By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
When I priced (on Edmunds I think???) they didn't show ANY dealer holdback. Don't know how Kia pays their dealers for sure. Most sites show true market value as equal to MSRP. However, I saw invoice price on the paperwork at the dealer I visited and he was offering a pretty decent deal without any negotiation. Have since heard from him about saving me "even more money". I think 1-1 1/2 over is definitely doable until this van gets really hot. Try Keystonedodge.com for that ad, but I can't believe that you couldn't match their offer somewhere closer. That's what I intend to try with my local dealer. Good luck. sritrovato
I think it's probably less confusing just to keep track of what people are paying and use that as a comparison basis. $21,800 is the lowest price I've seen (now twice) for a loaded or nearly loaded EX. Anything around $22k looks like a reasonable number to feel good about with, at least at this point. You could hope for better, but if inventory dries up, prices could easily stiffen again. Another thing to check out is when the current financing incentives (doesn't get much better than 0%) expires - might be the end of February.
New Kias also come with a 10yr/100k powertrain warranty (engine, transmission) which is not transferable, so you do lose that advantage by buying used. The actual value of the powertrain warranty is a personal thing (worth more to those who plan to keep the vehicle long term).
What options does the EX you are looking at have?
If it isn't loaded (mainly if it doesn't have leather and importantly, ABS), you might be able to get a new one for pretty close to that price - the dealer probably has quite a bit of room to dicker on the one you're looking at. If it has the leather/ABS combo (+ maybe sunroof, 2-tone etc.), price looks better.
http://www.canadacar.com/magazine/articlesummary.cfm?id=205
... Greg
I don't know how often Edmunds researches and changes rate listings, but Kia's web site clearly shows 0 for up to 36 mos and 4.9 for 37-60 mos. My local guy keeps trying to get me back in to "sweeten" the deal a bit and I'm pretty sure it's because the rates were higher last month when I was there(though 4.9 was still where they topped off). Ask them to show you Kia's current "chart" of rates or check the web. The rates can't change by region if the national web promos are posted. The only way that's possible is if they are trying to run financing through someone other than Kia or if someone's credit wasn't sufficient to qualify for top tier rates.
When we shopped and bought our Kia (2 weeks ago now) several dealers, including the one I bought from stated that Kia had changed their rate on the 60 month loan to 5.9%. When we were doing the financing I told the finance person that I could do better at my credit union at 5.74%. She got me out of the Kia finance and into a local bank for 5.5%. I believe I saw a post within the past two weeks where someone had written they had a dealer "honor" the 4.9 even though Kia had discontinued it. By the way, I saw an add on TV today for izuzu who are offering 0.0% for 5 years and a 10 year 120,000 PT warranty, wow!
I plan on doing regular oil AND filter changes every 3 to 5 thousand miles, just as I have always done depending on driving conditions and time of year. Do people really change their oil and not their filter???
http://kia.com/clearance/index.shtml
click on the details on the Sedona and it is stated that 5.9 is the rate on a 60 month loan
Nevertheless, I think it's important for the Sedona to remember that the owner's manual is indicating the minimum service level to maintain warranty coverage.
I just used the JD Power coupon to have the oil changed at 2000 miles, and I will probably do it every 5K miles or 6 months, whichever comes first.
I was very pleased, as was a friend of mine who did his own shopping, with the folks at Keller Kia in Grand Rapids, Mich. They, too, were willing to go $1,000 or so off MSRP on a loaded Sedona EX.
I would suggest contacting a dealer who is a little further away to see what they can do for you. Don't let a bad dealer experience (or three) prevent you from buying the vehicle you want.
With the Rear Heater button OFF, the vents will blow air. But the air is cold (not sure if it's just outside air - 30 degrees Fahrenheit in Detroit today - or air-conditioned). When I press the Rear Heater button, the air flow stops completely.
