Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car?

17273757778473

Comments

  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    The 2.0L Mercedes diesel being put in many of their lineup in the EU has 376 ft lbs of torque. That is a 100 ft lbs more than my Nissan Frontier 4.0L V6. And it does fine pulling 4500 lbs, rated at 6300 lbs. I think the Toyota World PU uses a 2.5L 4 cylinder. The new 2.0L MB is available in the ML and the new S series.

    http://www.daimler.com/dccom/0-5-7153-1-1452156-1-0-0-0-0-0-8-7145-0-0-0-0-0-0-0- .html
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    it's too dirty for America most likely, and might not be a good freeway vehicle either. American pickup owners want to tow an RV at 75 mph. I don't think a 2.5 diesel is going to cut it.
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    edited January 2012
    While in Europe I've driven in and ridden in any number of cars and small trucks motivated by small diesel engines which are both clean and powerful; I have no such concerns about them being acceptable for the American market.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I am guessing the Toyota diesel is too dirty. I don't think the Bluetec from MB is dirty or the new T6 Ford Ranger with both 4 and 6 cylinder diesels. You are right about the toy hauler crowd wanting to tow at 75 MPH. I think it would be the contractors and people that actually use their PU trucks to earn a living. A four cylinder diesel is going to be a lot better than the 4 cylinder gas engines in most of the mid sized PU trucks. I really like my mid sized Nissan. I just wish it got better than 16-17 MPG. 30 MPG would be dandy.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Just not seein' it for American tastes and driving habits. Very slim niche market IMO.

    Americans do not like diesels in passenger cars, and in trucks they like them BIG and LOUD.

    That's just the way we are and only necessity or desperation will change us, I fear.

    Keep in mind that development costs for new engines is astronomical. Foreign automakers would only bring what they have already over here, and IMO it's not right for us.
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    edited January 2012
    You've been saying essentially the same thing about diesels and the American appetite for them for a long time now, and maybe in your neck of the woods what you're saying is true. That said, there is a market, it is growing (rapidly), and here in New England the only thing holding the market back is the availability of product.

    As for American resistance to diesels, modern examples are:
    A) Quiet
    B) Clean
    C) Fuel efficient
    D) Powerful
    E) Cost effective to own and operate for many driving environments

    Contrary to your assertions, I'm firmly convinced that diesels can and will succeed here in the States. IMHO, the market share for them will grow rather dramatically over the next five to ten years (it would grow a heck of a lot sooner if we had product), and if we can make some headway on microalgae sourced biodiesel, maybe sooner than that.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited January 2012
    Depends on which fuel gets the subsidy?

    "As with many industries in India, the plans of carmakers hinge on uncertain government policy.

    "If we invest, and in months, or years, the (diesel) price rises, we are left high and dry," Saxena said on the sidelines of the biennial India Auto Expo.

    "We're agnostic," Andy Palmer, an executive vice president at Nissan, said in an interview at the auto show.

    "If the government dictates that the diesel price is X, we give you diesel. If it's Y, we say: here's petrol."

    Diesel or petrol? (Times of India)
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I think California is a good market indicator. Depends what you mean about "market share". Today's diesel sales for cars isn't close to the 6% it was in the 80s, so there's a long row to hoe for diesels, based on that.

    The diesels we are getting are, except for VW, premium level cars and I think this trend will continue.

    Americans won't pay the extra to put a diesel in an economy car I don't think.

    It costs about $3000 more to equip a car with a diesel engine and the "payback" is way too long for this to make sense in the USA.

    BMW has plans to maybe make a 10% mix of diesels in their USA lineup, but if sales aren't strong, they'll pull back---and if BMW pulls out, I think everyone else will, too.

    So I think we won't know the true picture until about 2015 or so.
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    "It costs about $3000 more to equip a car with a diesel engine and the "payback" is way too long for this to make sense in the USA."

    Hmmm, sounds a bit high. Granted it is almost impossible to compare a 2.5 liter Golf with a Golf TDI (a strippo TDI is better equipped than a fully tarted up 2.5 liter model), but I'm not seeing a $3,000 gap.

    Assuming Mazda keeps to their promise of bringing the SkyActiv-D Mazda3 to the U.S., the cost differential is supposed to be closer to a delta of $1,000. Time will tell on that one.
  • bpeeblesbpeebles Member Posts: 4,085
    edited January 2012
    I totally agree with you that MrShiftRight may be 'out of touch' with a portion of the public.

