be equal. I have not seen a gap that big ever. At the current price of diesel gas would have to be a dollar per gallon cheaper. That could be the reason they sell so many diesel PU trucks. The major reason that diesel is more expensive in the winter is the demand for heating oil. Here are the charts.

    http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/gdu/gasdiesel.asp
  • eliaselias Member Posts: 2,209
    bc13, D-C can use any reason it wants to charge $3k premium for the grand-cherokee diesel engine - remember that whole "free market" thing we've got here in USA!?
    23 mpg sounds great compared to the 17 mpg for the gasser version. 30% improvement! niiiiice!
    the application of proper arithmetic can tell you after how many miles there will be a cost savings, assuming current diesel & gasoline prices.
    if you want one of us diesel fiends to do the math for you, just follow up again and ask nicely and either me or someone else will calculate the answer. ttfn!
  • moparbadmoparbad Member Posts: 3,870
    Nissan will offer a diesel in the Maxima in 2009 for 2010 model year. This is a surprise as Nissan has tested and considered selling the Titan, the Frontier and Navarra with diesel as well as several SUV's, however, out of the blue they announce the Maxima.

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Nissan plans U.S. clean diesel vehicle in 2010
    Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. will launch its first clean diesel vehicle in the United States in 2010, CEO Carlos Ghosn said today.

    Speaking to the Council on Foreign Relations, Ghosn said Nissan would launch a diesel Maxima in the U.S. market and other clean diesel vehicles in Japan and China. The company already has clean diesel technology in its cars sold in Europe.

    "We are very confident about the potential benefits," Ghosn said, referring to growing U.S. demands to increase fuel efficiency and reduce greenhouse gases. Ghosn is also CEO of Renault SA.
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Nissan Maxima Diesel USA TODAY article
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    This is just my take, but the Maxima is a "higher end" Nissan and also competition to the (V6)Camry/Accord/Avalon. This is significant, for the Honda cTDI is rumored to be USA offered in an "Accord" platform. I think the markets are in for a treat! Two diesels in two "bread and butter" cars! My swag is an easy 40 mpg, without the Camry "hybrid" premium. With a 20 gal fuel tank, 700-800 mile range!!?? If they do it right, significantly enhanced drivability.

    I would further swag whom so ever comes up with the diesel in the so called "small car economy" sector will have a literal lock on the "category. Why VW has not been able to leverage their offerings in the "small car economy" sector in this light is beyond me. The Jetta, Beetle, Golf, gets anywhere from (my 2003 Jetta) 44-62 mpg! MONSTER!
  • houdini1houdini1 Member Posts: 8,356
    BC, I understand what you are saying and I have posted that identical opinion here before.

    You are wrong on one point though. There will be a huge savings on the use of diesel fuel, unfortunately it will go to the oil companies and car mfgs., not the consumer.

    I am also a diesel fiend but I know that the oil companies will overcharge us for diesel and the car mfgs. will overcharge us for the diesel option. The old saying is true, if you want to save money...it's gonna cost you!!

    2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460

  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    The market/s vote/s overwhelmingly for auto transmissions, despite its compelling disadvantage/s. Purely from a EPA mpg rating point of view, one important sub issue would be the mating of the proper (automatic) transmissions to the diesel power plant. There are few oem's that do this well. The only one that I know of personally is (gasser) Honda. I think the EPA mpg difference (same model) is -1 mpg for the automatic.

    I would even go so far as to say if the VW did not come with the manual option, the automatic, while still offering a (slight) mpg advantage over a similar Honda Civic, would not have penciled out as well as a 5 speed manual.
  • tomcat63tomcat63 Member Posts: 82
    You exactly hit the nail...! I´m a passionate car enthusiast and professional mechanic running a small auto-repair shop in Düsseldorf / Germany. You might call me a fanatic, but to my opinion automatic transmission is one of the most useless and ridiculous options you can have on a car apart from PDC, 20"x10"-chrome rims and DVD-"You are the King"-infotainment. Thousands of engineers torture their brains to improve motor efficiency, performance and pollution behavior. Finally all their efforts are eliminated by an overweighing, complicated and error-sourcing thing called auto-tranny. This should be in fact reserved for old and/or disabled people. Here in Europe the percentage of passenger cars being equipped with auto-transmission is only approx. 15% and drivers don´t have to suffer from a lack of comfort! They still know why they were born with 2 feet and 2 hands. And it does´nt matter if it´s a Diesel or a gasser, auto-trannys cut off engine performance and increase fuel consumption. Get a tank refill here in Germany, you´d to pay about $6,40 per gallon for unleaded regular and $ 5,60 for Diesel! We should take every oportunity to save up our valuable oil ressources unless we can put up with cruising around in a gay electric golf cart. This will kill me...! Regards from the Motherland of car-engineering.... tomcat63
  • bristol2bristol2 Member Posts: 736
    Amen.
    Please post in 'The Future of the Manual Transmission' also.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    The ratio here in the USA is almost precisely the mirror opposite; 85% automatic trans vs 15% manual. I think in most if not all makes/models, even that is WAY (overly) optimistic. The nexus to diesel (applies of course to gasser) is the 24/7 structural transmission energy losses, which show up in lesser fuel mileage per gal and of course heat and equipment wear: all result in higher costs (consumption) across the board. One might include acqusition and maintenance costs.