Not only does this seem like a problem, but it seems to be a different problem than other folks have been experiencing. I thought most of the problems with the rear HVAC unit were that the amount of heat was too strong and impossible to modulate.
Where do you put the air flow control when you want heat up front? - usually on the feet. Same in the back, when you engage the rear heater button a damper activates to stop blowing air from the upper vents and redirects the output to the vent or vents located near the wheel well(s) in the back. This makes some sense, because it will work faster to allow the heat to radiate up naturally, rather than trying to push the warm air down into the compartment.
If I had to guess - in other words, this is all pure unsubstantiated SPECULATION for now except for some notes at the end - the rear system is a simple recirculated air system. When the rear heat button is not depressed, cool air from the floor is pulled in through the wheel vents and directed over the top of the passengers.
When the rear heat button is engaged, the system is reversed and the soon-to-be warm air at the top of the cabin is pulled into the top vents, pushed across the rear electric heater coil, and sent back into the cabin through the wheel vents located near the floor.
So, in the summer time, the front air conditioner is going to do most of the work. The rear air system will help people feel cooler by mixing the air, providing evaporation effect and pulling the sinking cold air off of the floor and up over the top to sink back into the cabin.
Is this system ideal? No. However, I do think it's well engineered and obviously better than nothing. Now if only the owner's manual provided a better description of how the system worked.
Now to go out to the van and prove this. Here's what I do know:
1) Using the rear heat button works to quickly heat up the van on cold mornings. Air is blowing somewhere, but not through the upper vents. I thought it was going to the rear upper vents because I could hear it back there, but couldn't reach that far while driving to check.
2) My experience is that when the rear heater is off, cold air blows no matter where the front temperature dial is set.
It was my understanding that the rear heat controls and fan were merely boosting the flow of the heated air produced by the engine/heater coil arrangement.
2) It seems quite logical to me that the heat would only be sent out of the lower vents and the cool air out of the upper vents. Why would anyone want it any different? - Greg
Heat was not available instantaneously on a cold start. That makes me wonder what the heat source is. If it is an electric coil, I would have expected heat sooner. Regardless, I would never leave the rear heat switch in the on position without air moving through the system (fan position 0).
The front temp control has no effect on the rear heater - or if it does, it takes longer than I was willing to wait for the heat to dissipate when the temp control is moved to full cold.
Until the weather warms a bit more I won't know for certain, but my expectation is that there is no connection between the front and rear air systems and that the cooling part of the rear system is as discussed in the previous post. The detail in the owner's manual is brutal in its sparseness and incorrectly indicates that the rear heater button must be engaged to use the system at all. To be clear, one only need engage it if heat is required. Cool air blows from the top and warm air blows from the bottom - basic HVAC design.
I'd like to summarize a couple points that appear to be true, culled from the previous, more explanatory posts. Please don't sue me for plagiarism, but do mention if any of these claims are untrue:
1. The 4 upper vents in the 2nd and 3rd row blow outside air when the fan is on - or AC - but they do nothing when the Rear Heater button is pressed. The lower vents near the rear wheel wells do blow warm air when the Rear Heater dash button is pressed.
2. Item #1 above is a logical, and likely an intentional, design. Sending warm air to the floor and cool air up above is standard HVAC design, as hoyahenry pointed out.
3. The front temperature control has no effect on the air blowing out of the rear vents. Since the rear HVAC unit lacks its own temperature control, the temperature of the air from the rear vents (upper or lower) cannot be controlled.
4. The owners manual does a terrible job of explaining the rear HVAC system and incorrectly states that the rear heater button must be engaged to use the system at all.
5. It appears that there is no connection between the front and rear air systems.
Thanks for the info, guys. I compiled this summary as much for my own benefit as for others'. I really would like to feel that I understand how the rear HVAC system works, and I'm still getting there. E.g., I didn't even realize that these "lower" rear vents existed!
A couple more thoughts:
It would be nice if the upper vents were able to blow warm air, just for added flexibility.