    *) I Liked my VW Rabbit Pickup (It would easily carry my snowmobile in the back!!)
    *) I REALLY like my Subaru Baja Turbo (another small pickup)

    I also know that the local Subaru dealer gets DAILY requests for Baja availability.

    Whoever brings a small pickup with a diesel engine (economy) to this area will easily sell like hotcakes. I know several carpenters who would love a small pickup with great economy.

    My son drove 3-cylinder Geo's for YEARS until he could no longer rebuild the engines. (no more parts) He is looking for a Baja and I know 3 other folks that are also looking for Baja's.

    It is unfortunate that the market has somehow convinced Mr ShiftRight and the automakers to ignore this overlooked segment.

    Oh- And to counter MrShiftRights contention that Americans do not want to "downsize" their truck.... I USED to drive a Dodge Dakota and found it to be too big and expensive to fuel and maintain. I was very happy to get into the Baja.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    When I bought my Passat TDI, the MSRP was less than the Turbo gas version.

    My wife and I saw the New New VW Beetle today at Costco. She likes it. If they offer it with the TDI it may be our new runabout. So far they only have the gas guzzler 5 cylinder and the over priced Turbo gas engine.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    On the part of the domestics it is probably a wise business decision. They do not want to cut their own throats with a mid sized or smaller that gets twice the mileage of their bread and butter PU trucks. Ford and GM sell a LOT of PU trucks. They have always treated the smaller PU trucks like step children when it comes to innovation. Since 1970 the Japanese have offered better trucks in that segment. Just kept out of the market with high tariffs.
  • bpeeblesbpeebles Member Posts: 4,085
    Exactly!! It is not the "market" which does not want to buy small diesel pickups... it is the fear of the manufactures may lose sales of those huge, lumbering trucks.

    Dont get me wrong... there is a place for a full-size pickup with a torque-monster Diesel engine. Many farmers NEED that kind of pulling-power to yank a horse-trailer or hay-wagon.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    How about a midsized unibody then?

    Next Dodge Dakota: Think "Car" and Diesel (Inside Line)

    I came close to buying a used compact pickup years ago, but wound up with a wagon. Never had much interest in anything bigger. Could see myself in a Brat or Baja or El Camino. Just not in a diesel one, but y'all have heard that story.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I don't see it at all. I think a small diesel pickup would hit the market like a thud, because the price differential between gas and diesel is not large enough, and because you are adding thousands of dollars to a vehicle's MSRP in the entry level market. This is especially true in the small truck market because you have to put a turbo on the diesel for it to get out of its own way.

    It makes no business sense to me to market diesels in entry level vehicles--it makes more sense the way Audi, Benz and BMW are doing it.

    Even a large SUV diesel makes sense because you can justify the extra cost by the fuel savings in the case of pushing a porker SUV around.

    This is, after all, why 18 wheelers are diesel and not gas--power to pull and economy of use.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited January 2012
    I think the measures and indicators are important. So for example, I have read in passing, the passenger diesel population is @ 5% from a much lower %, we used to bemoan in 2003. VW TDI sales are at 25% for the Jetta model line. The light truck diesel population has dropped far below the 75% of the passenger diesel fleet it used to hold. The percentage has dropped due to the the growth of passenger diesel CARS. I think growth percentage would be manic if the oems came out with small and normal pick up truck diesel motor like a small TDI V8 or even the V6 3.0 TDI. As I have said 350-500 # ft is really the light trucks sweet spot !?

    Even as there is political talk about NOT punishing American fuel consumers, there is really not much incentive to use less fuel and to pay less FOR fuel. There is even LESS sentiment in getting getting someone off of the RUG to PUG addiction by using alternative fuels like D2. There is even less than that in the form of one category over: bio diesel. Indeed the real incentive for the higher mileage policy, du jour is to raise the costs and prices due to "compliance". D2 products are just one unwanted and unexpected consequence of that policy.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    True, but look at this. My friends who just bought a Jetta Sportwagon Diesel paid $5000 more for it than for the same car with a gasoline engine...and they got....9 mpg more, at least by EPA numbers.

    The difference in MSRP between a Passat diesel and gas is $6000.

