Options
What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car?
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Good one, we stop every couple hundred miles to stretch the legs and use the facilities. We like Carl's Jr restrooms overall. And they give senior discount. Restrooms in most gas stations are less than clean. We avoid McDonalds with their air dryers. Makes it hard to rinse off your face and get it dry. What were they thinking? The person that can go over 600 miles without a potty break is one tough hombre.
And up next, e-diesel. (BBC)
Finally, Phoenix wants diesel tax to fix truck damage. Phoenix, Oregon that is. (mailtribune.com)
I'm not sure what took me so long to find this diesel website.
There's one little section that list California diesels registered at 650,000+. With 24 million vehicles in California, that puts the diesel car population @ 2.7% The 2013 US figure is 269.3 M. (NHTSA)
http://www.cnet.com/products/2016-subaru-forester/2/
Subaru is one of the best make cars America, but for me the CVT would be a deal breaker, if I was in the market for a gasser.
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
15 VW Golf TDI gets approximately 43.7 mpg, 91% better fuel mileage, for a competitive vehicle . Put those into 180,000 miles calculations ( @ avg 15,000 per yr, for 12 yrs avg age of vehicle fleet) and that is 7,860 gal vs 4,119 gal. @ current prices ULSD $ 2.44/$10,050. versus RUG $ 2.61/ $ 20,515 = $ 10,465 SAVED using a TDI. Not to make people's eyes glaze over, but that fuel savings would actually find me another 187,426 miles for 367,426 miles. Or $ 10,465 toward a NEW car (diesel?).
Hm, 4 reports. The new Forester came out in 2014. and the Fuelly number for the 14's is 25.6, 25 for the 2015s. Two engine choices and two transmission choices available.
But the lower numbers are a reason to stick with a FWD Golf.
While I have two full time four-wheel-drives, IF I had my druthers @ the time, I would rather have had the CUVs 2WD . I understand that that CA TRANS chain control points will require "all track" vehicles (conditions dictating) to chain up/cable up where four-wheel-drive vehicles are waved on. So if anybody knows differently, please correct me!
This is unrelated, and TMI, but if anybody has had chain or cable chain fender etc., damage, destruction can easily be thousands of dollars to repair. Cables are also less durable. So anecdotally, I have absolutely no rust issues at the 13 MY mark for a 2003 VW Jetts TDI. The 3 VW's whether diesel or gasser are made from galvanized steel. I assume the MB's are also, but I don't know for sure. I have also read, MB employs Nano technology paint, but I don't know what that means in terms of longevity.
Here is the Labor Day special, an Edmunds.com article about edmunds.com.
https://www.yahoo.com/tech/s/5-best-labor-day-car-deals-country-according-185202515.html
http://www.wsj.com/articles/lower-gas-prices-yield-uneven-benefits-1441390917
Diesel car engine braking using the 7/8 speed A/T's are not near what you would expect from say, a big rig. All four diesels are drive by wire.
On the down grades, iM/T & A/T's are used for (non braking) descent- space cushion and speed control in curves, thus avoiding trail braking. The no fuel draw feature is quite dramatic. So while I normally post 37 mpg on overall downgrade leg- SOS/DD 210 miles. (MB GLK 250 Blue Tec) I can easily post 48/49.8 mpg on steeper mountain downgrades (little to NO brake use) for 65 to 100 miles, where the 4/5 lane flats and the rest of the 145 to 110 miles, gets the better of me.
The upgrade leg posts 33 to 35, depending on whether or not I charge UPgrade. When the wife does a steady 70/75 mph upgrade, she'll post 37 mpg.
As most already probably know, some to all modern cars have a myriad of known/unknown, normal/custom current draws, 24/7. Some cars have on board software to further customize current draw options. This does not take into account each operators' demands on each individual cars' system. When one puts this together with the fact that most OEM's alternator systems are not designed to charge the battery back to 100% charge, (not to mention they sell many more batteries like that ) it is probably no great surprise why a lot of batteries do not last past four years. In the old days, they would last much longer. It is also not a stretch to say that they are not built as reliability and durably as before. I am used to Toyota Land Cruiser batteries lasting 10 years or more.
The diesel nexus: current draw can be much greater that gassers during start up. It is commonly known in diesel circles, the diesel batteries are built with much greater draw capacity.
http://www.autoblog.com/2015/09/06/audi-sq5-tdi-plus-official/
Audi Q7 e-tron 3.0 TDI quattro
The Audi Q7 e-tron quattro will be launched in initial markets shortly after the rest of the new 2017 Q7 range goes on sale.
Its 258-hp 3.0-liter V-6 diesel engine and 94-kilowatt electric motor (which is integrated into the eight-speed automatic transmission) have a combined output of 373 hp, and produce 516 lb-ft of torque.