HVAC stands for "Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning." I heard the term for years before I finally realized what it stood for. Perhaps there are others out there in the same boat as I was.
I was interested in the oil discussion that went on. My dealership was offering an extended warranty on the engine (to 250K miles) IF you used Quaker State (documented) each time on schedule (I do it every 3000 miles). Is there something inherently great about this brand? I had not seen it mentioned in the oil discussions before. Has anyone else heard of such a deal with dealerships? I'm wondering if it's for real (although I have it in writing). I asked about it before, but now we have so many more folks responding to this site. Thanks, all!
Any thoughts, ideas, comments?
Heating- I'm with the concensus. Rear heat only works with button depressed and there is no temperature control, it comes out nice and warm, but not hot as others have expressed.
Front Defroster in my unit is not hot at all, warm at best, whether on defrost only setting or on defrost/floor setting. I know it should be hotter. If I switch from floor heat or floor/vent heat to defrost, it comes out considerably cooler. This is with the heat setting dial at about 3 oclock. To get it to come out warm at all I have to set the heat setting at full bore. Any others have the above symptoms?
I have not had rattle problems, but I did notice that the rear seats require some force to latch properly. When set into place, mine catch but don't fully latch, leaving some play in the latching mechanism that would potentially rattle at speed. When slammed into place, they fully lock and seem pretty solid.
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
Over at the Maintenance & Repair forums, Quaker State seems to have a good reputation. However, it's hard to tell if this is from long-ago experience or more recent experience. Both the petrol-based "regular" oil and the synthetic are well regarded. The synthetic is seen as a true synthetic, vs. many other "synthetics" that actually start with petroleum-based base stocks.
I doubt that Quaker State is somehow a better fit for the Sedona's engine than other oils. The more likely explanation is that your dealer or Kia has some sort of an arrangement with Quaker State to promote and/or use its products. Does anyone know what kind of oil the Kia service departments use?
Off the top of my head I don't remember the recommended tire pressure, but I think it's somewhere in the mid-30s.
The Sedona is replacing a 97 Dodge Grand Caravan ES that was fully loaded too and it stickered at $33,000 back in 97. I bought the Sedona for my wife and it has around 550 miles on it now and all has been perfect so far. The Sedona caught our attention at the Los Angeles Auto Show a couple of months ago. We thouroughly examined it there and to put it mildly, fell in love with it. I went online to get as much info as possible and found many great reviews. The only thing lacking at the time was a crash rating. Having a 2, 3 and 4 year old, we thought it was important to wait and see what the ratings would be. On the 13th of Feb., I went online to see if the Sedona has been rated and I saw that it received quad five stars. The following day we went to purchase the van.
Compared to the Grand Caravn with a 3.8L, the Sedona felt more powerful and quite a bit smoother. I like the 5 speed auto with OD button and I especially like the fact that the max torques is lower in the rpm range than on any other van. This will be very useful when towing our jet skis. Being able to turn off overdrive on long steep grades when towing is a plus as is the standard equiped tranny oil cooler.
The Sedona drives beautifully and the brakes are excellent. I'm hoping the brakes will still perform well when towing. Everything feels tight and solid and I actually like the shift lever placement. All the controls are laid out perfect and I like the large knobs for the HVAC system. The seats are very comfortable an feel solid. The rear seat split is also welcome because it can be taking out individually, which I couldn't do on the Caravan. The fit and finish throughout the Sedona is exceptional. Reveals and joints line up perfect both inside and out. There are screw caps everywhere which I am not used to seeing. Usually screw heads are exposed on other vehicles that I have owned. This is no big deal but it just shows the attention to detail.
I will keep checking this board and posting as the miles pile up.
What you got for it?
How many miles?
Any engine/tranny issues?
What was the difference between your negotiated price paid and trade-in?
More curiosity than anything else... I am looking at DC, Ody, Sedona, and Durango (wife insists).
Thanks!
