-June 2024 Special Lease Deals-
2024 Chevy Blazer EV lease from Bayway Auto Group Click here
2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee lease from Mark Dodge Click here
2025 Ram 1500 Factory Order Discounts from Mark Dodge Click here
2024 Chevy Blazer EV lease from Bayway Auto Group Click here
2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee lease from Mark Dodge Click here
2025 Ram 1500 Factory Order Discounts from Mark Dodge Click here
Options
What Would It Take for YOU to buy a diesel car?
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
It's ironic that the attack on Clean Diesel came from West Virginia University, home of the West Virginia Coal Hall of Fame.
Clean Coal anyone?
EV is run from the electrical grid, which depends on 39% electricity produced from "clean" coal.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal_power_in_the_United_States
Nuclear provides/produces 19.5% of electricity. The math indicates a majority ( nuclear/coal) at approximately 59%
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_the_United_States
It might be instructive to post the impressive SOLAR power electrical production percentage.
..."Today, solar energy provides four-tenths of 1 percent of the total energy consumed in the United States"... So if it took 18 years to get to that point, maybe in another 18 years, it will be slightly more @ 08% or STILL less than 1% ? At that rate, to generate the same volume of electricity so a/1/one nuck clear plant can be matched ( for removal presumably), of which there are 99, it will take 88 years with solar power ! ? Anybody care to put some numbers together for time needed to produce solar energy electricity to match a clean coal plant ?
http://instituteforenergyresearch.org/topics/encyclopedia/solar/
EV, solar and battery would be nonexistent IF not for nuclear and clean coal. Natural gas for power plants would have a hard time starting, again without nuclear and clean coal .
cleancoal.Thanks for not sticking "clean" in front of nuclear.
As ruking1 said, a crisis is an opportunity. They need to throw several billion dollars at this and turn it from something bad into something good. VW is a very rich company. They can do it.
Either recycle the polluting cars, or, if you're cynical and cheap, ship em to South America to sell there.
But for people who seem to hate gov't regs and pollution controls, they may have their ideal diesel already—one that defeats the EPA and CARB, gets higher mpg, has more power, and pollutes all it wants in the faces of the gov't bureaucrats.
More realistically, I wish I had zero diesels right now,? When TDI PANIC sales ensues , hopefully it will be @ way cheaper prices.
How does a midsize Mercedes Benz truck grab you? T TDI? Oh yes?!
http://truckyeah.jalopnik.com/mercedes-to-reach-decision-on-u-s-sales-of-pickup-truc-1731858742
And, not surprisingly, Consumer Reports has just taken the VW diesels that pollute off of their recommended list.
http://youtu.be/dKef1JFpiCA
VW EPA scandal, TDI reaction. In the WW2 style.
http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=427&t=3
The problem was that even as the first baby steps were being taken on tailpipe emissions, the number of cars and the miles driven were exploding in California, from c. 4 million vehicles in 1950, to 8 million in 1960, to 12 million in 1970. And so smog kept getting worse, not better, for not just years but for a couple of decades.
Since CARB came before the EPA (which was established under President Nixon in 1970--those darn liberals, Reagan and Nixon!), the EPA has consistently followed the work of CARB, using its work in California as a template for national tailpipe emission standards. Although EPA's rules usually aren't as strict, and lag behind those of CARB's by at least a few years.
By 1974, as a result, most cars had catalytic converters, significantly lowering tailpipe emission, although at the same time, as I remember as a child, degrading performance and power for several years until the technologies were steadily improved. Unleaded gas became required at the same time to allow the catalytic converters to work, taking thousands of tons of toxic lead out of the air.
Anyway, I found this 15-minute video that picks up the story from before and after this. Essentially LA went from c. 150 days of severe smog alert warnings in 1970, extremely toxic air that can hurt or in some cases even kill people with asthma and so on, to 0 days of these conditions by the year 2000. And what's even more remarkable is that during that time the number of cars and miles driven continued to dramatically increase in CA, up to c. 24 million vehicles by 2000. There are almost 30 million vehicles in California today.
Bottom line: If VW messed with and lied to CARB since 2009, they made a major miscalculation....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2Ra8PRtXSU
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/volkswagen-investigate-breach-u-environment-130056594.html
Reagan also said trust, but verify.
