Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

The Future Of The Manual Transmission

15960626465205

Comments

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Actually CR tests manuals all the time. I recall an issue with a few Scions in it and they tested both manual and auto. When they look at Miatas, S2000s, and other sports cars they're usually manual.

    dudelyr is mentioning small cars with small engines, where a manual would shine.

    When you look at a bigger V6 it makes far less difference. I get 25mpg overall in my huge Sienna van. I've seen 31.3 mpg on the highway. I'm fairly certain a manual, if it were available, would do no better. Once the torque converter locks up it pretty much makes no difference, so for highway driving it's all about how tall the gearing is.

    Just browsing a buyer's guide I have here, the TSX does better city and highway with an automatic, and that's a 4 banger. Audi's SMT splits the difference, auto is better in the city but less on the highway. Same for BMWs, also split.

    CTS' 5EAT does better city than the six speed manual, both 2.8 and 3.6 liters. Highway's a tie.

    HHR 2.4l does better city with the auto.

    Some small cars with autos are dogs, though, for instance the base PT Cruiser auto loses 4mpg highway compared to the manual. Ouch.

    That's only A-B-C for manufacturers, but the point is there are plenty of exceptions.

    That's EPA, I realize, but it's a quick and easy source. In the Subaru threads we did observe a 1-2mpg advantage for manuals with the normally aspirated 2.5l engine vs. auto, but then again with the turbo Foresters it was the reverse - the manuals are thirsty.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    From earlier...

    911 C2: $75,000 x 46.52% depreciation = $34,889
    Caddy : $45,000 x 72.8% depreciation = $32,770


    and

    I imagine anyone who asks gets at least invoice minus the $4000 rebate...which would be about $6000 and a 15% discount

    To make this more realistic, I looked up some actual street pricing. Fitzmall.com sells Caddys and they're no haggle. My family has bought 5 cars there so the prices are very much REAL.

    OK, they list an SRX with an MSRP of $46,270 for a no-haggle price of $39,999. We're talking about a $6271 discount, more than hinted at above.

    This is without haggling. You can easily beat that price by a few hundred if you simply ask a neighboring dealer to beat that price.

    But let's assume you're lazy and don't want to hassle at all with that, and pay that price.

    depreciation != $32,770

    actual depreciation = $26,770

    So the Porsche costs you $35k minus whatever you can negotiate off list (good luck with that), while the Caddy costs a reasonable $27k or less.

    The Porsche will not cost less in any scenario. 2 year, 3 years, doesn't matter. It will cost more.

    Of course! Otherwise we'd all be driving Porsches! :D
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,429
    Plus.. you aren't financing depreciation... You are financing the purchase price.. (whether you pay cash or not).

    That will also add to the cost.. Plus, in some cases... higher insurance rates (though Porsches can be surprisingly cheap to insure).

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Funny thing is I have a friend here at work, right now, trying to sell a 911 C2. Low miles, about 4 years old. He's pricing it below market and still can't get a bite.

    It's hard to sell a Porsche. You have a very limited market. Not a lot of people can afford to finance $40 grand on a used car past warranty.

    It's still for sale, if anyone's interested.
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    Funny thing is I have a friend here at work, right now, trying to sell a 911 C2. Low miles, about 4 years old. He's pricing it below market and still can't get a bite.

    It's hard to sell a Porsche. You have a very limited market. Not a lot of people can afford to finance $40 grand on a used car past warranty.

    It's still for sale, if anyone's interested.


    Yeah I think a lot of the post-993 air cooled ones are a little harder to unload.
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    I have a 1999 C2 Cab with 19,000 miles on it in the showroom now.

    We are asking 39,xxx for it which is the lowest price for hundreds of miles. Have only gotten an couple of bites so far but it is basically a cash car which takes a lot of people out of the market.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,429
    If it was a '95, that car would be gone for that price in two minutes... It's unreal what they get for the last air-cooled model..