Gill
2004 Honda Accord EX-L Graphite Pearl
2007 Honda Civic EX - Atomic Blue
2013 Honda Civic LX - Crimson Pearl
The reliability of the Caravan has been great. It only has 56K miles on it. The check engine light came on at 49,000 due to a purge solenoid tripping it but it doesn't impede driveability and I didn't want to spend the money to have to fix it because it's leased and almost up. I bet it would have been covered under warranty because emmisions items are 50K miles in California (Chrysler had the 3 year/36K mile factory warranty), but I never had the chance to take it in and then it went out of warranty. I just noticed the other day that the rear right shock is leaking fluid. Other than that, the Caravan has been fine. Where it and others fall short IMO is price. I was not about to pay $34,000 + fees for a comparably equipped van when I could pay $23,100 with all the bells and whistles that are usefull and come on the Sedona EX. My wife also wanted a smaller van compared to the Grand Caravan. I could definitely afford the others but my opinion was why when we get all the features we were looking for at a savings of $8000 - $10,000 in a van that first grabbed our attention before even knowing the price. The lower price was just an added bonus.
My buddy bought his wife a new Chrysler Town & Country several months ago for $10,000 more and when she came over to look at the Sedona and drive it, she said she would have rather gotten the Sedona too but she was unaware of it. The turn off for the T&C for us was the velour type porous leather. With a 2, 3 and a 4 year old, it seemed like it would stain more than cloth.
I have no experience with the Ody and never considered it because it's ugly and you can't tow with it unless some factory installed over priced options are added first.
I have a 98 Dodge Ram with the 5.2 V-8 that has been a great truck with 110K miles on it so far. The Durango used to have the same engine and tranny but I believe they come with the new 4.7 now and I have no experience with it. The complaints for my Ram are that the stock brakes wear extremely fast. In my case at 10K miles. I got a tip to use Bendix Fleet Pads and those yield 50K to 60K before needing to be replaced. The Durango/Dakota/Ram1500 are a crap shoot. Some like mine are great but I know others that have tranny problems. I'm personally not into SUVs so the Sedona suited us perfectly. It's also nice to have a unique vehicle and one that you don't see hundreds of on the street. That might change in the years to come if the Sedona truly ends up being as good in the long haul as it is now?
Please let me know if 1) I am clearly explaining the situation. 2) If this is happening on another Sedona. somewhere 3)Anyone has suggestions on what the problem is.
DEALER: I am embarrassed for the dealer to document in this forum what they have said is or is not the problem.
Jster381, I love my (currently problem-free) LX. No rattles, no steering problems, sliding doors work fine. My only regret is that it's not a loaded EX. The LX has everything I need, but If I'd known that the market would be softening so quickly, I certainly would have held out for a loaded one. At this point, particularly with the 0.0% financing, it doesn't make much sense to settle for less (unless you hate leather). The extras (leather, sunroof, ABS, etc.) are so comparatively inexpensive right now that I think the extra price difference between loaded and anything less will always be there in resale (unlike loaded Grand Caravans - ouch!)
Given the recent minor complaints, it would certainly make sense to take a long test drive and listen for rattles, take some extended time working the sliding doors to check for problems, etc. with a specific vehicle you're looking at before purchase.
2) As for problems, I do not see where any of the problems posted here are anywhere near service-affecting. That's not an attempt to downplay any of them, but is rather my perspective. I would like to get some experience with the front defroster issue, but "VA winter" is an oxymoron (until Wednesday?).
3) Frostbyte1, bought an EX in Leesburg on 12/31 fully loaded (except spoiler) for almost $1200 under MSRP, which appears to be a mostly average deal. Hope that helps - see also posts ~664-5.
4) Heat and fuel economy. I am suspicious that the fuel mixture is deliberately rich, which is one of the reasons for less heights on the mpg scale. One reason to do this is to keep engine temperature down as the "extra" fuel acts as a coolant. This could also be another reason for the heater not providing the warmest air. Just a theory.