    How does that make any sense? :confuse:

    I suppose you could justify it somewhat by a) claiming that you've "saved" 225 gallons of fuel a year, so...taking into account the 10% diesel fuel surcharge, you're saving perhaps $750 a year on fuel.

    and b) you'll get better resale value and perhaps recoup, in that way, maybe $2000 of the $5000 premium you paid.

    Still, none of this is compelling, is it?
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    "True, but look at this. My friends who just bought a Jetta Sportwagon Diesel paid $5000 more for it than for the same car with a gasoline engine...and they got....9 mpg more, at least by EPA numbers.

    The difference in MSRP between a Passat diesel and gas is $6000.

    How does that make any sense?"
    :confuse:

    The above really aren't fair comparisons. Why? Because the way VW packages their diesel offerings it to equip them with many stardard features which are either options or not even available on the lesser gasoline models. That and in some parts of the country, dealers mark up the diesels they have on their lot (and unfortunately some sucker is often willing to pay the premium instead of shopping further afield).

    The flip side of all of this is that if you look at resale values, the gassers don't fare very well compared to the industry average while the diesel models literally blow the averages away (on the high side). Yes, your initial costs will be higher, but as a general rule, when resale time comes around, the extra initial outlay will be more than recovered.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited January 2012
    More compelling than ever is the anti diesel resolve. Got an unintended result? make that result economically costly as an option. They also count on the oems to inflate or pass on the costs. From that perspective it is highly logical and compelling.

    As I have posted before, I have the 2003 Jetta TDI. 9 my's later, it now seems almost like the holy grail of TDI products.

    @ the time the premium was $236 (don't quote me here) as I recollect. I ran a used car sales pricing (on Edmunds) and it was easily worth $5,000 more than the gasser turbo diesel. I wish I could do a 235% yearly rate of return in the stock market !! ;) :shades:

    For this and many other reasons, I am looking to 500,000 miles as a minimum.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited January 2012
    I don't see quite that level of difference on craigslist SF in asking prices between a 2009 Jetta diesel and a 2009 Jetta gas....maybe $1000--$1500 to give the TDI all benefits of the doubt.

    The argument for higher resale value is reasonable, to a point. You're still in the hole $3500, if I'm reading these ads right.

    No used car goes UP in value after all. You might have a lower RATE of depreciation with a TDI, but you're starting from a higher point of descending.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I wish you well on that, but I don't think 500K is a realistic goal for most people, nor can it be used in a "real world" argument for justifying a $5000 premium.

    naturally, the longer one keeps a car the better off one is economically, since after 500K miles your car is essentially worthless to anyone but you, and is fully depreciated besides. And yet, you get to drive around in it. it's all gravy using your formula.

    I'm not getting your numbers, though. On a 2003 Jetta diesel vs. gas 1.8T, with 110,000 miles, clean condition, for private party sales I'm seeing an $1800 benefit for the TDI.

    Which is about what I predicted (really I was just guessing back then).

    Wow, only $236 premium back in 2003? Times have changed!
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited January 2012
    I ran the numbers some years ago. In addition, there was actually a time when it was selling for more USED than I paid new. I really should have gotten two and sold one.

    9 MY's and @ 175,000 miles, I still get 50 mpg with little to no effort. So if you say +$1800 currently I have no cause to disbelieve what you say.

    In 25,000 miles, I will come up on my (@2nd) TB/WP change. That however is the normal major tune up.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    If memory serves me, the same arguments were used against buying a Prius vs maybe a Camry. Yet the Prius with a premium price tag and few discounts sold well. Same goes for especially the VW Sportswagen TDI. People are buying them and paying MSRP. Same car with a gas engine gets discounted. VW can kick the price up with the current demand for the TDI. And I would say they are doing just that. My wife's granddaughter just bought one and the dealer would not budge a nickel off of MSRP. Which will keep the prices high at time of resale. I don't believe for a minute it costs VW $5000 more to build the TDI. So the only conclusion I can make is they are making LOTS of money on the diesels. Until some competition comes along they will keep on making lots of money.