Audi says the all-electric range from its 17.3-kilowatt-hour lithium-ion battery pack is 35 miles (56 km), but that's on the gentle NEDC European test cycle. A comparable U.S. figure might be closer to 20 to 25 miles.
The company quotes a top speed of 140 miles per hour, acceleration from 0 to 62 mph in 6.0 seconds, and all-electric acceleration from 0 to 37 mph in 6.1 seconds.
It accelerates from a standstill to 100 km/h (62.1 mph) in six seconds, and yet consumes not even two liters of diesel per 100 kilometers (117.6 US mpg). The Audi Q7 e-tron quattro is sporty, comfortable and at the same time highly efficient. The world's first TDI plug in hybrid with quattro drive, it is also the first plug-in hybrid with a diesel engine from Audi.
The Q7 e-tron quattro is Audi's second model with a powerful plug-in hybrid drive system. The model combines the best of two worlds: Powered by the lithium-ion battery, the large SUV covers up to 56 kilometers (34.8 mi) on electric power alone - quietly, powerfully and with zero local emissions. Together with the diesel engine, the car can cover a total distance of 1,410 kilometers (876.1 mi).
But you are right, I don't think the Audi SQ5 TTDI's are going to make the US markets.
The 2016 American market Audi SQ5 (compact) gasser puts out 346# ft of torque with a 3.0 L supercharged offering @ 17/24 mpg . The MB GLK 250 Blue Tech (compact) puts out 369 #ft of torque with a 2.1 L TT offering. It is easy to see the GASSER puts out 23# ft of torque LESS with a 43% LARGER displacement. It also does that posting way less mpg!! Edmunds.com puts it at 21 MPG. So using mine @ 35 mpg, that is 67% better, or 40% less.
The second generation Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (generation I debuted in 2012) is immediately recognisable as an individually designed estate and SUV crossover. It comes with anodised silver roof rails while the ground clearance has been increased by 27.5 mm. The body therefore has a total height of 1,506 mm. The new Passat Alltrack is 1,832 mm wide (with door mirrors 2,083 mm), with a length of 4,777 mm; the wheelbase extends over 2,789 mm.
2.0 TDI BMT 4MOTION with 176 kW / 240 PS
The most powerful four-cylinder direct-injection turbodiesel engine ever to be offered by Volkswagen - a 2.0 TDI with output of 176 kW / 240 PS (at 4,000 rpm) and extremely high maximum torque of 500 Nm (1,750 to 2,500 rpm) - is a completely new development. In order to realise this performance, a compact bi-turbo module was developed with a high-pressure and low-pressure turbocharger. Comfort at low revs is optimised by a new centrifugal pendulum absorber in the standard 7-speed dual-clutch gearbox. It enables further lowering of the gear shift points which reduces engine rev levels and contributes to the excellent fuel consumption figures of the TDI. With this high-tech engine the Passat Alltrack 2.0 TDI BMT 4MOTION reaches a top speed of 234 km/h; the Volkswagen speeds to the 100 km/h mark in just 6.4 seconds. The low average fuel consumption is impressive in view of the high power output of 5.5 l/100 km (144 g/km CO2).
Just had a (husband-and-wife) potential buyer of the 03 Jetta TDI ring the doorbell and ask if we wanted to sell (fishing-Zero advertising) Evidently they had a 2003 TDI before.
I find threads like these a cross between inspirational and entertaining. The question/s that comes to my mind is/are what UNscheduled maintenance did you do during those times /miles?
The tread starter (a tech) actually began with an app 4 year old 394,007 miles VW Jetta Sport Wagon TDI. Yes, that's 98,500 miles per year! @ the pictures taking, it was posting 45.2 mpg.
http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=409845
But that is about to change."
Jeep pickup ahead; diesel Wrangler possible (Automotive News)
It is interesting that both (that I have read) Chrysler Corporation and Mercedes-Benz manufacture/ assemble diesels for cars in the continental U.S. for worldwide consumption.
Diesels have been vilfied for far too long. I say bring diesel manufacturing and diesel sales back home. Strike down the laws, enforcements and economies that keep the % of diesel cars artificially low. You can almost gauge how far it needs to come back, when Cummins, a premier American diesel manufacturer is hardly known by any car buyers.
Mercedes-Benz GLC (2016)
Indeed even Edmunds.com, as well as some owners have complained of loud windshield noises @ higher cruising speeds? So a seemingly lower coefficient of friction & more angled windshield seems integrated into the new generations design, as well as whatever "constant" improvement issues. Style and design will inevitably always "progress." I, too like the new style. I have to confess that the old style has grown on me . Loud windshield noise does not seem to affect my particular 14 GLK 250 Blue Tech, as it is used to being run @ higher cruising speeds.