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    His is a little newer but has more miles. Not even a nibble.

    So resale is nice, but it's simply harder to sell a higher-priced used car, and that counts for something.
  • rayainswrayainsw Member Posts: 3,192
    I purchased an extended B2B warrantee ( GMPP ) on my 2007 Corvette – out to approx. 5 years & 60K miles – largely due to the resale \ trade-in vale issue.

    ( It already has a 5YR/100,00 mile powertrain warrantee. )

    Even if I never use it, I have the peace of mind & a second potential buyer has a warrantee well beyond the 3/36K mile Chevy B2B.

    Almost any such complex conveyance ( Porsche, Corvette, Audi, M-B, etc ) can be breathtakingly expensive to have problems diagnosed & repaired out of warrantee.

    Some $40K used cars ( particularly used sports \ GT cars ) are clearly second or third or fourth vehicles in a stable, are not driven many miles per year. And having one tied up for repair or awaiting parts is just not a big deal.

    BTW: The 6L80 Automatic Trans. in my 2007 Corvette did have an issue recently:

    Now I hasten to add here: I do ** NOT ** in any way abuse my vehicles. Ever. Not that I don’t accelerate quickly, etc. – but I do not indulge in anything anyone cold term ‘ abuse’.

    Yet - after many, many years of driving automatics with absolutely no issues or repairs required, 2 consecutive GM vehicles have had major transmission issues – each within the first 12,000 miles.

    A few details may be of interest to those here regarding my Corvette’s failure:

    My 2007 Coupe had been near perfect in over 10,500 miles ( 7 months of Daily Driver \ commuter duty, as well as a couple of longer trips ) but I began to encounter a problem that seriously concerned me:

    On acceleration, at shift points, the RPM would rise significantly as an upshift executes. [ flare? ] Sounded \ felt to me ( not a trans. engineer ) like the trans. was slipping.

    This had happened to me, to a lesser degree, every once in a while over the past few months – say once a week or so. But one day, driving to lunch, it happened on something approaching half of all the shifts.

    Did not seem to matter if it was in “S” w/paddles active ( as I typically drive ) just “S” shifting for itself, or “D”. Accelerator position seemed not to be a factor.

    It happened as I drove out of my work parking lot, after sitting for over 4 hours – thus the trans. was as cool as it will be in 80+ degree weather. The trans. temp typically tops out at 207 on the stop-n-go portion of my commute home, and it did not seem any worse ( or any better ) on that drive than earlier when the trans. was cooler.

    Once in any gear, things seem fine. Meaning: The TCC unlock \ lockup appears to be working fine & downshifts appeared unaffected – no unexpected RPM fluctuations. Though it was still intermittent, I called my dealer and scheduled an appointment for the next Monday.

    A couple of days later ( a Saturday, of course ), after a couple of apparent shift attempts with long neutral between gears, the trans. stuck in second gear. And the CEL lit, at the same time. ( I was afraid that before the end of that drive, I might end up with a ‘box “full of neutrals” . . . ) Parked it.

    On Monday AM, after another few shift problems, the trans. locked in third gear – and I continued directly to my Dealer.

    I stuck to relatively rural roads, kept my speed under about 50 ( about 2,500 RPM ) and made it without further incident to my Dealer. But not much fun.

    When I received the car back ( after a week ) it shifted as new.

    It took 5 business days for all the parts to arrive – and less than an hour on a lift for the actual repair.

    This was particularly annoying to me, since I had waited for a 2007 – after the 6 speed automatic trans was introduced for model year 2006 on the Corvette – specifically hoping that any potential issues with the transmission would be resolved, before mine was built.
    [[ sigh ]]

    Yet the 2008 Pontiac G8 V8 ( another GM product, with virtually the same trans. that failed on me a couple of months ago ) remains at or near the top of my list as a possible replacement for the Corvette – when that time comes . . .