    Audi 2011 best year EVER:

    TDI® mix remains very strong: 55% of total A3 sales YTD and 41% of total Q7 sales YTD were TDI clean diesel models

    VW best year since 1972:

    Volkswagen's high-mileage, clean diesel TDI models account for 21.6% of sales in 2011

    Companies like Honda know that diesels sell well. They could not compete in the EU until they offered diesel cars. Sadly they need some help engineering a diesel that will pass USA emissions standards.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited January 2012
    In some ways, you can not blame either. They established the "beach head" so to speak and in effect have little to no competition. We do know the 2.0 TDI engine is probably one of the most reliable. As most folks on this board know, the engine is common to both oems.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    We are not talking chump change here. The Audi Q7 sales for 2011 was 8998 units. A nicely equipped Q7 is about $64k. That means over $500 million in sales. IMO that puts VW/Audi at the leading edge of a trend. Can you imagine the rush to buy if gas was $8 per gallon and biodiesel selling for less?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited January 2012
    Yes,actually growth from 2003 has been to 5% (2011) in 9 years or 17% per year. from 2%.

    This is interesting in that diesel has always been vilified.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited January 2012
    yeah but it's still not the market share that it was in the 1980s...so it has to improve in order to match what diesels used to achieve.

    However, of course, if gas prices go way up, this will affect the equation considerably, especially in the larger cars/SUVs.

    As for the Prius, that's not really a good example, because the Prius does not sell on economics, it sells on "feel good marketing" and it sells to people who dislike cars in general. Can you imagine VW trying that approach?

    "It doesn't drive all that well, and it's kinda clumsy and slow, but the NEW VW TDI diesel is "clean" and "green" and will save the earth!"

    Not gonna work for VW or Audi I don't think.

    The marketing of diesel passenger cars IS a challenge in the U.S. Each new buyer has to be hand-sold and convinced. It's not like a Prius at all.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    I am not sure I really understand the context. So for example WW Prius units only last year hit 2 M manufactured. 2.0 TDI's far exceeded that. That is with up to bans against diesels and the all along anti (passenger car) diesels.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    edited January 2012
    VW is offering the Passat Wagon in the UK with both the 1.6 and 2.0L TDI

    The bigger diesel isn't that quick (close to 10 seconds 0-60 per the current issue of CR), so I think US consumers would call the 1.6 just plain slow.

    Prius is slow, yeah, I know, but the TDI competes with the Camry Hybrid and the new one was already substantially quicker. Same issue.

    The last thing we need is for Americans to find yet another excuse to hate diesels.

    Leave the slow pokes in Europe, give us the best ones. And maybe change the gearing on the new TDI so it's not Prius-slow.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    TDI® mix remains very strong: 55% of total A3 sales YTD and 41% of total Q7 sales YTD were TDI clean diesel models

    That's good but let's put it in perspective - they only sold 6561 A3s. That's 3609 diesels.

    Q7 sold 8998, so 3689 diesels.

    We're talking about 7k cars, not a whole lot.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    What I mean is you can't market a TDI in America in the same way you market a Prius and that, by extension, the hybrid market is easier to succeed in.
  • bpeeblesbpeebles Member Posts: 4,085
    Today, my wife and I stopped by the VW dealerahip to renew the 9-year old battery in her 2003 Jetta TDI. (Yes, the Dealership has the very best prices on TDI batteries with 80aH rating)

    We noticed several Toureg TDI (BLUE "I") and walked over to check them out... I nearly fell down when I saw the sticker-price of $60,000. Holy Cr@p - is this for real?.. this is nearly 3X what we paid in 2003 for our Jetta TDI.

    I was VERY glad we were only buying a battery for our Jetta TDI. I really hope it goes 500,000 miles (Just like a past appender [ruking] suggested about their 2003 TDI)
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I really like the Touareg TDI. It is a bit on the high priced side. It now has the distinction of holding the record time from the tip of South America to the end of the road in the Arctic of Alaska. It also won the World's toughest race the Dakar for the last three years. Making it arguably the best off road vehicle in the World.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I wonder who, do you think, would buy a vehicle like this?
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I would say 7535 people last year with enough money to buy one. That is an increase of 59.9% over Touareg sales in 2010. That would be about $452 millions worth. I cannot find the breakout on the Touareg TDI. I would imagine it is pretty high as it was never a big seller until the V6 diesel was offered. Too many cheaper choices in gas SUVs.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited January 2012
    I'd pick the supercharged hybrid in that case, since it beats the diesels numbers for HP and torque----I'd presume that in this price class people aren't shopping gas mileage, but rather luxury and towing capacity perhaps. (for that sailboat!)