The new GLE 300d is at our dealers. It would seem MB has had good luck with that wonderful 4 cylinder 2.1L diesel engine. It is the only diesel option in the GLE (M class) SUV. Looks like the ML 350 Bluetec was the last we will see of the V6 diesel. Unless they keep it for the GLS.
http://paultan.org/2014/11/12/mercedes-benz-announces-new-naming-convention/
On Fuelly.com, the MB GLK 250 Blue Tec (EPA 24/33) posts roughly 31 mpg. Hopefully as it morphs to its new designation, it can do that or better!
Finally got a diesel passenger vehicle fleet PVF # , (circa 2012) of 6.6583 M.
NHTSA FARS 2012 PVF @ 265.647 M , will post app 2.5%.
That % is a far way off the 10% alternative fuel goal that the US government has set. With 2013 passenger vehicles @ 269.294 M, 10% = 26.93 M vehicles, it appears on the diesel side, it's the lip service and not actual vehicles & %'s hitting the road. Actually, a better way to look at it: the actual goal percentage of fuel using GAS vehicles ARE hitting the road @ 95 % + .
http://forcechange.com/983/billions-spent-by-federal-government-on-alternative-fuel-cars-little-to-show/
Slow news diesel day: RBob gas @$1.38 versus heating oil @$1.58.
SOS/DD halfway point: ULSD at $2.44, RUG $2.59, MG $2.72, PUG $2.83. The cable TV TV pundits think the price of gas is going down longer term. If US/CA diesel taxes are 63.78 cents, plus 9% SST, then governments are making a min of 49.4 %. Using the MB GLK 250 35 mpg = .0182 cents taxes min.
US/CA gas taxes are 60.75 cents Using the MB GLK 350 22 mpg = .0276 cents taxes min. 52% higher per mile driven like model : fuel.
The downstream oil/gas food chain is making about 14% PRE taxation.
It is easy to see that IF the price of gas goes down, and TAXES stay the same, or are legislated HIGHER, who makes more % wise in this deal ?
http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/
But, I find it even more interesting that refining RUG/PUG is @ 25% versus ULSD @ 12%, RUG/PUG costing 208% MORE! This is not even to mention the fact that RUG/PUG @ 30 to 90 ppm sulfur is dirtier than ULSD @15 ppm sulfur, nominally delivered @ 5 to 10 ppm sulfur. These and other incongruities are truly "hidden" in plain sight!?
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-gasoline-prices-december-20150909-story.html
Or gee, maybe a refinery will catch fire and we'll all pay more.
Skimmed three stories similar to this one, and didn't see any reason for the small increase in diesel pump prices. Maybe just demand with all the consumer shopping or harvest time.
Diesel Costs Up After 14 Weeks (gobytrucknews)
Halfway to SOS/DD, pricies are @ ULSD 2.44, RUG 2.59, MG 2.72, PUG 2.83. Indeed without the profit potential ULSD should be about $.13 cheaper or $ 2.31 minimum.
Judging by the high ULSD prices relative to RUG/PUG, my swag, exports are UP!
TMI : US refiners can really save a LOT of money by refining diesel, i.e., LSD, 500 ppm, to what the world market consumption dictates, rather than higher refining cost ULSD @ zero to 15 ppm, nominally delivered @ zero to 10 ppm.
Further TMI: they can use less than premium crude @ substantial discount to make LSD.
Eyes glazed over TMI: The local refinery (chevron) applied for and was DENIED ( after 10 plus years of studies) upgrades to the refinery, in the BILLIONS of $$'s that limited USA crude oil from being refined there. This all but guarantees Middle East crude ! Of course in the very next sentence, they are whining to reduce our dependency on FOREIGN oil. We wonder why we get the politicians that we do ?
"Meijer said its fuel supplier inadvertently put the wrong fuel in the tanks, mixing up the diesel and unleaded fuels." (Detroit News)
A couple of TDI's on the 2015 year end bargain list.
https://www.yahoo.com/autos/10-best-end-of-summer-car-deals-of-2015-128673945747.html
That's not the case in the US - the big nozzles are more typically found at truck stops but not at regular gas stations.
You can't depend on those green handles either - sometimes they indicate E-10 gas or premium.
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2022 Wrangler Sahara 4Xe, 2023 Toyota Tacoma SR 4WD
On the 14 MB GLK 250, three drivers are posting 35 to 37 mpg, from grueling commute traffic to higher speed highway to mountain (7,380 ft) roads.. @ over 17k miles, it's drive train continues to wear well on us.
We like the compact CUV platform. So the question arises: why would we switched to a GLK 350 gasser that posts 22 mpg, maybe ? It puts out less torque @ higher RPM.
Then weld the hood shut.
Assuming there is a hood.
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2022 Wrangler Sahara 4Xe, 2023 Toyota Tacoma SR 4WD