My 2003/2009 VW Jetta TDI's have been VERIFIED by CA Smog Only stations on two year cycles! The same is true of the 2012 VW Touareg ! PASSED in ALL inspections. Those inspections were a TOTAL waste of time and resources , THEN . In light of this current VW hysteria, they remain a TOTAL waste of time and resources, NOW !
97.5 % + of CA's 30 M cars are GASSERS, NOT diesels.
To blame/ insinuate app way less than 750,000 TDI's in the whole state are responsible for LA LA lands RUG/PUG pollution (or CA's for that matter) is wildly delusional @ best! Just plain crazy is about as PC as I can make it.
One of the biggest things done in CA was to go from LEADED RUG/PUG to UNLEADED in the 1970's. Why lead was allowed in the first place was beyond absurd. Be that as it may, RUG/PUG is STILL ( 200 % to 600% ) dirtier (30 ppm sulfur vs 15 ppm-nominally delivered@ 5/10 ppm ) than ULSD. ZERO progress there? To boot, biodiesel is @ ZERO 0 ppm sulfur. That puts RUG/PUG figures at even greater absurdity levels.
One of the biggest mistakes that CARB made, at that time was NOT ordering LSD !!
http://www.autonews.com/
"VW orders probe into breach of U.S. emissions rules
Sales of remaining 2015 models with 2.0-liter diesel engines halted
UPDATED: 9/20/15 9:50 am ET - adds details, link | 0 Comments
VW orders probe into breach of U.S. emissions rules
Volkswagen ordered an external investigation after U.S. regulators found software the carmaker designed for diesel cars gave false emissions data, CEO Martin Winterkorn said Sunday, adding he was "deeply sorry" for the violation of U.S. rules...."
Testers drove the monitor-equipped diesels from San Diego to Seattle because if Volkswagen had gamed the emission test, they couldn’t be sure how, German said.
Then German received the results of the real-world tests
The California watchdog and the U.S. Environment Protection Agency opened an investigation into Volkswagen in May 2014, according to letters published Friday. The company said it had identified the reasons for the higher emissions and proposed a fix. That resulted in a recall of nearly 500,000 U.S. vehicles in December to implement a software patch.
At the same time, regulators were considering whether to certify VW’s 2016 models for sale -- a routine process for most automakers. Regulators said they wouldn’t approve the cars unless the company resolved the questions about real-world tailpipe pollution."
VW's Emissions Cheating Found by Curious Clean-Air Group (Bloomberg - good article that reads better than my snippets, and they've had some other good coverage)
IF you believe all accounts, they still do it with 100% reliability!!!
If CARB missed this in the VW diesel over any number of years, how do they still conclude that all the other OEM's gassers do NOT have similar flaws or have not been similarly (allegedly, of course) gamed???? Again keep in mind 98% + remain GASSERS.
Microsoft/Apple etc. should hire these magical programmers that code error free!!!! This is HUGE ! I mean past Donald Trump, and the Wharton School of Business! Even GOD doesn't program with 100% reliability? Indeed that was the reason for the FLOOD. Remember, 98% of the species that ever were on earth are extinct? Indeed, if you are a women's libber Adam was the 1.0 beta test, Eve was perfection? 2.0 That of course might be seen as good? Tha bad news might be GOD is still male?
But let's not dwell in the past. If they're that good, we should take them off the Volkswagen payroll and have them hack Russia and China, to name two! If hey are stealing billions upon trillions of dollars, we have the right to steal it back!
VW Starts Anti-Hacking Venture as Web-Connected Car Use Grows (Bloomberg)
Anytime the steering wheel is not moving, and the hood is unlatched, don't run the strict emissions controls. It really doesn't get much simpler than that.
Now you have brought up one good question: How do we know others aren't running the same kind of "defeat"? The answer, of course, is that we don't know. And quite obviously, we NEED to find out! I have noticed in the past, the high level executives almost never get punished. The worst that could happen, they resign with a golden parachute and millions in severance packages.
The people who ordered this are almost certainly in Germany anyway, what exactly could an American court do to a German citizen?