    Also the BMW X5 diesel would be a formidable competitor to the VW.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Both the hybrid and TDI have the same 7700 lb tow rating. The Hybrid needs something extra according to the VW website. Which is pretty good, as the GM hybrid SUVs have lousy towing capacity. You can get a Touareg TDI for about $15k less. And it does get better highway mileage, which I am most interested in. The hybrid also requires premium unleaded which is another negative. Different strokes I guess. I would not even consider a hybrid where a diesel is offered.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited January 2012
    Interesting that you should ask that. There was an interesting article in the WSJ about the "new" Ford having a 90-92 day supply of one of their recent "better" effort's, the FOCUS and 126 days for the Fiesta. (both critical to Fords mpg fuel efficiency sales effort and US fuel economy requirements) Now, I do not know what PRECISELY a 90 to 92 to 126 days supply means, but I am sure it is stated that way so it CAN be NON precise. Now since all are NON diesel, I can easily be accused of being off topic. I will stand corrected, if folks think so.

    However, if you were the oem would you like the precisely imprecise 90-92 to 126 day OVERAGE's or would you like the diesels one has manufactured to be precisely (most to all) sold?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    Correction: " 25,000 miles should be 200,000 miles. "
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Translation:

    They have too many Focuses in dealer lots.

    They have WAY too many Fiestas in dealer lots.

    60-65 days is considered ideal. 126 days is a glut of inventory.

    What it really means is - here come the rebates.

    I think word about the transmission issues got out, Ford better get a handle on those quick. Also, oil is hovering around $100 a barrel, still, so compared to the $145 peaks we say, fuel is still relatively cheap. People are used to it now.

    $3.569 for regular gas, still $4.209 for diesel near me.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    And back to the Touareg ...

    $60k is spendy. VW needs to get one in at less than $40k to hit real volume, and I think the Tiguan may just be too small.

    To be fair, the Touareg is a lot more car than a Jetta or Golf, plus inflation has eroded the dollar, so $60k ain't what it used to be.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited January 2012
    Evidently and obviously, a lot of Focus and Fiesta potential buyers are not going for it !! This is despite your regular gas vs diesel prices.

    If I were a potential Focus and Fiesta buyer, nothing short of 2 cycles warranties of 100,000 miles on the drive drain would even put the potential risk at par, enough for me to buy. Again from the WSJ article there is no clue as to identifying the percentage of overage due to the bad news transmission/s.

    This kind of gets back to what I was saying many posts ago about a lot getting lost in the translation when it hits the US market. Ford has been selling diesel Focus'es and Fiesta's in the European market and for a long time. It isn't as if the diesel or gassers for that matter are brand new products that need to be massaged.
  • alltorquealltorque Member Posts: 535
    I really like the Touareg TDI. It is a bit on the high priced side. It now has the distinction of holding the record time from the tip of South America to the end of the road in the Arctic of Alaska. It also won the World's toughest race the Dakar for the last three years. Making it arguably the best off road vehicle in the World.

    I'd have to say that the only points of commonality between a Paris-Dakar Rally anything and the "donor" road car are, Badge, Name and Basic Shape and, possibly, type of fuel. Everything else is very specialised. Compare a Land Rover to a Bowler Wildcat or a Nascar Chevy to a production Impala or even a Ferrari F1 to a 430, (admittedly the Ferrari FXX is very close to being F1 in a body but you cannot actually own one, only kind of lease it...............if they like you.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    a lot of Focus and Fiesta potential buyers are not going for it !!

    Well, it's supply and demand. Could also be supply is just too high, perhaps due to overly optimistic forecasts.

    A co-worker got an early Fiesta, sure enough had to replace the whole trans. I drove it and liked it. Ford took care of her - she has a 7/100 B2B warranty now and is happy.

    Where's a diesel B-segment car?
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    I would not even hazard a guess why Ford does not bring over diesel Focus/Fiesta's? They have been made for the European markets for a long time. It would seem to me just those two FORD TDI's would go a long way into making TDI's ubiquitous. But on the other hand, the excess inventories of the gassers should be a clue.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited January 2012
    It's a complex question. For one thing, due to exchange rates, etc., a Ford Fiesta diesel, even WITH government rebates, might easily top $25,000. Ford dealers just don't see how they can add profit to that--it would cost more than a Prius, and a Prius is a substantial 4-door car. It might also approach the price of a Jetta TDI sportwagon. Both those are a lot more car than a Ford Fiesta.