    ..."I´m a passionate car enthusiast and professional mechanic running a small auto-repair shop in Düsseldorf / Germany. "...

    Out of curiosity, which makes/models do you repair, or you have a specialty/s?
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    SheckItOut

    It's nearly seven years since the first proto­type was unveiled, but Norfolk firm Trident has taken until now to get its biodiesel-powered supercar ready for sale.

    Driving the rear wheels via an eight-speed manual gearbox, the unit can propel the Iceni from 0-60mph in 3.9 seconds and on to 170mph

    There have been a few changes made to the original concept. The production model has a redesigned front end with new headlamps, a fresh bonnet that features aggressive air vents, and a revised front bumper.

    Under the skin, the chassis has been lengthened and widened for improved handling and ride, but the most significant change is to the engine. Sourced from an Isuzu pick-up, the front-mounted 6.6-litre V8 diesel is tuned to deliver 375bhp and 383Nm of torque.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    So who were they that said there was not room for a fantastic road car that gets 70 mpg!!!???? Which gasser has a chance in catching it!!????? It would be like buying a batch of losing lottery tickets for last week's $240 m prize... Of course while you will not get 70 mpg trying to lay down 0-60 times of 4 secs or less... THIS propels the bar WAY high, if not revolutionizes the sports car segment! :) The Corvette (25 mpg) can already cruise 400-500 miles!! With the 70 mpg, that puts it at 1260 miles!!!! This literally will put you in Denver, CO (from SF, CA) app half way between NYC and San Francisco.!!! If Corvette, in the USA market puts a twin turbo diesel, 8 speed manual on the market, it can/will literally dominate that segment with 1-2-3 x 2 (gasser is the x2) offerings. The possibilities are simply awesome.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Welcome to the Forum, wonderful to hear from the home of Mercedes, BMW, Porsche and VW. SEND us your Diesel cars soon!!!

    What is your opinion on the DSG transmission in the VW & Audi cars? Is it as complex as other auto transmissions? I too like manual shifting. Just hard to find without special order in the USA. Many models are not even available with Manual.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    That is a well proven engine. I am sure it is the same as the Duramax in the GM trucks. Seems a bit big for a sports car. It is easy to get 25 MPG if you baby it in an 8000 PU truck. I can feel that torque now. What a ticket getter that would be.
  • winter2winter2 Member Posts: 1,801
    I saw this article concerning the use of E85, a fuel our fearless president is pushing.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/04/18/ethanol_jolly_bad_says_windmill_booster/-
  • hwyhobohwyhobo Member Posts: 265
    automatic transmission is one of the most useless and ridiculous options you can have on a car

    While I've driven almost exclusively manual transmission cars for the past 20yrs+, there are situations when automatic is very justified. After I busted my left knee some years ago, I could not drive my car for an extended period of time because it was manual. Believe, I cursed myself for not buying an automatic every day. ;)
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    The cat is out of the bag on diesel. CNBC did a piece on diesel (and ethanol) They basically hashed over the normal misconceptions about diesel, (not your DADDIES 1980's "dirty diesel") etc. Even totally mis-stepped on the "non renewable" issue of diesel fuel; i.e., totally glossed over bio diesel and its variants, while indicating ethanol is renewable.

    They should have read up on Edmunds.com to get it right! :)
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    ..."While I've driven almost exclusively manual transmission cars for the past 20yrs+, there are situations when automatic is very justified. After I busted my left knee some years ago, I could not drive my car for an extended period of time because it was manual. Believe, I cursed myself for not buying an automatic every day. ;)"...

    He actually covered (conceptually) your concern.

    "This should be in fact reserved for old and/or disabled people. "
  • hwyhobohwyhobo Member Posts: 265
    He actually covered (conceptually) your concern. "This should be in fact reserved for old and/or disabled people."

    Perhaps, but temporary disabilities cannot be forecast or "reserved for". I am back to a manual transmission, but I no longer scoff at automatics.