    - Ray
    Not necessarily always ( ever? ) logical – when it comes to cars .
    2022 X3 M40i
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    1997 was the last air cooled model and I had one of those too. Not sure what it was sold for I would have to ask. It was a Targa, automatic and Arena Red all of which are value killers on a 911.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,429
    Uh yeah... Isn't Arena Red a burgundy color?

    Seriously... most of those never get advertised.. If you bought a new '97 911, it's probably depreciated less than 50% in ten years.. :surprise:

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    Yeah it is a burgundy color. I was all excited when I heard it was coming and then I found out it was a Targa. I was still kind of excited even though I don't like Targas. Then I went to look at it and is burgundy not a problem for me I like that color but most people do not like burgundy on a 911.

    All of my excitement faded when I saw that auto shifter sticking out of the center console. :confuse: :sick: :mad: :cry: Who buys an automatic Porsche.
  • user777user777 Member Posts: 3,341
    Who buys an automatic Porsche

    ans: people that shouldn't be buying or driving that kind of vehicle.

    New question: Why would Porsche make an Automatic?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I mentioned this above, but I'll say it again: Tiptronic is the Porsche of automatics.

    Literally.

    I'd pick a manual, sure, but my left knee makes a funny creaking sound after an hour in bumper to bumper traffic and on those days I (almost) wish my Miata were an automatic.

    Fortunately for me that sort of traffic is something I see only a few times per year.

    If it were every day, well then...I would ride the bus or take the subway. :D

    But if I had to drive and wanted an auto a Tiptronic wouldn't be so bad I suppose. :P
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    Next new question: Why does Porsche make an SUV?
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,429
    For money... so they can afford to keep making sports cars... :D

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    They don't VW does.

    Yeah I know Porsche puts a lot of extra work into that platform but really it is still a VW. Just compare the repair records on a Cayenne to all the other Porsches.

    It amazes me that Porsche can stay number one on the IQS with all those Cayennes dragging the surveys scores down.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Don't get me started... :D
  • habitat1habitat1 Member Posts: 4,282
    So the Porsche costs you $35k minus whatever you can negotiate off list (good luck with that),

    I happened to get $10.8k off my new 2005 C2S Cab, but I was definitely in the right place at the right time (September 2005).

    The Porsche will not cost less in any scenario. 2 year, 3 years, doesn't matter. It will cost more....Of course! Otherwise we'd all be driving Porsches!

    OK, I'll give you that.

    But let's look at another way. Before a 2005 C2S Cab found it's way into my garage, I put 11 years and 150,000 miles behind the wheel of a 1995 Nissan Maxima SE. That car cost me $21,000 brand new and other than routine oil changes and service, didn't have it's first repair until a water pump broke at 110,000 miles. (Some would even call that a maintenance item). Hardly anything since. I've kept that car at our second home, but have twice turned down offers from freinds to sell it to them (for their kids) at $4,500+. The car looks very good and runs perfect.

    Show me a Caddy at 13 years old with (now) 157k miles that looks 1/2 as good and drives 1/2 as well as my old Maxima and I'll buy it for you. :surprise:

    Anybody that thinks a Porsche is expensive, but then goes and buys a $40k Caddy that really does cost two or three times as much to own as a higher build quality Toyota, Honda or Nissan, is, I suspect, NEVER going to own a Porsche. ;)
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Nissans have good longevity, so I'm not surprised by your case at all.

    Still not sure what that has to do with Caddy vs. Porsche, though. ;)
  • habitat1habitat1 Member Posts: 4,282
    Still not sure what that has to do with Caddy vs. Porsche, though.

    That if you can't (yet) afford a Porsche, buy a Honda or Nissan and maybe someday you can. But not if you pee away money on a Caddy. ;)

    And, before the Host says so, none of this has anything to do with the future of manual transmissions, so I'll stop digressing now.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    At least you can still get a manual trans CTS! :D
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    Base engine only, though. :-/

    Ditto the Lexus IS and '08 Merc C300. Acura goes the other way, making it only available in the sport packaged TL, costing $6K more.

