Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)

14254264284304311306

Comments

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
  • omarmanomarman Member Posts: 2,702
    That looks familiar to me too in a way. Ohio State Highway Patrol used all white Chevy sedans in 1968 - but without the red light on top. They used two red flashing lights mounted inside on the rear window package shelf.

    I tried to find a pic online for one of those but found something else instead. Somebody turned a '55 Chevy 2dr model kit into a replica of an Ohio Turnpike Patrol car.
    Photobucket
    A time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...a Philadelphia Police R-body!

    image
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    Ahh, a '79 Newport. Isn't she lovely? :shades:

    I wouldn't mind having an ex-police car R-body. '79 is really the year to have, when they had the 195 hp 360-4bbl. It was cut to 180 or so hp the next year, and then for 1981 all they offered was a 165 hp 318-4bbl.

    And it wouldn't be until 1989, that big police cars got BACK to the performance level of a 1979 R-body. And even then, it took a fuel-injected TBI 350, 4-speed automatic, and 3.42:1 axle to do what a 360-4bbl, 3-speed, and 2.94:1 axle did a decade prior.
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,861
    The two-door '64 Chevelle wagon 4-speed, bone stock, we discussed earlier was bid to $26,500 but the bid denied by the seller. FYI.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    seller was very foolish. He hit a home run and walked back to the dugout.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Gee a $75,000 car for only $200,000. What a deal!

    'Yes, but it's John LENNON's car....so now I'm famous, too!"
  • lemmerlemmer Member Posts: 2,689
    You'd have been better off buying his old wagon for $5,500.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Absolutely. That Ferrari is not one of the prettiest, that's for sure. For 200K, you can get far lovelier and better Ferraris.
  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 16,951
    'Yes, but it's John LENNON's car....so now I'm famous, too!"

    I never understood why people care if a car was celebrity owned. Its not like the 200K Ferrari is gonna sing for you in your garage.

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • omarmanomarman Member Posts: 2,702
    "Its not like the 200K Ferrari is gonna sing for you in your garage."

    and posted elsewhere:

    "Everybody’s talkin’ at me...I can’t hear a word they’re sayin’...just drivin’ around in Jon Voight’s car..."
    A time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    To heck with that Ferrari! I'm more interested in John Lennon's last car, this 1972 Chrysler Town and Country!

    image
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    You could drive that Chrysler/Nimitz around and sing:

    Imagine no high gas prices,
    I wonder if you can
    No need for air bags and seat belts
    A brotherhood of man
    Imagine all the people
    Sharing their parking spaces

    You may say I'm a Mopar dreamer
    But I'm not the only one
    I hope someday you'll join us
    And all chip in for gas.
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,723
    Hillarious!
    How about:
    I hope some day you'll join us
    and fill the tank for fun.
    or
    I hope some day you'll join us
    but realize we pay road tax by the ton.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • omarmanomarman Member Posts: 2,702
    edited December 2010
    Baby you can drive my car,
    Maybe we won't get too far,
    Baby it's a big Mopar,
    And that's why we're walking...

    :D j/k Andre
    A time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing.
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,861
    Lennon really owned that T&C?? A good friend in high school's parents had a '72 T&C...beige with woodgrain. With those moldings, looks like John's had the woodgrain at one time, too. I thought it was a ridiculous boat even when new and thought the GM big wagons looked so much better.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    LMAO!! :D
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I thought it was a ridiculous boat even when new and thought the GM big wagons looked so much better.

    For the most part, I never really cared for most of Mopar's 1969-73 "fuselage" offerings. I always thought the 1969 Dodge Polara/Monaco was the best looking of the bunch. It's sides were a bit more squared off, so it didn't look so fat and tipsy. It made me think a bit of a '69 Coronet, just blown up to full-size proportions.

    The '69-73 Imperial was a good looking car, too, and I kinda like the lesser models when equipped with hidden headlights, at least.