    Besides, trying to resist the trend is like decrying the fact that fully manual cameras have all but disappeared. It's only a matter of time. "Manumatics" will rule the roost. Resistance is futile. We can only try to figure out how to make a better manumatic to pair well with the future diesel engines.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    I am glad you agree with my past post.

    Since I do not have much sotp experiences with the DSG, it would be good to hear from folks with a few miles under the pedal and paddle. I would be most interested in mpg and longevity.

    It is also not a stretch to swag that in the future the majority of passenger vehicle diesels will probably be of automatic, dsg and manual in that descending order.
  • coontie57coontie57 Member Posts: 128
    Your message is exactly why I now drive automatics. I have had 3 friends break their legs, ankles, heels and couldn't drive. For myself I often go fishing with people that can't drive a stick shift and pulling a 2500 lb boat up out of a boat ramp can be challenging with a stick.
  • hypnosis44hypnosis44 Member Posts: 483
    The older people become the less romantic stick shifts appear to be.

    I think they rank with crank starters, 6 volt electrical systems, flat head engines, and mechanical brakes.

    Of the 40 or more cars we have owned the only transmissions we have lost have been sticks, not to mention the clutches, slave cylinders and linkage failures. Some of the automatics have gone more than 200K, even with enthusiastic driving.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    "The older people become the less romantic stick shifts appear to be."

    Gee you would think you believe people in Europe don't get old!

    The issue here has never been about romancing the stick shift. The discussion was of the European vs USA about the strutural consumption of less rather than more.
  • hypnosis44hypnosis44 Member Posts: 483
    We should probably wonder about discussions involving minute cost savings (auto vs manual trans.?) on a transportation system designed to consume everything in sight.
  • tomcat63tomcat63 Member Posts: 82
    Hello ruking1, just got back home from another nightshift in my shop and I´m pretty pleased to see how the discussion about manual vs. auto is progressing. Great that some people at least think about it...!

    By the way, thanks for your curiosity. After having been working in a Volkswagen shop the past 15 years I run my shop together with my brother for almost 5 years now. We are kind of universal soldiers and except bodywork and painting we do any kind of repair on any make of car, domestic, foreign and occasionally even American. Nowadays you have to be quite flexible in this business, real money is only made by the big factory dealers and established specialists. We take what comes along, which is sort of a nice challenge sometimes. Often enough there are disappointed and desperate clients who had their cars checked at several places and nobody could or had the time to figure out the cause of their problem. Yet, in most of the cases we could help them, even without having the latest diagnostic features and software at our disposal. Sometimes experience and the "right feeling" is more important.

    In order to receive some reasonable earnings we started converting gassers into bi-fuelers last year. With an additional tank and some modifications on the engine they run with LPG (a propan/butan mixture) and normal gasoline as well. In Italy and the Netherlands bi-fuelers are quite common for plenty of years already, but as a result of the exploding gas prices they are becoming more and more popular in Germany,too. LPG is only half the price of unleaded regular and if everything is well adjusted there is no difference in performance and mpg worth mentioning. Another positive result is a lower emission of carbon-dioxide (approx. - 20%) and no emission of sulfur-hydrogen.

    I hope I could satisfy your curiosity a little bit!

    Best regards....tomcat63
  • tomcat63tomcat63 Member Posts: 82
    Well, I consider the DSG being an interesting compromise.
    Defacto it´s a completely different story than a conventional auto transmission with an energy-sucking torque converter. Basically the DSG is a mechano-sequencial transmission (similar to a motorbike) with two mainshafts (one for 1.,3. + 5. gear and one for 2.,4. + 6. gear) and two seperate clutches all together in one box. Declutching and shifting are controlled and operated hydro-electronically. That´s the main difference to a clean manual and the reason why a clutch pedal is missing. In contrast to a conventional auto tranny, there are no gallons of fluid that need to be twirled round first before the car gets into move.

    The mechanical part of DSG is pretty simple and shouldn´t cause any big problems. My concern is more about the electronics, which in general can be awfully tricky (as you may know perhaps) and which is very complex in this case.
    Apart from a short highway stint on the new Golf GTI a have neither any personal experience with DSG nor did I hear of any disastrous failures yet. We simply have to wait and see, how reliability and durability will turn out to be. The trend is: Customers are the testdrivers...!!