    There is a lot of that in the marketplace now: manuals are shaking out of the midmarket, to the cheapie entry-level models (IS250 for instance) and high-priced specialized sport packages, like the TL-S.

    Nothing in between.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • rayainswrayainsw Member Posts: 3,192
    "Base engine only, though. :-/ "

    Not true.
    See current C+T pg. 54-61.
    2022 X3 M40i
  • rayainswrayainsw Member Posts: 3,192
    "See current C+T pg. 54-61. "

    That's supposed to be: C+D = Car and Driver.
    Sorry....
    Anyway - the top CTS engine option ( 300+ HP ) ** IS ** available with the manual trans.

    Cheers,
    - Ray
    Wondering what the 'take rate' or % sold of the manual will be . . .
    2022 X3 M40i
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,330
    I read that article. Yeah, it comes with a manual, but they said that it is the same junky unit that was in the old model. OK, maybe it wasn't junky, but I don't think they liked it that much.

    At the risk of getting flamed (and I am one of the true believers that drives 3 pedals every day!), some cars, including the caddy, just make more sense with an AT.

    Most big, overly poserful cars (unless they are a sports car) are in the same boat. After driving my BILs 550I BMW, I actually thought it would have been better with the auto tranny. Myabe because the 340HP engine was just overkill.

    But, a 325i would be a different story. That car should have a stick.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Caddy offers both, so they shouldn't be scolded for that.
  • cdnpinheadcdnpinhead Member Posts: 5,617
    a Freudian slip:

    ". . .overly poserful cars. . ."
    '08 Acura TSX, '17 Subaru Forester
  • british_roverbritish_rover Member Posts: 8,502
    I thought he did it on purpose... :P
  • boaz47boaz47 Member Posts: 2,747
    expressed here was the cost of repair after the warrentee on most cars expired. Manuals tend to not be 100 percent covered from the day you leave the lot because of the Clutch disk. Automatics were covered 100 percent for the warrentee period. Now with Chryslers life time power train warrentee the cost of repair to a automatic isn't even an issue in their case. They are even offering a lifetime warrentee on the powertrain of a Jeep.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    True, but there are a couple of catches. You still have to service the ATF and keep records. The warranty requires also requires a periodic inspection by a dealer.
  • boaz47boaz47 Member Posts: 2,747
    Well we have solved that in California. All you need to do is show you have serviced or had the vehicle inspected by receipts for the fluids or a certified mechanic. No dealer service is required. But you do need the receipts.
  • habitat1habitat1 Member Posts: 4,282
    I haven't had a clutch replaced on any car in the last 20+ years. That includes 13 years and 155k miles on my Maxima.

    Don't tell me about Chrysler's "lifetime" powertrain warranty. Assuming it could even make it that long, if I was stuck driving a Chrysler product for 13 years and 155k miles, I'd probably just shoot myself and end my life. :cry:
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The dealer might just say "they all do that" and if the products isn't very good he could be right! :D
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    Hey, I resemble that remark.

    Due to launching a new business in a niche that may or may not ultimately succeed (and the fact that I have a very long commute to my current contract), my business partner and I are both driving old Chrysler products. Furthermore, the one that I'm driving is going to hit 150,000 miles in the next couple of weeks. :surprise:

    One does what one must, I'll be back in a new BMW with a stick sooner or later. ;-)

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • rayainswrayainsw Member Posts: 3,192
    "I'll be back in a new BMW with a stick sooner or later"

    Hope it is SOONER!!
    2022 X3 M40i
  • cdnpinheadcdnpinhead Member Posts: 5,617
    Perhaps, but the w is just above the s. Lots of typos in these boards. You (or at least I) never know.
    '08 Acura TSX, '17 Subaru Forester
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    You and me both. ;-)

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • boaz47boaz47 Member Posts: 2,747
    One of the things that makes some of us skeptical about the future of manual transmissions is the lack of choices we as Americans have.