    I think GM did the "fuselage" look better with the '71 models, mainly because the beltlines were lower and the glass area was huge. And with the more creased body work and larger rear wheel openings, they didn't seem quite as fat.

    I'm actually surprised that GM's '71-76 wagons have a bit more cargo space than the '69-73 Mopars: 106.4 according to the '76 Chevy brochure, and 104.2 according to the '73 Dodge brochure. I would've thought that clamshell tailgate would eat up a lot of storage space on the GM cars.

    When the Mopars redesigned for 1974, the wagon lost a few cubic feet, down to 100.8. However, they were also about 5" shorter, and that ate into interior space. The length behind the front seat dropped from something like 99.5" to 97.7", so that theoretical 4x8 sheet of plywood would now have to be force-fitted in, probably doing some damage (or is a 4x8 really not truly 4x8? kinda like how a 2x4 is really something like 1.75x3.5"?)

    Interestingly, the midsized '71-78 Mopar wagons had the same 48.5" of clearance between the wheel wells in back that the full-sizers did, so they could hold that theoretical plywood sheet flat on the floor, even if the tailgate wouldn't close all the way. In contrast, GM's '73-77 intermediates only had 44.5" of clearance.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    How did plywood become the unit of measure for designing vehicles? I mean, how often does the average American haul around sheets of plywood in a car? Have you ever tried to *lift* one sheet of 3/4" ply and carry it somewhere?

    Why didn't grocery bags become the unit of measure? Or sacks of dog food?
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,861
    Andre, you mention the '69 Dodge Coronet. I think it, and the '68-69 Plymouth Satellite, were the best-looking Mopars of the '60's. They still look good and well-proportioned, at least to me. I like them better than the same-year Charger, and also the Barracuda.

    The parents of a kid I knew, who owned a corner bar, had a '69 Polara 500 in gold with a black top. I thought it was sharp at the time, but in hindsight those cars seem so 'porky', even for a big car! Nice buckets-and-console interior I remember.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    How did plywood become the unit of measure for designing vehicles? I mean, how often does the average American haul around sheets of plywood in a car? Have you ever tried to *lift* one sheet of 3/4" ply and carry it somewhere?

    I don't do it on a daily basis, but I've done it from time to time. I was SOOO glad when I finally got my '85 Silverado. Made it a lot easier than trying to strap a 4x8 to the roof of an '89 Gran Fury or '85 LeSabre!

    IMO, the 4x8 thing was always what separated a full-sized wagon from all others...where even if you couldn't close the tailgate all the way, at least you could lay it flat on the floor. And similarly, in trucks, I always thought that being able to lay it flat between the wheel wells is what separated a full-sized truck from everything else. I've heard that with the Dodge Durango though, that it has a bit over 48" between the rear wheel housings, and that's the main reason they never based the Dakota on it. Didn't want it to steal sales from the full-sized Ram!
  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 16,951
    And similarly, in trucks

    Yeah 4 x 8 anything is a pain in my S10. It gets the job done, but doesn't fit neatly between the wheel wells. I think the reason that became to be is that most home projects have a need for 4x8 something (plywood, drywall, lattice, laminate, rigid insulation etc) that it just makes sense that if you can stack it perfectly flat you can haul more and get it home in good condition.

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 16,951
    Look at this barge. 1966 Ford

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • lemmerlemmer Member Posts: 2,689
    I've put sheets of 4X8 plywood, sheetrock and pegboard in the back of the wife's Pilot. I can even shut the back. It is a really tight fit, but it is nice to have the capability.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    yes but would you have walked away from buying a Pilot if the plywood wouldn't fit?

    probably not.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    yes but would you have walked away from buying a Pilot if the plywood wouldn't fit?

    probably not.


    Well, if you truly need the capacity, and it couldn't handle it, you'd have no choice BUT to walk away, and find something that suits your needs. But, for most people, being able to hold a 4x8 sheet is more of a side benefit than a necessity.