However, the greater issue: how does CARB miss this .....TOTALLY? and probably more germane SYSTEMATICLY. Not to mention them missing it over many years? This calls into total question the whole 29.4 M /30 M GASSER side.
IF I were VW's legal eagle, I would call for CARBs 100% testing, gasser,diesel , gas hybrid, EV sides. You can bet that it VW knew about it, so does EVERYBODY else ! ! As much as they want to blow this out of proportion, VW diesels are an infinitesimally small portion.
CARB knows the consequences, even without VW calling for it. CARB /EPA is standing in plain sight with the proverbial and literal pants down with a digit in the six o'clock position. This is a scandal of epic proportions! Mark my words, it'll get swept under the rug . So for example, what do you think is going to happen to the EPA, responsible for the Animus River toxic chemical releases?
Another car example: the 2004 Toyota Prius advertised EPA of 60 C/50 H. At the time 2003/2004 that I had it in my gun sights, I was hearing 43 mpg max. Subsequent ownership flap was so vehement, that the EPA changed car testing procedure to favor gas/hybrids. Still the changes still would not let Prius come near to those numbers. Only subsequent redesigns elevated the mpg!
One of the problems, I think, is funding. It's not cheap to do the emissions testing so the EPA just adopts the standards and spot checks the manufacturers. It's kind of like the IRS, you pay your taxes or get hammered if you get caught cheating.
But Congress won't fund the IRS so the number of audits is miniscule making the odds really good for cheaters. Probably the same sort of thing with the EPA.
What's ironic is that if you funded the agencies (and didn't subcontract out the work to contractors who would charge the taxpayers twice as much) then the cheating would ease and the revenues from simple compliance would more than fund the IRS and the air would continue to stay clean(er). But no, government is a big bad boogieman that must be hindered at every turn. The heck with our lungs and our asthmatic kids.
Don't know how CARB does it.
You commentis does not explain the government required smog certifications that are required to be done by the car owners.
So what you are saying defacto : Buddha bless you at every checkpoint. Pay the man @ each checkpoint waving the holy water !
2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460
In other news, here is MB's CEO doing the "Lois Learner" or H. Clinton"s state dept official moonlighting on her unauthorized server, handling the highest classified documents. Some of those are literally burn before reading. If anyone else in the classified material food chain mishandle just ONE classified document, they'd get three hots, a cot and a b/g f named bubba for easily 10 years.
..."Volkswagen peer Daimler, meanwhile, signaled it may not be subject to the same violation.
"I have a rough idea of what is happening and that it does not apply to us," Daimler Chief Executive Dieter Zetsche said on Sunday at an event in Hamburg.
"But it is much too early to make a final statement on this," he added."...
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/volkswagen-investigate-breach-u-environment-rules-130056470--finance.html
I also can guess some of the technical issues. The GTG's attended over the years have been instructive. But then neither VW nor MB will be prosecuted on what I think or guess. But on the other hand, on first look, I'd take $37,500 to settle on my 2009 VW Jetta TDI sub 100,000 miles ! Fat chance!
I think the truth is much closer to what I've been saying all along: follow the money. Using the MB 350/250 BT as an example: the governments would rather receive taxes on 22 mpg (.0276) rather than 35 miles mpg.(.0182) (60.75 vs 63.78 CA) 52% more per mile driven. No brainer here, CRUSH the diesel segment.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_taxes_in_the_United_States
What all this goat roping fiasco tells me is the Government has NO way to tell if my diesel is emitting pollution on the highway. And that goes for millions of diesel trucks out on the road. Sniff and watch for black smoke.
Someone posted a long dissertation about CARB and EPA and Los Angeles smog. I was also raised there. I could not breathe from the horrible air during the 1950s and 60s into the 70s. Getting the lead out of gas was at least 95% of the problem. The rest is fine tuning of the exhaust systems. Getting the Sulfur out of diesel was the big difference between dirty diesel and clean diesel. Most of the recent developments have only cut very minute amounts of pollution. Ships are still the largest polluters on the planet.
Time for a reality check that is needed around here from time to time. EPA and CARB go for the low fruit and don't worry about the real polluters. Thanks to the oligarchy that owns our government.