    I started the search by looking at some of the cars I might be interested in and seeing if the came in AWD or 4WD. Several did and I even found the Ford 500 came with AWD but not with a manual. When I factored in the idea that I might want the most practical vehicle with AWD and the fuel mileage I was pushed into hybrid vehicles and once again manuals are rare in that kind of vehicle. The search narrows a bit if I factor in cost and fuel mileage and you pretty much end up with Subaru, Honda, and Toyota. Subaru has a lot of manual options but their reliability isn't up to Honda and Toyota standards. Subaru is also not a fuel saving king. Now it gets narrowed to the CR-V and the Rav4 and it looks like neither the new CR-V nor the new Rav4 come with manuals. The Rav4 is rated as about the best bet if fuel mileage and cost are giving equal value to the transmission type. I did notice that a lot of these crossovers are getting CVT transmissions as an option.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Subies aren't fuel misers, but a Legacy sedan with a manual trans gets 23/30 mpg, that's not bad at all.

    Also, don't forget Suzuki, Kia, and Hyundai. Mitsubishi, too.

    Ironically a lot of lower-end cars offer the desirable option of a true manual.
  • boaz47boaz47 Member Posts: 2,747
    I checked out Subaru because we have had reasonable luck with them but Edmunds lists them at 23-28 with a manual and the Rav4 is the same price with more room and is rated by edmunds at 24-30 with the automatic only. Like I said Subaru has never been rated as high as Toyota so all thing being equal I would have to pick between dependability of Toyota or a manual from Subaru. Kia has been at the bottom of the reliability list so long I would have to toss caution to the wind to walk on a Kia lot. Hyundai doesn't offer much in fuel mileage and even Suzuki isn't a fuel sipper with a manual and AWD. So I can skip AWD and increase my manual choices or I can or I could move fuel mileage down some and increase my AWD choices. It is just that until now fuel mileage was about forth on my list of wants and manuals were about third. Now that has changed because I am hoping to get what I can hope is about my last car for my retirement.
  • iluvmysephia1iluvmysephia1 Member Posts: 7,709
    transmission, besides Mitsubishi and their Lancer for 2008, is Suzuki with their SX4 sedan and hatchback/crossover. Fiat and Suzuki team up to make this new SX4 which also offers AWD for about $14,999. Until the new '08 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS hit the internet with early pictures I was pondering either a 2007 Suzuki SX4 or a 2007 Kia Optima.

    Was gonna go manual tranny's with either of those cars but wound up moving over to a CVT automatic in my Lancer GTS. It's splendid, you can play with the paddle shifters or just eat your jelly donut and change CD's while you drive with the automatic tranny simply in 'D'. :D

    We've got choices and more are coming out all the time in small cars. The Kia Optima was too big...needed to stay small with the Lancer GTS.

    2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick

  • jeffyscottjeffyscott Member Posts: 3,855
    There has been some discussion on the repair cost advantages of manual transmissions here. In looking for a used car for my son, we ran across a nice clean Protege with 95K mi that needed a new clutch. Called a Mazda dealer and was surprised to hear that the cost to replace the clutch is $850.

    While this is much less than a new automatic transmission, I guess it is possible to run into some pretty expensive repair costs on manuals.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,429
    Sounds like the typical dealer cost.. I'm guessing an independent could bring that down to the $450-$550 range..

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    RAV4 uses part-time AWD, so the rear axle is disengaged most of the time. That's how they get good MPG numbers from the EPA.

    Bummer that Toyota dropped the manual option. I think they still have them in Europe.

    I had a '98 Forester that served me well for 9 years, and highly recommend those. Resale was amazing for its age, I got back about a third of what I paid for it.