    I'm just curious...what ARE the cargo measurements of a Pilot, anyway? I think it's really impressive that something that short can hold a 4x8. A Pilot's only about 190" long, so the plywood is just over half of the vehicle's total length!
  • omarmanomarman Member Posts: 2,702
    Here's a link to a story about the '72 Chrysler wagon which belonged to Lennon and was sold at auction recently.

    Nishi and Fred Seamen, John Lennon’s personal assistants, also used the car in New York City, running errands and shopping for the family. When Fred expressed concern about the car’s bad brakes and worn-out tires, Yoko Ono instructed him to go to their business manager and get a check so that it could be replaced with a Mercedes Benz W123 300 Touring.

    According to this History channel video that Mercedes wagon had to be special ordered since it wasn't offered for sale in N.A. at the time!
    A time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    edited January 2011
    That's pretty cool...I remember a lot of those details (especially the upholstery pattern and hubcaps) as my first car was a 66 Galaxie. That wagon looks much better on correct wheels and tires than on the somewhat douchey modern units, IMO. Nice looking old barge otherwise.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Have you tried hauling plywood with a subcompact?

    image
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    Ahh, yes, I remember that pic! In fact, I think that's down in Southern Maryland somewhere!
  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 16,951
    Lemko,
    That pic reminds me my high school job. I worked in the carpet department at Rickel (remember them?). Two guys come in at 830 on a Friday night needing a fairly large carpet roll. We had something cheap in stock and we loaded on a cart and I proceeded to walk them out the door. I said pull your truck and I'll help you load it up.

    "We don't have a truck, I'm gonna strap it to the top of my Thunderbird"

    I explained that I wouldn't recommend that and I wouldn't assist in it.

    They decided to do it anyway and blew out the back window, the moonroof, and crushed the roof pretty well. I wish I had a cell phone camera back then.

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • andys120andys120 Member Posts: 23,670
    edited January 2011
    Yoko Ono instructed him to go to their business manager and get a check so that it could be replaced with a Mercedes Benz W123 300 Touring.

    Once in the late '70s I was standing on the corner of Fifth and Central Park Drive/W62nd one day when a cream colored W123 wagon pulled up to wait for the light and I spotted John Lennon in the passenger seat. I think that Merc changed hands recently.

    2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    Yep, I don't think NA got the 123 wagon until model year 1980.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    I remember Rickel, Channel, Grossman's, Builder's Square and Hechinger's. Home Depot and Lowe's obliterated them. For hauling big stuff like drywall and carpets, I borrow a decent-sized truck. I often debated actually buying a truck, but I wouldn't use it enough to justify its purchase.
  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 16,951
    I have a 99 S10 that I keep for hauling purposes. In all honesty I use it for a spare vehicle (while one is being serviced, etc) more than I haul with it. It certainly comes in handy when I need it though.

    Yes HD and Lowes blew away all the other home center chains in our neck of the woods, pretty amazing how fast too.

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I often debated actually buying a truck, but I wouldn't use it enough to justify its purchase.

    I've toyed around with the idea of getting another truck when my '85 Silverado finally bites the dust. But in all honesty, I could probably get away without it. I can always borrow my uncle's '97 Silverado if I have to. The only downside is that he has the short bed, and a camper shell on it. Still, it could hold just about anything that would fit in an 8-foot bed; it would just need to be secured.

    About the only area where it wouldn't come in handy, is if I went to load up on dirt or mulch, where they just dump it in with a front-end loader. But, I really shouldn't be doing that even with my '85 Silverado, as it's only a half-ton truck, and a cubic yard of dirt weighs about 2800 lb! I tried that a few times with my truck, but on the third load, I guess it was pressing down on the rear axle enough that the tailpipes got pinched, and broke off. They were rusty though, and about to break anyway.
  • lemmerlemmer Member Posts: 2,689
    In reality, it would be easier to leave the back open. With it closed, the plywood ends over my head in the front seat. I do this maybe once a year, so that is good enough for me.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    n reality, it would be easier to leave the back open. With it closed, the plywood ends over my head in the front seat. I do this maybe once a year, so that is good enough for me.