    Best regards from Germany.....tomcat63
  • tomcat63tomcat63 Member Posts: 82
    You are right, life is pretty dangerous and accidents can happen every day. But that´s no reason for me to carry around a wheelchair just in case...!
    Of course it´s your individual freedom to decline stick shifts, but what is the challenge about pulling and slipping a boat with a manual? Need lessons?
    Even my good old friend Alexander from New York City got it finally one day. He works for Microsoft and surprisingly dropped in a couple of weeks ago for some business reason and for a short visit. Got a desperate phonecall from the airport telling me he was stranded at some Avis or Budget counter and they had no automatic vacant (his company would only pay for a middle-class car and he was to stingy to pay extra). Okay, picked the poor guy up at the airport and he was awfully embarrassed about the situation since I couldn´t stop picking on him. Result: Gave him a few stick shift lessons next day and he LOVED it...!

    Best regards....tomcat63
  • coontie57coontie57 Member Posts: 128
    I have had stick shift vehicles all of my life starting with a 61 Corvair and I probably would have given great thought to a stick shift in my new 06 Chevy Duramax but its not offered. I still have a stick in my OLD 91 Chevy 1500 4 X 4. I know they get better gas mileage than autos and that was my reason for buying the ones I had over the years. But from my 3 friends with leg problems when it happens to you and you break a leg as they say YOU are sitting at home. I guess you could own some of each ie, stick and autos like I do. Until my boss shattered his leg in a basketball game (playing with 10 year olds) I had never thought of the problem of shifting and having to have your legs working to shift the vehicle. I still like sticks.
  • tomcat63tomcat63 Member Posts: 82
    Hi coontie57, please don´t get me wrong, I just love to be a little provocative sometimes. In the first place I very much appreciate you chose manuals in the past for better gas mileage. Second your friends´ situation with their leg problems is absolutely understandable and I never was talking about abolishing auto transmissions. But on the other hand even the best automatic is useless when your left leg is ok and the right one is broken...! And if I felt comfortable to go fishing with severe leg problems, MY friends wouldn´t hesitate to give me a lift...!

    Don´t worry - be happy....tomcat63
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Perhaps this type of attitude is one of the key locks on the inertia of why on the one hand there is talk of an unleaded regular crisis, but the practicality of consumption is still at record levels and growing. The truth is; we are only slowing the "GROWTH" portion of the TOTAL consumption. In other words, if each years' growth is 4% year over year. "Conservation" is 3.5% or 104% vs 103.5%.!!!???

    Despite your assertions to the contrary, the reality is, the difference in potential fuel mileage is very high. You need only compare and contrast, or in extreme cases ignore and call so called "enemies" CRAZY.

    Just on the Jetta TDI auto vs 5 speed manual, the EPA differences are: 34/45 vs 42/49. =

    -8 to -4 mpg -19% to -8.9% !!!???

    MINUTE??????

    Factor in the gasser 1.8 T

    ..."Manual: 24 mpg / 31 mpg Automatic: : 22 mpg / 29 mpg"...

    -2 to -3 mpg -8.8% to -9.7% !!??

    Jetta TDI manual vs 1.8T auto is 42/49 vs 22/29 mpg= -20 mpg. - 47.6% to 40.8% !!??

    So if one considers -20 mpg.... minute!!!????...... SNAFU comes to mind.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    All the best in your enterprize!!
  • tomcat63tomcat63 Member Posts: 82
    ...STRIKE...! Well done.

    And if all those big business gurus and industrial managers wouldn´t tell us the contrary every day, you could say that for mankind minutes are an almost unlimited free gift. Our oil ressources are defenitely and irreversibly LIMITED...!!
  • moparbadmoparbad Member Posts: 3,870
    330d BMW Review

    I'll most likely be buying the Accord diesel, however, it would be welcome to have the opportunity to buy the BMW 3 diesel.

    quote-
    Okay, so if it’s so much fun, why isn’t BMW giving you the choice? Talk to the environmental regulators. Even as diesel technology has advanced by leaps and bounds in Europe, regulators have been cracking down in ways that keep them out of the United States. While America now has low-sulfur fuel that makes efficient particulate-trap filters workable, that corresponds to a new set of emissions requirements that essentially treat diesels and gasoline engines the same. Diesels have no trouble with the hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide standards, using the same sorts of catalysts that do the job for gasoline cars, and the latest traps can meet even tough particulate (smoke) standards. But the same high-compression/ lean-burn characteristics that make diesels efficient fuel sippers result in nitrogen oxide emissions. The NOx standards in most of America allow only one-eighth the amount permitted in Europe (a fleet average of 0.05 gram per mile, versus 0.25 gram per kilometer, which works out to 0.40 gram per mile). In California, Maine, Massachusetts, New York and Vermont, the standards are even tougher.