    I wouldn't sweat a 1 or 2 mpg difference, the fact is Subarus with manuals get better mileage than the automatics even when the autos have higher EPA numbers.

    Honda also dropped the manual on the CR-V. Suzuki does sell a Grand Vitara with a manual, but it's not very fuel efficient.

    What about a Scion xD? Or xB? Outback Sport? Suzuki SX4?
  • lilengineerboylilengineerboy Member Posts: 4,116
    So I somehow wound up replacing an early 90s Accord EX 5spd with a contemporary one in the same configuration. It was relatively easy to find, and cheaper than the automatic counter-part by about a grand. Since the old Accord has 140k on the original clutch, I am not too worried about the clutch replacement cost.
    These sedans are geared relatively tall, I am still short shifting somewhat for break-in/fuel economy (try to keep revs 2-3k) and the engine seems to be responding nicely. I am looking forward to having the first couple of tanks of gas out of the way so I can get on it a bit more.
    The car is considered a LEV at least, and I am sure I can beat the 34hwy with my driving style.
  • plektoplekto Member Posts: 3,738
    The fact is that unless the AWD is full-time, it's worthless for anything other than snow and such. 88 feet at 60mph per second. Most AWD systems take up to a full second to transfer power and do anything meaningful to compensate(ie actually move the wheels).

    You might look at the Jeep Patriot as well. The 4x4 system has a manual "lock" mode, like the Rav-4, But you can get it with manual as well. Now, you won't get low-range 4x4 with it(Freedom drive II only comes with automatic), but it's great full-time 4x4 for tamer thing than crawling over rocks.
  • boaz47boaz47 Member Posts: 2,747
    I looked at all the Subarus and most of the rest and the SX4 isn't much on fuel mileage either. Does the xD come in AWD or 4WD? And yes snow is the reason so either will work. No one should be seen driving a xB in the daylight no matter what wheels are driven. Yes it would make a good delivery vehicle but nothing you would ever drive to dinner with your wife in the thing. Only the Element will cause me to avert my eyes as quickly as a xB.

    Yes, the Rav4 seems to get the best fuel mileage and only in the last year or so would I have cared.

    I talked to the wife tonight and she has been thinking about a new ride herself. However fuel mileage seems to be of less concern to her than I thought. She wants one that will pull a small camping trailer so I believe Subaru is out. I may be able to put her on another track in that respect because we haven't been camping together in years. I can sleep on a cot in a sleeping bag and she isn't into that kind of camping. I have been known to sleep in the car with the seat tilted fully back.

    Well maybe fuel mileage isn't all that important but I was surprised to see that the Rav4 was the crossover mileage champ at the 20k mark.
  • boaz47boaz47 Member Posts: 2,747
    Does the Forester or the Outback have any towing capacity at all? I don't remember seeing a Rav4 or CR-V pulling anything so I might have to move towards a Ford or Mazda but I am not sure if they come in a manual either. The Escape Hybrid get 32 and 29 but I pay 25k up front at least. It doesn't have a manual. I don't care what the Element comes with I am not interested. Turns out the Jeep Patriot isn't bad at 23-26 for the manual and 25-29 for the CVT. And with the new life time powertrain warrentee it might be worth a look. Good price as well. I have always liked the Forester but it is close to 4k more than the Patriot. Maybe I can find a good deal on a low mileage used one? At least I can let someone else take the first two year hit on the new car price. Well I can wait till closer to the end of the year to take advantage of some sales they might have in November.
  • daysailerdaysailer Member Posts: 720
    Yes, the Subaru's have towing capability, I bought an Impreza for that reason. The Impreza's capacity is 2000lb w/trailer brakes or 1000lb without. As I recall, the Legacy/Outback is somewhat greater (2700lb IIRC), I presume due to larger brakes, but since it is the same engine in a heavier vehicle, that is a trade-off. The CRV's towing capacity is 1500lb as I recall but without a manual, it was not a candidate for me.
Sign In or Register to comment.