As ships get bigger, the pollution is getting worse. The most staggering statistic of all is that just 16 of the world’s largest ships can produce as much lung-clogging sulphur pollution as all the world’s cars.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1229857/How-16-ships-create-pollution-cars-world.html
Just for the record, the average Tesla uses about 1 KWH to go 3 miles. Or in San Diego that is 14 cents a mile. About 40% more expensive than driving my Touareg TDI. And I don't have to kill my back getting into and out of my SUV.
Where to move Em? Why near Yellowstone National Park, of course !
They didn't "believe what they read", they were told the truth by their monitoring equipment. At that moment in time, there was no illegal pollution going on. Why? Because the hood was unlatched, and the steering wheel was not moving.
This ain't rocket science, folks.
I like diesels, I think we would be better off with more diesels.
But the two diesel apologists on this forum are losing all credibility. All.
But I think it's true that CARB and the EPA need to start doing significant levels of real world testing with not just diesels, but with gas cars as well. I assume they are gearing up to do that now.
One question is obviously: how many people at VW knew about this? My guess is quite a few, although probably there's no record of it. My son, who is a computer science major in college, offered this speculation for how this could have happened: back in c. 2007 someone wrote a simple piece of code, as suggested, as a "stop gap" measure as the car and engine were being developed. They assumed that it would fixed it down the line, by someone else, as the engineering on the engine and emissions system were completed. But then this never got done. And when CARB and the EPA gave certificates, it just became a "don't rock the boat" situation. Probably a few people in powertrain and software knew, but swept it under the rug. Perhaps a few execs knew as well, and similarly said ignore it.
VW has whined in the past about its diesels being picked on unfairly in the US. Perhaps that corporate culture of victimization leaked down to the people doing this, who mentally excused themselves because they thought the regs were too tough and "unfair."
But, as other have suggested, in many ways this is a black eye for CARB and the EPA too. How did this problem go undetected for 6 years?! Shows their certifications for compliance sometimes aren't worth the paper or electrons used to compose them. They need to change their testing policies asap....
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
jalopnik.com/your-guide-to-dieselgate-volkswagens-diesel-cheating-c-1731857018
"To some extent the cheating by Volkswagen seems more blatant (than Toyota's SUA recall), but the numbers are lower and there are no fatalities involved," Stadler said. "This suggests that in the 'heat of the moment' the long-term effect on Volkswagen may be overstated. Sure it will hurt, but maybe not quite as bad as we expect right now."
Story from Yahoo and that's my parenthetical note in the quote.
Might be a good time to buy a gasser VW too, since the dealers just lost ~25% of their inventory and may be hurting for customers. Or even an AdBlue VW, assuming they aren't affected by the stop order. Don't know if the certification for the 2016 AdBlues has been stalled. (in the comments, the author of the Jalopnik story says they are stalled too).
I only wish I had caught it at the 52-week high and sold today (52 wk low) ! The gains would be enough to buy a Bentley. Oh well, guess I have to settle for VW's ( dah people's car) (Touareg ).
Then again, gas is heading for $1.99 all over....
Bet CARB requires (re)testing of all of VW's diesels now.
I want to feel some schadenfreude after all the comments by the clean diesel crowd but this corporate nonsense directly affects my one nephew in Chattanooga who works for a supplier making interior bits for VW and other car manufacturers.
Place your bets:
How much will DieselGate cost VW?
A retrofit would require plumbing and could take up some interior room. Owners wouldn't like that, even if it were possible.
Now my guess is whatever they do at the dealer or corporate has to be all good. Sure, not peel me a grape good.
Early on in ownership, there was a question about the DSG. The warranty went up to 100,000 miles . I've posted about how VW stepped up and took care of the high-pressure fuel pump issue . Perhaps my emissions systems will get double the mileage warranty to say 250,000 miles. Or, they will cover it whenever it needs repair. There is no DEF system , aka catalytic converter.
The local dealers have taken care of goofy stuff that I would never imagined it would have. They have replaced free of charge lamps that have blown out. They've replace batteries with generous proration. They even wash the car after each visit.
You're right, maybe the Passat, but the big issue is all the 100,000s of Golfs and Jettas without DEF. VW may not be able to 'fix' them to meet regs. Then what???