    Some people say that Ford could build the Fiesta diesel in Mexico, to get the price down, but that's about a 350 million dollar investment---not chump change.

    It's all about dollars and sense. With diesel fuel at $4 bucks a gallon or more, the $25,000 + price tag is simply not justifiable.

    The Ford Fiesta diesel would be a *killer* if it were $18,900 + t&l.

    And last of all, there is the marketing challenge. Aside from the American prejudice against diesel cars (which seems slowly to be dissipating) there is the perception that diesel is "old tech".

    Oh, that's NOT last of all---then there is the issue of diesel fuel purity in the USA.
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited January 2012
    I say they can (continue to) build them (US market F Focus and Fiesta) where they build them and do the TDI parts dance (best, cheapest, etc, you know the normal Texas economic 2 step). I think it is probably a given that Ford lobbyists far outnumber VW lobbyists?

    As you probably know the VW TDI Sportwagen IS built in Germany and the Jetta TDI Sedan's are built in MX and in other places. Last I have read the TDI engine is STILL designed and built in Germany. The GOLF TDI continues to be built in Germany also. Passat while I think it does fulfill world market orders/demand comes from Track 29, Chattanooga Choo Choo. TN. ;)
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    To be fair, the Touareg is a lot more car than a Jetta or Golf, plus inflation has eroded the dollar, so $60k ain't what it used to be.

    You can get the Sport model for around $45k. The Touareg has all the benefits of the best in German engineering and that costs money. I don't think it is meant as a high volume vehicle. They did sell half $billion dollars worth last year. It would be interesting to know how much profit compared to selling Jettas. It looks like you will be able to get basically the same vehicle for about $100k with the Porsche name on it soon. Or you can get the Q7 which I just cannot get past the looks on. The Touareg is just more appealing. And I know the VW dealer.

    The Mercedes ML350 Bluetec is not much more expensive when you compare amenities. The X5 35d is not as comfortable as the MB. But plenty fast enough. I am still waiting for a test drive in the Touareg TDI. Every time I stop by the dealer the Touareg TDIs are all sold or not even in stock. So I don't think they are having any trouble selling all they bring over.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I'd have to say that the only points of commonality between a Paris-Dakar Rally anything and the "donor" road car are, Badge, Name and Basic Shape and, possibly, type of fuel.

    The Dakar Touaregs are heavily modified. Don't forget BMW tried their best to beat the Touaregs with modified X5s and failed. However the Touareg that set a new record for the Pan American Highway was stock with the exception of bigger tires and more fuel capacity.

    http://www.tdi-panamericana.com/touareg.php
  • ruking1ruking1 Member Posts: 19,826
    edited January 2012
    ..."Oh, that's NOT last of all---then there is the issue of diesel fuel purity in the USA."...

    No disrespect intended, but this is a straw (wo)man issue. If I were in a place where one can freely speak, FAKE comes to mind :blush:;)

    Biodiesel has lubricity in literal buckets. The US government has not certified regulations for(passenger diesel cars) an engine that can run 100% biodiesel. Now this is disingenuous for there are plenty of equipment/s that are certified to run 100% biodiesel and without required emissions equipment !!! Indeed any TDI can be modified to run 100% biodiesel. For passenger cars, it is listed as a felony to do the conversion. VW as you know was dragged kicking and screaming to run 5% biodiesel, which as you know the US has mandated with various implementation dates. My understanding is up to 20% biodiesel is being considered to be mandated. Needless to say they have mandated emissions devices that not only are NOT durable, but uncorrelated and of course almost prohibitively costly (for the 5% biodiesel).

    Now philosophically I am an avid supporter of 100% biodiesel. It makes all the sense in the world and for a couple of lifetimes after I am long gone. However as a practical matter, I will not use it !!

    To preserve my chances to run for President, I have used 1 tank full of 5% biodiesel once on the road because I didn't want to go to a station and hopefully buy NON biodiesel. So I bought, as I remember 10 gals. With 5% biodiesel it was probably 1/2 a gal of 100% biodiesel.
This discussion has been closed.