    Engineers can beat these bogies—Mercedes-Benz is the only company offering an automotive diesel this model year, but others are coming. The problem is that doing so adds cost and complexity. The BMW 330d costs about $1,700 more than a 335i in Germany. There, the differential in fuel costs and taxation can make the tradeoff worthwhile. Here, if still another layer of pollution controls is needed and where, in most states, there’s not much difference in gas and diesel prices, there’s less certainty that the marketplace would respond.
    -end
  • hypnosis44hypnosis44 Member Posts: 483
    That is Funny! What do you think about getting rid of those pesky automatic turn signals and going back to the tried and true arm out the window? There must still be a few out there that still do that anyway.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Being as how the MAJORITY of folks (with "auto" turn signals) do NOT signal....
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 268,115
    BMW has re-invented the turn signal.. not in a good way.

    Who complained about the way they were working?

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    MSG 2420 and its logical conclusion to mating the correct transmission to a diesel?
  • hypnosis44hypnosis44 Member Posts: 483
    It was a further digression from Diesels in the News, to a claim of waste placed against automatic transmissions and the claimed superiority of manuals, and then to the waste involved in automatic turn signals and the implied superiority of manual signals over automatic.
  • hypnosis44hypnosis44 Member Posts: 483
    Bingo! Thanks.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    While the term waste might be seen as pejorative, it is as easy as doing the math, which some folks are truly ignoring. OEM's really try to provide what the markets want, especially when it is a higher profit item. So in that sense I am "pro choice". But it is hard to chose if 100% of some models are "automatic".
  • tomcat63tomcat63 Member Posts: 82
    You are a smart guy and at first sight your suggestion sounds perfect to me. But taking into consideration the aerodynamic disturbances your manual turn signal will cause, you better should sleep over it once more...!
  • hypnosis44hypnosis44 Member Posts: 483
    Very funny!! OK. Consider that 85% of all turns are in city stop and go traffic, at speeds of less than three miles per hour; the increased drag of a signalers arm out the window at that speed is immeasurably slight. However, the electrical drain of the signals on the generating system which is driven by the engine can be easily measured. As for automatic transmissions: consider the human energy used to pump that clutch and the food consumed to produce that energy and there you go! Add to that the misshapen thigh and calf muscles on that leg, and the unequal distribution of load on the sacrum and you have more costs. And then there is the unequal wear of the clutching shoe to consider.
  • jlbljlbl Member Posts: 1,333
    Tomcat63, I would quote your answers as examples of the so called German logic :)

    Regards,
    Jose
  • tomcat63tomcat63 Member Posts: 82
    A truly legitimate question! You don´t have to ask ME again - take a manual to get the best out of it. DSG is basically also ok, but I´d wait until there is more news about its electronical reliability.
    If dealers tell you "only available with automatic", kick them! They just import only few manuals because they believe Americans don´t want them! But they are available, they drive around whole Europe...!
  • moochorbbmoochorbb Member Posts: 16
    well guys take a look at this since we are discussing transmissions zeroshift just released its second generation of the automated manual transmission

    Compared to a manual transmission, Zeroshift calculates that its transmission can deliver 2% better fuel economy and 5% better acceleration. While the Zeroshift AMT would increase production cost over a manual transmission by about 25%, it is significantly less expensive to manufacture than a 6 speed AT, which, Zeroshift calculates, costs 70% more to manufacture than a manual transmission.
  • tomcat63tomcat63 Member Posts: 82
    ...Great news but - not really new. The Zeroshift AMT is nothing else but a British DSG, and "Made in Britain" is always driving me a bit nervous...!
    The Zeroshift AMT shows up with exactly the same features as DSG: absence of an energy-sucking torque converter, shifting without thrust intermission and choice between "manual" and "auto" mode. It has to cope with the same complex electronical control and operation system and will probably have to suffer from the same latent danger of malfunctions as DSG in this concern.
    There is one big mechanical difference which in my opinion could make the Zeroshift even more vulnerable: While DSG uses two seperate mainshafts with fixed sprockets to preload next higher or lower gear and shifts by switching between two clutches, the AMT has only one mainshaft with sprockets being constantly locked or released by tiny little wedges.
    And apart from that I didn´t hear of any car manufacturer yet using the Zeroshift for mass-production, did you?

    Best regards from Germany....tomcat63
  • coontie57coontie57 Member Posts: 128
    I have not looked lately as the last two vehicles I purchased new had autos but that discription you posted about the VW's is exactly how I used to make my decisions to buy manual tranmissions on several of my previous vehicles. Let EPA do it for me. With the exception of the 3/4 ton trucks the data is right on the windshields.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.