    Oh, okay...so the cargo area isn't quite 8 feet then? I know the Pilot is very roomy inside for its external dimensions, but 8 feet is an awful lot!
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,347
    I do a fair amount of DIY, but the last time I had to haul 4x8 sheets (luan) was went I put in pergo floors, and used my Quest to haul it home, so at least 7 years ago.

    If I didn't have the odyssey (will fit, likely not flat though) or I had to haul a bunch I would either have it delivered (if big enough) or just spend the $20 to rent their truck for 75 minutes.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,284
    I really like the '69-'71 Mopar fuselages. I would love to find a nice '70/'71 Dodge Monaco or Polara. Part of that is that my dad bought one new, a '71 Monaco, that I thought was a really cool car, and our family's first Mopar. I think the '70/'71 from all 3 Chrysler brands look better than the '69s.

    One interesting thing I've found is that this generation does not seem to be nearly as long-lived as the earlier Mopar fullsizers from the mid-60s. Don't know why, but there are a lot more of the earlier cars around than the fuselages.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,415
    I think those 65-68 fullsize Mopars were exceptionally solid cars. My grandpa bought a new Newport in 65, red with a 383, he loved it - he'd talk about it 35 years later. It ended up being replaced by a large fuselage car (Newport HT or NYer, I can't remember) that was not very good in comparison.
  • jwilliams2jwilliams2 Member Posts: 910
    I agree, very solid car. I had a '66 Newport, drove it for 6 years. It was a great family highway car with lots of room. Replaced it with a '71 Olds 98, another huge car. Kept it for about 14 trouble free years. It too was solid, and had great torque with the 455. Would hate to put gas in either of them today!
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,284
    Here's a really nice example of one of those '66 full-size Chryslers:

    '66 Newport 4-door hardtop

    No idea on the reserve price. I wish I had a place in my garage for something like that.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,723
    The last picture shows an indent in the right front fender liner.
    Looks like it could be to make room for that alternator if it had a big block motor. Maybe they were all like that.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • jwilliams2jwilliams2 Member Posts: 910
    edited January 2011
    I wish I had a place in my garage for something like that.

    It would take up a lot of room as it's over 18' long. Looks nice and is the same color as the one I had. Drove great with that Torsion-Aire suspension, and had plenty of room.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    edited January 2011
    Pretty nice looking car---falls down in the engine bay though. The seller should have spent a day working on that. I'm thinkin' $2,500 to $4,000 will be the bidding range.

    Being a bottom of the line Newport and a 4-door hardtop, this is not a car a lot of people actually want to own. A '66 300 2D HT could bring you double the money.
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,284
    I don't mind seeing a clean, unmolested engine bay like that without any resto work having been done. It shows me what I'm buying instead of something somebody has used a few rattle cans to dress up quickly.

    I think that indent in the inner fender is factory and is as the poster noted, to make space in a big-block car.

    It is the bottom-line model for '66, true, but it shows you what a Chrysler of that era was like. Later on, the Newport became pretty stark, almost like a late-70s Impala. This one was still trimmed nicely. I like it.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I just think the engine bay is substandard to the car, and it's jarring to raise the hood and see things like corroded battery cables and jury-rigged wire ties.
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,861
    edited January 2011
    I'm not saying I want it...but I kind-of like it! Wish it weren't black though:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Chevrolet-1973-BelAir-/300513922564?pt=US_Cars_Tr- - ucks&hash=item45f8068e04

    From the pic of the dealer paperwork, I can see it was indeed built new with clock and AM radio and whitewalls.

    For some reason, in my mind I could see this car in the "Green-Gold" color they offered that year.

    My sister and her husband had a new '73 Chevelle Deluxe station wagon with six and Turbo-Hydramatic, and I thought THAT was unusual!
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
This discussion has been closed.